<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lori Leibovich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/lori_leibovich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our family&#8217;s recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/11/family_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/11/family_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2006/09/11/family</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the grandmother the girls called "the human Barbie doll" died in the World Trade Center, they were buried in grief.  But Brianna and Shannon, and their parents, Jay and Louise, refuse to let the past rule them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For months after her grandmother died, Shannon Yaskulka doodled incessantly, drawing swirls and curlicues on any piece of paper she could find. Confused by what the drawings meant, her parents, Jay and Louise, brought them to Shannon's pediatrician, who showed them to a psychologist. "The psychologist said it looked like smoke," says Jay. Presumably Shannon was copying the plumes from the World Trade Center that she had glimpsed on television on Sept. 11, 2001, when the 3-year-old turned to her father and said, "Daddy, that's where Grandma works." </p><p>"We figured she's only 3, she's not comprehending this," says Jay. "But she was." </p><p>Shannon's grandmother, Myrna Yaskulka, was killed in the World Trade Center on 9/11. She worked as an executive secretary at Fred Alger Management, located on the 93rd floor of the north tower. Five years after her death, the Yaskulkas, like thousands of families who lost loved ones on Sept. 11, are still coping with the aftershocks. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/09/11/family_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/11/family_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/08/what_else_78/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/08/what_else_78/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/08/07/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Sesame Street" gets girlie, Andi Zeisler defends young feminists, and "Girls Gone Wild" founder Joe Francis humiliates a female reporter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/arts/television/06domi.html">New York Times</a>: The newest addition to the mostly male "Sesame Street" cast is Abby Cadabby, a girlie-girl with magical powers. (Priceless quote: "If Cookie Monster was a female character," Carol-Lynn Parente, executive producer of the show, told the Times, "she'd be accused of being anorexic or bulimic. There are a lot of things that come attached to female characters.") </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/magazine/06wwln_q4.html">New York Times Magazine: </a> Antagonistic interviewer Deborah Solomon accuses <a target="new" href="http://www.bitchmagazine.com/">Bitch</a> co-editor Andi Zeisler and other feminists born in the '70s of being "trapped in a pop-culture bubble." Zeisler more than holds her own. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/08/08/what_else_78/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/08/what_else_78/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More middle-aged men are single &#8230; and OK about it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/single_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/single_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/08/07/single_men</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest article in the New York Times' series on gender looks at why marriage rates among men without college degrees are declining]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fourth <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/us/06marry.html?ex=1155009600&en=198334593b14608d&ei=5087%0A">article</a> in its fascinating series "The New Gender Divide," the New York Times looks at why marriage rates among men without higher education are declining at a significant clip. </p><p>The reasons for the decline vary and include greater economic independence for women, and the increase in the number of couples who live together without getting married. The Times interviewed men who are afraid to commit, men who fear divorce, and one 41-year-old who says he'd love to have a family but he just hasn't met the right woman. </p><p>But the single most significant reason these men remain unattached is "because the pool of women in their social circles -- those without college degrees -- has shrunk," according to the Times. "And the dwindling pool of women in this category often look for a mate with more education and hence better financial prospects." As Shenia Rudolph, 42, from the Bronx said succinctly, "Men don't marry because women like myself don't need to rely on them." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/single_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/single_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suffragist&#8217;s home bought by anti-choice group</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/feminists_for_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/feminists_for_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/08/07/feminists_for_life</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A member of Feminists for Life buys the birthplace of Susan B. Anthony.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Broadsheet reader forwarded us an email she received from <a target="new" href="www.feministsforlife.org"> Feminists For Life </a> -- "I got on their mailing list to monitor their activities after it was revealed that Supreme Court Justice Roberts' wife has been actively involved with them," she assures us -- announcing the purchase of the Adams, Mass. birthplace of suffragist Susan B. Anthony by a member of its organization. </p><p>"While Feminists for Life of America will not own the house, the pro-life feminist organization will manage and care for the birthplace," according to the press release. "FFLs national office will remain in the Washington, D.C., area. A panel of experts will be assembled to determine the best use for the dwelling. Others who care about Susan B. Anthony will be provided a means to contribute ideas." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/feminists_for_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/feminists_for_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t date him, girl!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/dont_date_him_girl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/dont_date_him_girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/08/07/dont_date_him_girl</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Web site allows women to post warnings about the sleazy guys they've dated. But it is fair to the men?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People magazine (subscription only) has a short article this week about a self-explanatory Web site called <a target="new" href="http://dontdatehimgirl.com">DontDateHimGirl.com.</a> The 8-month-old site, which allows women to dis guys who have done them wrong, is making news because -- didn't we see this coming? -- it is being sued for defamation by one of the men who appear on it. </p><p>Thirty-eight-year-old Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis, who is accused on the site of being messy, unfaithful, a deadbeat dad, possibly gay, and suffering from herpes, has sued DontDateHimGirl.com's creator, Tasha Joseph, because she has refused to take down several posts about him, which Hollis insists are filled with lies. </p><p>Women post to the site accusing men of everything from serious crimes such as sleeping with young girls to minor annoyances like spending too much time playing video games. A recent post is typical of the kind of trash talking that goes on: "At first, I thought he was my great legionary in shining leather but he turned out to be just a manwhore, sticking his turgid manmeat in any cavernous hole he can find. All he ever does is get drunk and pass out on my stairs." (The site does offer accused men the opportunity to respond to their critics). </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/dont_date_him_girl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/dont_date_him_girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/what_else_74/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/what_else_74/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/31/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennnifer Aniston is not a feminist, but she supports women in film. Plus: Why are millions of men swearing off work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new">New York Times</a>: Milllions of American men between the ages of 30-55 are choosing not to work instead of taking jobs they think are beneath them. </p><p>More <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/31/business/media/31adco.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin"> New York Times: </a> Glamour magazine is sponsoring a series of short films based on true stories from its readers, and directed by Hollywood celebrities. "Im not like a bleeding heart feminist or a bleeding heart anything, said Jennifer Aniston, who co-directed the film, Room 10" for the series. But I think I like women. I support women. </p><p><a target="new">Washington Post:</a> Beware the toxic parent! Bwa ha ha ha ha! </p><p><a target="new">Women's e-news:</a> Happy World Breastfeeding Week! The good news: Two-thirds of new mothers choose to breast-feed. The bad and not surprising news: those rates drop dramatically when women return to work. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/what_else_74/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/what_else_74/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA to (finally) consider Plan B</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/plan_b_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/plan_b_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/31/plan_b</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years of stalling, women might finally have access to over-the-counter emergency contraception.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Today the FDA announced that it is considering approval of the sale of the emergency contraceptive Plan B without a prescription. The FDA is in discussions with Plan B's manufacturer, Barr Laboratories, and according to the <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/31/giving/31cnd-pill.html?hp&ex=1154404800&en=3df0f0cc0e529b01&ei=5094&partner=homepage"> New York Times,</a> they could be completed in a matter of weeks. </p><p>It's about friggin' time. </p><p>As you'll <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2005/11/14/gao_plan_b/index.htm">recall,</a> a ruling on the over-the-counter status of the drug has been tied up for years and has been tainted by the suggestion that politics -- not concerns for women's health -- have been the cause of the government's indecision regarding the drug. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/plan_b_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/plan_b_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is parenthood boring?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/bored_mom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/bored_mom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/31/bored_mom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A British columnist says being a mum is just plain tedious]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm partial to warts-and-all parenting articles so I was intrigued by a recent <a target="new" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=397672&in_page_id=1879&in_page_id=1879&ct=5&expand=true#StartComments">column </a> in Britain's Daily Mail with the headline "Sorry, but My Children Bore Me to Death!" The piece, written by Helen Kirwan-Taylor, a 42-year-old writer with two boys, ages 12 and 10, argues that mothers are "enslaved" by their children and admits that she often chooses work, shopping or going to the gym over doing kids stuff -- even reading bedtime stories! -- because she finds it all so mind-numbingly dull. </p><p>"I know this is one of the last taboos of modern society," she writes. "To admit that you, a mother of the new millennium, don't find your offspring thoroughly fascinating and enjoyable at all times is a state of affairs very few women are prepared to admit. We feel ashamed, and unfit to be mothers." Kirwan-Taylor feels alienated from those mums who have made raising children their de facto careers, but her guilt subsides once she starts talking to friends who also find aspects of parenting dreary, and shrinks who tell her that child-centered parenting just creates narcissistic children anyway. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/bored_mom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/bored_mom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexicans ditch sexist wedding vows</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/mexican_vows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/mexican_vows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/30/mexican_vows</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 147 long years women can finally say "I do" without being humiliated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an AP story in yesterday's <a target="new" href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/latinamerica/articles/2006/07/30/mexico_abandons_vows_seen_as_sexist?mode=PF">Boston Globe,</a> the wedding vows traditionally recited by Mexican judges -- which proclaim wives both weak and annoying -- are thankfully falling out of favor as machismo loses some of its cultural impact, and people generally begin to recognize that predicating a modern marriage on sexist assumptions just won't cut it. </p><p>"Even though the Mexican constitution says we are equal, the vows put the woman in a very disadvantaged position where the man can make it her obligation to reproduce, take care of the home," Teresa Ulloa, president of the women's rights organization Defensoras Populares, told the AP. </p><p>The old vows -- a 537-word ode to marriage written by liberal politician Melchor Ocampo in 1859 -- were created to replace religious vows endorsed by the Roman Catholic Church. (After penning the vows Ocampo was executed for promoting the separation of church and state -- yet for some reason his vows were left in the civil marriage law.) In March, Defensoras Populares convinced Mexico's Congress to adopt a resolution that urges judges to skip the vows, though they are still on the books in 31 states. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/mexican_vows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/31/mexican_vows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion bill puts teens&#8217; lives at stake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/abortion_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/abortion_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/24/abortion_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frist and others want to toss grandmothers in jail for helping their granddaughters obtain an abortion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, the Senate votes on a bill called the <a target="new" href="http://www.nrlc.org/Federal/CCPA/CCPASenatetext012405.html">Child Custody Protection Act, </a> or, as Planned Parenthood has more honestly dubbed it, the "Teen Endangerment Act." The bill, backed by Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist, would prohibit anyone other than a parent -- including a grandparent, clergy member, aunt, sibling or cousin -- from accompanying a young woman across state lines for an abortion if her home state's parental notification law has not been met. </p><p>Advocates say that most teenage girls <i>do</i> seek help from a parent when faced with an unintended pregnancy, and those who don't have good reasons not to. But instead of encouraging young women to seek guidance from other trusted adults, this bill would force them to face their abortion decision alone. Should this bill pass, a grandmother who simply accompanied her granddaughter to get an abortion could spend <i>up to a year</i> in jail, pay a steep fine and be subject to a civil lawsuit. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/abortion_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/abortion_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are the &#8220;daddy wars&#8221; next?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/stay_at_home_dads_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/stay_at_home_dads_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/24/stay_at_home_dads</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article portrays stay-at-home dads as laid-back about their kids, blas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Hartlaub, a dad who takes care of his 15-month-old son one day a week, wrote an <a target="new" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/23/CMG1PJLEHN1.DTL&hw=stay+at+home+dads&sn=001&sc=1000">article </a> in yesterday's San Francisco Chronicle about the culture of stay-at-home fathers. His observations, gleaned from interviews with several dads in an East Bay fathers group, include: </p><p>
<li> Stay at home dads are less stigmatized than they used to be. </p><p>
<li> Anecdotally, dads seem to take a more laid-back approach to parenting and exhibit a greater tolerance for things like germs and scrapes. </p><p>
<li> Many dads come to the job of full-time parent thinking it will be easier than it actually is. </p><p>
<li> Many stay-at-home dads did not have fulfilling careers before they had children, but nevertheless see their stay-at-home status as temporary. They seem to assume that when they're ready to go back into the workforce, their old jobs will be there, or they will easily be able to land another one. </p><p>
<li> Gender stereotypes remain even when a man takes on a historically female role. "The big difference between a moms group and a dads group is the guys in the dads group drink more beer," yuks stay-at-home dad Peter Weschler. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/stay_at_home_dads_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/stay_at_home_dads_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should childbirth be pain-free?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/epidurals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/epidurals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/23/epidurals</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A doctor wonders why any woman would choose to have a baby without anesthesia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a target="new" href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2006/07/23/the_mother_lode_of_pain?mode=PF">cover story </a> in the Boston Globe Sunday magazine yesterday, <a target="new" href="http://www.darshaksanghavi.com"> Dr. Darshak Sanghavi </a> asks why some women choose to go through labor and delivery without the aid of drugs. </p><p>"One justification I've often heard is that labor pain 'empowers' women or gives them a sense of 'control,'" writes Sanghavi. "But many women accept pain for a more mundane reason: They are poorly educated about obstetrical anesthesia and don't have access to compassionate and technologically advanced medical care." Other reasons for a drug-free birth proffered in this pro-epidural article: Some people, including natural childbirth proponent <a href="/people/bc/1999/06/01/gaskin/index.html">Ina May Gaskin,</a> believe that birth offers the potential for an ecstatic labor that includes intense orgasms. And many people simply don't believe that birth pain needs to be treated because it's not pathologic. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/epidurals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/epidurals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our stretch marks, ourselves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/shape_of_the_mother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/shape_of_the_mother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/23/shape_of_the_mother</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new blog asks mothers to share photos of their bodies during and after pregnancy in hopes that the female form will be demystified -- and honored.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Most of the mothers I know get all wistful when they talk about parts of their pre-pregnancy body, waxing rhapsodic about their formerly tight vaginas, pert breasts and flat, scarless bellies. Their descriptions of their postpartum shape, however, are usually vicious and unforgiving and almost never acknowledge the fact that their bodies have undergone dramatic changes for a pretty good reason: incubating a life for nine months -- then pushing out that life, or having it taken from your body -- tends to shift things around. </p><p>Whether this self-torture is a result of the ludicrous standards set by a new generation of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2004/07/31/pregnancy_porn/index.html">Hollywood moms</a> who employ a pit crew of trainers and nutritionists and plastic surgeons to shrink their bodies back into their Us Weekly-ready size 0 jeans just weeks after giving birth, or occurs simply because most American women tend to use a great deal of their mental energy punishing themselves for what they <i>don't</i> look like, I'm not sure. What I do know is that a new blog, <a target="new" href="http://shapeofamother.blogspot.com/">the Shape of a Mother,</a> may be one small way we can make headway in this endless battle we wage against ourselves. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/shape_of_the_mother/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/24/shape_of_the_mother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working women, unite!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/afl_cio_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/afl_cio_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/17/afl_cio</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new AFL-CIO survey asks women workers about their most pressing concerns.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever find yourself talking to anyone who will listen -- your partner, your colleagues, your Broadsheet audience -- about the maddening lack of good work options for women? Well, instead of stewing in rage, take this AFL-CIO <a target="new" href="http://www.aflcio.org/issues/jobseconomy/women/wwsurvey2006.cfm?%3E0%5FQ%3CF%40%3AS%3D%3F6LCJ%2E3IDN3%5B%5F%5E%3AC%259%24FYR%5B4L7%3CK%3B%2AT%0A">"Ask a Working Woman Survey."</a> I just did, and I feel calmer already knowing that my answers will be delivered to every U.S. representative and senator on Labor Day. </p><p>The survey asks you to rate the importance of certain laws that would improve the lives of working women, and provides space for you to craft 600 words on "what is the most important thing members of Congress need to understand about working women?" (Yes, it's hard to limit oneself to 600, but you can abbreviate. I did.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/afl_cio_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/afl_cio_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/what_else_67/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/what_else_67/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/17/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skirts as art, the backlash against policewomen in Peru, more slutiness in the New York Times. Plus: Will Mo'Nique be in Playboy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a target="new">San Francisco Chronicle:</a> Columnist claims "funny is the new sexy." But as we learned <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/07/11/project_runway/index.html">last week,</a> columnists can be very silly when it comes to gender. </p><p><a target="new">Entertainment Weekly:</a> Two years ago, F.A.T. actress Mo'Nique -- yes, we're a little <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/07/09/monique/index.html">obsessed</a> -- dared Hugh Hefner to invite her to pose nude for Playboy. She still hasn't received an answer. Should we start a <a target="new">letter-writing</a> campaign? </p><p><a target="new" href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/07/15/opinion/15dowd.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists%2fMaureen%20Dowd">New York Times:</a> More on <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/07/13/slut/index.html">sluts.</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/what_else_67/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/what_else_67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy generalizations, Batwoman!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/daum_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/daum_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/17/daum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are all women either girlie girls or lesbians?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her weekly Los Angeles Times <a target="new" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-daum15jul15,0,1929260.column?coll=la-opinion-columnists">column </a> Meghan Daum uses the debut of a <a target="new" href="http://feministing.com/archives/005123.html">gay Batwoman</a> comic to riff on a new "sexual identity crisis." She claims that there are currently only two ways to be female -- you're either a girlie girl or a lesbian. </p><p> "You either get the Botox, the boob job, the bikini wax and baby doll dresses, or you take the radical step of looking and acting like a fully formed, grown-up female," she writes. "Once upon a time, these fully formed creatures were called 'real women.' Now they're called lesbians. This is especially true in cases in which the women in question are not known to actually be lesbians. What do Hillary Rodham Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Christiane Amanpour, Oprah Winfrey and Martha Stewart have in common? It's not that they're accomplished, independent, talented, ambitious or rich, it's that they're all secretly gay!" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/daum_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/daum_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are parents miserable?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/warner_14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/warner_14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/17/warner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judith Warner says that calling parents whiners trivializes their very real concerns.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In a New York Times <a target="new" href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/07/16/opinion/16warner.html">Op-Ed</a> Sunday, Judith Warner takes issue with a new study by the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University that suggests that parenthood is the source of the widespread depression, anxiety and marital discord experienced by many mothers and fathers. According to Warner, one of the study's premises, that today's older parents have spent decades "soused on cosmopolitans and scattering their disposable income on Caribbean vacations" and therefore have a harder time adjusting to the demands and responsibilities of parenthood, rings completely false. </p><p>"I have to say that I cannot recognize myself -- or anyone I know -- in this picture," she writes. "That isn't to say that other parents and I don't suffer from stress, anxiety or sometime marital tensions. Of course we do. But does that mean that parenthood is for us the 'source,' as Whitehead puts it, of dissatisfaction and distress? Absolutely not. On the contrary: children are the bright spot -- the joy -- that makes every other aspect of life worthwhile." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/warner_14/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/17/warner_14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/what_else_64/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/what_else_64/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/10/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An elegant slam of Mary Cheney's new book, how football helps colleges lure men. Plus: Should female gamers disguise their voices to avoid  harassment by men?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new">Slate</a>: Michael Kinsley on what anti-choicers miss in the stem-cell debate. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/10/education/10football.html?ex=1152676800&amp;en=194c374389cb50e8&amp;ei=5087%0A"> New York Times: </a> The second article in "The New Gender Divide" series looks at how small colleges are starting football programs to attract more male students. </p><p><a target="new">Mother Jones:</a> Does everybody have the right to have a baby? </p><p><a target="new">New York Times Book Review:</a> Critic Alexandra Jacobs gracefully slams Mary Cheney for failing to "confront the inherent contradiction of working for a party whose attitude toward homosexuality runs the gamut from mild intolerance to out-and-out hostility" in her new autobiography, "My Turn." </p><p><a target="new">Eurogamer:</a> New software disguises female gamers' voices so they won't be harassed by men. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/what_else_64/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/what_else_64/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The faces of child brides</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/child_brides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/child_brides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/10/child_brides</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dramatic photos depict the young wives of Afghanistan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times Magazine published a harrowing <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/09BRI.html">photo essay</a> by Stephanie Sinclair yesterday that depicts child brides in Afghanistan. One photo shows Ghulam Haider, who looks much older than her 11 years, sitting next to her grizzled 40-year-old husband and flashing him a suspicious, piercing look. The caption notes that before she became engaged, Ghulam had hoped to become a teacher. </p><p> As reporter Barry Bearak writes in the accompanying text, early marriages are arranged for a variety of reasons -- to relieve debts, because virginity is such a prized commodity and "parents prefer to yield their daughters before misbehavior or abduction has brought the family shame and made any wedding impossible." Most are simply "family transactions" and the younger the bride, the more prized she is. "Girls are valuable workers in a land where survival is scratched from the grudging soil of a half-acre parcel," Bearak writes. "In her parents' home, a girl can till fields, tend livestock and cook meals. In her husband's home, she is more useful yet. She can have sex and bear children." The dire health costs of not-yet-mature bodies going through childbirth include an increased risk of hemorrhaging and obstructed labor. </p><p>Bearak, a gorgeous writer who won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for his reporting from Afghanistan, says that when he lived in the country, rarely did he see "anything more heartbreaking than the tears of a relinquished child." And you won't read anything more heartbreaking than the quote from Ghulam that ends this article. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/child_brides/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/child_brides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Times weighs in on the &#8220;boy crisis&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/boys_who_coast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/boys_who_coast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/10/boys_who_coast</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An exhaustive article looks at why college women soar, while their male counterparts slack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As part of a series called "The New Gender Divide," the New York Times took a much-needed and in-depth look yesterday at what's happening with young men and women in higher education. The article, <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/education/09college.html?ex=1152676800&en=6e7e9bdaf6df5b28&ei=5087%0A">"Boys Who Coast" </a> (currently the most-e-mailed article on NYTimes.com), offered some fascinating anecdotal evidence to back up studies that show that men in college study less and socialize more than their female counterparts. Women at private and public universities told reporter Tamar Lewin that they are more ambitious, conscientious and interested in their professional futures than their male classmates. Jen Smyers, who has held three jobs and four internships in her three years at American University, said simply, "The women here are on fire." </p><p>The boys don't disagree. In fact, they seem perfectly aware of -- and not terribly concerned by -- the fact that they are often, well, slackers. "What's the difference between an A and a B?" said Rick Kohn, a student at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. "Either way, you go on to the next class." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/boys_who_coast/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/10/boys_who_coast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

