<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lydia Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/lydia_lee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spend shamelessly.com</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/eluxury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/eluxury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/business/feature/2000/07/10/eluxury</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LVMH quietly launches Eluxury.com, but will anyone buy a $17,000 watch on the Web?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he gluttonous orgy that was the e-commerce revolution may have finally come to an end, but that hasn't stopped <a target="new" href="http://www.eluxury.com">Eluxury.com</a> from swaggering into the soiree. </p><p> As high-profile guests drop like flies from the Web party, France's <a target="new" href="http://www.lvmh.com/">LVMH</a> (aka Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessey, parent company of such gilded names as TAG Heuer, Celine and Sephora) is boldly moving ahead in the flashiest of frocks. Its latest venture? Convincing the moneyed class to buy luxury goods the new-fashioned way: online. </p><p> Don't expect the Parisian luxury purveyor to make a splash -- at least not yet. Eluxury.com launched late last month, but LVMH won't begin marketing it until the fall. Nevertheless, the site now hawks a wide range of designer items with eye-popping price tags. Why the soft launch? Perhaps amid the doom and gloom, LVMH understands that selling $17,000 Bulgari watches, $900 Louis Vuitton pooch carriers or $100 La Perla undies may be seen as a little tactless. </p><p> But market faux pas or not, this is no nouveau riche VC experiment. Through Eluxury.com, LVMH plans to aggressively showcase and sell the latest collections of its key brands, including Vuitton, Christian Dior and Givenchy, to name a few. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/eluxury/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/10/eluxury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raging youths tune in to aging soaps</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/22/daytime_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/22/daytime_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2000 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/business/buzz/2000/05/22/daytime_tv</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Hottie and Trouble pull in the ratings for daytime TV?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new" href="http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB958954086872376289.htm"><b>Fed up with fish</b></a><br />
<br>Fish and chips franchiser Arthur Treacher's has traded in its deep fryers to start a new chips business -- the computer kind, says the Wall Street Journal. By changing its name to Digital Creative Development Corp., the company is reinventing itself as a Web site development firm. Ralph Sorrentino, who was tapped to launch the digital business, admits the transformation seemed odd at first, but says he then realized the publicly traded fast-food purveyor provided a "pretty clean shell."</p><p><a target="new"><b>Mossimo's flames flickering out?</b></a><br />
<br>Three creditors that say they're owed $650,000 have filed a petition to liquidate the sportswear company, reports the New York Post. The New York Stock Exchange halted trading in the trendy fashion house after the filing was disclosed and may delist it permanently. Shareholders already seem to have written off the company; it began the year at $8 a share but was at 88 cents until the trading halt. Mossimo plans to lay off 90 percent of its employees and close its Los Angeles store.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/22/daytime_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/22/daytime_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boo hoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/18/boo_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/18/boo_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/05/18/boo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over-the-top design and a burn rate of $120 million in six months force the achingly hip fashion retail site to give up the ghost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he fashion retail site Boo.com was laid to rest Wednesday, after reportedly burning through $120 million in a mere six months. The Web's first immersive retail environment had its own online guide (Miss Boo), its own online magazine (Boom) and some of the hippest clothing brands. But it was wildy overdesigned, difficult to navigate and completely out of touch with most Web retailers' vision of quick shopping and ease of use.</p><p>Shoppers and analysts alike found Boo overly ambitious and few were surprised by <a target="new" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_618000/618808.stm">staff cuts</a> announced in January. Still, the death of this short-lived, high-profile venture marks Europe's first major dot-com failure. With big-name backers like Benetton and Bernard Arnault, the famed chairman of Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy, Boo.com was one of the most publicized e-commerce efforts.</p><p>According to a <a target="new" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_752000/752293.stm">BBC report,</a> a last-ditch effort to secure another $30 million failed, and while the site was growing, it wasn't getting enough orders to make up the vast sums already spent starting the company. So, some 300 people were reportedly clearing out their desks Wednesday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/18/boo_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/18/boo_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam virgin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/sacrificial_spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/sacrificial_spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/04/18/sacrificial_spam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which we offer up sacrificial e-mail addresses and are spurned by the bulk e-mailing gods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>H</b>ow long does it take a fresh new e-mail address to get spam? We decided to find out by creating a fictitious new Salon staffer, Wallis Sanford (a nod, of course, to the once notorious Spam King <a target="new" href="http://www.annonline.com/interviews/970522/biography.html">Sanford Wallace</a>). We wanted our new "junior staff writer" to live life dangerously on the Web and see how quickly he fell victim to spammers. So we set him up with new accounts on America Online and Hotmail. We also set up a Geocities home page, posted a question on Usenet, and put him on the Salon <a href="/contact/staff">masthead</a> -- in each case, listing a separate Salon e-mail address set up expressly to collect spam. Then we sat back and waited to see which of the five lures would get the first bite.</p><p>It didn't take long for an e-mail address to get hit on by a bulk e-mailer. After four days, an unsolicited commercial e-mail made its way to the address listed on the masthead. The message touted "the all new exclusive Y2K highly targeted e-mail address CD volume #7!" And to make doubly sure that Wallis didn't miss his chance to buy one of the 27 remaining CDs, the spammer sent two copies of the same e-mail. We got spam!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/sacrificial_spam/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/sacrificial_spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasty spam?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/brondmo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/brondmo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/view/2000/04/17/brondmo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If companies served up e-mail right, consumers would beg for it, says Hans Peter Br]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P</b>ost Communications sends out millions of e-mails each week, for Web retailers like Petopia and CDNow. You might consider these commercial solicitations just another form of spam, contributions to the deluge of "get rich quick" missives, pornographic solicitations and other motley messages that fill e-mail boxes everywhere.</p><p>But talk to Hans Peter Brxndmo, 37, founder and chairman of Post Communications, and you might be persuaded that this e-mail is a great service to you. Brxndmo may be an e-mail marketer, but he's as passionately anti-spam as any frustrated user could be. "Spam is unsolicited, unwanted, unexpected and soon to be unlawful e-mail," says Brxndmo. "What we do is help companies establish communications with existing customers -- everyone has signed up and given permission for the company to communicate with them." But even legitimate companies, Brxndmo adds, send too many e-mails." If companies keep sending users so much mail, then users will stop responding, just as they stopped clicking on banner ads."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/brondmo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/brondmo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A vote for Bill is a vote for more (dollar) bills</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/10/microsoft_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/10/microsoft_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/04/10/microsoft_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is on the campaign trail, hustling for a better public opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P</b>residential campaigning is on hiatus until later this year, but that isn't stopping some people who've got plenty of money in their coffers from getting up close and personal with TV-watching Americans. "Twenty-five years ago, my friends and I started with nothing but an idea -- that we could harness the power of the PC to improve people's lives," says Bill Gates in his high-pitched nasal voice, as acoustic guitar plays gently in the background. For 30 seconds, the richest man in the world makes an unspecified appeal to the American people, an unspecified appeal whose message is readily apparent to most anyone who has seen the new TV commercial.</p><p>When Gates, dressed in a conservative dark sweater, says "Since then, [the PC has] become a tool that has transformed our economy and had a profound effect on how we live and how our children learn," he may as well be saying, "Look what I've done to transform our economy. A vote for Microsoft is a vote for a strong economy." Gates doesn't go so far as to say to write to our congressperson and tell them to call off the Justice Department hounds, but it wouldn't feel out of place here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/10/microsoft_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/10/microsoft_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#039;re here, we&#039;re queer, we&#039;re media moguls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/planetout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/planetout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/view/2000/04/03/planetout</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is PlanetOut CEO Megan Smith building the gay and lesbian AOL Time Warner?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he gay and lesbian portal site <a target="new" href="http://www.planetout.com">PlanetOut</a> announced about 10 days ago its intention to merge with Liberation Publications, publisher of two of the gay community's leading print magazines: Advocate and Out. The deal will not only make the five-year-old Internet company one of the biggest players in gay media, but yet another experiment in combining "real world" media with online companies, a la <a href="/tech/col/rose/2000/01/14/aol_deal/index.html">America Online Time Warner.</a></p><p>PlanetOut, under the direction of CEO Megan Smith, already serves up daily news, an Internet radio show called "Homophonic" and numerous discussion boards and chat rooms to its 485,000 registered members. It also runs the gay and lesbian sections of AOL (which owns a stake in PlanetOut) and several major portals including Yahoo, Netscape and Lycos. A mechanical engineer by training, Smith, 35, did a stint at MIT's Media Lab and led product development at the pioneering handheld computing firm General Magic before joining PlanetOut in 1996.</p><p><b>PlanetOut just announced a merger with Liberation Publications, publisher of Advocate and Out magazines. What are your plans? </b></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/planetout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/planetout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge to Microsoft: Guilty!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/microsoft_ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/microsoft_ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2000 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/04/03/microsoft_ruling</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Penfield Jackson slams Microsoft for abuses of monopoly power.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>G</b>uilty, guilty, guilty. Pulling no punches, U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled on Monday that Microsoft had abused its monopoly power and was guilty of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.</p><p>"The Court concludes that Microsoft maintained its monopoly power by anti-competitive means and attempted to monopolize the Web browser market," declared Jackson in his "findings of law." "Microsoft placed an oppressive thumb on the scale of competitive fortune, thereby effectively guaranteeing its continued dominance in the relevant market. More broadly, Microsoft's anti-competitive actions trammeled the competitive process through which the computer software industry generally stimulates innovation and conduces to the optimum benefit of consumers."</p><p>Specifically, Jackson determined that Microsoft violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by unlawfully "tying" its Web browser to its operating system, and by a series of other anti-competitive acts that included foregoing millions of dollars in revenue through its practice of giving away the browser for free, and applying extreme pressure on Internet service providers and hardware retailers. Jackson also declared that Microsoft's creation of a version of the Java programming language incompatible with Sun Microsystems' Java fit into the same pattern of abusive practices.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/microsoft_ruling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/03/microsoft_ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vote naked in the privacy of your own home!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/election_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/election_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/view/2000/03/20/election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Arizona Democrats cast online ballots in the primary, Election.com CEO Joe Mohen patrolled the virtual booths for illegal hanky-panky.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>J</b>ust over a week ago, almost half the Arizona Democrats voting in their state's presidential primary skipped the voting booth and clicked on their candidate of choice. These were historic mouse clicks; it was the first time Americans have been able to vote online in an official election.</p><p>The nearly 39,943 online votes (of a total of 85,970) relied on the technology of Election.com, a Garden City, N.Y., firm that set up the online polls and worked to ensure that there was no virtual ballot-box stuffing, no ballots cast by the dead, no <a href="/tech/col/rose/2000/02/10/web_attacks/index.html">denial-of-service</a> attacks. A for-profit company, <a target="new" href="http://www.election.com">Election.com</a> was started in February 1999 (it was called Votation then) to run online elections for private companies as well as the government.</p><p>CEO Joe Mohen, 43, previously founded a networking software company called Proginet. But in his spare time, he did a lot of civic volunteering and organized elections for the school board, the village mayor and other local offices -- doing everything from finding polling places to renting machines. He says all that election grunt work "wasn't my passion," so he created a smoother system with Election.com, hoping to spare others the headaches.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/election_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/election_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#039;t shoot that iMac!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/imac_attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/imac_attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/03/20/imac_attack</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online reviewers convince Epinions not to run a TV ad featuring a Mac being blown to smithereens by a PC lover.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<b>W</b>ould you really want to buy a computer based on its color?" says Jay, before unleashing another round at a stricken iMac, hung up like a paper target at a shooting gallery. The iMac takes four bullets and some heavy criticism in a <a target="new" href="http://www.epinions.com/tvad-iMac">TV ad</a> for the Epinions <a href="/tech/log/1999/09/13/epinions/index.html"> consumer ratings</a> site -- an ad that'll never make it to your TV.</p><p>Epinions doesn't seem afraid of controversy. Other cinema viriti-style <a target="new" href="http://www.epinions.com/tvad">ads</a> it plans to air include a woman demonstrating a mechanical breast pump on her own breast and a snowboarder trying to break into a skier-only resort. The ads, which started airing last week, star regular-Joe consumers who wrote provocative reviews on the Epinions site, and caught the eye of Goodby, Silverstein and Partners, the San Francisco advertising agency who brought us the "Got Milk?" campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/imac_attack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/20/imac_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The privacy police?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/13/truste_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/13/truste_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/view/2000/03/13/truste</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TRUSTe CEO Bob Lewin explains how even sites selling personal data can get the nonprofit&#039;s privacy seal of approval.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen TRUSTe launched in 1996, the nonprofit promised to help the Internet industry regulate itself with regard to protecting surfers' privacy. Over the past three years, it has vetted the privacy policies of over 1,300 sites, and its black-and-green logo, which signals to visitors that a site actually abides by its policies, can be found on most major e-commerce sites. But what kind of teeth does the organization really have?</p><p>TRUSTe didn't look so trusty last year when a security expert found that its licensee RealNetworks had been collecting user information <a href="/tech/log/1999/11/09/truste/index.html">on the<br />
sly.</a> Instead of reprimanding the company, the nonprofit argued that because RealNetworks' privacy violations took place via its RealJukebox software, not its Web site, the incident was outside the purview of TRUSTe. More recently, it's been other privacy advocacy groups like <a target="new" href="http://www.junkbusters.com">JunkBusters</a> that have alerted the public to privacy violations such as Intel's decision to include <a target="new" href="http://www.junkbusters.com/ht/en/intel.html">an identifier</a> in its Pentium III chip; JunkBusters also started a campaign <a target="new" href="http://www.junkbusters.com/ht/en/doubleclick.html">against</a> DoubleClick's acquistion of Abacus when it was announced last June.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/13/truste_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/13/truste_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Opt-in rules!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/moore_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/moore_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/view/2000/03/06/moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does 24/7 Media CEO David Moore target ads without raising the ire of privacy activists? He asks permission.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen online advertising giant DoubleClick suggested last month that it would merge its database of anonymous Web surfing habits with a database of names and other personal information it had recently acquired, it unleashed a firestorm. Privacy activists protested, the Electronic Privacy Information Group filed a lawsuit and the Federal Trade Commission opened an investigation. On Thursday, DoubleClick began back-pedalling furiously, and CEO Kevin O'Connor admitted the plan was <a target="new" href="http://www.doubleclick.com/company_info/press_kit/pr.00.03.02.htm">a mistake.</a></p><p>But competitor <a target="new" href="http://www.247media.com/" />24/7 Media</a> already has a database of about 20 million people's names and personal spending habits, which it sells to advertisers. And it hasn't provoked the suspicions of the FTC.  David Moore, the president and CEO of 24/7, says the key to avoiding trouble is asking permission. 24/7 Media's information is based on opt-in marketing, and Moore, 47, who got his start in advertising selling ads for Turner Broadcasting and  Lifetime Television Network, says his goal is to get everyone with an e-mail address to agree to receiving targeted e-mail and ads.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/moore_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/moore_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Bouncer is watching you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/biometrics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/biometrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/03/02/biometrics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biometric smart-card scanners are keeping undesirable elements out of Dutch clubs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>o get into the <a target="new" href="http://www.alcazar.nl">Alcazar Pleasure Village</a>, a nightclub in the Netherlands, you'll have to make it past more than just a velvet rope. A vigilant "cyber-bouncer" will scan your fingerprint and face, refusing to let you in if you're a known troublemaker or waving you through if your file comes up clean.</p><p>Alcazar and 14 other Dutch clubs are installing biometric smart-card scanners to ensure that whoever is working the door will know who's been naughty and who's been nice. The biometric ID technology was created by <a target="new" href="http://www.keyware.com">Keyware Technologies,</a> which expects that the clubs will not only use the cards to identify patrons, but to store data such as the frequency with which patrons visit -- offering, in return, "disco dollars" or other frequent flyer-like promotions redeemable for drinks or a free coat check.</p><p>"A small number of individuals can wreak havoc on the atmosphere at a nightclub, destroying the fun that most attendees seek," says a Keyware <a target="new" href="http://www.keyware.com/600_news/press_releases/interstrat2.html">press release.</a> "By implementing Keyware's cutting-edge identification system, nightclub owners will be able to prevent the problems caused by unruly patrons and provide a safer and more enjoyable environment for all."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/biometrics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/biometrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux in every lap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/eazel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/eazel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/02/24/eazel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stars of the original Mac development team try to solve one of the hottest puzzles in technology today: How to make the Linux desktop user-friendly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>cross from a small sea of cubicles in a Palo Alto office, a photographer tries to corral the Eazel executive team into a makeshift conference room for a press photo. CEO Mike Boich is late; he's busy working on a second round of financing. The company logo is ready -- a yellow "Eaze" with a teal "l" -- but there are still no company shirts, so Andy Hertzfeld strolls over promoting the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art on his T-shirt. Bart Decrem and Stan Christensen are polishing off a late lunch on the last weekday before the company's official launch.</p><p>It's an enticingly chaotic scene that the Eazel founders have acted out before -- several as seminal members of the original Apple Macintosh development team. This time around, these ace programmers and business folks are set on a new "Let's change the world" course: to build a user-friendly desktop for Linux-based operating systems and to make managing the notoriously tricky Linux a breeze.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/eazel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/24/eazel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much for that doggie in the dot-com ad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/sock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/sock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/02/14/sock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pets.com auctions off its mascot, a singing sock puppet-pooch, raising some serious cash for charity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hat's a singing dog worth? Well, $20,100 if an auction held last week on Amazon.com is any measure. Pets.com put its mascot, a sock puppet <a target="new" href="http://www.pets.com/cgi-bin/puppy/products/category_home.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=YES&amp;oid=-12422&amp;animal=Puppet">masquerading</a> as a pooch, on the block to raise money for its charity, Pets.commitment. The allure of the furless critter attracted dozens of bidders, including at least one member of the pet supply site's staff.</p><p>"If it was mine, I'd pierce its tongue -- my tongue is pierced," says Debra Chang, who works in Pets.com's order processing department. "Then I'd create a Web site for it and put up pictures."  Unfortunately, her hopes were dashed when she came in third among 70 bidders -- with an offer of $14,500. "I was going to go for 25 [thousand dollars], but then I thought that might be a little more than I wanted to spend."</p><p>The winning bid belonged to Randall Smith, a computer contractor for the Environmental Protection Agency in San Francisco.  "It's not the type of thing I'd normally do, but I thought, let me buy a ticket on this ride and see where it goes," says Smith. He says he's no dot-com millionaire, just a "regular working guy" willing to give some spare cash to the charity that supports animal-loving organizations. "I'm single. I have nothing else to spend it on."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/sock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/14/sock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friends don&#039;t let friends use AOL</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/aol_friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/aol_friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/02/02/aol_friends</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve tried and failed to convince my boyfriend&#039;s father to "upgrade" to the wide-open Web.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hich would you rather be: Serf@aol.com or surf@earthlink.net?  I would have thought there was an easy answer to the question posed by EarthLink's latest advertising campaign. But I've learned better.</p><p>Back in 1996, I helped my boyfriend's father, Curt, get online -- by arranging a six-month subscription to AOL. We thought it would be an easy way to give him a taste of what the Net was like, and that he would quickly graduate to the wide-open Web. After all, Curt didn't know much about the Internet then, but he had had a home computer for ages and engaged in some distinctly non-newbie activities, like defragging his hard drive and editing his digital photos. Curt is a smart man, a retired executive who now teaches management courses at University of Michigan.  I figured it would be relatively simple to "upgrade" his Net connection after he got his feet wet. Boy, was I wrong.</p><p>I've learned from Curt and others like him that it's not just the stereotypical newbies who like AOL. Among AOL's 20 million subscribers there are some technically proficient people  who honestly prefer the proprietary network. It lets them log on from practically anywhere without long distance charges; it makes it easy for them to customize their view of the Internet and funnels right to them lots of  information they regularly go online to find.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/aol_friends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/aol_friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dot-cominator</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/26/sun_dot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/26/sun_dot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/01/26/sun_dot</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re going to dot-com yourself, Sun wants to help. That&#039;s just what its new ads are trying to say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t looks like an old "Jaws" movie poster, with a swimmer at the surface and<br />
a humongous, menacing -- wait, that's not a shark, it's a big dot lurking<br />
below. <a target="new" href="http://www.sun.com/thedot">"The Dot"</a> --<br />
with the teaser "Just when your competition thought it was safe to do<br />
business" -- is one of 10 new Sun Microsystems movie-poster spoofing ads,<br />
whose recent appearance in publications like the New Yorker, the Wall<br />
Street Journal and the New York Times is supposed to prime us for a $100<br />
million-plus ad blitz starting in February.</p><p>There is also the Java programming <a target="NEW" href="http://www.sun.com/UBERCODER">"Ubkrcoder:</a> The Man Who Can Build Anything." "That's right," reads the poster's fine print, "the ubkrcoder can build anything to run anywhere on any device, because the ubkrcoder has the power of the dot in .com." And then there's <a target="new" href="http://www.sun.com/biggerandbadder">E10000: Bigger and Badder,</a> featuring a  Sun server looming like the  Terminator -- "It's back, and it still means business." E10000: Bigger and Badder -- "a dot in dot-com production" is a big meanie: It "devours terabytes like appetizers, and your competition like the main course" and is rated "HC: For hard core capitalists only -- some material may not be suitable for squeamish bourgeoisie." ("The Dot is rated LB -- "lame business people strongly cautioned.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/26/sun_dot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/26/sun_dot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-book makers sold to a TV-centric company</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/ebooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/ebooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2000 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/01/19/ebooks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What will Gemstar International, a maker of VCR programming technology, do with SoftBook and NuvoMedia?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n a strange twist for the emerging electronic book field, the two leading e-book makers, <a target="new" href="http://www.nuvomedia.com">NuvoMedia</a>  and <a target="new" href="http://www.softbook.com/">SoftBook Press,</a> have  been acquired by Gemstar International, which only a few months ago acquired TV Guide. The all-stock deal was completed last week and announced on Tuesday.</p><p>The acquisitions are a little puzzling. Gemstar is certainly an  up-and-comer in the TV world. It's the maker of VCR Plus, or <a target="new" href="http://www.gemstar.co.uk/en/videoplus/intro.html">Video Plus,</a>  technology, which lets you record a TV show by entering a code rather than  navigating through your VCR menu. The new TV Guide owner is also a major provider of  interactive TV guides that let you browse cable programming. America Online  has licensed Gemstar technology for its upcoming <a target="new" href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-1516271.html?pt.salon">TV  service.</a></p><p>OK, but what's a TV-centric company going to do with digital books? The official line is that the acquisition is a straightforward attempt to  corral a new market before it really takes off.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/ebooks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/ebooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Net on AOL&#039;s Time Warner deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/11/aol_reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/11/aol_reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2000/01/11/aol_reaction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the new colossus change the Internet for better or worse?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>merica Online's surprise announcement Monday that it plans to <a href="/tech/col/rose/2000/01/10/aol_time/index.html">buy</a> media giant Time Warner for $166 billion in stock raised more than a few eyebrows in the Net community.</p><p>Old-time Net heads and Web business people quickly focused on the big issues raised by the big merger. Will independent voices still have room to thrive on an Internet increasingly dominated by huge corporations? Will this merger dumb down the Net? How open will this new-old media powerhouse make its content and its network? Will AOL-Time Warner -- or anyone -- figure out how to make broadband work?</p><p>We surveyed a number of geeks, new-media savants and technology critics to get their take on the century's biggest  mega-merger (at least so far). Here's what they had to say:</p><p><b>Martin Nisenholtz, CEO of Times Company Digital, the Internet unit of the New York Times Co.</b></p><p>It's great for those of us who go back to the earliest days of AOL, back when they were Quantum Link with a service that ran over 300-baud modems for Commodore computers. Who would have thought that they'd be taking over Time Warner?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/11/aol_reaction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/11/aol_reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No cooks in the kitchen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/10/cookexpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/10/cookexpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/01/10/cookexpress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CookExpress looks for funding after its gourmet meal-delivery service grinds to a halt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>D</b>arby Williams has one New Year's resolution: to get funding as soon as possible. His company, <a href="http://www.cookexpress.com" target="new">CookExpress,</a> which offered Web users "the return of the home-cooked meal," closed up shop right before Christmas.</p><p>"We have very little cash in the bank," said Williams, CookExpress's CEO. The San Francisco company burned through $3.5 million of private financing in the last two years, establishing a nationwide dinner delivery service, serving the fixings for pre-fab gourmet meals like lamb chops with Madeira sauce.</p><p>With the help of famous chefs like Bradley Ogden (of One Market in San Francisco), CookExpress adapted over 100 time-consuming recipes to create easy-to-use meal kits. Customers could place an order on the CookExpress Web site by 2 p.m., and before dinner time you could expect a package of pre-prepped ingredients. More than a step up from takeout, the kits offered meals such as pan-seared scallops, wild mushroom lasagna and butternut squash stew. (The only drawback was environmental: Every order involved lots of plastic bags and cardboard boxes.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/10/cookexpress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/10/cookexpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

