<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lynn Harris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/lynn_harris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Life with an STD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/women_living_with_stds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/women_living_with_stds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/01/17/women_living_with_stds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's it like to date? When do you have The Talk? Women open up about the common diseases that still carry stigma]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susie Carrillo was 21 years old and a mother of two young children when an abnormal Pap smear yielded a triple-whammy nightmare. She was shocked not only by a diagnosis of high-grade cervical dysplasia -- a serious precancerous condition -- but also by its apparent cause: human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually-transmitted infection (STI, more commonly known as STD, for sexually transmitted disease). A doctor had found it two years earlier but had largely dismissed it, saying, eh, it'll probably clear up on its own. With no warnings about the risks of cancer, or transmission, Carrillo says she "just didn't think about it" and told no one. And that's what led, in part, to the third and perhaps biggest whammy of all: her husband's reaction to the cause of her cancer. "He turned it into hell for me. He demanded to know how many people I'd slept with, accused me of cheating and called me a slut," she says. Even though Carrillo had never strayed &#8212; she believes she contracted HPV from a pre-marriage ex &#8212; her husband's abusive words began to infect her, too. "I started to wonder if maybe it <em>was</em> my fault," she says. Ashamed and embarrassed, she went through cancer treatment alone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/women_living_with_stds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/women_living_with_stds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MTV&#8217;s shockingly good abortion special</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/mtv_abortion_show_no_easy_choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/mtv_abortion_show_no_easy_choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2010/12/29/mtv_abortion_show_no_easy_choice</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The network that brought us "Teen Mom" tackles one of television's trickiest taboos. Amazingly, they nail it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can't you talk about on television? These days, not so much. But if there's one topic that, even amidst reality show ribaldry and talk show turpitude, remains (or has become) glaringly absent -- even bizarrely so, given how common it is in real life -- it's abortion.</p><p>Sure, "Friday Night Lights" did get massive <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072302432.html">kudos</a> last summer for its nuanced depiction of a Texas 10th-grader's decision to end a pregnancy. But that kind of thing basically hadn't happened since <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/ginia-bellafante-on-bea-arthur-maude-and-abortion/">"Maude."</a> Today, other than a handful of relatively tidy plot turns on "House," "Six Feet Under," "DeGrassi" and "South Park" (not to mention "Juno" and "Knocked Up," where "smashmortion" is ruled out in one or two perfunctory scenes) that's pretty much it. And, in fairness, that's all fiction.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/mtv_abortion_show_no_easy_choice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/29/mtv_abortion_show_no_easy_choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How to Meet European Men&#8221; lady speaks!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/26/katherine_cahoon_how_to_meet_european_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/26/katherine_cahoon_how_to_meet_european_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2010/11/26/katherine_cahoon_how_to_meet_european_men</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katherine Chloe Cahoon's dating advice made her a viral sensation. But is she for real? We talk to her to find out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A month after Katherine Chlo&#233; Cahoon's peppy promotional videos on "How to Meet European Men" went viral, obsessive <a href="http://www.urlesque.com/2010/10/22/is-katherine-chloe-cahoon-meeting-european-men-for-real/">debate</a> about her <a href="http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow/aroundthenet/72764/Turtle-Dirty-Talk-Liar-Card.html">continues</a>. <em>Is this girl for real?!</em></p><p>Why such confusion in the first place? Cahoon's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/KatherineChloeCahoon">series of videos</a>, based on the advice in her book, "<a href="http://%20http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Single-Girls-Guide-to-Meeting-European-Men/Katherine-Cahoon/e/9781608320585">The Single Girls' Guide To Meeting European Men</a>," are so hilariously perky yet wooden, so social-media-savvy yet dated, so mannered yet subtle, so "worldly" yet wide-eyed, that "parody" vs. "real" sides have been ferociously taken. (Video posted below.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/26/katherine_cahoon_how_to_meet_european_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/26/katherine_cahoon_how_to_meet_european_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is female-on-male violence on the rise?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/women_more_violent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/women_more_violent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/11/23/women_more_violent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Teen Mom's" Amber Portwood has turned a spotlight on women who hit. We take a closer look at the supposed trend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's getting harder to argue that MTV's hit show "Teen Mom" makes young motherhood look <a href="http://organizedwisdom.com/16-pregnant-and-famous-mtv-glamorizes-teen-moms/3300610/nxi/med">"glamorous."</a> Last week, Amber Portwood, arguably the most troubled of the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2010-11-23-teenmom22_CV_N.htm">four teenagers on "Teen Mom"</a>&#160;-- and online, the most ruthlessly trashed -- was <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/11/19/amber_portwood/index.html">charged</a> with three counts of domestic violence for several physical attacks on her oafish on-again-off-again fianc&#233; and daughter's father, Gary Shirley. Local authorities had launched an investigation approximately two months ago, CNN <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/11/18/teen.mom.charged/index.html">reports,</a> after Portwood was seen slapping, hitting, punching and kicking Gary while cameras rolled. Two of the three counts are felonies because Portwood's toddler daughter, Leah, was in the room when the incidents took place.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/women_more_violent/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/women_more_violent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nailing infertility with an ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/increase_your_chances_infertility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/increase_your_chances_infertility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/07/increase_your_chances_infertility</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, couples trying to conceive find understanding and comfort ... in a campaign by big pharma?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She's a bird. He's a bee. In other words, they do it. And yet, we soon find out, what "should" be the most "natural" thing in the world isn't happening: After a year and a half of doing it, there's still no, um, bird-bee baby on the way. She wings another negative test across the bathroom; he sneaks a peek at his package -- his <em>bee</em> package -- in the mirror, wondering if it's all his fault. She gamely acts as baby shower gift-note secretary, wondering, "Who has a baby shower on her fourth child, anyway?" They, in a failed attempt to "relax," play a joyless game of bird-bee Jenga.</p><p>Mr. and Mrs. Bird-Bee are actually "Neil and Karen," who are actually two very funny deadpan actors in giant goofy costumes. They're the stars of a series of five webisodes at the centerpiece of a new campaign designed to raise awareness about <a href="http://www.resolve.org/infertility-overview/what-is-infertility/">infertility,</a> one that nails the experience so knowingly and wittily that it's getting big love from the infertility community -- which is especially notable considering that, in fact, it's coming from big pharma. Sponsored, subtly (no, really), by EMD Serono -- Massachusetts-based maker of fertility drugs used to stimulate ovulation -- the <a href="http://increaseyourchances.org/">"Increase Your Chances"</a> campaign encourages couples to visit a specialist if they hit that fertility wall, and, more broadly, aims to change the way infertility is talked, or, more to the point, whispered about, in our culture. (Part of the campaign involves sending bird- and bee-clad actors onto the streets of small cities -- <a href="http://increaseyourchances.org/press/media/051110.html">two weeks ago, it was Austin</a> -- to "get couples talking about fertility issues.") The Web spots also close with key facts about infertility: One in eight couples struggles with it; it's about equally likely that fertility issues will stem from the male as the female partner; 85 to 90 percent of fertility issues are treatable; infertility -- "just relax," my ass -- has no correlation with stress. While scattered dissenters find the humor trivializing, most bloggers and commenters became big fans on sight, sending the videos to each other and also (as one poster <a href="http://forums.fertilitycommunity.com/intrauterine-insemination-iui/2020189726-increaseyourchances-org.html">wrote)</a> to "close (and fertile) friends who are trying to be supportive of me but who just don't quite understand what living with infertility is like."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/increase_your_chances_infertility/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/increase_your_chances_infertility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Female genital mutilation in the U.S.: No compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/fgm_genital_nick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/fgm_genital_nick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Female Mutilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/06/02/fgm_genital_nick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we can learn from the American Academy of Pediatrics' hasty reversal on "clitoral nicking"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pregnant woman, an immigrant to the United States from Somalia, is answering routine hospital inquiries about her plans for labor and delivery, including this: "If it's a boy, do you want him circumcised?"</p><p>"Yes," the woman replies. "And also if it's a girl."</p><p>How might a doctor respond? Female genital mutilation (as a matter of health policy, "circumcision" is considered a misnomer) has been a federal <a href="%3Ca">crime</a> since 1996, but we know it <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/01/24/fgm_in_america/index.html">happens</a> here, with an <a href="http://www.brighamandwomens.org/africanwomenscenter/research2.aspx">estimated</a> 228,000 American girls having undergone or being at risk of the procedure. If the doctor doesn't do it -- or do <em>something</em> -- someone else probably will, either here or in Somalia, as untold numbers of girls are also sent to their home countries for the procedure. (This, too, <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/04/27/female_genital_mutilation_bill">may soon become a federal crime</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/fgm_genital_nick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/fgm_genital_nick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there a better word than &#8220;pro-choice&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/pro_choice_versus_pro_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/pro_choice_versus_pro_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/01/pro_choice_versus_pro_freedom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By calling themselves "pro-life," abortion foes won the rhetorical war. Could "pro-freedom" win it back?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the&#160;<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-cohen-abortion-20100529,0,5336153.story">Washington Post,</a> political historian Nancy L. Cohen analyzes polling data (and "misleading media reporting abetted by partisan hype") to show that national opinion on abortion is more complex than folks like Sarah Palin, who cannot see nuance from her house, have recently made it out to be. Cohen draws this conclusion: "A majority of Americans do not want to see <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/abortion/">abortion</a> criminalized, but the nation is evenly divided between those who call themselves pro-life and those who call themselves pro-choice. Although abortion rights supporters can take heart that they retain the advantage on practical matters of law and policy, the antiabortion movement seems to be winning the framing war with its 'pro-life' label. It is this trend, not changing policy views, that the Gallup polls have picked up."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/pro_choice_versus_pro_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/pro_choice_versus_pro_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Roeder&#8217;s life sentence: What it means</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/scott_roeder_sentencing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/scott_roeder_sentencing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/01/scott_roeder_sentencing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slain abortion doctor George Tiller's closest colleague talks about the justice served -- and the challenges ahead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Roeder, 52, has been sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison for the 2009 assassination of late-term abortion provider George Tiller, M.D. The sentence was handed down Thursday by Judge Warren Wilbert at the end of a remarkable nine-hour hearing in which a self-righteous Roeder, shadowed by a burly bailiff, spoke unrepentantly in his own defense while the doctor's widow, Jeannie Tiller, sat <a href="http://twitter.com/rsylvester/status/11444423186">shaking her head "no."</a></p><p>Roeder had been convicted in January of first-degree murder for gunning Tiller down in his Wichita, Kan., church last May. The question remaining today was whether Roeder's mandatory life sentence would carry a minimum of 25 or 50 years before he would be eligible for parole. Prosecutors -- citing Roeder's longtime stalking of Tiller and assault of others in the aftermath of the shooting -- argued for the so-called hard 50. Determining that those aggravating factors were not outweighed by factors presented by Roeder and his counsel, the judge gave Roeder the maximum sentence.</p><p>Throwing the book at Roeder sends the clearest possible message that nothing -- not even his stated belief that his actions prevented the "murder" of millions more -- mitigates his crime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/scott_roeder_sentencing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/scott_roeder_sentencing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Godly discipline turned deadly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/no_greater_joy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/no_greater_joy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/02/22/no_greater_joy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial child "training" practice comes under fire -- this time from Christians themselves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four years ago this month, a 4-year-old boy named Sean Paddock died when his adoptive mother wrapped him in blankets so tightly that he couldn't breathe. His adoptive mother, Lynn Paddock, was later <a href="http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/3032232/">convicted</a> of his murder. The case brought some mainstream attention -- including <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2006/05/25/the_pearls/index.html">a 2006 Salon story</a> -- to the popular, pervasive and controversial <a href="http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/child-training/">child "training"</a> practices of Michael and Debi Pearl, which Lynn Paddock was said to have followed. The teachings of the Pearls and their Tennessee-based &#160;<a href="http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/">No Greater Joy</a> ministry, which brought in $1.8 million last year in <a href="http://shop.nogreaterjoy.org/">sales</a> of books, DVDs and the like, are widely known and normalized across many conservative Christian churches and home-schooling communities. Perhaps the most popular of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0764225634/104-0678577-6161524?n=283155">several</a> ultra-conservative Christian <a href="http://www.stoptherod.net/">figures</a> to carry forward this centuries-old strain of Christian thought, the Pearls advocate a specific program of even-tempered, non-injurious corporal punishment, or "chastisement," designed to bring about total obedience -- even by <a href="http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/articles/general-view/archive/2006/june/21/too-young-to-spank/">infants</a>&#160;-- to their sovereign parents. (The Pearls' ministry and principles are described in greater depth, and broader context, <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2006/05/25/the_pearls/index.html">here</a>.) By no means do the Pearls advocate suffocation with blankets; they are emphatically against <a href="http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/index.php?id=84&amp;cHash=8440f96b4a&amp;tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=89&amp;tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=12">"abuse." But they do not</a> <a href="http://www.exclassics.com/hudibras/hbii1.htm">spare the rod.</a> From their <a href="http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/articles/general-view/archive/2000/may/01/questions-answered/">Web site:</a> A length of <a href="http://www.usplastic.com/catalog/default.aspx?catid=728&amp;clickid=redirect">quarter-inch plumbing supply line</a> is a "real attention-getter."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/no_greater_joy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/no_greater_joy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our daughters should not be cut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/fgm_in_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/fgm_in_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Female Mutilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/01/24/fgm_in_america</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Female genital mutilation isn't just a problem in other countries. It's happening here, and we need to face it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FGM in the USA Some girls came back from this past winter break with Christmas loot, ski tans, still more to say about "Twilight: New Moon." But others, women's health experts suspect, came back with deep, and literal, wounds to heal. According to human rights advocates and service providers, families in the U.S. who have immigrated from countries where female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced often take their daughters home, when school is out, to be cut.</p><p>Yes, FGM is practiced -- or at least planned -- on U.S. soil, on girls in immigrant families who were born and/or raised here. Perhaps even among people you know: Not long ago, a concerned mother posted on my Brooklyn-area parenting list-serv that she believed an eight-year-old friend of her daughter's had undergone some form of the procedure in her home country in the Middle East (and appeared to be markedly traumatized). Archana Pyati, an asylum attorney for <a href="http://www.sanctuaryforfamilies.org/">Sanctuary for Families</a> in New York, has encountered dozens of FGM cases just in the past six months. "The majority of our African clients have been through it, and most often, they are fighting to protect their daughters," she says. (Older relatives with "seniority" often push for the procedure.) "It is our hope that by recognizing that FGM may be occurring under our noses we will become better able to respond to it, just as we would any other form of violence against children," she says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/fgm_in_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/fgm_in_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we ever win the abortion wars?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/abortion_dispatches_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/abortion_dispatches_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/01/22/abortion_dispatches_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fanatical fringe has hijacked medicine and wrought terror. But there is hope, says the author of a new book]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As jury selection continues in the Wichita, Kan., trial of Scott Roeder -- whose alleged murder of late-term abortion provider Dr. George Tiller was lauded by the extreme antiabortion group <a href="http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/06/abortion-doctor-killer-a-soldier-in-terrorist-army-of-god.html">Army of God</a> -- the title of sociologist and reproductive rights historian Carole Joffe's new book becomes all the more chillingly apt. In "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dispatches-Abortion-Wars-Fanaticism-Patients/dp/0807035025/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1264118430&amp;sr=8-1">Dispatches From the Abortion Wars</a>," Joffe shows that the battles over abortion rights in the United States are being "fought on numerous fronts": not only with guns, bombs and fire, and not only in <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/01/23/gag_rule/">foreign relations,</a> national politics and state legislatures.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/abortion_dispatches_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/abortion_dispatches_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late-night&#8217;s real problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/women_writers_late_night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/women_writers_late_night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/01/10/women_writers_late_night</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comedy writers -- male and female -- dish about the strange, men-only world of late-night TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we can agree on anything following the week of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch/2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc/index.html">big Leno-Conan shakeup</a>, it's that late-night these days is, well, kind of lame. Leno moving to 11:30? That's like getting back together with the dumb boyfriend you finally dumped last year. There are so many weak links -- corporate meddling, dwindling viewership, multimedia competition, a spectacularly un-21st-century monopoly of male hosts -- that there's no one quick fix. But those hoping to try <em>something</em> new might heed the advice of former David Letterman scribe and sitcom veteran Nell Scovell, who, in the wake of the Letterman sex scandal last year, made a <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/features/2009/10/david-letterman-200910">convincing case on VanityFair.com</a> for improving late-night comedy. Her bold, call-me-crazy, whacked-out suggestion? Hire more women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/women_writers_late_night/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/women_writers_late_night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everybody hates mommy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/mommy_hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/mommy_hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/11/22/mommy_hate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're "stroller Nazis." We're whiny "breeders." Why is there so much contempt for mothers these days?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I heard about Maclaren's recent <a href="http://recall.maclaren.us/">recall</a> of one kabillion strollers, I assumed Gawker.com was playing an elaborate prank on Brooklyn's Park Slope neighborhood. After all, the online snarkosphere has made <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/fashion/18slope.html">urban blood sport</a> of mocking the Slope's (exaggerated) reputation as New York's -- if not the planet's -- epicenter of &#252;ber-coddled children with aggro-attachment parents plowing their pricey, bulky baby buggies along the sidewalks like tricked-out cattle prods.</p><p>Thing is, that derision is not only about Park Slope, and it's not only about strollers, which have somehow become synecdoche for the perceived ills of indulgent parenting everywhere. And it's not only about "parenting," either. No, I am telling you, it's about mothers. (White mothers, generally, and usually urban ones -- if in part because they're out and about on sidewalks and subways, not cloistered in carpools and playrooms.) You know them, or at least their epithets: "Stroller moms," the "stroller mafia," the particularly objectionable "stroller <em>Nazis</em>" -- and while we're at it, the "helicopter moms" and "sanctimommies." Along with the area blogs, the New York Times got in on the Maclaren fun with a <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/stroller-recall-stirs-unease-in-park-slope/">silly shark-bait story</a> on the allegedly "palpable sense of anxiety" the recall had wrought on the "hyper-conscientious" Slope. Standard online comment: "If the typical 'Slope Mummy' was not so hell-bent to get to her pilates classes, yoga classes, or whole foods market to pick up her 'fair trade, organic food items,' perhaps she would not be so careless as to fold 'Johnny's finger tips' into the hinge mechanism and amputate them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/mommy_hate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/23/mommy_hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>561</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Do-or-die moment&#8221; for abortion coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/hcr_abortion_amendments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/hcr_abortion_amendments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/11/04/hcr_abortion_amendments</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take action today for women's healthcare reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is <a href="http://www.womenstake.org/2009/11/womens-day-of-action-for-health-care-reform-todays-the-day.html">Women's Day of Action for Healthcare Reform</a>, sponsored by the National Women's Law Center and many allies. Turns out &#160;it's <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/11/house_releases_final_bill--vot.html">also</a> the day a vote on the 1,900-page House proposal (<a href="http://docs.house.gov/rules/health/111_ahcaa.pdf">PDF</a>) may be in sight. "Americans are ready for comprehensive health insurance reform and the House will soon act," Nancy Pelosi said in a statement last night accompanying many last-minute changes to the bill. "Publication of the changes started a 72-hour legislative clock, meaning that a floor vote could take place as early as Saturday," the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-ap-us-health-care-overhaul,0,6777107.story">AP</a> reported. "But with no Republican backing for the measure, Democrats will need overwhelming support from their own. A festering intra-party disagreement over how to prevent federal funds from being used to pay for abortion remained unresolved Wednesday morning."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/hcr_abortion_amendments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/hcr_abortion_amendments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I used to call myself pro-life&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/no_longer_anti_choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/no_longer_anti_choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/11/04/no_longer_anti_choice</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former clinic director Abby Johnson says she's now anti-abortion. But do more "converts" go the other way?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anti-abortion activists, the allegedly abrupt <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/11/03/planned_parenthood/index.html">anti-abortion "conversion"</a> of former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson is the jackpot woman-bites-dog story of the century, or at least the week. But let us not forget all the planes that didn't crash, so to speak: "99.9 percent of clinic workers who see ultrasounds and provide abortions don't have sudden, suspicious religious conversions," Amanda Marcotte <a href="http://scribe.doublex.com/blog/xxfactor/former-planned-parenthood-director-telling-fishy-story">wrote</a> yesterday at Double X. And no matter what you believe about how Ms. Johnson came to link arms and wave signs with those whose threats of violence she'd said, plausibly, that she feared, another reverse story is also true: plenty of women "convert," if more quietly, the opposite way, from anti-abortion rights to pro-choice -- especially (though not only) when the issue shifts from abstract to personal.</p><p>Ann Moore, a senior researcher associate at the Guttmacher Institute, has conducted in-depth interviews with women in abortion clinics. When asked how they found out about the clinic, she told Broadsheet, some women responded that "they used to protest outside."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/no_longer_anti_choice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/04/no_longer_anti_choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 reasons abortion must be covered</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/why_abortion_must_be_covered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/why_abortion_must_be_covered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/28/why_abortion_must_be_covered</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opponents of choice would have you believe it's a complicated issue. It's not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Abortion should be covered by health insurance.</em> We say this, we sense this, we assume this. We insist that abortion is simply a medical procedure -- and that it, therefore, merits coverage. (By "we," I mean you people over there in the choir loft. You people humming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dies_Irae">Dies Irae</a>.) As we watch the healthcare debate go on/devolve/<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_overhaul">offer sudden, faint hope,</a> we see an appalling, though unsurprising, level of <a href="http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/issues/abortion/access-to-abortion/health-care-reform-lies.html">specious posturing</a> about the matter of abortion coverage, most of which amounts to calculated opportunism by, as Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards told Broadsheet, "some very hard-line anti-choice individuals who would like to overturn Roe [but] have been unsuccessful and therefore are using healthcare reform as an opportunity to relitigate the legal right to abortion in the United States." And in the push against insurance coverage for abortion -- that is, the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/30/abortion_coverage/">push to <em>remove</em> coverage that <em>already exists</em></a> -- opponents of abortion are exploiting what is for some people a very real, gut-level (if deeply misinformed) hesitation: I <em>guess</em> abortion should be legal, but should we "sanction" it by "paying" for it? Isn't it, like, "elective"? Can we really say that abortion is "just" a medical procedure?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/why_abortion_must_be_covered/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/why_abortion_must_be_covered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminist wedding controversy: The song!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/secret_conservative_side/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/secret_conservative_side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/10/21/secret_conservative_side</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hilarious Brooklyn trio sing about a friend going from vegan feminist lesbian to tulle and "The Electric Slide"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us have by now <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/20/valenti_roundtable/index.html">opined</a> on the, er, marriage of professional feminism and the New York Times Vows column. (My untouchable authority as a Vows veteran -- and a feminist of humble socialist origins -- commands me to, well, agree with pretty much everything my colleagues <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/20/valenti_roundtable/index.html">said</a>.) But while it's entirely possible -- from a political standpoint -- to give Feministing founder&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/20/valenti_roundtable/index.html">Jessica Valenti's wedding coverage</a> a big shrug of the off-the-shoulder gown scored for $50 on eBay, some of you might also have some <em>personal</em> experience with that Feminist Until...<em>Him!</em> feeling you got from friends who were sucked into the tulle vortex as you watched. (At an approximate travel/gift/wardrobe cost of $450.) Enter Brooklyn's hilarious lady-country trio <a href="http://www.menageatwang.com/">Menage a Twang</a>, who need to put even more of their stuff on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/menageatwang">YouTube</a>: "We met as lesbian feminist vegans who wanted to free Tibet / But then you met Mr. Right and your mind moved to Stepford and now I have watched you forget&#8230;.&#8221; Check out their song "Secret Conservative Side" -- and others -- <a href="http://www.menageatwang.com/Music.html">here</a>.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/secret_conservative_side/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/secret_conservative_side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scandalous Oklahoma abortion law: The saga continues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/oklahoma_law_update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/oklahoma_law_update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/21/oklahoma_law_update</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A law that would require the anonymous public sharing of patients' personal data is stayed -- for now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK <a href="http://www.womensenews.org/story/reproductive-health/091020/okla-abortion-publicity-law-blocked-court">news</a> from Oklahoma: the scandalously transparent law we <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/07/okla_abortion/">covered</a> October 7, which requires the collection -- and "anonymous" public sharing -- of abortion patients' personal data, will, at least, not go into effect as scheduled on November 1. This delay should give anti-choice forces extra time to snip out some more scarlet As for the women of Oklahoma.</p><p>What's happened, as Dionne Scott of the Center for Reproductive Rights explained it to Broadsheet today: The CRR, who filed suit against the law on behalf of two local women, requested a temporary restraining order (TRO) to prevent the law from going into effect as the wrangling went on. In response, a judge set a hearing for October 30 -- and then, for reasons unclear, recused herself from the case. The new judge, Twyla Mason Gray of the Oklahoma County District Court, ignoring the TRO request itself, granted the state's request for an extension on that hearing, moving it to December 4. Yes: this would allow the law to be in effect for a month before anyone could order it restrained. (Indeed, CRR attorney Jennifer Mondino <a href="http://www.womensenews.org/story/reproductive-health/091020/okla-abortion-publicity-law-blocked-court">called</a> the move "very unusual.") So the CRR, no doubt delighted to have found <em>something</em> to do with all the time on its hands, filed a motion opposing that extension <em>and</em> saying, "Also, about that TRO?" Result, late this Monday: Judge Gray kept the December 4 date -- this just for the TRO hearing, mind you -- but did stay the law for now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/oklahoma_law_update/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/oklahoma_law_update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here she is, Miss Homeless Belgium</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/miss_homeless_belgium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/miss_homeless_belgium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/10/14/miss_homeless_belgium</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can a pageant put a face on a tragic problem?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week in <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/11/19/angola/index.html">iffy pageants</a>: <a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/133777">Miss Homeless Belgium</a>. The prize -- won by 58-year-old Therese Van Belle, is ... a home. One year, anyway, in a rent-free apartment. (What&#8217;d the others get? Turtle Wax?)</p><p>The pageant's goal, as reported, was to bring attention to the plight of the country's homeless. But -- really? Contestants were required to give a talk <strike>about the importance of ending homelessness</strike> demonstrating their "will to get themselves out of a difficult situation." And, as pageant organizer Aline Duportail <a href="http://austriantimes.at/news/Around_the_World/2009-10-13/17178/Roofless_competition">said</a>, "It was about the contestants' inner strength and determination to get themselves out of their old life and on a new path."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/miss_homeless_belgium/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/miss_homeless_belgium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The deadly new stats on abortion bans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/abortion_bans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/abortion_bans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/14/abortion_bans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global study reconfirms: Limits on the procedure don't lower its rate -- only its safety]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do you want the good news, or the bad news? OK-, first good: According to a major just-released report <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/AWWfullreport.pdf">(PDF)</a> from the Guttmacher Institute, increased use of contraception has helped decrease unintended pregnancy worldwide. (Globally, the percentage of married and of sexually active single women of childbearing age with access to contraception has increased from 54 percent in 1990 to 63 percent in 2003.)&#160;Abortions, ergo, are down as well, from an estimated 45.5 million procedures in 1995 to 41.6 million in 2003. In Eastern Europe, where a decade ago abortion was commonly, and infamously, used to limit or space births, the abortion rate was so high it <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/25s3099.html">threw off the curve.</a> Now, abortion in that region has dropped by a whopping 50 percent, thanks to the wider availability of actual birth control.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/abortion_bans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/14/abortion_bans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

