<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lolita C. Baldor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/lolita_c_baldor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. reportedly moving toward arming Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk of arming the rebels is gaining traction in the Obama Administration, according to officials]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Discussions within the Obama administration in favor of providing arms to the Syrian rebels are gaining ground amid new indications that President Bashar Assad's regime may have launched additional chemical weapons attacks, U.S. and other diplomatic officials say.</p><p>As the number of suspected attacks grows, U.S. officials said intelligence agencies are seeing signs that Syrian opposition forces may be distancing themselves from the al-Qaida-linked group there — chipping away at one of the key arguments against giving lethal aid to the rebels. Yet, at the same time, the fighters associated with the extremist group are among the most effective against the regime. Assad displayed new confidence, going on the offensive in the hopes of taking advantage of ill will against the extremist group.</p><p>Officials insisted Wednesday that no decisions have been made but said arming the rebels is seen as more likely and preferable than any other military option. One U.S. official described a new "reconsideration" within the administration of the military options. The officials, who all spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss publicly the options under consideration, said most U.S. leaders prefer that the Syrians determine their own fate, so arming the opposition is more palatable than direct U.S. intervention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP sources: Pentagon extending benefits for gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13191777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is likely to allow same-sex partners to have access to some health and welfare programs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The military is poised to extend some benefits to the same-sex partners of service members, U.S. officials said Tuesday, about 16 months after the Pentagon repealed its ban on openly gay service.</p><p>Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has not made a final decision on which benefits will be included, the officials said, but the Pentagon is likely to allow same-sex partners to have access to the on-base commissary and other military subsidized stores, as well as some health and welfare programs.</p><p>Panetta must walk a fine, legal line. While there has been increased pressure on the Pentagon to extend some benefits to same-sex partners, defense officials must be careful not to violate the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA. The federal law forbids the federal government from recognizing any marriage other than those between a man and a woman.</p><p>An announcement is expected to come in the next several days. Officials discussed the plan on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss internal Pentagon deliberations.</p><p>Pentagon press secretary George Little declined to comment. Other officials made it clear that there are still last-minute legal discussions going on to determine the details.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military has to decide which combat jobs for women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/military_has_to_decide_which_combat_jobs_for_women_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/military_has_to_decide_which_combat_jobs_for_women_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in the military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials aim to preserve readiness and develop a process that would give service members equal chance to succeed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon's decision to lift the ban on women serving in combat presents a daunting challenge to top military leaders who now will have to decide which, if any, jobs they believe should be open only to men.</p><p>Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is expected to announce Thursday that more than 230,000 battlefront posts — many in Army and Marine infantry units and in potentially elite commando jobs — are now open to women. It will be up to the military service chiefs to recommend and defend whether women should be excluded from any of those more demanding and deadly positions, such as Navy SEALs or the Army's Delta Force.</p><p>The historic change, which was recommended by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, overturns a 1994 rule prohibiting women from being assigned to smaller ground combat units.</p><p>The change won't take place overnight: Service chiefs will have to develop plans for allowing women to seek the combat positions, a senior military official said. Some jobs may open as soon as this year, while assessments for others, such as special operations forces, may take longer. The services will have until January 2016 to make a case to that some positions should remain closed to women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/military_has_to_decide_which_combat_jobs_for_women_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/military_has_to_decide_which_combat_jobs_for_women_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norman Schwarzkopf, Iraq war general, dies at 78</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/norman_schwarzkopf_iraq_war_general_dies_at_78/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/norman_schwarzkopf_iraq_war_general_dies_at_78/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Schwarzkopf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Schwarzkopf dies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He led the forces that drove Saddam Hussein from Kuwait in 1991]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A U.S. official says retired Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf, who commanded the U.S.-led international coalition that drove Saddam Hussein's forces out of Kuwait in 1991, has died. He was 78.</p><p>The official tells The Associated Press that Schwarzkopf died Thursday in Tampa, Fla. The official wasn't authorized to release the information publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.</p><p>A much-decorated combat soldier in Vietnam, Schwarzkopf was known popularly as "Stormin' Norman" for a notoriously explosive temper.</p><p>He lived in retirement in Tampa, where he had served in his last military assignment as commander-in-chief of U.S. Central Command. That is the headquarters responsible for U.S. military and security concerns in nearly 20 countries from the eastern Mediterranean and Africa to Pakistan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/norman_schwarzkopf_iraq_war_general_dies_at_78/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/norman_schwarzkopf_iraq_war_general_dies_at_78/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US officials counter reports on Benghazi attack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/us_officials_counter_reports_on_benghazi_attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/us_officials_counter_reports_on_benghazi_attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intelligence officials fight claims that CIA failed to respond quickly or efficiently ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- Just days before the presidential election, U.S. officials are striking back at allegations they failed to respond quickly or efficiently against the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, detailing for the first time a broad CIA rescue effort.</p><p>Senior U.S. intelligence officials said Thursday that CIA security officers went to the aid of State Department staff less than 25 minutes after they got the first call for help from the consulate, which was less than a mile from a CIA annex. The detailed timeline provides the first in-depth look at how deeply the CIA was involved in the rescue attempt, and it comes amid persistent questions about whether the Obama administration responded as quickly and effectively as it could to the siege.</p><p>The attack on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 by what is now suspected to be a group of al-Qaida-linked militants killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.</p><p>U.S. officials described the timeline in a clear effort to rebut recent news reports that said the CIA told its personnel to "stand down" rather than go to the consulate to help repel the attackers. Fox News reported that when CIA officers at the annex called higher-ups to tell them the consulate was under fire, they were twice told to "stand down." The CIA publicly denied the report.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/us_officials_counter_reports_on_benghazi_attack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/us_officials_counter_reports_on_benghazi_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese leader-in-waiting reappears after two weeks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/chinese_leader_in_waiting_reappears_after_two_weeks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/chinese_leader_in_waiting_reappears_after_two_weeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta met with Xi Jinping yesterday, after Jinping's mysterious two-week absence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIJING (AP) — U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta met Wednesday with Chinese leader-in-waiting Xi Jinping, who just days ago reappeared after a puzzling two-week disappearance.</p><p>The meeting was part of Panetta's weeklong trip through the Asia Pacific, in a campaign to pursue the U.S. military's increased focus on the region.</p><p>Xi stood to greet the American delegation in a lavish room in the Great Hall of the People and energetically shook Panetta's hand. Once seated, he said Panetta's visit "will be very helpful in further advancing the state-to-state and military-to-military relations between our two countries."</p><p>Panetta told Xi that the two Pacific powers have common concerns and that he is confident they will be able to improve their dialogue.</p><p>The U.S. and China have long had a tumultuous relationship, fueled by America's distrust of Beijing's military buildup and China's concerns about the expanded U.S. military presence.</p><p>In repeated statements this week, Panetta has stressed that the new focus on Asia is not aimed at China. But the U.S. has had persistent concerns about China's growing economic and trade dominance in the region.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/chinese_leader_in_waiting_reappears_after_two_weeks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/chinese_leader_in_waiting_reappears_after_two_weeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US officials: Gadhafi fires first scud missile</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/us_us_libya_scud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/us_us_libya_scud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/16/us_us_libya_scud</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Libyan strongman taps his arsenal as rebels inch closer to Tripoli]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libyan government forces tapped into their stores of Scud missiles this weekend, firing one for the first time in this year's conflict with rebels, but hurting no one, U.S. defense officials said Monday.</p><p>The missile launch was detected by U.S. forces shortly after midnight Sunday and the Scud landed in the desert about 50 miles outside Brega, said one official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss military operations.</p><p>Rebel and regime forces have battled over the strategic port city of Brega throughout the conflict, and control has swung back and forth between the two sides.</p><p>The strike comes as rebel forces continue to advance, working in recent days to block key supply routes around Tripoli. The Obama administration said Monday that it is encouraged by recent rebel progress, but stopped short of predicting victory for the opposition forces after months of inconclusive battles.</p><p>According to the military, the Scud missile was launched from a location about 50 miles east of Surt, a city on the Mediterranean coast about 230 miles east of Tripoli. Noting that Scuds are not precision guided missiles, officials said they couldn't tell if Brega was the target.</p><p>Brega is about 450 miles southeast of Tripoli.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/us_us_libya_scud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/us_us_libya_scud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama formally ends ban on gays in military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/22/us_obama_gays_in_military_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/22/us_obama_gays_in_military_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/07/22/us_obama_gays_in_military_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Don't Ask, Don't Tell" era officially ends in 60 days]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama on Friday formally signed off on ending the ban on gays serving openly in the military, doing away with a policy that's been controversial from the day it was enacted and making good on his 2008 campaign promise to the gay community.</p><p>The president joined Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Adm. Mike Mullen, the joint chiefs of staff chairman, in signing a notice and sending it to Congress certifying that military readiness would not be hurt by repealing the 17-year-old "don't ask, don't tell" policy.</p><p>That means that 60 days from now the ban will be lifted.</p><p>"As commander in chief, I have always been confident that our dedicated men and women in uniform would transition to a new policy in an orderly manner that preserves unit cohesion, recruitment, retention and military effectiveness," Obama said in a statement.</p><p>"Today's action follows extensive training of our military personnel and certification by Secretary Panetta and Admiral Mullen that our military is ready for repeal. As of September 20th, service members will no longer be forced to hide who they are in order to serve our country."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/22/us_obama_gays_in_military_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/22/us_obama_gays_in_military_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gates: Pakistan arrests for CIA help are reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Gates did not directly confirm the reports, he is telling senators that "most governments lie to each other"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense Secretary Robert Gates is dismissing as harsh reality the accusations that Pakistani officials arrested several people who provided information to the CIA before the U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden.</p><p>While Gates did not directly confirm the reports, he is telling senators that "most governments lie to each other," sometimes they arrest people, and sometimes they spy on us. He says it's the "real world we deal with."</p><p>Gates was responding to sharp questions from Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy during a Capitol Hill hearing.</p><p>Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says the U.S. is struggling to rebuild its badly broken relationship with Pakistan.</p><p>A Western official in Pakistan has confirmed that five Pakistanis were arrested by Pakistan's top intelligence service.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/us_gates_pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lockheed Martin hit by cyber attack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defense contractor fended off a major security breach last week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hackers launched a "significant and tenacious" cyber attack on Lockheed Martin, a major defense contractor holding highly sensitive information, but its secrets remained safe, the company said Saturday.</p><p>Lockheed Martin, the Department of Homeland Security and the Pentagon confirmed that the contractor's information systems had come under attack. Lt. Col. April Cunningham, speaking for the Defense Department, said the impact on the Pentagon "is minimal and we don't expect any adverse effect."</p><p>Still, the concerted attempt to breach the contractor's systems underscored the risk to the nation's critical defense data. Chris Ortman, Homeland Security spokesman, said his agency and the Pentagon were working with the company to determine the breadth of the attack and "provide recommendations to mitigate further risk."</p><p>Lockheed Martin said in a statement that it detected the May 21 attack "almost immediately" and took countermeasures. As a result, "our systems remain secure; no customer, program or employee personal data has been compromised." The company's security team is still working to restore employee access to the targeted network. Neither Lockheed Martin nor the federal agencies revealed specifics of the attack.</p><p>     <em>AP writer Jennifer Malloy contributed to this report from Los Angeles.</em>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Videos show bin Laden watching himself on TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_videos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five movies offer the first public glimpse at bin Laden's life behind the walls of his Abbottabad compound]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newly released videos show Osama bin Laden watching himself on television and rehearsing for terrorist videos, revealing that even from the walled confines of his Pakistani hideout, he remained a media maestro who was eager to craft his own image for the cameras.</p><p>The videos, released by U.S. intelligence officials Saturday, were offered as further proof that Navy SEALs killed the world's most wanted terrorist this week. But they also served to show bin Laden as vain, someone obsessed with his portrayal by the world's media.</p><p>One of the movies shows bin Laden, his unkempt beard streaked in gray, sitting on the floor, wrapped in a brown blanket and holding a remote control. He flipped back and forth between what appears to be live news coverage of himself. The old, small television was perched on top of a desk with a large tangle of electrical wires running to a nearby control box.</p><p>In another, he has apparently dyed and neatly trimmed his beard for the filming of a propaganda video. The video, which the U.S. released without sound, was titled "Message to the American People" and was believed to be filed sometime last fall, a senior intelligence official said during a briefing for reporters, on condition that his name not be used.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_videos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bin Laden home videos expected to be released</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Footage and propaganda tapes shot at terror leader's Abbottabad compound could be passed to media later today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world is expected to get its first glimpse at Osama bin Laden's daily life as the world's most wanted terrorist Saturday with the disclosure of home videos showing him strolling the grounds of the fortified compound that kept him safe for years.</p><p>The footage shot at the terror leader's hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and propaganda tapes made there, are expected to be released to the news media Saturday, U.S. officials said.</p><p>They are among the wealth of information collected during the U.S. raid that killed bin Laden and four others. The information suggests bin Laden played a strong role in planning and directing attacks by al-Qaida and its affiliates in Yemen and Somalia, two senior officials said.</p><p>And it further demonstrates to the U.S. that top al-Qaida commanders and other key insurgents are scattered throughout Pakistan, not just in the rugged border areas, and are being supported and given sanctuary by Pakistanis.</p><p>Despite protests from Pakistan, defeating al-Qaida and taking out its senior leaders in Pakistan remains a top U.S. priority. That campaign will not be swayed by Islamabad's complaints that the raid violated the country's sovereignty, a senior defense official said Friday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/us_bin_laden_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bradley Manning to leave Quantico</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/us_us_wikileaks_army_private/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/us_us_wikileaks_army_private/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/19/us_us_wikileaks_army_private</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WikiLeaks suspect will be moved to Fort Leavenworth following international outrage over his treatment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. officials say the Army private suspected of giving classified data to WikiLeaks is being moved to Fort Leavenworth in Kansas in the wake of international criticism about his treatment during his detention at the Marine Corps base at Quantico, Va.</p><p>The officials say an announcement that Army Pfc. Bradley Manning will be moved is expected Wednesday at the Pentagon. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the move has not yet been made public.</p><p>Amnesty International has said Manning's treatment may violate his human rights. A committee of Germany's parliament has also protested about his treatment to the White House.</p><p>Manning is being held in maximum security in a single-occupancy cell at Quantico, and he is allowed to wear only a suicide-proof smock to bed each night.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/us_us_wikileaks_army_private/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/us_us_wikileaks_army_private/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gates: No ground troops while &#8220;I am in this job&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/libya_ground_troops_robert_gates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/libya_ground_troops_robert_gates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/31/libya_ground_troops_robert_gates</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defense Secretary nixed American involvement, saying "somebody else" could train Libyan opposition fighters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the U.S. debates its future role in the Libyan conflict, Defense officials slammed the brakes on any broad participation Thursday, with Defense Secretary Robert Gates saying there will be no American ground troops in Libya "as long as I am in this job."</p><p>Under withering congressional probing and criticism of an ill-defined mission to aid a rebel force that officials know little about, Gates and Joint Chiefs chairman Adm. Mike Mullen sketched out a largely limited role for the U.S. military going forward, with Gates saying some other country could train the rebels trying to oust strongman Moammar Gadhafi.</p><p>"My view would be, if there is going to be that kind of assistance to the opposition, there are plenty of sources for it other than the United States," said Gates. "Somebody else should do that."</p><p>Asked by one lawmaker whether the U.S. involvement might inevitably mean "boots on the ground" in Libya, Gates replied, "Not as long as I am in this job."</p><p>The U.S. turned over control of the military operation to NATO Thursday, just hours before Gates and Mullen told Congress that future U.S. participation will be limited and will not involve an active role in airstrikes as time goes on.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/libya_ground_troops_robert_gates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/libya_ground_troops_robert_gates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gates: U.S. may cede no-fly control by weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/23/libya_no_fly_zone_transfer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/23/libya_no_fly_zone_transfer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/23/libya_no_fly_zone_transfer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defense secretary claims the U.S. military could turn over control of Libya operations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he can't predict when the international military enforcement of a no-fly zone over Libya might end, but that the U.S. could turn over control of the operation as soon as Saturday.</p><p>Gates says no one thought the assault would last only two or three weeks, but he could not say how the coalition operation might be resolved.</p><p>Gates said Wednesday the goals of the operation against Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi are clear -- establishing a no-fly zone and preventing Gadhafi from slaughtering his own people. Yet Gates had no answer when asked about a possible stalemate that could occur if Gadhafi hunkers down, and the coalition has no U.N. authorization to target him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/23/libya_no_fly_zone_transfer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/23/libya_no_fly_zone_transfer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gates: U.S. expects to hand off Libya lead in &#8220;days&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/21/us_us_libya_gates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/21/us_us_libya_gates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/20/us_us_libya_gates</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military mission likely to be headed by French and British or NATO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Sunday that the U.S. expects to turn control of the Libya military mission over to a coalition -- probably headed either by the French and British or by NATO -- "in a matter of days."</p><p>In his first public remarks since the start of the bombings, Gates said President Barack Obama felt very strongly about limiting America's role in the operation, adding that the president is "more aware than almost anybody of the stress on the military."</p><p>"We agreed to use our unique capabilities and the breadth of those capabilities at the front of this process, and then we expected in a matter of days to be able to turn over the primary responsibility to others," Gates told reporters traveling with him to Russia. "We will continue to support the coalition, we will be a member of the coalition, we will have a military role in the coalition, but we will not have the preeminent role."</p><p>The two key possibilities, he said, are a combined British-French command or the use of a NATO command. He acknowledged there is "some sensitivity on the part of the Arab League to being seen to be operating under a NATO umbrella."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/21/us_us_libya_gates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/21/us_us_libya_gates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. launches next phase of Libya intervention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/us_libya_intervention_phase_two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/us_libya_intervention_phase_two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/20/us_libya_intervention_phase_two</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military pummels Gadhafi forces with stealth bombers, precision-guided bombs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a barrage of attacks by sea-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles Saturday, an array of U.S. warplanes -- including several Air force B-2 stealth bombers -- followed in the pre-dawn hours Sunday with a coordinated assault using precision-guided bombs, according to a U.S. military official.</p><p>The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military missions, said the planes included Air Force F-15s and F-16s, Navy EA-18G electronic warfare planes and Marine attack jets.</p><p>Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs, described the campaign's aims as "limited," saying it "isn't about seeing him (Gadhafi) go." Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Mullen was asked whether it was possible that the mission's goals could be achieved while leaving Gadhafi in power.</p><p>"That's certainly potentially one outcome," he replied.</p><p>Pressed on this point later in an interview on CNN's "State of the Union," Mullen was more vague. "How this ends from the political standpoint, I just can't say," Mullen said. He said it was too early to speculate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/us_libya_intervention_phase_two/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/us_libya_intervention_phase_two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mullen: Chance Gadhafi could cling to power</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/libya_gadhafi_cling_power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/libya_gadhafi_cling_power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/20/Libya_Gadhafi_cling_power</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top U.S. military officer says U.S. could conceivably complete objectives without ousting Gadhafi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S.-led international military assault on Libya could achieve its stated goals without forcing Moammar Gadhafi from power, the top U.S. military officer said Sunday as the bombing campaign continued.</p><p>Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs, described the campaign's aims as "limited" saying it "isn't about seeing him (Gadhafi) go." Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Mullen was asked whether it was possible that the mission's goals could be achieved while leaving Gadafi in power.</p><p>"That's certainly potentially one outcome," he replied.</p><p>Pressed on this point later in an interview on CNN's "State of the Union," Mullen was more vague. "How this ends from the political standpoint, I just can't say," Mullen said. He said it was too early to speculate.</p><p>U.S. officials said at the outset of the missile strikes on Saturday that the goals are to prevent Gadhafi from inflicting further violence on his own people and to degrade his military's ability to contest a no-fly zone. Mullen said Sunday that the no-fly zone was now in place, with Gadhafi having put no aircraft in the sky.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/libya_gadhafi_cling_power/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/20/libya_gadhafi_cling_power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama restarts Guantanamo trials after two-year ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/obama_restarts_guantanamo_trials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/obama_restarts_guantanamo_trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/07/obama_restarts_guantanamo_trials</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President backs away from promise to close the prison, setting stage for first trials since inauguration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama approved Monday the resumption of military trials for detainees at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, ending a two-year ban.</p><p>It was the latest acknowledgement that the detention facility Obama had vowed to shut down within a year of taking office will remain open for some time to come. But even while announcing a resumption of military commission trials, Obama reaffirmed his support for trying terror suspects in U.S. federal courts -- something that's met vehement resistance on Capitol Hill.</p><p>"I strongly believe that the American system of justice is a key part of our arsenal in the war against al-Qaida and its affiliates, and we will continue to draw on all aspects of our justice system -- including Article III courts -- to ensure that our security and our values are strengthened," the president said in a statement.</p><p>The White House also reiterated that the administration remains committed to eventually closing Guantanamo Bay, though Monday's actions didn't seem to bring that outcome any closer.</p><p>Under Obama's order, Defense Secretary Robert Gates will rescind his January 2009 ban against bringing new cases against the terror suspects at the detention facility.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/obama_restarts_guantanamo_trials/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/obama_restarts_guantanamo_trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discharging gays cost Pentagon $200 million</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/dadt_repeal_cost_pentagon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/dadt_repeal_cost_pentagon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2011/01/20/dadt_repeal_cost_pentagon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report by the Government Accountability Office says upholding "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" proved very expensive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A government analysis says that discharging gay service members cost the Pentagon nearly $200 million from 2004 to 2009. The money went mainly to recruit and train replacements.</p><p>The Government Accountability Office report says it cost an average of $52,800 per discharge. The totals are estimates because of differences in how the military services compile and report budget data.</p><p>Congressional investigators say that of the 3,664 service members dismissed for being gay, more than 1,400 held critical jobs or spoke an important foreign language.</p><p>President Barack Obama signed a new law in December ending the Pentagon's 17-year-old "don't ask, don't tell" policy and allowing gays to serve openly for the first time in history. That change is not expected to take effect for several months.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/dadt_repeal_cost_pentagon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/dadt_repeal_cost_pentagon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>