<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mary Elizabeth Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mary_elizabeth_williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Greeting cards for the terminally ill are a great idea</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/greeting_cards_for_the_terminally_ill_are_a_great_idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/greeting_cards_for_the_terminally_ill_are_a_great_idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greeting Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hallmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hallmark introduces a new line to deal with tough topics -- and that's a good thing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even in an increasingly paperless world, there are times when an e-card just won't do. There's something about the sound of an envelope opening, the feel of paper in your hand. It's estimated that Americans purchase 6.5 billion cards a year. Cards to say "Happy birthday." "I'm thinking of you." And "Thanks for being a pal while you're dying."</p><p>As <a href="http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21580157-hallmark-cards-show-new-candour-about-terminal-sickness-american-way-death">the Economist first reported</a> over the weekend, greeting card behemoth Hallmark is preparing to roll out some bold new messages in 2014 – including cards that take on tough topics like terminal illness. "Our paths came together in this life," reads one. "You're in some of the best memories I have and you always will be."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/greeting_cards_for_the_terminally_ill_are_a_great_idea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/greeting_cards_for_the_terminally_ill_are_a_great_idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Lopez: Clueless</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/jennifer_lopez_sings_for_repressive_leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/jennifer_lopez_sings_for_repressive_leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lopez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkmenistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She claims she was ignorant of the Turkmen leader's alleged human rights abuses. She couldn't just Google?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you spend your Saturday night? If your name is Jennifer Lopez, the answer is: wishing a happy birthday to the leader of a country known as <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2013/06/30/jennifer-lopez-birthday-turkmenistan/2477513/">"among the most repressive in the world." </a></p><p>Lopez was performing over the weekend in the small Soviet bloc country of Turkmenistan at an event hosted by the China National Petroleum Corporation. It was there that she, in the words of her publicist, "graciously obliged" a request to serenade the birthday boy, president Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow. "It was our pleasure. And we wish you the very happiest birthday," she said at the time. A Human Rights Watch report from just this past April cited the country's "high levels of repression," "harassment and intimidation of journalists" and "longstanding use of imprisonment as a tool for political retaliation." It did not, however, mention any predilection for Pitbull collaborations. On Sunday, Human Rights Foundation president Thor Halvorssen said that Lopez's actions "utterly destroy the carefully crafted message she has cultivated with her prior involvement with Amnesty International's programs in Mexico aimed at curbing violence against women," and asked, " <a href="http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00061735.html#ixzz2Xns1uekg">What is the next stop on her tour, Syria? </a>The dictator of Kazakhstan's birthday is July 6, maybe she will also pay him a visit?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/jennifer_lopez_sings_for_repressive_leader/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/jennifer_lopez_sings_for_repressive_leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Alec Baldwin has in common with the president of Chick-fil-A</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_alec_baldwin_has_in_common_with_the_president_of_chick_fil_a/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_alec_baldwin_has_in_common_with_the_president_of_chick_fil_a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chick-fil-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy and Alec Baldwin are polar opposites, except when it comes to anti-gay tweets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolutionary theory suggests that it was when we developed thumbs that we put our species on the path to becoming sentient humans. And then Twitter made us go and reconsider that call. This week's prime examples of how having the ability to hit a button is no proof of being a fully developed creature: Alec Baldwin and Chick-fil-A.</p><p>Popular poultry purveyor Chick-fil-A has a long and well documented history of <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/chick_fil_a/">support for "traditional," man-lady marriage</a>. But after Wednesday's Supreme Court rulings, the company's president, Dan Cathy, couldn't resist sharing his observation, via Twitter, that it was a "Sad day for our nation, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/06/27/technology/social/chick-fil-a-gay-marriage-tweet/">founding fathers would be ashamed</a> of our generation to abandon wisdom of the ages re: cornerstone of strong societies." Yes, I am totally sure that self-described <a href="http://www.constitution.org/primarysources/mistress.html">cougar chaser Ben Franklin</a>, along with Thomas Jefferson, a man who likely <a href="http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account">fathered six children</a> with<em> his slave</em>, would be appalled. Cathy quickly deleted the tweet, and issued a corporate statement that he "realized his views didn't necessarily represent the views of all customers, restaurant owners and employees and didn't want to distract them from providing a great restaurant experience." In other words, oops, he forgot that thoughts go on the inside, and that conflating "shame" and civil rights can be bad for business.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_alec_baldwin_has_in_common_with_the_president_of_chick_fil_a/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_alec_baldwin_has_in_common_with_the_president_of_chick_fil_a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Not all gays are alike!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop *]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today uncovers the shocking news that not all gay people will get married]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, a news headline is so bottomlessly dumb -- and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/27/kendall-jenner-photo-shoot_n_3509483.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular">not even from HuffPo</a> -- it makes us wonder if there's an editorial directive out there to State the Obvious. In the aftermath of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/best_of_the_worst_right_wing_responses_to_the_court/">a historic week</a> for LGBT rights, we bring you this recent gem: A USA Today story that reveals <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/27/same-sex-marriage-research/2465023/">"Not all gays and lesbians want to marry, research shows."</a> You don't say!</p><p>USA Today isn't exactly a bastion of profound insight – it's best known as the newspaper you find outside your hotel room door in the morning. But it still deserves a very special shout-out for condescending, heterosplaining crap anyway. In the story, Sharon Jayson says that "Just because same-sex couples can legally marry doesn't mean they will" and that "marriage isn't for everyone." Whoa whoa whoa SLOW DOWN, USA Today. The Supreme Court didn't just make marriage mandatory for every homosexual in America? Jayson goes on to quote a University of Minnesota researcher who observes, "Some gays and lesbians clearly want to get married, but others are unsure or reject marriage for themselves." I feel a <a href="http://www.themoreyouknow.com/">"The more you know"</a> rainbow coming on here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The smearing of Rachel Jeantel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/the_smearing_of_rachel_jeantel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/the_smearing_of_rachel_jeantel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Jeantel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why is the star witness in the George Zimmerman case being treated like a defendant?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Jeantel is a 19-year-old Florida woman. On Facebook and Twitter, she's been known to post photos of her nails and talk about drinking. She is also the last person to have spoken with Trayvon Martin before George Zimmerman shot him to death last year, the woman who was on the phone with him when his fateful encounter unfolded. She is known in the justice system as Witness #8 in Zimmerman's trial. She is, in fact, the prosecution's key witness. But you'd be forgiven if you'd gotten the impression recently that she was sitting up there to defend herself.</p><p>Jeantel does not fit the comfortable image of the grieving girl. As Rachel Samara wrote Wednesday in Global Grind, <a href="http://globalgrind.com/news/what-white-people-dont-understand-about-rachel-jeantel-trayvon-martin-blog">"A predominantly white jury is not going to like Rachel Jeantel,"</a> a girl "who has no media training and who is fully entrenched in a hostile environment." There is confusion over whether or not she was Martin's girlfriend, which eradicates her chances of being depicted as a devastated young quasi-widow. On the stand, she has been blunt, hostile and at times seemingly confused. Online, she has a documented history that includes partying. She is not thin or blond or demure. So there goes her credibility.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/the_smearing_of_rachel_jeantel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/the_smearing_of_rachel_jeantel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2692</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women can be sexist pigs too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/women_can_be_sexist_pigs_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/women_can_be_sexist_pigs_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rihanna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nasty spat between Rihanna and columnist Liz Jones reeks of old-fashioned misogyny]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the hard-fought ideals of feminism is that women can be the equals of men in any field. And so, as an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/">unapologetic feminist</a>, allow me to take my hat off this week to both Daily Mail columnist Liz Jones and superstar Rihanna, for proving that ladies can really hold their own in the realm of sexist trolling.</p><p>Jones has spent her entire career establishing herself as a walking collection of pure, bona fide nonsense. She's a gasbag, even by Daily Mail's notoriously incoherent standards. Long before her riled-up column on what a "toxic role model" Rihanna is earlier this week, she'd already made a name for herself as the columnist who most resembles that one relative with no filter you just try not to get into a fight with at holiday dinners. She's declared overweight people "lazy," homeless people "ignorant," and insisted that women <a href="http://www.thegloss.com/2011/11/05/sex-and-dating/crazy-things-liz-jones-has-said-951/#ixzz2XQGf7XYs">"most definitely, incontrovertibly, do not want sex once they have children."</a> That's why it wasn't exactly a shocker when she declared that Rihanna "promotes drug-taking, drinking and the sort of fashion sense on stage that <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2347680/Rihannas-toxic-role-model-army-young-fans-says-LIZ-JONES.html#ixzz2XQJKCvYw">surely invites rape at worst</a>, disrespect at least" and is "infecting our High Streets with her gun tattoos, her false nails and fake hair, her bogus bad-ass shenanigans."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/women_can_be_sexist_pigs_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/women_can_be_sexist_pigs_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop calling it &#8220;gay marriage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/lets_end_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/lets_end_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Fischer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we celebrate marriage equality, it's time to change how we talk about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before lunchtime on Wednesday, June 26, 2013, the date had already secured its place in the annals of history. It will now forevermore be known as the day that the United States Supreme Court struck down the insultingly named Defense of Marriage Act, and dismissed an appeal on California's Proposition 8. I'm not sure, but I think it means we can start marrying our dogs and that heterosexuality has been abolished or something. So now that we're living in a country that has just taken its biggest steps ever toward civil rights for its LGBT men and women, can we make this the day that we also took strides toward eliminating gay marriage?</p><p>I'm not asking we forget marriage equality. I'm not requesting that one inch of the hard-fought ground gained Wednesday recede. I'm saying instead that as we recognize that two men or two women can forge together loving, enduring, legally recognized unions, it's time to retire the belittling phrase "gay marriage" itself, once and for all. Calling it "gay marriage" is like calling it "black marriage" or "geriatric marriage" or any other absurd, insulting modifier. It anoints the institution with otherness and makes it seem outside the norm. Marriage Substitute. Marriage Lite. I Can't Believe It's Not Marriage! The term doesn't even have the brilliant hilarity of American Family Association director Bryan J. Fischer's definition of the Supreme Court ruling Wednesday as a victory for <a href="https://twitter.com/BryanJFischer/status/349901475624923136 ">"sodomy-based marriage."</a> At least that sounds <em>fun</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/lets_end_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/lets_end_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t tell Marissa Mayer she&#8217;s pretty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/dont_tell_marissa_mayer_shes_pretty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/dont_tell_marissa_mayer_shes_pretty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A "compliment" from a shareholder shows that for too many men, a woman's looks still matter more than anything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just an offhand comment. A little attempt at humor. A compliment, even. But here's some advice for Yahoo shareholder Mr. George Polis: When you're addressing the CEO of a major corporation at a shareholder's meeting, this isn't how you do it. "I have 2,000 shares of Yahoo," said Polis. "I'm Greek, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/yahoo-shareholder-to-marissa-mayer-im-a-dirty-old-man-and-you-look-attractive-2013-6#ixzz2XKIWQDcu">and I'm a dirty old man, and you look attractive."</a> Go ahead and consider for a moment that nobody gives a crap about your aesthetic assessment of Marissa Mayer's looks.</p><p>There is a default expectation that a woman should be visually and temperamentally pleasing – especially to males. When, a few years ago, a female friend started taking Japanese lessons, she was surprised that the instructor taught females students to <a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005104.html">speak at a higher pitch</a>. And as stories in both <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/06/memoirs-of-an-un-smiling-woman/277063/">the Atlantic</a> and <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/06/bitchy_resting_face_and_female_niceness_why_do_women_have_to_smile_more.html ">Slate</a> this month pointed out, women are considered suspect when their natural resting face is anything but soft, smiling and pliant.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/dont_tell_marissa_mayer_shes_pretty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/dont_tell_marissa_mayer_shes_pretty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here come the preschool fashionistas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/here_come_the_preschool_fashionistas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/here_come_the_preschool_fashionistas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suri Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shiloh Jolie-Pitt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are we fascinated with overdressed kids?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://surisburnbook.tumblr.com/">Suri</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/shiloh_jolie_pitt_hair_drama/">Shiloh</a> are so 10 minutes ago. Plus they're both like, over the age of 5. Behold our new fashion icons, Alonso and Quinoa.</p><p>On Monday, <a href="http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/06/five-year-old-boy-whos-become-a-style-icon.html">the Cut profiled Alonso Mateo</a>, the current bad boy of male fashion. Mateo is 5. Mateo has of late been dominating on Instagram thanks to his effortlessly cool fashion sense and his attendant grown-ups' liberal use of hashtags. Typical entry: "That's how you do it. #MateoStyle #fashion #mensfashion #kidsfashion #instafashion #instapic #kidsinstyle #fashionista #instastyle #coolestkid #handsome #boys #instacute #follow #followme #igdaily #swag #ootd #igers #shoutout #instacool #instaworld #lookbook #trendy #streetfashion #fashiondiaries." Mateo, whose look can be described as "young Steve McQueen – really, really young Steve McQueen," favors slouchy jackets, jeans and aviators. He likes <a href="http://www.us.allsaints.com/women/footwear/allsaints-damisi-boot/">expensive boots</a>. He likes to mix things up – sometimes accessorizing with a jaunty scarf, sometimes with a plush car seat. In one photograph, he is seen chilling with a book on the floor of his closet, in front of a collection of shoes that would seem generous by Kardashian standards. Mateo has over 11,000 followers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/here_come_the_preschool_fashionistas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/here_come_the_preschool_fashionistas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The endless slut-shaming of Weiner&#8217;s women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_endless_slut_shaming_of_weiners_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_endless_slut_shaming_of_weiners_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner may be enjoying a second act, but the women he messaged are still being punished]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guardians of morality have a lengthy and remarkably selective memory. And what has long been excused in a man can be an enduring badge of shame for a woman. It's been two years since Anthony Weiner's penis went viral and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/gene_lyons_male/">his career took an abrupt detour</a> in light of revelations regarding his explicit online communications with at least six women. His resignation from Congress prompted a gold mine of tabloid headlines and a deluge of moral outrage from the punditsphere, all of which briefly kicked up again when he last month announced his intention to run for mayor of New York City. Yet despite the jokey New York Post headlines and the muttering accusations of sleaziness that he will always bear, Weiner is doing pretty well today. He still has his wife and the son she bore him just months after the scandal broke. He has a viable political career. But as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/nyregion/for-women-in-weiner-scandal-indignity-lingers.html">a New York Times story</a> this week has revealed, the women who were on the receiving end of Weiner's attentions have fared differently.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_endless_slut_shaming_of_weiners_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_endless_slut_shaming_of_weiners_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rape culture punishes boys too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/rape_culture_punishes_boys_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/rape_culture_punishes_boys_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Colorado case shows boys can be assaulted too -- and too often, teachers have ignored or even laughed about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The endlessly repeated argument that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/five_easy_steps_for_becoming_a_rape_apologist/">rape is just one of those things</a> that guys can't help doing because girls can't stop provoking them ignores a simple, brutal reality: Males don't just perpetrate sexual violence – they are the victims of it as well. And when they come forward, male victims often face a raft of suspicion, bullying and blame, as a heartbreaking recent case out of Colorado proves.</p><p>The father of a Norwood student says that after a wrestling tournament last year, three of his then 13-year-old son's teammates <a href="http://bangordailynews.com/2013/06/21/news/nation/sodomy-norwood-colorado-wrestling-coach-pencil-shun/ ">"bound him with duct tape and sodomized him with a pencil"</a> on an empty school bus. The attack came to light when the victim's father heard one of the perpetrators bragging about it to his dad afterward. But that was just the start of the family's nightmare. The boy's father was the school's principal. Two of his attackers? The coach's sons.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/rape_culture_punishes_boys_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/rape_culture_punishes_boys_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Carrey takes a stand against violence in &#8220;Kick-Ass 2&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/jim_carrey_takes_a_stand_against_violence_in_kick_ass_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/jim_carrey_takes_a_stand_against_violence_in_kick_ass_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Carrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kick-Ass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kick-Ass 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Millar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny Or Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actor, who's been outspoken about gun violence in recent months, says he "can't support" the movie's bloodshed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cartoony summer action movie may not, on the surface, seem to have much to do with a December tragedy. But in a rare case of an actor backing away from an opportunity to self-promote, Jim Carrey took to Twitter Sunday to explain why he's backing off from the new "Kick-Ass 2," in which he plays the bat-wielding Colonel Stars and Stripes. "I did Kickass a month b4 Sandy Hook and now in all good conscience <a href="https://twitter.com/JimCarrey/status/348886602384281600">I cannot support that level of violence</a>," he wrote. "My apologies… to others involve [sic] with the film. I am not ashamed of it but recent events have caused a change in my heart."</p><p>Carrey has in recent months become increasingly outspoken about gun violence. In March, he played both a clenched Charlton Heston and a suave country and western singer crooning the anti-gun anthem <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/0433b30576/cold-dead-hand-with-jim-carrey">"Cold Dead Hand"</a> for Funny Or Die. Sample lyric: "Only the devil's true devotees could profiteer from pain and fear." It quickly became one of the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/jim-carreys-cold-dead-hand-432769">most viewed clips in the site's history</a>, and led to a predictable amount of frothing from fans and in conservative outlets like Fox News. In response, Carrey described the network as a "media colostomy bag that has begun to burst at the seams."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/jim_carrey_takes_a_stand_against_violence_in_kick_ass_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/jim_carrey_takes_a_stand_against_violence_in_kick_ass_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to America, atheists!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/welcome_to_america_atheists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/welcome_to_america_atheists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Doughty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom from Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Immigration authorities reverse course and welcome a non-believer (with a Texas Republican's support)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret Doughty, you must have really wanted to live here. As <a href="http://dividedundergod.com/2013/06/20/margaret-doughty-awarded-citizenship/">Divided Under God first reported</a> earlier this week, the British-born 64-year-old has had a bumpy road to United States citizenship.</p><p>Doughty, who has lived in the U.S. for more than thirty years, had wanted to become a naturalized citizen, but objected to the required pledge to bear arms in defense of the country. She explained, "I deeply and sincerely believe that it is not moral or ethical to take another person’s life, and my lifelong spiritual/religious beliefs impose on me a duty of conscience not to contribute to warfare by taking up arms… my beliefs are as strong and deeply held as those who possess traditional religious beliefs and who believe in God."</p><p>Maybe it was the mention of deeply held beliefs that tripped up Immigration. Conveniently ignoring the whole part of her explanation where she implied she doesn't have "traditional religious beliefs," it then demanded Doughty provide documentation to support her status as a conscientious objector <a href="http://dividedundergod.com/2013/06/14/woman-being-denied-citizenship-because-her-morality-doesnt-come-from-religion/">"on official church stationery, attesting to the fact that [she is] a member in good standing and the church's official position on the bearing of arms."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/welcome_to_america_atheists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/welcome_to_america_atheists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why hasn&#8217;t Paula Deen apologized?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/why_hasnt_paula_deen_apologized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/why_hasnt_paula_deen_apologized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paula deen racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paula deen apology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her racist past is bad, but her current cowardice is just as shocking -- though she says a statement is coming soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the long-simmering revelations about Paula Deen's history of casual, clueless racism broke earlier this week -- her admission that "Yes, of course" she'd used racial epithets and cast African-American wait staff to represent "a certain era in America" for a wedding -- the public response has ranged from outrage <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/paulas_best_dishes_are_racist_jokes_twitter/singleton/">to mockery</a> to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/paula_deens_racism_isnt_shocking_at_all/">disgusted lack of surprise</a> to inevitable, trollish justifications.  Everyone, it seems, has a strong opinion about Paula Deen's past behavior. Everyone but Deen, that is. The cholesterol-loving chef and Food Network star has been remarkably circumspect in the past few days – at precisely the moment the Georgia native should have been speaking out. And it's her rigid retreat that's added an extra and entirely unnecessary layer of ugliness to the debacle.</p><p>On Friday morning, Deen was scheduled to appear on the "Today" show, but at the last minute, Matt Lauer announced, <a href="http://www.today.com/food/paula-deen-no-show-today-6C10408932">"We just found out she's a no-show."</a> He added that everything had seemed a go for an "an open and candid discussion, no holds barred" interview when he'd spoken to her Thursday, but now her representative had simply said she was "exhausted."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/why_hasnt_paula_deen_apologized/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/why_hasnt_paula_deen_apologized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>237</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sister Helen Prejean: &#8220;How can watching a person die heal anybody?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/sister_helen_prejean_how_can_watching_a_person_die_heal_anybody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/sister_helen_prejean_how_can_watching_a_person_die_heal_anybody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sister Helen Prejean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dead Man Walking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital punishment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years after "Dead Man Walking," her mission to end capital punishment is fiercer than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been exactly two decades since Sister Helen Prejean published her riveting and deeply personal account of her experience in the Louisiana penitentiary system, and her relationship with death row inmate Patrick Sonnier in the time leading up to his execution. Since then it's become the basis of an Oscar-winning Susan Sarandon movie, <a href="http://dmwplay.org/">an ongoing school theater project</a>, an opera and a bona fide movement that changed the national conversation about capital punishment.</p><p>This month, Vintage has issued <a href="http://www.dmw20.org/">a 20th anniversary edition</a> of Prejean's seminal work, with a new introduction by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and afterwords by Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins and Prejean herself. "I cannot write this without fierce anger and distress at the blindness and unfairness of the current Court," she writes in it, "which continues to sanction the death penalty in case after case as if there were not abundant evidence that their 'machinery of death' does not work."</p><p>Salon spoke to the 74-year-old nun about the current state of capital punishment, her feelings on the new pope, and why sisterhood is powerful.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/sister_helen_prejean_how_can_watching_a_person_die_heal_anybody/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/sister_helen_prejean_how_can_watching_a_person_die_heal_anybody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Serena&#8217;s rape victim-blaming got everything wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/serenas_rape_victim_blaming_got_everything_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/serenas_rape_victim_blaming_got_everything_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serena Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steubenville rape case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steubenville]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tennis star's apology for her comments about the Steubenville rape victim didn't help matters either]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today in incendiary, idiotic statements followed by nauseating, half-assed apologies: all things Serena Williams.</p><p>In an interview called <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/serena-williams-the-great-one-20130618">"The Great One"</a> Rolling Stone posted on Tuesday, the tennis champ held forth on everything from her career to her nails, but it was her comments about the Steubenville rape that got most immediate – and strongest – reaction. As she watched a news report on the case with journalist Stephen Rodrick, she asked, "Do you think it was fair, what they got? They did something stupid, but I don't know." In March, 17-year-old Trent Mays and 16-year-old Ma’lik Richmond were found guilty of raping an unconscious classmate in August of last year. The assault first came to light after <a href="http://www.xojane.com/issues/steubenville-rape-verdict-alexandria-goddard">blogger Alexandria Goddard  exposed</a> a series of damning social media evidence from the night joking about the incident. "I'm not blaming the girl," Williams said before going on to blame both her and her parents, "but if you're a 16-year-old and you're drunk like that, your parents should teach you: Don't take drinks from other people. She's 16, why was she that drunk where she doesn't remember?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/serenas_rape_victim_blaming_got_everything_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/serenas_rape_victim_blaming_got_everything_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archbishop: &#8220;May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is &#8216;yes&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archbishop Oscar Cruz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cleric says gay people can totally marry -- as long as they marry someone of the opposite sex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing the Catholic Church is good at, it's finding loopholes in its own convoluted dogma. These are the people who invented Limbo, after all. So leave it to an enterprising archbishop to find a workaround on marriage equality. If gay men and women want to get hitched, no problem, says Archbishop Oscar Cruz of the Philippines. "I ask this question to myself and I have thought about it for a long time and the answer is 'yes,'" he declared earlier this week at the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines-National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal. There's just one catch.</p><p>"May a lesbian marry a gay man?" he told the crowd. <a href=" http://gaynewsnetwork.com.au/news/world/11220-philippine-archbishop-says-it-s-okay-for-a-gay-man-and-a-lesbian-to-marry.html">"My answer is 'yes,' because in that instance the capacity to consummate the union is there.</a> The anatomy is there. The possibility of conception is there." Apparently in Cruz's mind, "consummation" is limited strictly to those activities which can result in conception, and conception is good enough to call it a marriage. Cruz went on to to discuss marriage equality, saying, "For the Church, even if you turn it upside down and call it by another name, it would still not be marriage. For the Church, even if a hundred [judges] bless a same-sex wedding, it would still not be effective." Who needs love or even a like-minded orientation to get the Church's blessing anyway, when you've got straight up anatomy?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guys worry about sex on the first date too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/guys_worry_about_sex_on_the_first_date_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/guys_worry_about_sex_on_the_first_date_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We assume men just want to have sex as early as possible. But the truth is more complex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a question that decades of sexual liberation still hasn't diminished: If you put out on the first date, are you just a big, relationship-dooming whore? Because, after all, the choice about whether to have sex is always up to the woman, and the responsibility for whether those initial dating actions bloom into true love or having your calls go straight to voice mail also belongs entirely to her. Hey, here's a radical idea: Sexual consent applies to men too.</p><p>Give credit where it's due in the latest example of this old trope – when the Cut ran a story on <a href="http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/06/fucking-on-the-first-date-8-women-tell-all.html">"Fucking on the First Date? How It Worked Out for 8 Women"</a> Monday, it did at least include a few ladies whose entire lives were not ruined just because they were down for it right away. Inspired by a new book (called "It's Okay to Sleep With Him on the First Date," a title straight out of the Department of Things I Didn't Know We Needed Permission For), author Alyssa Shelasky admits she'd never go all the way that soon. But she also cites women who managed to find their soul mates, who fondly assert relationships launched with "our pure and uncomplicated sexuality from the start."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/guys_worry_about_sex_on_the_first_date_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/guys_worry_about_sex_on_the_first_date_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why didn&#8217;t anyone help?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/why_didnt_anyone_help_nigella/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/why_didnt_anyone_help_nigella/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigella lawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ring the Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Saatchi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Nigella Lawson's husband had his hand around her throat, how come no one stepped in?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ever there were a woman who represented the ideal of homey perfection, it'd be Nigella Lawson. This, after all, is the woman who jokingly titled one of her cookbooks "How to Be a Domestic Goddess," a woman whose television show "Nigella Bites" frequently ended with her triumphantly feeding <a href="http://youtu.be/3HdI223Wp8Y">an eager crowd</a> (or just <a href="http://youtu.be/D5x_ID13Dpk">her two children</a>).</p><p>So it came as stunning news Sunday when the Mirror's People page published a series of photographs showing the British food writer and television personality apparently <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nigella-lawson-attacked-husband-see-1955564#ixzz2WUPzz79g">being choked by her husband,</a> Charles Saatchi, during a recent lunch at Scott's restaurant in London. In the series of photographs, the man's hand is seen extended across a table and around Lawson's throat. As the Mirror sensationally describes it, "At first he used only his left hand, then both. At one stage he tweaked her nose then pushed both hands in her face. Twice Nigella jerked her head backwards as if in fear." Strangely, soon after, she reportedly kissed him on the cheek. Another photo shows her apparently crying and visibly upset, leaving the restaurant. Police are now investigating the incident but have not launched a formal investigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/why_didnt_anyone_help_nigella/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/why_didnt_anyone_help_nigella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>199</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSA agent allegedly tells teenage girl to &#8220;cover herself&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/tsa_agent_allegedly_tells_teenage_girl_to_cover_herself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/tsa_agent_allegedly_tells_teenage_girl_to_cover_herself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Frauenfelder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the girl's dad, Boing Boing editor Mark Frauenfelder, fights back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NSA may be reigning champs among the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/evade_the_nsa_with_these_safe_surfing_tips_partner/">Creepy and Invasive Government Agencies</a>, but let it not be said that our stalwart Transportation Security Administration workers aren't doing their part to make us shudder, one gross person, one repulsive comment at the time.</p><p>When Boing Boing and MAKE editor and <a href="http://boingboing.net/author/mark_frauenfelder_1">beloved Internet happy mutant Mark Frauenfelder's</a> teenage daughter was flying through Los Angeles Airport Sunday, she says a TSA agent had some unsolicited wardrobe advice. She texted her father that the agent was "glaring" as he was checking passenger identifications and mumbling in her direction. He then reportedly told her, "You're only 15, COVER YOURSELF!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/tsa_agent_allegedly_tells_teenage_girl_to_cover_herself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/tsa_agent_allegedly_tells_teenage_girl_to_cover_herself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>