<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Louis Bayard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/louis_bayard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can James Franco write? Yes, but &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/james_franco_palo_alto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/james_franco_palo_alto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Franco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/10/18/james_franco_palo_alto</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actor's new collection, "Palo Alto," shows promise -- and an undeveloped obsession with youth and violence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the old days, by which I mean last week, no one expected an author to look hot. If you had bathed within the last lunar cycle, if your body compared favorably with Winston Churchill's, if your eyes, nose and mouth were all in roughly approximate position, you got a pass. An affirmative-action, hey-he-shaved-and-brushed-his-teeth pass.</p><p>Now who should come along to screw it up but <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/james_franco/index.html">James Franco,</a> whose short-story collection, "Palo Alto," comes with an author pic so ridiculously dreamy, so full-lipped and chin-carved and chestnut-haired that I'm already wondering how I can scan it into my next book jacket. "Yes," I imagine responding to e-mail queries. "That's exactly what I look like. Which is why I don't do public appearances anymore. The fans get so damn grabby."</p><p>Envy, then, is a prime consideration in confronting Franco the Writer. It's not enough that he should be <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/sexiest_man_living_2009/index.html">Salon's Sexiest Man Living of 2009.</a> Or an artist with a solo exhibition in Tribeca. Or an extremely well-compensated and (when occasion demands) competent movie actor. Nooo, James Franco is now making a play for the New York Times Book Review and the monthly Book Sense list and the Barnes &amp; Noble 100 and all those places where homely, unsocialized men and women once held sway.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/james_franco_palo_alto/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/james_franco_palo_alto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Having kids made me a movie wuss</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/28/kids_in_peril_movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/28/kids_in_peril_movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Last Exorcism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/08/28/kids_in_peril_movies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always thought I'd be a rational father. But seeing a child in danger drives me over the edge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Friday marked the premiere of a movie called <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/the_last_exorcism/index.html?story=/ent/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/08/26/last_exorcism">"The Last Exorcism."</a> It is a faux cin&#233;ma-v&#233;rit&#233; documentary about a deeply troubled teenage girl racked by demons. It may be a piece of art or a hunk of trash. It may spin interesting new variations on the possessed-girl template, or it may be the holy water sprinkled on the genre's corpse. None of this will matter because I won't be watching.</p><p>Any more than I'll be watching, in the weeks to come, "Let Me In" (severely bullied boy seeks help from a neighboring vampire girl) or "Case 39" (12-year-old girl's parents try repeatedly to murder her, to the point of stuffing her in an oven). Or putting <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2010/04/16/kick_ass">"Kick-Ass"</a> on my Netflix list or, except under great duress, escorting my kids to the latest Harry Potter movie. And my reasons have nothing to do with esthetic principles, of which I have few. It's just that, after 10 years of parenthood, I have become ridiculously, intractably, humiliatingly averse to seeing children in peril.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/28/kids_in_peril_movies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/28/kids_in_peril_movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miss Universe and the death of the beauty pageant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/miss_universe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/miss_universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beauty Pageants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2010/08/24/miss_universe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even as a gay man, I couldn't find joy or fun in last night's monument to wax figurines and Donald Trump]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, I watched a two-hour commercial, and a beauty pageant kept breaking out.</p><p>Which is to say that, somehow, amid the interstices of skin- and hair-care commercials and NBC fall-show previews (repeated as insistently as Buddhist chants) and distance-learning courses in hair styling (from chief sponsor Farouk Systems) and running spigots of advertorials for Las Vegas attractions (Sushisamba! Minus 5!), the high solemnities of the 2010 Miss Universe competition were prosecuted efficiently and relentlessly and, yes, joylessly.</p><p>Do you remember when beauty pageants were entertainment? A hoot and a holler and a half? Gay men crowded around the TV set with their boy and girl pals and laughed at all those fire jugglers and hula dancers and rhythmic gymnasts and all the glib horrors that came tumbling from their cherry-red mouths, and look, there WAS Bert Parks dragging his ponderous ass down the Atlantic City runway, and we could laugh because it was our game, too. We were in on it, living in the same gap between aspiration and reality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/miss_universe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/miss_universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Role Models&#8221;: Filth king John Waters dishes the dirt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/06/john_waters_role_models/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/06/john_waters_role_models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2010/06/06/john_waters_role_models</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film legend and memoirist on his fight for a Manson family member and why reality TV is the worst kind of bad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the most disorienting thing about meeting John Waters in person is realizing what an old-school gentleman he is. The kind who gives your hand a courtly shake, fetches tea for you, and never lets on that this is his gajillionth interview of the day. By now, the self-proclaimed king of puke has earned the right to be a book-tour paragon. Which makes it fitting that his new essay collection, "<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=9780374251475&amp;lkid=J30387533&amp;pubid=K238614">Role Models</a>," celebrates some of the paragons in his own life.</p><p>As you might expect from the director who brought us Odorama and Divine eating dog shit, these role models are a raffish lot: lesbian stripper moms, foul-mouthed barmaids, pornographers, perverts. Not to mention the occasional cult celebrity (including "Monster Mash" singer Bobby "Boris" Pickett and former child actress Patty McCormack, star of "The Bad Seed"). Loitering as always on the edges, Waters finds inspiration where others see squalor and makes provocative points about art and morality and the good life &#8212; without losing an ounce of his ironical cheer.</p><p>Salon spoke with Waters in Washington, D.C.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/06/john_waters_role_models/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/06/john_waters_role_models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My antidepressant gets harder to swallow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/is_my_lexapro_working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/is_my_lexapro_working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/04/05/is_my_lexapro_working</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As studies shed doubt on certain psychiatric drugs, I wonder: Do I really need my little white pill?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it every morning, right after I brush my teeth. A single white pill, with the letters F and L stamped on one side, the number 10 on the other. It's so small it nearly disappears into the folds of my palm. You could drop it in my orange juice or my breakfast cereal, and I'd swallow it without a hitch.</p><p>And, for the last three years, I have been swallowing my Lexapro -- and everything that comes along with it. And, apparently, I'm not alone.</p><p>Between 1996 and 2005, the number of Americans taking antidepressants doubled. According to the Centers for Disease Control, antidepressants are now the most commonly prescribed class of drugs in the U.S. -- ahead of drugs for cholesterol, blood pressure and asthma. Of the 2.4 billion drugs prescribed in 2005, 118 million were for depression. Whether the pills go by the name of Lexapro or Effexor or Prozac or Wellbutrin, we're downing them, to the tune of $9.6 billion a year, and we're doing it for a very good and simple reason. They're supposed to be making us better.</p><p>Which leaves a quite massive shoe waiting to drop. What if these costly, widely marketed, bewitchingly commonplace drugs really <em>aren't</em> fixing our brains?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/is_my_lexapro_working/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/is_my_lexapro_working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Edwards&#8217; scorned confidant spills</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/30/andrew_young_2020/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/30/andrew_young_2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2010/01/30/andrew_young_2020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["20/20" turns ex-aide Andrew Young's confessional into a hoary Victorian melodrama with a sex-tape finale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaker 1: "I love you. I really love you ... I will never abandon you."</p><p>Speaker 2: "I fell in love with him ... I truly believed that we were going to do great things, and he was my ticket to the top ... I became his sole confidant."</p><p>Given the crush of recent news coverage, you won't have any problem believing the first speaker is John Edwards. Your task now is to figure out the second speaker, who is also the person to whom he directed the aforementioned remarks. Is it:</p><p>A) Soon-to-be-ex-wife Elizabeth?</p><p>B) Mother of most recent child Rielle?</p><p>C) Disgraced ex-aide Andrew?</p><p>As anyone who sat through last night's "20/20" soft-pornathon can attest, the answer could very well have been A or B, but it is in fact C.</p><p>And maybe that's everything that need be said about the quasi-erotic and not-so-quasi-erotic ties that bind political leaders to the young men who champion them and sacrifice their egos for them and work 16 hours a day for them, and even their example pales alongside that of Andrew Young, who pretended to be the father of his boss's mistress's child despite already being the married dad of three kids. And who, to keep that deceit alive, actually dragged his family across the country with the mistress in tow and paparazzi snapping at their asses the whole way.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/30/andrew_young_2020/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/30/andrew_young_2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best &#8220;Christmas Carol&#8221; ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/25/christmas_carol_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/25/christmas_carol_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2009/12/24/christmas_carol</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Patrick Stewart, Alastair Sim and (please!) Jim Carrey. Nobody gets Dickens like George C. Scott]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's see. America is pulling out of a recession. The military-industrial complex is humming along. Healthcare is far from being reformed. We might as well pretend it's 1984.</p><p>And in that case, let's pause and pay due homage to a movie that many of us either missed or overlooked the first time around. A <em>television</em> movie, of all things, that through some convergence of inspired casting, rich production values, and deep but unfussy textual fidelity became the definitive version of a beloved literary classic.</p><p>Only we're just now figuring that out.</p><p>When you ask ardent Dickensians to name the best version of "A Christmas Carol," they will invariably close ranks around the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044008/">1951 Alastair Sim adaptation</a>. I was one of those partisans myself. I turned up my nose at Reginald Owen and Albert Finney, I scoffed at Michael Caine and Patrick Stewart, I rolled my eyes at the mere mention of Bill Murray and Kelsey Grammer, I resisted even the myopic charms of Mr. Magoo. It was Sim or nobody.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/25/christmas_carol_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/25/christmas_carol_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crying foul on Martina Navratilova</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tennis star's legal woes remind us that even gay icons have some growing up to do about same-sex marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A famous multimillionaire athlete falls in love. He invites his new girlfriend to live and travel with him; he registers hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of property and assets in her name; he lavishes her with gifts, assures her of his undying love and even goes so far as to marry her in a private ceremony. Eight years later, the athlete has cast his wife out of his life, denied her every financial claim and left her with little more than the clothes on her back.</p><p>Here&#8217;s a question. Would any court in the land deny this wife restitution? And in the court of public opinion, would anyone take the side of a husband so stingy and unfeeling?</p><p>Let us now switch the husband&#8217;s gender. He is now a she: a lesbian tennis star willing to use the legal system to extract herself from another unhappy relationship. This makes the case more complicated, to be sure, but it does nothing to alter the injustice. And, if anything, the outrage should be greater.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/29/martina_navratilova/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>158</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s secrets of success</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/17/gladwell_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/17/gladwell_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/11/17/gladwell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Gates and the Beatles owe their genius to nurture not nature, argues the acclaimed "Tipping Point" author. It's a nice theory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Consultants are people who borrow your watch and tell you what time it is," business executive Robert Townsend once said, "and then walk off with the watch."</p><p>Townsend didn't live long enough to witness the ascent of &#252;ber-consultant Malcolm Gladwell, who walks off with considerably more than a watch: $40,000 a speech, by most accounts, and an annual income in the neighborhood of $1 million. Buoyed by two runaway bestsellers, <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/books/review/2005/01/13/gladwell/index.html">"Blink"</a> and <a href="http://archive.salon.com/books/feature/2000/03/17/gladwell/index.html">"The Tipping Point,"</a> Gladwell has positioned himself as a roving ambassador between cultural and corporate America, penetrating boardrooms and living rooms, providing bullet points for cocktail parties and management seminars, and changing not just the things we talk about but the way we talk about them.</p><p>But in this new era of belt-tightening, everyone must expect some cost-benefit analysis, and so, in our best consultant-speak, we ask: How much value does Malcolm Gladwell really add?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/11/17/gladwell_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/17/gladwell_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8220;Scarface&#8221; is f-ing great</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/13/scarface/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/13/scarface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/11/13/scarface</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[De Palma's '80s cult classic is trash, many scoff. But the lowdown, seedy movie with Al Pacino as a Cuban thug influenced pop culture from gangsta rap to "Miami Vice."
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160; It's a tough mission that critic Ken Tucker has set himself in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FScarface-Nation-Ultimate-Gangster-Changed%2Fdp%2F0312330596&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"Scarface Nation"</a>: to apotheosize and assay and cogitate over a movie that ... is not very good. At all. At least not by the critical standards we grown-ups are supposed to apply to the film form. We're supposed to hoist our delicate noses in the air and point out that "The Godfather" saga and "The Sopranos" series are far more profound depictions of the mobster soul than this "Scarface" creature and that "The Wire" is an infinitely more complex study of crime's intersection with poverty and that pretty much everything accomplished by Brian de Palma's 1983 cult classic has been done more subtly, more thoughtfully, more humanely by someone else.</p><p>Oh, screw it: A quarter-century after its birth, "Scarface" lives on, for all its vulgarity. Or is it because of its vulgarity? "There is something unshakably low-down and seedy," writes Tucker, "disreputable and sneaky, about 'Scarface' as a piece of art, an antistatus that only adds to its pervasiveness and longevity."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/11/13/scarface/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/13/scarface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black presidents we have known</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/03/black_presidents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/03/black_presidents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2008/11/03/black_presidents</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does it look like to have an African-American in the White House? Pop culture has offered versions awful and great, from Sammy Davis Jr. to Chris Rock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Barack Obama wins Tuesday, he might begin his victory speech by thanking Dennis Haysbert.</p><p>At least Dennis Haysbert seems to think so. Months ago, he declared that his portrayal of a black president on Fox's "24" series had paved the way for the real-life senator from Illinois. "If anything, my portrayal of David Palmer, I think, may have helped open the eyes of the American people. And I mean the American people from across the board -- from the poorest to the richest, every color and creed, every religious base -- to prove the possibility there could be an African-American president, a female president, any type of president that puts the people first."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/11/03/black_presidents/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/03/black_presidents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Payback&#8217;s a bitch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/payback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/payback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/10/28/payback</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Margaret Atwood talks about the perils of debt -- and imagines a utopian future without greed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If nothing else, Margaret Atwood has a gift for timing. Her 1986 futuristic dystopia, "The Handmaid's Tale," arrived at the precise cultural moment when theocracy was starting to look scarier than nuclear holocaust. And her latest work, a book-length essay called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FPayback-Debt-Shadow-Side-Wealth%2Fdp%2Fproduct-description%2F0887848001&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"Payback: Debt and the Shadow Side of Wealth</a>," comes just as Wall Street is undergoing a holocaust of its own. While the recent bailouts have come too late to figure in Atwood's analysis, they loom large over anyone reading it, and they impart a sheen of black humor to Atwood's poker-faced thesis: "A great many people are spending more than they're earning. So are a great many national governments."</p><p>To put numbers on it: As of 2004, U.S. citizens were carrying, on average, 14 percent more debt than income; as of last month, the U.S. government owed China something on the order of $1.3 trillion; as of, well, now, the total amount of our national debt is more than $10 trillion. So maybe the time has come, as Atwood suggests, to examine "debt as a human construct ... that peculiar nexus where money, narrative or story, and religious belief intersect, often with explosive force."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/payback/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/payback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If McCain wins, should we all move to Scandinavia?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/22/zuckerman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/22/zuckerman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/10/22/zuckerman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine a land where presidents don't sprinkle holy water on wars, citizens have good healthcare and governments care about the environment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine the unimaginable: Todd Palin picking out curtain patterns for the vice-presidential mansion. In such an eventuality, whither shall we flee?</p><p>Four years ago, Democrats made a lot of noise about <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/11/04/canada/">Canada</a>, but as political statements go, there's not much sting to "I'm so mad at America I'm going to move a few degrees of latitude northward." Tina Fey has suggested we leave Earth altogether, but at the risk of reviving a discredited rubric, I'd like to propose a "third way." Actually, I'll let sociologist Phil Zuckerman propose it. In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSociety-without-God-Religious-Contentment%2Fdp%2F0814797148%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1224624985%26sr%3D1-1&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment,"</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=saloncom08-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" style="border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" width="1" /> he tells of a magical land where life expectancy is high and infant mortality low, where wealth is spread and genders live in equity, where happy, fish-fed citizens score high in every quality-of-life index: economic competitiveness, healthcare, environmental protection, lack of corruption, educational investment, technological literacy ... well, you get the idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/22/zuckerman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/22/zuckerman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>289</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Wettest County in the World&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/08/bondurant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/08/bondurant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/must_read/2008/10/08/bondurant</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bootlegging brothers, get-rich-quick schemes and a sensational murder trial make "The Wettest County in the World" a riveting read.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Sherwood Anderson, your time has come. Again. </p><p> Last month, Philip Roth's novella, "Indignation," created a WASP bastion named Winesburg College in your honor. This month, you're a flesh-and-blood fictional character. In the opening pages of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FWettest-County-World-Novel-Based%2Fdp%2F1416561390%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1223396511%26sr%3D1-1&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325 ">"The Wettest County in the World,"</a> you've come to southwestern Virginia to revive a flagging career. Old prot&eacute;g&eacute;s like Hemingway and Faulkner have turned on you; your dreams of starting a "rustic literary salon" have come to naught; the two local newspapers you're editing have sucked away your life force; and you live in the shadow of a "nameless terror … some great thing, swaying, descending." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/08/bondurant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/08/bondurant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A nation of conspiracy theorists can&#8217;t be wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/02/counterknowledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/02/counterknowledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/10/02/counterknowledge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From miracle diets to creationism to rumors about the origins of 9/11, a new book traces our irrational love of misinformation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The U.S. government blew up the twin towers. The AIDS virus was engineered by scientists to kill African-Americans. Chinese explorers landed on American shores in 1421. Crystals will heal you. Aliens landed at Roswell. The Priory of Sion is protecting the secrets of the Messianic bloodline. Barack Obama is a Muslim. </p><p> If you believe any of those propositions, you are ... well, let's tack toward charity. You have been swept along in a tide that the British polemicist Damian Thompson likes to call <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FCounterknowledge-Damian-Thompson%2Fdp%2F1843546752&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"Counterknowledge."</a> Moreover, you are legion. Millions of unwary souls from every quadrant of Earth are swallowing a daily diet of quackery, conspiracy theory, bogus history and faux science. We haven't just turned off our bullshit detectors, we've permanently disabled them. And in so doing, Thompson argues, we've made for ourselves "a thrilling universe in which Atlantis is buried underneath the Antarctic, the Ark of the Covenant is hidden in Ethiopia, aliens have manipulated our DNA, and there was once a civilization on Mars." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/02/counterknowledge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/02/counterknowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philip Roth&#8217;s Jewish question</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/16/roth_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/16/roth_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/09/16/roth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his affecting new book, Roth's young hero abandons his Jewish upbringing for life in small town Ohio.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/books/review/2004/09/29/roth/index.html">"The Plot Against America,"</a> Philip Roth imagined an alternative WW2-era USA in which President Charles Lindbergh launches a pogrom against Jewish citizens. In the author's latest novel, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FIndignation-Philip-Roth%2Fdp%2F054705484X%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1221510425%26sr%3D1-1&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"Indignation,"</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=saloncom08-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> he has imagined an alternative Philip Roth: a young Jewish man who leaves Newark, N.J., in 1951 not for literary glory, as Roth did, but for a series of zero-sum face-offs with the WASP power establishment. In each book, the message is the same: Assimilation may at any moment be reversed. If it can ever be achieved. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/16/roth_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/16/roth_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So much misery, so little time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/05/trachtenberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/05/trachtenberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earthquakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/09/05/trachtenberg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Trachtenberg took a tour around the world in his quest to understand why some people are crushed by suffering and others are transformed by it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Nov. 1, 1755, Catholics gathered across Lisbon, Portugal, to celebrate All Saints Day. Before they had finished Mass, a massive earthquake had brought the cathedral walls down on them. When the rubble was cleared, some 30,000 of the faithful lay dead. In the ensuing months, French clergy, seeking to reassure their own flocks, fell back on a tried-and-true explanation: Lisbon had been punished for its sins. This so enraged the great skeptic Voltaire that he wrote first a furious poem -- "O'er this ghastly chaos you would say/ The ills of each make up the good of all!" -- and then "Candide," a comic tale that lays waste to the notion of a benign universe. </p><p> Voltaire did at least have one thing in common with the clerics he loathed: He had been shocked into the contemplation of suffering. And it doesn't necessarily require an earthquake. For essayist Peter Trachtenberg, it was simply the experience of watching his friend Linda succumb to autoimmune disease and cancer. "She was good in all the ways I wasn't," he writes in his searching and often searing <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FBook-Calamities-Questions-Suffering-Meaning%2Fdp%2F0316158798&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"The Book of Calamities</a>." "She was temperate and loyal; she loved her family. She was good to me. It's quite likely that I owed her my life, though in all the years I knew her, she never reminded me of my debt to her." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/05/trachtenberg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/09/05/trachtenberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A fraud&#8217;s life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/forgery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/forgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/08/14/forgery</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can great art spring from a lie? Two new books about forgers raise provocative questions about the links between authenticity and genius.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All artists begin as forgers. They hear a chord progression, they see light splash on a canvas, they feel the pull of someone's sentences ... they fall in love. And it becomes the most natural thing in the world to write or draw or compose like the objects of their devotion. </p><p> Traditionally, this rite of passage is understood to be both necessary and necessarily brief. Growing up in the early years of the 20th century, for instance, a young painter like Han van Meegeren was expected to mimic the old masters as closely as possible, but only so that he could absorb their accomplishments and, one day, surpass them. What van Meegeren eventually realized -- to his chagrin, probably -- was that he was a much better artist when painting as someone else. So began one of the most audacious careers in the annals of art fraud, a journey superbly etched by Jonathan Lopez in his absorbing history <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FMan-Who-Made-Vermeers-Unvarnishing%2Fdp%2F0151013411&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"The Man Who Made Vermeers</a>." Taken together with Lee Israel's eccentric affidavit-memoir, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FCan-You-Ever-Forgive-Me%2Fdp%2F1416588671%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1218653005%26sr%3D1-1&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"Can You Ever Forgive Me?</a>" the book raises provocative questions about the links between authenticity and art. Is the "true" better than the "false"? Can art ever spring from a lie? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/forgery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/forgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1960s&#8217; gayest show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/wild_wild_west/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/wild_wild_west/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-viewed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2008/08/12/wild_wild_west</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a kid, "The Wild Wild West" taught me about sexiness and desire -- and how two men could live together and love each other.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"West. James West." </p><p> That three-word introduction in the pilot episode nicely spells out the Ian-Fleming-on-the-range conception behind <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FWild-West-Fourth-Season%2Fdp%2FB00105307O%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1218119240%26sr%3D8-1&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"The Wild Wild West</a>." The show -- which ran on CBS from 1965 to 1969 -- melded the then declining western form to the ascendant spy thriller, and then added some buddy-movie dynamics, a healthy dose of political intrigue and generous helpings of science fiction. The result was ... well, a mess sometimes, to judge from the DVD release of the show's fourth and final season. But at its best -- which is to say, in its earlier seasons -- "The Wild Wild West" stands as one of the most intriguing and literate actioners of '60s TV. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/wild_wild_west/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/wild_wild_west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forging the missing case for war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/06/suskind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/06/suskind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/08/06/suskind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In further chronicles of Bush government deceit, author Ron Suskind drops a bombshell: The White House ordered the CIA to fake a letter linking Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Suskind is really good at burying a lede. </p><p> Diligent, linear-minded readers will have to ford through 370 pages of his alternately incisive and gauzy book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FWay-World-Story-Truth-Extremism%2Fdp%2F0061430625%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1217977359%26sr%3D1-4&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism,"</a> to reach the accusation that has set the nation's blogs abuzz. In September 2003, according to Suskind, CIA officials -- at the direct command of then-CIA director George Tenet and at the behest of the White House -- deliberately forged a backdated letter from Iraqi security chief Tahir Jalil Habbush to Saddam Hussein. The phony letter claimed that 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta had trained for his mission in Iraq and that al-Qaida had facilitated mysterious shipments from Niger to Iraq. The letter was the "slam dunk" the Bush administration had been seeking so desperately: evidence of a direct operational link between al-Qaida and Saddam's regime. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/06/suskind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/06/suskind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

