<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mark Schoofs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mark_schoofs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TSA removes body scanners from airports</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/tsa_removes_body_scanners_from_airports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/tsa_removes_body_scanners_from_airports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TSA has finally abandoned the controversial practice of making passengers go through full-body X-rays]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Transportation Security Administration will <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-18/naked-image-scanners-to-be-removed-from-u-s-airports.html">remove all X-ray body scanners from airports</a>, Bloomberg News reports. The reason: Software couldn't be developed by a congressionally mandated deadline to automatically detect suspicious items on the body. Instead, TSA officers viewed images of passengers' naked bodies to see if they were carrying weapons or other contraband, a process that privacy advocates have dubbed a "virtual strip search."</p><p>Privacy had not been the only concern dogging the scanners. A ProPublica investigation found that the TSA had <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/u.s.-government-glossed-over-cancer-concerns-as-it-rolled-out-airport-x-ray">glossed over</a> the small cancer risk posed by even the low doses of radiation emitted by X-ray scanners. The stories also showed that the United States was <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/europe-bans-x-ray-body-scanners-used-at-u.s.-airports">almost alone</a> in the world in X-raying passengers and that the Food and Drug Administration had gone <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/u.s.-government-glossed-over-cancer-concerns-as-it-rolled-out-airport-x-ray">against its own advisory panel</a>, which recommended the agency set a federal safety standard for security X-rays. In addition, ProPublica reported that, outside airports, <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/drive-by-scanning-officials-expand-use-and-dose-of-radiation-for-security-s">other security agencies</a> are exposing people to radiation in more settings and in increasing doses.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/tsa_removes_body_scanners_from_airports/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/tsa_removes_body_scanners_from_airports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
