<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mary Elizabeth Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mary_elizabeth_williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is killing a fetus murder?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/is_killing_a_fetus_murder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/is_killing_a_fetus_murder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ariel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Anthony Welden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man is charged with murder for giving his pregnant girlfriend an abortion pill and telling her it's an antibiotic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Andrew Welden is charged with the murder of a person who was never born.</p><p>As Tampa's WFTS-TV news reports, Welden is facing first-degree murder charges for allegedly giving his pregnant girlfriend Remee Lee an abortion pill and telling her it was an antibiotic. Welden worked in his father's Florida clinic, a <a href="http://www.docwelden.com/">"specialty infertility practice.</a>" When Lee began bleeding and experiencing cramps, she went to her local hospital, where doctors informed her the container labeled as amoxicillin was in fact the labor-inducing Cytotec. The fetus died in utero. "I was never going to do anything but go full term with it," she told reporters this week. <a href="http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20130517/NEWS01/305170045/Florida-woman-says-boyfriend-tricked-her-into-abortion">"And he didn’t want me to."</a> It's an appalling tale, which will once again force us to ponder what constitutes a human life -- and when one has taken it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/is_killing_a_fetus_murder/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/is_killing_a_fetus_murder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>165</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographed secretly at home: Is it art?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/photographed_secretly_at_home_is_it_art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/photographed_secretly_at_home_is_it_art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arne Svenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gallery show features pictures of residents shot through their windows. The subjects are understandably annoyed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When does an image become an invasion?</p><p>For as long as there have been cameras, there have been photographers who've captured the intimate, unaware moments of human existence. Masters like Eugène Atget and Henri Cartier-Bresson defined photography as an art form with their images of people simply going about the business of being themselves. And the recent posthumous fame of <a href="http://www.vivianmaier.com/">Vivian Maier</a> is ample proof of our obsession with the beauty of the unposed moment.</p><p>Yet in a world in which anyone with a phone -- which is pretty much everyone -- can be an amateur lensman, the opportunity to go too far is always present, if fuzzily defined. There is an entire genre of creepy quasi-porn gleaned from surreptitious photos of women, and a whole <a href="http://www.khou.com/news/crime/Man-arrested-charged-with-improper-photography-in-Walmart-Store-189746671.html ">new class of sex offenders</a> thanks to it. And Instagram, when not fulfilling its primary function as a chronicle of other people's meals and manicures, is often one big exercise in "Look at that stupid person over there." But in a daily world of questionable ethics, photographer Arne Svenson has managed to come up with a new head-scratcher. For his latest project, he didn't go out to the street. He peered into the window.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/photographed_secretly_at_home_is_it_art/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/photographed_secretly_at_home_is_it_art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My &#8220;truly remarkable&#8221; cancer breakthrough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/my_truly_remarkable_cancer_breakthrough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/my_truly_remarkable_cancer_breakthrough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab Rat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melanoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That groundbreaking clinical trial in the New York Times? It's my study -- and I'm 15 months clean]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've spent my whole career trying to make some kind of a name for myself. But it turns out that if I am ever remembered for anything, it will likely be as a number.</p><p>My patient number is how I'm identified in the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/24/my_life_as_a_lab_rat/">immunotherapy clinical trial I've been in since the fall of 2011</a>. It protects my privacy as my doctors and researchers at Memorial Sloan-Kettering assess my results. And those results have been, in the words of American Society of Clinical Oncology president Dr. Sandra Swain, "very exciting." "Truly remarkable," even. Results with far-reaching implications not just for countless melanoma patients just like me, but, soon, for patients with a variety of other forms of cancer. It's a whole new era of treatment.</p><p>This is something I've known about – and lived firsthand -- for a while. But <a href="http://abstracts2.asco.org/AbstView_132_107862.html">the first abstract</a> from the report my doctor, Jedd Wolchok, will be presenting at the ASCO annual meeting starting May 31 was released Wednesday – and even in a cancer news week dominated by <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/angelina_jolies_choice_need_not_be_yours/singleton/">Angelina Jolie and prophylactic mastectomies</a>, the findings still managed to make waves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/my_truly_remarkable_cancer_breakthrough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/my_truly_remarkable_cancer_breakthrough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triumph of the viral crazies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/triumph_of_the_viral_crazies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/triumph_of_the_viral_crazies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy's Baking Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Ramsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amy's Baking Company and a school that teaches creationism go viral and thrive -- thanks to us mocking them online]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started as a joke. But Good Lord, America, what have we done?</p><p>In a validation of stupidity not seen since, well, NBC's entire lineup, two institutions that have gone viral for their idiocy are now reaping the <em>benefits</em> of attention.</p><p>First, there's there Amy's Baking Co. in Scottsdale, Ariz., an establishment that became instantly notorious after owners Amy and Samy Bouzaglo were unflatteringly featured on Gordon Ramsay's "Kitchen Nightmares" – and went on a hilariously bonkers social media rampage. As the Phoenix Business Journal reported on Wednesday, the restaurant this week has become <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2013/05/15/amys-baking-company-turning-into.html?page=all">"a tourist attraction as cars slowly drove by to ogle, take photos and try to eat at the bakery and bistro."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/triumph_of_the_viral_crazies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/triumph_of_the_viral_crazies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with Disney princesses?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney princesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small victory for Merida doesn't change the company's dysfunctional branding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing you can count on Disney for, it's creating strong leading female characters in its movies – and then reducing them to wide-eyed idiots in their merchandising. The Belle who obsessed on books and the Tiana who scrimped and saved for her own restaurant, the warrior Mulan and the wise Pocahontas – they've all been reduced to flowing hair and off-the-shoulder dresses and coy looks in their post-cinematic incarnations. But when the mouse tried to give its "Brave" heroine Merida a "Stepford Wives" makeover, it finally went too far.</p><p>Last week, Disney announced that it was adding the headstrong, flame-haired heroine to its "Princess" collection. But it was the revamped image of Merida -- her waist nipped, her eyes elongated, her messy tangle of hair a sexy tumble, her plain dress a shimmer of bling and her trademark bow and arrow nowhere to be seen – that set parents' jaws dropping. Disney blandly told Yahoo Shine that <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/disney-princess-makeover-sparks-outrage--merida-petition-goes-viral-175251230.html ">"Merida exemplifies what it means to be a Disney Princess</a> through being brave, passionate, and confident and she remains the same strong and determined Merida from the movie whose inner qualities have inspired moms and daughters around the world." But it didn't quell the disgust.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/whats_wrong_with_disney_princesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angelina Jolie&#8217;s choice need not be yours</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/angelina_jolies_choice_need_not_be_yours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/angelina_jolies_choice_need_not_be_yours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pink Ribbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her decision was brave. But don't forget the healthcare industry is getting rich exploiting breast cancer fears]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're an international movie star with one of the most famous bodies in the world. You're also a daughter who lost her mother to cancer when she was only 56. You have six children of your own to raise. And you find out you carry the BRCA1 gene that increases your risk of developing the cancer that killed your mom.</p><p>OK, now make a choice.</p><p>In a bold and candid Op-Ed for the Tuesday New York Times, Angelina Jolie revealed <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html?_r=0 undergo">"My Medical Choice"</a> to be a preventive double mastectomy after her doctors "estimated that I had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer." As Jolie writes, "Cancer is still a word that strikes fear into people’s hearts, producing a deep sense of powerlessness. But today it is possible to find out through a blood test whether you are highly susceptible to breast and ovarian cancer, and then take action."</p><p>The 37-year-old's act has already been hailed as "brave" from everybody from <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/10055920/William-Hague-praises-brave-Angelina-Jolie-after-she-reveals-double-mastectomy.html">British Foreign Secretary William Hague</a> to a slew of the women in your Facebook feed. And it's undeniable that it takes tremendous strength to make a grueling medical decision <em>and</em> to share it with the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/angelina_jolies_choice_need_not_be_yours/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/angelina_jolies_choice_need_not_be_yours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seth Meyers pick: Why must late night be so white and male?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/seth_meyers_pick_why_must_late_night_be_so_white_and_male/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/seth_meyers_pick_why_must_late_night_be_so_white_and_male/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Kimmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Meyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seth Meyers is an affable, funny guy. But why in 2013 are we still looking for any diversity in late night?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's just get this part out of the way first. It's not that Seth Meyers isn't fantastic. He is. He's charming and funny and personable. He's also, like his predecessor Conan O'Brien, a skilled writer whose boyish looks belie his dark, surreal sense of humor. (As "Saturday Night Live's" head writer, he's given the show some of its most memorably quotable moments of the past decade.)</p><p>And it's not that we like having these conversations every single goddamn time there's a vacancy anywhere on late-night television, one that is promptly filled by an affable white dude. Believe me, I'd love to write the "Hooray for this bold new era in television" story. But here we are again, America. With the official announcement Sunday that Meyers will be assuming the chair now occupied by Jimmy Fallon as host of "Late Night," our post-11 p.m. hours seem yet again to be largely safe, for the foreseeable future, from having any people of color or ovaries anywhere near them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/seth_meyers_pick_why_must_late_night_be_so_white_and_male/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/seth_meyers_pick_why_must_late_night_be_so_white_and_male/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There will never be another Barbara Walters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Walters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Today Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retiring veteran newswoman set the gold standard for female journalists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara Walters is ready for a different view -- but not just yet. On Monday, the 83-year-old newswoman officially announced that she will retire in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-barbara-walters-retires-20130513,0,288355.story">"</a><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-barbara-walters-retires-20130513,0,288355.story">I do not want to appear on another program or climb another mountain,"</a> she explained in a weekend statement. "I want instead to sit on a sunny field and admire the very gifted women — and OK, some men too — who will be taking my place." But Barbara Walters, if nobody's managed to take your place yet, what makes you think it'll happen now?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/there_will_never_be_another_barbara_walters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thirteen miles with my teenager</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/thirteen_miles_with_my_teenager/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/thirteen_miles_with_my_teenager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You learn a lot about your hometown -- and your daughter -- when you spend a day walking together away from iPhones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live on a tiny island. A mere 13.4 miles from end to end – shorter than Nantucket – and so narrow in points you can walk from its western shore to its eastern edge in minutes. You'd think in a place so small that it'd be impossible not to know every nook and cranny of it. But Manhattan is a wildly provincial place. To look at most maps of it, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=manhattan+map&amp;hl=en&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=JbuLUbScI4n64APkqYCgDA&amp;ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&amp;biw=1341&amp;bih=765 ">you'd think it disappeared</a> somewhere around 125th Street, though it goes on for another 100 blocks. To watch movies or read New York Times stories about trendy restaurants or interesting locals, you'd get a picture of place that exists only from the Upper West Side to Wall Street. But for the past seven years, my vantage point from the northernmost tip of the borough has served as a daily reminder that this city is more complicated than that. It's far more than meets the eye. It's a work in progress. It's beautiful and mysterious and frequently exasperating. It is, in fact, in many ways very much like my 13-year-old daughter. And so recently, one bright spring day, she and I decided to go exploring together in the place we call home.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/thirteen_miles_with_my_teenager/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/thirteen_miles_with_my_teenager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Catholic Church even trying to make sense on marriage equality?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_the_catholic_church_even_trying_to_make_sense_on_marriage_equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_the_catholic_church_even_trying_to_make_sense_on_marriage_equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tough-talking letter to American Catholics on gay marriage reveals a shocking new level of ignorance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be so frustrating to be a Catholic bishop right now. Gosh, what must it feel like, to be part of a group that's struggling to be taken seriously, and whose wishes are increasingly ignored? Tough break, guys. In the wake of <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/delaware-gay-marriage-91035.html">Delaware's historic decision</a> earlier this week and as Minnesota now moves toward potentially becoming the 12th state to approve marriage equality, the Catholic Church is sending out the alarm to its American flock, with a new message on <a href="http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/marriage/promotion-and-defense-of-marriage/upload/Bulletin-Insert-Marriage-and-the-Supreme-Court-Spring-2013.pdf ">"Marriage and the Supreme Court."</a> Predictably, it's quite a corker.</p><p>The new letter from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops will be distributed in church newsletters throughout May and June. In it, the bishops unsurprisingly state their support for the Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8, and call Catholics "to prayer, penance and sacrifice for the sake of renewing a culture of life, marriage and religious liberty."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_the_catholic_church_even_trying_to_make_sense_on_marriage_equality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_the_catholic_church_even_trying_to_make_sense_on_marriage_equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should rape victims &#8220;submit&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/should_rape_victims_submit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/should_rape_victims_submit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Krusinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air Force brochure says it may be "advisable." Believe it or not, it's the least of the military's problems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the surprising, jaw-dropping and infuriating things that have happened in recent weeks regarding the military and rape, this was hardly the worst of the lot. In fact, it might have even been common sense. It just happened to arrive in the midst of a whole lot of garbage. That's why the news this week that an <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/05/air-force-sexual-assault-brochure/">"Air Force Brochure Tells Sexual Assault Victims to 'Submit'"</a> seemed at once so shocking – and so goddamn typical.</p><p>The Air Force advice isn't quite so cut and dried as the Wired headline first appears. Instead, it comes within Shaw Airforce Base's literature on "Sexual Assault Prevention and Response" – specifically what to do in the event of an attack. "It may be advisable to submit rather than resist," it reads. "You have to make this decision based on circumstances. Be especially careful if the attacker has a weapon."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/should_rape_victims_submit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/should_rape_victims_submit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is breast-feeding &#8220;gross&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_breastfeeding_gross/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_breastfeeding_gross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanna Moakler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Playboy playmate backtracks after calling it "incestual." But each mom's choice is her own -- and not for debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's inevitable that when you're Shanna Moakler -- Playmate, reality star, mother of three – and you're talking to TMZ – <a href="http://www.cracked.com/video_18242_if-tmzs-reporters-were-self-aware.html">celebrity-accosting, barrel-scraping, TMZ</a> – you're going to get asked about your breasts.</p><p>Naturally, it didn't take too long on the gossip site's TV show Tuesday to get into it. <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/05/07/tmz-live-charlie-sheen-denise-richards-brooke-mueller-chris-christie-lindsay-lohan-chris-brown-shanna-moakler-kobe-bryant/">"So what do you think about breast-feeding, folks?"</a> asked Harvey Levin, before segueing into a clip of Moakler in a garage somewhere saying, "I didn't breast-feed. I'm selfish." Tabloid jackpot! "I look at my breasts as like, sexual," she explained, while gesturing in the vicinity of her famed front matter. "I think it's like, incestual. It's gross. I don't like it. Sorry."</p><p>Later, she called the show to clarify her stance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_breastfeeding_gross/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_breastfeeding_gross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally: FDA cracks down on tanning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/finally_fda_cracks_down_on_tanning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/finally_fda_cracks_down_on_tanning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melanoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the spring rush, the FDA proposes new warning labels on indoor tanning and cancer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They're going to need a really big sticker on those beds. On Monday, the FDA announced that it is proposing new warning labels on indoor tanning.</p><p>The tactic, aimed at teens, wouldn't prohibit the use of tanning devices, but would require them to carry a warning of <a href="http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm350864.htm">"the consequences"</a> aimed at users under 18. The American Academy of Dermatology says there is a 75 percent increase in the risk of melanoma for "those who have been exposed to ultraviolet radiation from indoor tanning, and the risk increases with each use." Brace yourselves now for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/is_sunscreen_worse_than_cigarettes/">inevitable backlash from the tanning industry</a>, which has already been none too pleased with the push for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/10/should_teens_be_prohibited_from_tanning/">stricter regulation in several states</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/finally_fda_cracks_down_on_tanning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/finally_fda_cracks_down_on_tanning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Ramsey, hero and viral superstar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/charles_ramsey_hero_and_viral_superstar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/charles_ramsey_hero_and_viral_superstar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Ramsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amanda Berry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina DeJesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ariel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Ramsey helped save Amanda Berry -- and gave the interview of a lifetime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's amazing and wonderful enough that after three women disappeared without a trace over the course of a decade, Amanda Berry, Gina DeJesus and Michele Knight were <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57583153-504083/amanda-berry-gina-dejesus-michele-knight-ohio-women-missing-about-a-decade-found-alive-report-says/">all found alive</a> in a Cleveland house on Seymour Avenue on Monday. It's just a bonus that the rescue happened to produce your newest viral star.</p><p>As the sound bite-frenzied media descended in the wake of the dramatic rescue, it was local Good Samaritan and Big Mac aficionado Charles Ramsey who brought an earthy levity – and blunt racial context -- to the proceedings. Sure, in about an hour there will be a thousand autotuned remixes and parodies, but they will never, ever do better than the real thing.</p><p>That he's a hero who didn't hesitate to help a stranger in a moment of extreme crisis is indisputable. But Ramsey didn't just assist Amanda Berry as she fled the home owned by <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/07/castro-berry-cleveland/2140619/">52-year-old former bus driver Ariel Castro</a>. He then turned around and wove the tale into the most straight-shooting, shockingly funny interview about violence since Antoine Dodson told his neighbors that a would-be rapist is <a href="http://youtu.be/_oYnM9DD04s">"climbing in your windows, he's snatching your people up." </a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/charles_ramsey_hero_and_viral_superstar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/charles_ramsey_hero_and_viral_superstar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.cleveland.com/pdextra/audio/amanda-berry-911-call-2.mp3" length="491354" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s latest unfunny trend: #killallmen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#killallmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A satire turns into a serious conversation -- but mostly it's an excuse for both sexes to be obnoxious]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why we can't have nice things: Every day, plenty of nice, reasonably normal women are already tired from defending the word "feminism" from the angry, annoying trolls who think that acknowledging sexism means misandry. And then we wake up and see that <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23killallmen&amp;src=tyah">#killallmen</a> is trending on Twitter, and we just want to turn this car around until everybody can behave themselves.</p><p>I swear to God, no ice cream for anybody today, Twitter.</p><p>Nobody really thinks a hashtag is a serious call to genocide. One doesn't go looking for great pearls of wisdom in a form whose crowning achievement is the motivational #risenandgrind, either. And Twitter is already a reliably rich trove of trending topics that are <a href="http://www.badreputation.org.uk/2011/02/02/why-are-trending-topic-hashtags-so-sexist-part-1/">openly hostile to females</a>, usually employing some version of the word "slut."  I fully believe that if we could convert all the misogyny on Twitter into a fuel source, we could reverse climate change in one hour. But there's nothing quite like gleeful shoe-on-the-other-foot bullying disguised as satire to give the most tiresome elements of the men's right's lobby – <a href="http://jezebel.com/rape-and-death-threats-what-mens-rights-activists-rea-476882099">and they are legion</a> -- fuel for their own self-righteous sense of victimhood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reminder: Men get raped too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/reminder_men_get_raped_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/reminder_men_get_raped_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two high-profile cases remind us sexual assault isn't just a crime against women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a story so common we forget it could look any different. When we talk about rape, we talk in terms of him and her, and their roles as assailant and victim feel ironclad. But as two important stories this week remind us, the story isn't always so simple.</p><p>In the U.K. on Sunday, Nigel Evans, a senior conservative member of Parliament, found himself responding to accusations of rape and assault -- and declaring them <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/06/world/europe/british-lawmaker-denies-rape-accusations.html?_r=0 ">"completely false."</a> His two accusers are both male.</p><p>The British media says the claims against him go back as far as 2009 and as recently as this past March. The 55-year-old Evans has not been charged with any crime, and though he will not be chairing House of Commons debates this week, he has vowed he will not step down. He was interrogated over the weekend, and police searched his car and home. Though the accusers, said to both be in their 20s, have not been named, Evans says that the claims have been made by "two people who are well known to each other and until Saturday, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tory-mp-nigel-evans-should-not-step-down-over-rape-and-sexual-assault-claim-says-andrew-mitchell-8605053.html">I regarded as friends</a> ... I cannot understand why they have been made, especially as I have continued to socialize with one as recently as last week."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/reminder_men_get_raped_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/reminder_men_get_raped_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Komen for the Cure give Nancy Brinker a 64 percent raise?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_did_komen_for_the_cure_give_nancy_brinker_a_64_percent_raise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_did_komen_for_the_cure_give_nancy_brinker_a_64_percent_raise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan J. Komen for the Cure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Brinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Komen, already under fire for shrinking contributions for breast cancer research, paid its CEO $684,000 last year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year may have been a very bad year for the Susan G. Komen Foundation, but it still was a very good year for its CEO, Nancy Brinker. Extravagantly good.</p><p>In 2012, the breast cancer organization ignited a firestorm by announcing it was pulling its funding for breast cancer screenings and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/komen_for_the_cure_sells_out_women_again/singleton/">services for Planned Parenthood</a> -- and then had to hastily and ineptly apologize, then backpedal. It watched as its conspicuously conservative vice president for public policy <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/komen_scandal_goodbye_karen_handel/">Karen Handel resigned</a> in the wake of the scandal. It saw registrations for its events decline <a href="http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-10-18/health/bs-hs-komen-registration-20121018_1_komen-maryland-cure-group-worries">in Maryland</a>, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/21/1076382/-Komen-Foundation-in-Disarray">in Texas</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/us/with-komen-image-hurt-support-for-affiliates-lags.html?pagewanted=all">all over the damn place</a>. It squirmed at increasing questions over why an organization that features the words "the cure" so heavily in its promotion, that boasts how its "research investment has changed the breast cancer landscape," devotes a minuscule and declining portion of its dollars to actually finding one.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_did_komen_for_the_cure_give_nancy_brinker_a_64_percent_raise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_did_komen_for_the_cure_give_nancy_brinker_a_64_percent_raise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhode Island bishop: Stay away from gay weddings!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/rhode_island_bishop_stay_away_from_gay_weddings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/rhode_island_bishop_stay_away_from_gay_weddings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After marriage equality's big win, Catholics are warned to boycott nuptials]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a brief honeymoon, Rhode Island. Just hours before becoming the 10th state to approve marriage equality, the slim, pocket-sized state -- which also happens to be <a href="http://blogs.wpri.com/2013/03/12/study-ri-has-3rd-most-catholic-baptisms-in-the-united-states/ ">the nation's most Catholic</a> -- received a stern warning from the Bishop of Providence.</p><p>In a seriously buzzkill message, <a href="http://www.diocesepvd.org/letter-to-catholics-on-the-approval-of-same-sex-marriage-in-ri/">Bishop Thomas Tobin issued a pastoral letter</a> to his brothers and sisters in the Ocean State suggesting they might want to decline invitations once same-sex marriage becomes official in August. "It is important to affirm the teaching of the Church, based on God’s word, that 'homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered,' (Catechism of the Catholic Church, #2357)," he writes, "and always sinful. And because 'same-sex marriages' are clearly contrary to God’s plan for the human family, and therefore objectively sinful, Catholics should examine their consciences very carefully before deciding whether or not to endorse same-sex relationships or attend same-sex ceremonies, realizing that to do so might harm their relationship with God and cause significant scandal to others."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/rhode_island_bishop_stay_away_from_gay_weddings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/rhode_island_bishop_stay_away_from_gay_weddings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dolls for girls, science and Legos for boys: The toy aisle is still sexist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A drugstore chain declares science is for boys -- until customers fight back on Twitter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can't do away with sexism by doing away with sexist labeling. But it's a start. So thanks, Boots. After an embarrassing kerfuffle over what it backwardly deems gender appropriate toys, the U.K. drugstore chain is moving toward a more equitable display system.</p><p>Boots' enlightenment began after Twitter user Sean E. Gray posted a photo from the store, with the caption "not impressed." It revealed the store's "Girl Toy" section, featuring princess gear and mini-tea sets, and the "Boy" section -- chock-full of Science Museum brand kits.</p><p>As the Guardian reports, Boots initially defended the placement, saying its real estate choices were based on <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317559/Boots-removes-store-signs-labellign-girls-boys-toys-customers-complain-sexism.html#ixzz2S2DdqHAN">"customer feedback" and making the stores "easier to navigate."</a> But in the face of mounting criticism, it has since retreated, promising on its Facebook page that "It was never our intention to stereotype certain toys. It's clear we have got this signage wrong, and we're taking immediate steps to remove it from store."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ultimate cancer taboo: Sometimes it kills you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pink Ribbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelo Merendino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We keep talking about battles, warriors, miracles and hope. Meanwhile, those with metastatic cancers are ignored]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary cancer gets couched in the language of cheerleaders. Even a generation ago, the mere word "cancer" seemed a certain death sentence; today, in contrast, it's an opportunity to talk about battles and fights and hope. It's something to be bravely dealt with – having cancer automatically designates a person a "warrior." The disease is then referred to only at occasional "awareness" opportunities, preferably with a tasteful ribbon.</p><p>But people with metastatic cancer don't follow the tidy, cheerful narrative. They don't necessarily fit the inspirational survivor mold. And so they're ignored.</p><p>In the middle of her righteous New York Times Magazine story on breast cancer this past weekend, writer Peggy Orenstein dropped the bombshell statistic that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_there_too_much_breast_cancer_awareness/">"only an estimated 0.5 percent of all National Cancer Institute grants since 1972 focus on metastasis.</a>" As University of Kansas Cancer Center chairman Danny Welch explained to her, "A lot of people are under the notion that metastatic work is a waste of time." Orenstein went on to reveal that last year, for the first time in its history, the Komen Foundation featured a woman with Stage 4 cancer in its ads. And the author herself described meeting a different woman with metastatic breast cancer by admitting, "It isn't easy to face someone with metastatic disease," calling the woman's condition her own "worst fear."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
