<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lee Fang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/lee_fang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 00:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets of the conservative media machine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/secrets_of_the_conservative_media_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/secrets_of_the_conservative_media_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Bozell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Weyrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After mastering TV news and talk radio, conservatives lost control of their message online. That's about to change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To borrow a Sarah Palin aphorism, after their election defeat in 2008, conservatives didn’t retreat, they “reloaded.” Instead of finding new solutions to public policy problems or seriously reevaluating Bush’s failures, conservatives focused almost solely on new ways to communicate their old ideas. To do so, they looked to their natural allies in corporate marketing for inspiration -- and they looked to the Left for imitation. The result has been a recent and profound turnaround that has allowed the Right the bury Obama’s message and dominate the political debate.</p><p><strong>Historical right-wing domination of the media</strong></p><p>Traditionally, conservatives have almost always dominated direct mail solicitations, retained the best pollsters money could buy and paid for the most celebrated advertising makers. Message discipline is the first lesson for any Republican politician. Talk radio? unquestionably controlled by conservatives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/secrets_of_the_conservative_media_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/secrets_of_the_conservative_media_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon contractors flock to Mrs. McKeon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/pentagon_contractors_flock_to_mrs_mckeon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/pentagon_contractors_flock_to_mrs_mckeon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12276781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are defense lobbyists funding the pet crusade of the wife of Buck McKeon, House Armed Services Committee chair?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patricia McKeon, wife of a powerful committee chairman in Congress, announced her bid for California Legislature last fall by <a href="http://thesecondalarm.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/patriciamckeon.pdf" target="_blank">telling</a> local Republicans that she decided to run for office because she's fed up with the plastic bag tax in Los Angeles County. "Just think how much food we could buy if we weren't forced to pay 10 cents for grocery bags," she said in announcing her campaign. Within <a href="http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1341424&amp;session=2011&amp;view=received" target="_blank">days</a> of her official announcement, one industry stepped up to finance her campaign -- but it wasn't the plastic bag industry. It was military defense contractors and their Beltway lobbyists.</p><p>Disclosures posted last evening at the <a href="http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1341424&amp;session=2011&amp;view=received ">California secretary of state's website</a> confirm that a flood of military contractor money has flowed to Patricia McKeon, who is running for an open Assembly seat in a district that overlaps that of her husband, Republican Rep. Buck McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/pentagon_contractors_flock_to_mrs_mckeon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/pentagon_contractors_flock_to_mrs_mckeon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. lobbyist aids Rep. McKeon&#8217;s wife</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/d_c_lobbyist_aids_rep_mckeons_wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/d_c_lobbyist_aids_rep_mckeons_wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Armed Services Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buck McKeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12264431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spouse of the House Armed Services Committee chairman got Washington money for California Assembly bid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could an effort to lift his wife's political aspirations land the powerful chairman of the House Armed Services Committee in hot water?</p><p>Recent disclosures reveal that a federal lobbyist with ties to Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., the senior member of the committee overseeing the Pentagon, provided financial support to McKeon's wife, who is seeking a seat in the California Assembly this year. As defense industry lobbyists scramble to head off looming cuts in the Pentagon budget, they are looking for new ways to ingratiate themselves with McKeon.</p><p>Patricia McKeon, Buck's wife, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/mckeon-s-family-feud-spouse-vs-former-staffer-20120125" target="_blank">surprised</a> many when she announced her intention last September to run for an open seat that largely overlaps her husband's district. One of the first reported contributions to her campaign came from a political committee called the Fund for American Opportunity, registered to a post office box in Washington, D.C., that <a href="http://thesecondalarm.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/markvalente527.pdf" target="_blank">donated</a> $1,000. The fund, which is <a href="http://thesecondalarm.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/markvalente527.pdf" target="_blank">financed</a> by a number of corporations including the drug industry trade association PhRMA, is owned and operated by Mark Valente, a Beltway lobbyist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/d_c_lobbyist_aids_rep_mckeons_wife/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/d_c_lobbyist_aids_rep_mckeons_wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney relied on corporate welfare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/romney%e2%80%99s_record_as_a_crony_capitalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/romney%e2%80%99s_record_as_a_crony_capitalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bain Capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10744101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Bain Capital leveraged government assistance to boost profits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the presidential campaign, Mitt Romney has lashed out at the Obama administration's taxpayer subsidized grants to clean energy start-up companies. “The U.S. government shouldn’t be playing venture capitalist,” <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/blogs/mitts-view/2011/10/we-need-environment-jobs">wrote</a> Romney in October. “The very process invites cronyism and outright corruption.” But public records show that Romney's private equity firm, Bain Capital, repeatedly persuaded the government to play venture capitalist when it came to its own portfolio of companies.</p><p>News outlets have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/us/politics/retirement-deal-keeps-bain-money-flowing-to-romney.html?pagewanted=all">recently</a> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/how-vulnerable-is-romney-on-bain/2011/12/19/gIQAw0p94O_blog.html">focused</a> attention on Romney’s history as a businessman at Bain, which he founded in 1984. What hasn’t been reported, or fully explained by the candidate, is how Romney often got ahead in the private sector by using government help.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/romney%e2%80%99s_record_as_a_crony_capitalist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/romney%e2%80%99s_record_as_a_crony_capitalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich lauded &#8220;good parts&#8221; of Obama health plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/gingrich_lauded_good_parts_of_obama_health_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/gingrich_lauded_good_parts_of_obama_health_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10490171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“There are clearly things that we’d like to see continued," he told clients]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Newt Gingrich’s meteoric rise in the polls in the last two months, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gingrich-think-tank-collected-millions-from-health-care-industry/2011/11/16/gIQAcd72VN_story.html">Washington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/politics/gingrich-gave-push-to-clients-not-just-ideas.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times</a> have begun reporting on the Republican front-runner's dual role as a vocal critic of President Obama’s healthcare overhaul and as a paid consultant who explains the law’s benefits to corporate clients.</p><p>What hasn’t been reported yet are two <a href="http://www.medical.siemens.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/LandingPage?storeId=10001&amp;langId=-1&amp;catalogId=-1&amp;catTree=&amp;pageId=141883&amp;Identifier=#tabId=2">conference calls</a> in June and December 2010 in which Gingrich and his for-profit Center for Health Transformation touted "the good parts" of Obama's plan and offered advice about how clients might take advantage of a myriad of provisions of the Affordable Care Act.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/gingrich_lauded_good_parts_of_obama_health_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/gingrich_lauded_good_parts_of_obama_health_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>