<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lynn Parramore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/lynn_parramore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>6 insidious ways you&#8217;re getting ripped off</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And how to fight back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a><strong>I</strong>n the wake of the financial crisis, there was a moment<strong></strong>of hope that predatory businesses would no longer be able to pick at our bones like vultures. Instead, we've seen Dodd-Frank weakened and stalled, and the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau stymied at every turn. In the latest round, Republicans are thwarting the confirmation of Richard Cordray to lead the Bureau. Meanwhile, we continue to get fleeced. Here are a few egregious scams to watch out for, along with ways to protect yourself.</p><p><strong>1. Auto-renewal scams</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/6_insidious_ways_youre_getting_ripped_off_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The brutal truth about how childhood determines your economic destiny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/the_brutal_truth_about_how_childhood_determines_your_economic_destiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/the_brutal_truth_about_how_childhood_determines_your_economic_destiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[56 Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13169422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British class system looks frighteningly rigid in "56 Up." But is America any better?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> "Give me the child until he is seven," the old Jesuit teachers say, "and I will give you the man."</p><p>Back in 1964, filmmaker Paul Almond set out to test that theory by documenting the lives of a group of seven-year-old British children. Some were born to the manor; others grew up in charity homes. There were tykes from both the countryside and the city. Almond wanted to know if the destiny of the children had already been scripted by the circumstances of their birth -- particularly those of class. His film <em>Seven Up!</em> has grown into a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_Series">series</a> spanning over five decades. Every seven years, like the cycle in some mythological saga, Michael Apted, the assistant on the original project, has returned to these children as they have morphed before our eyes into awkward adolescents, tentative adults, and now, the paunchy survivors of late middle-age.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/the_brutal_truth_about_how_childhood_determines_your_economic_destiny/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/the_brutal_truth_about_how_childhood_determines_your_economic_destiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America must stop blaming divorce on women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/america_must_stop_blaming_divorce_on_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/america_must_stop_blaming_divorce_on_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13164117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stereotypes about women's behavior totally obscure the driving forces that can split a marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent poll revealed a clear tendency to blame women for not keeping their husbands happy and a habit of viewing divorced women as unwanted and pitiable.</p><p>That was in the United Arab Emirates. But what about the United States of America? You’d think a more enlightened view of women and marriage might prevail.</p><p>Think again. The Huffington Post ran a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-doyle/women-five-reasons-your-d_b_2341955.html">front-page piece</a> just this week with a headline that would make any old-school patriarch proud: “Women: Five Reasons Your Divorce Is Your Fault.” The author, self-appointed intimacy expert Laura Doyle, spent several paragraphs hectoring women for sins including “Taking the same approach at home as you do at work” and “Rejecting his efforts to make you happy.” She reserves special scorn for present-day Lysistratas who are cruelly “withholding sex” from their partners, as if they were using sex as a punishment rather than simply too tired or not aroused enough to want it. Doyle’s “remedy” for this transgression? <em>“</em>Consider making yourself available for sex at least once a week in support of your mutual goal of connecting.” Problem solved!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/america_must_stop_blaming_divorce_on_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/america_must_stop_blaming_divorce_on_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans are buying more gifts for themselves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/americans_are_buying_more_gifts_for_themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/americans_are_buying_more_gifts_for_themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New market research suggests that roughly 25 percent of us are at the top of our own holiday shopping list]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Who is that lucky person at the top of your holiday list this year? Maybe someone very familiar?</p><p>This year, self-gifting has hit an all-time high. Shoppers are rushing to sales racks and frantically loading up on everything from tablets to trendy sneakers for that very special someone known as Me.</p><p>According to the <em>Wall Street Journal, </em>market research company NPD has discovered that the trend is a <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intelligence/2012/12/10/number-one-on-the-holiday-gift-list-is-myself/?mod=e2tw">prime driver of holiday shopping growth this year. </a>Before the recession, the firm found that around 12 percent of shoppers said they’d purchased items for themselves during the holidays. Last year the figure was up to 19 percent for surveys that went out before Christmas. And the post-Christmas surveys showed that 26 percent of respondents had made holiday purchases for Numero Uno. This year, the figure is already up to a whopping 32 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/americans_are_buying_more_gifts_for_themselves/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/americans_are_buying_more_gifts_for_themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSBC: Too big to jail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass-Steagall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being charged with money laundering, HSBC gets a Monopoly-style get-out-of-jail card]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/hsbc-said-to-near-1-9-billion-settlement-over-money-laundering/">reports this week</a> that megabank HSBC has escaped criminal prosecution for money laundering that probably funded terrorists and narcotics traffickers. Why? Because regulators and prosecutors were petrified that an indictment would undermine the entire financial system. The<em>Times</em> quotes anonymous government sources who confessed fears about bringing formal charges because doing so would be a "death sentence" for the bank. So they let it off the hook.</p><p>That’s right, HSBC is officially above the law. Too-big-to-fail has become too-big-to-prosecute.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/hsbc_too_big_to_jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 things money shouldn&#8217;t be able to buy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/6_things_money_shouldnt_be_able_to_buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/6_things_money_shouldnt_be_able_to_buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From cushy prison cells to human kidneys, some things just shouldn't be for sale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Need a womb? You can rent one from an Indian surrogate mother for $8,000. Want to make millions? Do like Natalie<br /> Dylan did and<a href="http://www.bettyconfidential.com/ar/ld/a/Natalie_Dylan_Explains.html"> auction off your virginity online.</a></p><p>Before the financial crash sounded a high-decibel wakeup call, Americans had gone decades without serious public discussion about the intersection of markets and morals. Sold on Reagan-era market worship and frenzied deregulation, we looked more and more to markets to solve our problems and enhance our lives. But that’s slowly starting to change. We're beginning to ask the question: When everything is for sale, how much does it really cost us?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/6_things_money_shouldnt_be_able_to_buy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/6_things_money_shouldnt_be_able_to_buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moms to Congress: Don&#8217;t throw families over the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/moms_to_congress_dont_throw_families_over_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/moms_to_congress_dont_throw_families_over_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working women delivering teddy bears to lawmakers send the message, “We Can’t ‘Bear’ More Than Our Fair Share!” ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Today, as members of Congress negotiate a budget to address the so-called fiscal cliff, families are taking a stand. Women, mothers, and their families are descending on Capitol Hill to deliver teddy bears, petition signatures and personal stories to lawmakers to send the message that moms and kids can’t “bear” more than their fair share.</p><p>Wealthy CEOs have joined together in the much-maligned "<a href="http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/obscenely-rich-men-bent-shredding-safety-net">Campaign to Fix the Debt</a>" to argue for lower taxes on the rich and cuts to the social safety net, but they are being met by a counterforce of ordinary women trying to work and raise their families. <a href="http://www.momsrising.org/">MomsRising</a>, a grassroots organization that advocates for family-friendly policies including paid family leave and an end to wage discrimination, is taking action to tell America about how the fiscal cliff will impact them. They are gathering in Washington, DC to deliver to congressional offices stories about the financial burdens facing families across the United States, as well as thousands of signatures calling on Congress to end the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Members will also be making over 190 deliveries of a short book of fiscal cliff stories to the in-district offices of their local representatives in 40 states.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/moms_to_congress_dont_throw_families_over_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/moms_to_congress_dont_throw_families_over_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt &#8220;fixers&#8217;&#8221; 6 biggest lies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/debt_fixers_6_biggest_lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/debt_fixers_6_biggest_lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Blankfein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Wall Street movement is afoot to seize the "fiscal cliff" debate -- and dismantle our social safety nets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> <em>New York </em>magazine <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/how-fix-the-debt-won-over-wall-street.html">calls it</a> a “Mass Movement for Millionaires.” The <em>New York Times'</em> Paul Krugman <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/opinion/krugman-fighting-fiscal-phantoms.html">sums up the idea</a>: “Hey, sacrifice is for the little people.”</p><p>The <a href="http://www.fixthedebt.org/">Campaign to Fix the Debt</a> is a huge, and growing, coalition of powerful CEOs, politicians and policy makers on a mission to lower taxes for the rich and cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid under the cover of concern about the national debt. The group was spawned in July 2012 by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, architects of a misguided deficit reduction scheme in Washington back in 2010. By now, the "fixers" have collected a war chest of $43 million. Private equity billionaire Peter G. Peterson, longtime enemy of the social safety net, is a major supporter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/debt_fixers_6_biggest_lies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/debt_fixers_6_biggest_lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe Jeffrey MacDonald was innocent after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/maybe_jeffrey_macdonald_was_innocent_after_all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/maybe_jeffrey_macdonald_was_innocent_after_all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Bragg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errol Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wade Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe McGinniss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rare interview, co-counsel Wade Smith reflects on the murder case that's long captured America's imagination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Remember the <a href="http://brainden.com/face-illusions.htm">perceptual illusion</a> where you look at a picture and you’re certain that you see the bust of a young woman? Then, if someone draws your attention to certain details, suddenly the picture transforms into the profile of an old woman. It’s a disorienting trick. You think you know what you’re seeing, but then you aren’t so sure.</p><p>The Jeffrey MacDonald murder case is one of the most disturbing in living memory. There are only two possible pictures, both nightmares.</p><p>Picture No. 1. Jeffrey MacDonald, a Princeton-educated Green Beret doctor with no history of violence and a sterling record, butchered his pregnant wife and two young daughters using a knife, ice pick and club. Then he injured himself and set up the scene to make the crimes appear to be the work of intruders. He claimed they chanted, “Kill the pigs! ... Acid is groovy!” and scrawled the word “PIG” on the wall in his wife’s blood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/maybe_jeffrey_macdonald_was_innocent_after_all/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/maybe_jeffrey_macdonald_was_innocent_after_all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9 greediest CEOs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/9_greediest_ceos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/9_greediest_ceos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Blankfein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JetBlue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These financiers, polluters and business honchos are teaming up to strangle the economy -- and shred our safety net]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>  A gang of brazen CEOs has joined forces to promote economically disastrous and socially irresponsible austerity policies. Many of those same CEOs were bailed out by the American taxpayer after a Wall Street-driven financial crash. Instead of a thank-you, they are showing their appreciation in the form of a coordinated effort to rob Americans of hard-earned retirements, decent medical care and relief for the poorest.</p><p>Using the excuse of a phony, manufactured crisis known as the “fiscal cliff” – which isn’t a crisis at all, as economist James K. Galbraith has <a href="http://www.alternet.org/economy/6-reasons-fiscal-cliff-scam">succinctly explained</a> -- they are gearing up to pull the wool over the public's eyes by cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The CEOs are part of the Fix the Debt campaign run by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_George_Peterson">Peter Peterson</a>-backed Center for a Responsible Federal Budget, which plans to unleash tens of millions pushing for a deficit reduction deal that favors the rich in the lame-duck session and beyond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/9_greediest_ceos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/9_greediest_ceos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Spielberg’s “Lincoln” conveniently leaves out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/what_spielberg%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9clincoln%e2%80%9d_conveniently_leaves_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/what_spielberg%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9clincoln%e2%80%9d_conveniently_leaves_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerned as he was about the power of corporations, he was also in bed with the most powerful titans of his era]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Over this Thanksgiving week, you may find yourself in a movie theater watching Steven Spielberg’s treatment of Abraham Lincoln and the battle<strong> </strong>to pass the 13th Amerndment, which abolished slavery once and for all.<strong> </strong>There’s much to be said for <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443272/">Lincoln</a> [3]</em>: marvelous acting, less mythologizing than usual, and a fascinating window into raucous realpolitik. Spielberg’s film stands several cuts above any movie depiction of the Lincoln presidency you’re likely to see.</p><p>Lincoln himself stands several cuts above the vast majority of U.S. presidents. After some equivocating, he freed the slaves, a monumental undertaking<strong> </strong>that was a service to the country and to humanity in general. He was also friendlier to workers than most presidents, an affinity noted by Karl Marx, who exchanged letters with Lincoln leading up to and during the Civil War. (You won’t see the GOP acknowledging that!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/what_spielberg%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9clincoln%e2%80%9d_conveniently_leaves_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/what_spielberg%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9clincoln%e2%80%9d_conveniently_leaves_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s big Social Security lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/gops_big_social_security_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/gops_big_social_security_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing sharks are using America's increased life expectancy as an excuse to gut one of its best-loved programs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Trying to convince the public to cut America’s best-loved and most successful program requires a lot of creativity and persistence. Social Security is fiscally fit, prudently managed and does not add to the deficit because by law it must be completely detached from the federal operating budget. Obviously, it is needed more than ever in a time of increasing job insecurity and disappearing pensions. It helps our economy thrive and boosts the productivity of working Americans. And yet the sharks are in a frenzy to shred it in the upcoming “fiscal cliff” discussions.</p><p>The most popular red herring Social Security hustlers have unleashed into the waters of public discourse has grown into such a massive whale of a lie that liberals frequently subscribe to it. The idea goes like this: We need to somehow “fix” Social Security because people are living longer – “fix” in this context being code for “cut.” Two groups stand to benefit in the short-term from such a scheme: the greedy rich, who do not want to pay their share in taxes, and financiers, who want to move towards privatizing retirement accounts so they can collect fees. As for the masses of hard-working people who have rightfully earned their retirement, the only “fix” is the fix they will be in if already modest benefits are further reduced.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/gops_big_social_security_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/gops_big_social_security_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t progressives reach white Southern men?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_cant_progressives_reach_white_southern_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_cant_progressives_reach_white_southern_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The South's comfort with the GOP is understandable, even predictable. But it shouldn't be inevitable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Ever since Neil Young sang about him, the white Southern man has been the symbol for all that is wrong with America to urban lefties. He is a redneck. A gun-toting, rebel flag-waving racist whose sinister activities wreak far more havoc on the country than, say, the wily Wall Street financier. If you can’t hate the white Southern man, who can you hate?</p><p>I grew up with white Southern men. Some of them hard-core Republicans. They have been my classmates. My neighbors. I’m related to lots of them. Having been raised in North Carolina and attended the University of Georgia, it’s impossible for me to see them as strangers.  And while they can irritate me no end when they say and do dumb things, I cringe when <a href="http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/why-frightened-white-men-love-romney">San Franciscans like Mark Morford </a>wax elitist and paint them as a monolithic band of aliens whose intolerance is only matched by their ignorance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_cant_progressives_reach_white_southern_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_cant_progressives_reach_white_southern_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>153</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Downtown Manhattan, down for the count</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/downtown_manhattan_down_for_the_count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/downtown_manhattan_down_for_the_count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power outages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manhattan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Con Ed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As days pass and the temperature drops, Manhattanites grow increasingly weary of Sandy's destructive force]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> I spent two dark nights stumbling around in my apartment on West 20th Street after vicious Hurricane Sandy wiped out power in downtown Manhattan, where I live. Until Wednesday afternoon, there was no way to get out, even if you wanted to, unless you were prepared to walk; cabs had been ordered off the streets, and it was difficult to find information about emergency buses, which were reported to be overfilled, anyway. So I hunkered down and congratulated myself on rigging up a contraption out of a ceramic pot and candles that would heat the water for my tea. Sort of.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/downtown_manhattan_down_for_the_count/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/downtown_manhattan_down_for_the_count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s six biggest lies to women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/mitts_six_biggest_lies_to_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/mitts_six_biggest_lies_to_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a campaign noted for its deceit, Romney's appeals to women voters have been especially craven]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Women -- along with a handful of undecided voters -- are pretty much going to decide this thing come November 6. The gender gap is at historic highs, and if solely women were voting, there’s no question as to who would be occupying the White House for the next four years.</p><p>In the last weeks before the election, Romney has shown himself ready to get down on bended knee to woo the female vote. Which would be cute, if he didn’t have a record of denying women their basic human rights. Unbeknownst to Mitt, women, in addition to making handy office workers, are also fully capable of seeing through all the manipulations, mansplaining and malarkey that have been spread around this campaign season. So let’s pause a moment to take a look at Mitt’s continual war on women’s credibility.</p><p><strong>1. Global Rights for Women</strong></p><p>In the final presidential face-off Monday night, Romney seemed to glow with the fire of the global struggle for women’s rights. Right off the bat, he hailed the Arab Spring and the “hope that there would be a change towards more moderation, and opportunity for greater participation on the part of women in public life….”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/mitts_six_biggest_lies_to_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/mitts_six_biggest_lies_to_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plutocrat bosses to employees: Vote Romney or else</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/plutocrat_bosses_to_employees_vote_romney_or_else/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/plutocrat_bosses_to_employees_vote_romney_or_else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plutocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democracy is getting a black eye this election season from brazen CEOs. Is what they're doing even legal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> It’s quickly becoming the story of the election season. Every day there’s a new report of bosses putting pressure on employees to vote for Mitt Romney or very bad things will happen. The threats range from job loss to wage cuts, and the Gilded Age-style strong-arming shows no signs of slowing.</p><p>Most recently, we’ve learned that Arthur Allen, CEO of ASG Software Solutions, <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/yet-another-ceo-asks-employees-to-vote-romney-for-sake-of-the-company-and-their-jobs/">sent an email to workers </a>with the following subject line: “Will the US Presidential election directly impact your future jobs at ASG? Please read below.”</p><p>David Siegel, the billionaire founder of Westgate Resorts, has been playing the worker intimidation game. So have the Koch brothers, <a href="http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/koch-employees-vote-romney-or-bad-things-will-happen-maybe-your-job">sending anti-Obama voter materials </a>to 45,000 employees of their Georgia Pacific subsidiary (thanks to AlterNet's Adele Stan for bringing us that story). In Michigan, the president of Lacks Enterprises<a href="http://www.mlive.com/business/west-michigan/index.ssf/2012/10/lacks_enterprises_ceo_has_sugg.html"> warned his company's 2,300 employees </a>that their paychecks will shrink if Obama is re-elected.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/plutocrat_bosses_to_employees_vote_romney_or_else/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/plutocrat_bosses_to_employees_vote_romney_or_else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six 1 percenters desperate to elect Mitt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/six_one_percenters_desperate_to_elect_mitt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/six_one_percenters_desperate_to_elect_mitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Welch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Siegel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If these men had their way, America would be a plutocracy -- if it isn't already]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The following 1 percent wonders are doing just fine under Obama, but since their worldview is largely restricted to an obsession with their marginal tax rate, they can’t refrain from denouncing the president and thinking of new ways to thwart his re-election bid. The Romney men desperately want to see the first financier president, a man after their own cold hearts.</p><p><strong>1. David Siegel, the Bitching Billionaire</strong></p><p>Thanks to folks over at <a href="http://gawker.com/5950189/the-ceo-who-built-himself-americas-largest-house-just-threatened-to-fire-his-employees-if-obamas-elected">Gawker</a>, we’ve gotten a look at the noxious activities of David Siegel, founder and CEO of national timeshare giant Westgate Resorts. Siegel is filthy rich and wants you to know it, building himself the largest (and possibly the tackiest) house in America. The documentary <em><a href="http://www.magpictures.com/thequeenofversailles/">The Queen of Versailles</a></em> follows Siegel and his wife Jackie in pursuit of obscene excess in the form of a 90,000-square-foot homage to bad taste, complete with a 20-car garage, a two-story wine cellar, and a 30-foot stained glass dome.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/six_one_percenters_desperate_to_elect_mitt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/six_one_percenters_desperate_to_elect_mitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s sweatshop secret?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_sweatshop_secret/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_sweatshop_secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Labor and Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global-Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report reveals that Romney invested at a firm called Global-Tech, whose factories exploited Chinese workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Republicans like to paint Romney as an entrepreneur whose activities at Bain Capital have benefited Americans. In a campaign full of whoppers, that’s one of the biggest lies of all. Economist Paul Davidson recently <a href="http://www.alternet.org/economy/how-mitt-romney-got-rich-destroying-american-jobs-and-promoting-sweatshop-capitalism">pointed out the truth on AlterNet</a>: “Romney has spent his career offshoring and outsourcing American production processes -- and associated jobs -- to countries like China where human labor is valued in the market at a very low wage rate.” The sub-human conditions at these production facilities represent things that Americans are strongly opposed to: child abuse, squalor, forced overtime, and peanuts for pay.</p><p>Romney’s penchant for bragging about his business activities at fundraisers helps underscore just how vile his brand of capitalism really is. While CEO of Bain, Romney invested in a Chinese sweatshop which he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uxYXT7G7xg">appears to be describing in detail</a> at the very same Boca Raton fundraising event where he made his infamous case that nearly half of all Americans are freeloaders.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_sweatshop_secret/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_sweatshop_secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walking in a fecal wonderland</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/walking_in_a_fecal_wonderland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/walking_in_a_fecal_wonderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sewage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arizona Snowbowl resort has found a way to turn human sewage into snow, giving new meaning to "slippery slope"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Winter brings wonderland dreams of pristine, snow-covered landscapes. At the Arizona Snowbowl resort, you can ski on it. You can sip hot chocolate gazing upon it. You can even get married on it.</p><p>But you might not want to make snow cones out of it. Because this year at Snowbowl, that twinkling white powder will be made from human sewage.</p><p>Three cheers for America’s innovative capitalists, who are leading the world in turning shit into snow. This year, the Arizona ski resort, located near Flagstaff, will become the first ever to charge humans to glide about in their own waste: 100% pure sewage effluent. How’d you like to face-plant in that?</p><p>If that’s not horrible enough, the mountain is sacred to Native Americans, who are outraged over its desecration. Navajo Klee Benally has spent years fighting the resort’s expansion. But in February, a federal appeals court <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/27/us/arizona-ski-resorts-sewage-plan-creates-uproar.html?src=me&amp;ref=general&amp;_r=1&amp;">ruled in favor </a>the plans, which had been opposed by 13 Native American tribes and environmental groups.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/walking_in_a_fecal_wonderland/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/walking_in_a_fecal_wonderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stiglitz&#8217;s plea for compassionate capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stiglitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13017904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent talk, the Nobel Prize-winner asks: Can the ideology of capitalism bend to justice and love?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Cash payment is not the sole nexus between man and man. ~Thomas Carlyle</em></p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Even after a terrible financial crisis exposed their folly, the High Priests of Old Time Economics still speak the cold, barren language of self-interest. Acting solely in your own interest, they preach, is the key to efficiency and human well-being.</p><p>Not Joseph Stiglitz. Wednesday night, the Nobel Prize-winner spoke to a packed chapel at New York City’s Union Theological Seminary, which, along with the <a href="http://ineteconomics.org/">Institute for New Economic Thinking</a> (INET), a New York-based think tank, hosted the first conversation in a brand-new series meant to change the way we understand economic issues.  Union Theological Seminary president Dr. Serene Jones, INET Executive Director Robert Johnson, Professor Gary Dorrien of Union Theological Seminary and Columbia University, and Betty Sue Flowers, Director of the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum, joined Stiglitz to talk about the topic at hand: “Economics &amp; Theology.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>