<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mary Elizabeth Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mary_elizabeth_williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The ultimate cancer taboo: Sometimes it kills you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pink Ribbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelo Merendino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We keep talking about battles, warriors, miracles and hope. Meanwhile, those with metastatic cancers are ignored]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contemporary cancer gets couched in the language of cheerleaders. Even a generation ago, the mere word "cancer" seemed a certain death sentence; today, in contrast, it's an opportunity to talk about battles and fights and hope. It's something to be bravely dealt with – having cancer automatically designates a person a "warrior." The disease is then referred to only at occasional "awareness" opportunities, preferably with a tasteful ribbon.</p><p>But people with metastatic cancer don't follow the tidy, cheerful narrative. They don't necessarily fit the inspirational survivor mold. And so they're ignored.</p><p>In the middle of her righteous New York Times Magazine story on breast cancer this past weekend, writer Peggy Orenstein dropped the bombshell statistic that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_there_too_much_breast_cancer_awareness/">"only an estimated 0.5 percent of all National Cancer Institute grants since 1972 focus on metastasis.</a>" As University of Kansas Cancer Center chairman Danny Welch explained to her, "A lot of people are under the notion that metastatic work is a waste of time." Orenstein went on to reveal that last year, for the first time in its history, the Komen Foundation featured a woman with Stage 4 cancer in its ads. And the author herself described meeting a different woman with metastatic breast cancer by admitting, "It isn't easy to face someone with metastatic disease," calling the woman's condition her own "worst fear."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/the_ultimate_cancer_taboo_sometimes_it_kills_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most racist commercial of all time?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/the_most_racist_commercial_of_all_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/the_most_racist_commercial_of_all_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odd Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain Dew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip-hop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Critics call a Mountain Dew ad racist -- but the joke could be on them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it's weird, all right. It's aggressive and provocative -- two qualities you don't usually expect from a soda commercial, but not surprising at all coming from the minds behind Odd Future. But does this new series of Mountain Dew ads actually reinforce ugly stereotypes? Or are its critics completely missing the point?</p><p>The story begins back in March, when Tyler, the Creator cheerfully announced on Twitter that <a href="http://www.spin.com/articles/mountain-dew-goat-tyler-the-creator-commercial-video/">"They Let My Stupid Ideas Come To Life, Thanks Dew!"</a> He followed up by unleashing the first spot he directed – a surreal vision in which Errol Chatham finds himself distracted by a fellow restaurant patron – the "nasty," rampaging, Dew-chugging Felicia the Goat.</p><p>Now, in the third and newest spot, Felicia's terrified waitress, now bruised and hobbling on crutches, is led into a lineup at a police station. And there's the goat, flanked by a tough-looking group of young minority men. The white cop tells the blond lady to make an identification, but the goat ominously warns, "Ya better not snitch on a playa," because "snitches get stitches."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/the_most_racist_commercial_of_all_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/the_most_racist_commercial_of_all_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo blows it again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/yahoo_blows_it_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/yahoo_blows_it_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new expanded leave policy doesn't cover real life -- especially for a company that has banned working from home]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's a start, I guess. On Tuesday, NBC broke the news that Yahoo, of all places, has now significantly <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/marissa-mayer-doubles-the-length-of-yahoos-paid-maternity-leave-gives-new-dads-eight-weeks-off-2013-4">upped its family leave policy</a>. The company will now increase employee maternity leave from eight weeks to 16 weeks, and offer new dads eight weeks paid leave. It will also give new parents $500 <a href="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/tech/NATL-After-Work-From-Home-Ban-Yahoo-Expands-Maternity-Leave-205377421.html?sai">"to spend on such things as house cleaning, groceries and babysitters, plus Yahoo-branded baby gifts."</a> What's this, boss? A tiny onesie with a corporate logo on it? You shouldn't have! <em>So yeahhhhhhh, thanks.</em></p><p>In recent months, Yahoo has not won a reputation as the most family-friendly of organizations, in spite of its new CEO, Marissa Mayer. You may recall hearing a word or two about how everything in the world was going to be different henceforth for working parents back when Yahoo hired her last year, while she was still pregnant. Instead, Mayer made good on her vow to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/marissa_mayer_can_work_if_she_wants/">power through her own brief maternity leave</a> like a character out of Monty Python, <a href="http://youtu.be/ptTwi6-ii-s">popping out a baby</a> while never breaking stride. True to form, by November, she was confidently declaring, "The baby's been way easier than everyone made it out to be."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/yahoo_blows_it_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/yahoo_blows_it_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop mocking Adam Holland</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/stop_mocking_adam_holland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/stop_mocking_adam_holland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cox Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cowhead Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A radio station faces an $18 million lawsuit for using a photo of a boy with Down syndrome for its "Retarded News"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nashville couple Bernard and Pamela Holland didn't even take the photograph. It's a 9-year-old image of their son Adam as a teenager, smiling broadly as he holds up a drawing he made in art class. It's a photo that's now generated an $18 million lawsuit.</p><p>The Hollands filed the suit against Cox Media, claiming <a href=" http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/tenn-couple-sues-retarded-images-son-article-1.1330304#ixzz2Rx7obaAS">"invasion of privacy, misappropriation of likeness, defamation and emotional distress"</a> after the image of Adam, who was born with Down syndrome, began appearing as a punch line on various websites. Most notably, Cox's Florida radio station WHPT-FM's Cowhead Show reportedly altered the photo of Adam to make it appear he was holding a sign touting its "Retarded News."</p><p>The station's director has apologized, sort of, by issuing an email that says, "The segment 'Retarded News' is designed to highlight odd stories that are seemingly always in the news. Stories such as botched bank robberies and failed crimes. These stories are NOT about disabled individuals." I guess if you're using the image of someone with Down syndrome on your "Retarded News," but not actually talking about people with Down syndrome, he thinks it's somehow ok.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/stop_mocking_adam_holland/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/stop_mocking_adam_holland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapists should not get custody</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/rapists_should_not_get_custody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/rapists_should_not_get_custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A shocking number of states allow custody rights to men who impregnate their victims. One state is saying "enough"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine that after one of the most harrowing experiences a person could endure, a woman not only found herself pregnant but also made the bold, difficult choice to raise the child. Imagine next that her decision would then give her rapist an opportunity to remain firmly in her life, in one of the most intimate of relationships.</p><p>Imagine he wanted – and legally had the right to be – that child's father. It's a very real scenario, all across America. But in one state, that may soon be changing.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/opinion/prewitt-rapist-visitation-rights/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn">a riveting CNN story</a> last summer, at the height of<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/todd_akin_ive_relived_legitimate_rape_comments_many_many_times/"> "legitimate rape" fever</a>, illuminated, a stunning majority of states – 31 of them – offer some form of visitation and custody rights for men who impregnate their rape victims. And it's not just the threat of having to co-parent with one's assailant that's a nightmare for many victims -- it's the ugly opportunism it inspires. As attorney Shauna Prewitt, whose daughter was the product of a sexual assault, wrote back then, "When no law prohibits a rapist from exercising these rights, a woman may feel forced to bargain away her legal rights to a criminal trial in exchange for the rapist dropping the bid to have access to her child." A baby can become a bargaining chip.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/rapists_should_not_get_custody/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/rapists_should_not_get_custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminism didn&#8217;t kill men&#8217;s rights advocate Earl Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Rights Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earl Silverman had his demons, and his pain must be taken seriously. But feminism isn't responsible for his death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was a hero of the Men's Rights movement. Three years ago, Earl Silverman, a self-described long-term survivor of violence at the hands of an abusive wife, turned his own home into the Men's Alternative Safe House, Canada's first domestic abuse shelter for men and their children. On Friday, he was found hanging in its garage, <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/28/earl-silverman-who-ran-mens-safe-house-dies-in-apparent-suicide/">an apparent suicide. </a></p><p>Silverman had been going through a period of intense personal stress lately – his death came just one day after he packed up his recently sold home. Just last month, he'd closed the shelter because he could no longer afford to maintain it. He had said he was struggling to keep up with his heat and grocery bills.</p><p>In his dogged efforts to help men and to raise public awareness, Silverman worked to remove the stigma that can often prevent men from speaking out because of pride and fear and misunderstanding. Yet where Silverman came up short was in perpetuating the Men's Rights movement's fiction that there's any gender equity as far as violence and victims. The Calgary Herald recalled, in its coverage of his death, Silverman's oft-repeated insistence that <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/rights+supporters+mourn+loss+advocate/8307690/story.html">"men are about as likely as women to say they have been the victims of domestic abuse."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/feminism_didnt_kill_mens_rights_advocate_earl_silverman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>261</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear famous actresses: Your looks scare me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What have you all done to yourselves? I've loved you for decades, but your plastic features are freaking me out  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, lady. You, lady. Beloved celebrity of my generation, icon with a career spanning decades. I saw a story about you today and I was excited, because I've always been your fan. Then I looked at it. And I just want to know one thing. <em>Girl, what the eff have you done to your face?</em></p><p>I've tried to ignore it. I've tried not to say anything. Not just to you, today, but to lots of female celebrities, for years. I want to believe that if you were to go out and get a tattoo that said "I LOVE CHEESE" across your forehead, I would support your right to do whatever makes you happy. And as someone who keeps a stock of hair color in her closet in case there's ever a Feriapocalypse, and who doesn't own an item of makeup or moisturizer that doesn't boldly feature the word "youth" on the packaging, I'm not one to espouse growing older gracefully. I'd never sell anybody on the nobility of looking like you just stepped out of <a href="http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A3373&amp;page_number=5&amp;template_id=1&amp;sort_order=1">a Dorothea Lange photograph</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/dear_famous_actress_your_plastic_face_freaks_me_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyundai&#8217;s shocking ad: You can&#8217;t kill yourself in our car</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/hyundais_shocking_ad_you_cant_kill_yourself_in_our_car/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/hyundais_shocking_ad_you_cant_kill_yourself_in_our_car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The car maker apologizes for a horribly tasteless ad -- but no one wants to take responsibility for it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that Ford is no longer the front-runner for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/22/ford-of-india-in-hot-water-for-figo-celebrity-bondage-ads/">most tasteless, boneheaded ad campaign</a> of the year. Sorry, America! South Korea’s largest automaker, Hyundai, and its advertising agency Innocean Worldwide Europe, has utterly stolen your glory.</p><p>In the spot, hilariously titled <a href="http://adland.tv/commercials/hyundai-pipe-job-2012-60">"Pipe Job,"</a> a grim, middle-aged man is seen in his garage, methodically taping and running a pipe into his car. He then sits inside stoically, breathing deeply, his face a mask of weary woe. Cut to nightfall, and the man emerging from the garage very much alive. The tag line? "The new iX35 has 100 percent water emissions." Apparently someone thinks Hyundai's target demographic is the depressed, unsuccessfully suicidal car-buyer market. Way to own it!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/hyundais_shocking_ad_you_cant_kill_yourself_in_our_car/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/hyundais_shocking_ad_you_cant_kill_yourself_in_our_car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there too much breast cancer &#8220;awareness&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_there_too_much_breast_cancer_awareness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_there_too_much_breast_cancer_awareness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the world is a pinker place. But an author (and survivor) says we're squandering time, money and resources]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facing the helplessness of disease – especially a disease that has a penchant for women, for our mothers and our friends and daughters – it feels good to go on the offensive. It feels good to believe we are somehow collectively "battling" it. It feels good enough, in fact, to have turned breast cancer into a big, Pepto Bismol-colored business, and to have driven unprecedented droves of women into prophylactic mastectomies.</p><p>Yet reality is far more complicated than a jaunty ribbon on a lapel or the hopeful promise of "early detection." And the key to unlocking the secrets of a pernicious disease will not be found <a href="http://lipstickpowdernpaint.com/2011/10/04/bc/">in a pink bottle of nail polish</a> -- or even, very likely, in radical defensive surgery.</p><p>That point is well-illustrated in author Peggy Orenstein's blisteringly sensible cover story for the New York Times Magazine on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/our-feel-good-war-on-breast-cancer.html?pagewanted=all">"Our Feel-Good War on Breast Cancer."</a> (It will appear in print this weekend, but is on the Times' site now.) Orenstein knows well the nightmare of breast cancer. She was diagnosed in 1996, at age 35. A decade and a half later, she was diagnosed again. And that span of time represents a massive shift in our cultural relationship with breast cancer – and a surprising new concern: what she calls "the dangers of overtreatment."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_there_too_much_breast_cancer_awareness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_there_too_much_breast_cancer_awareness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP official&#8217;s Facebook status: She&#8217;s &#8220;hot enough to almost make me register Democrat&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New Mexico official gets suspended for sexist social media activity -- during a meeting. It's just the beginning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His <a href="https://www.facebook.com/kush.steve">Facebook friends</a> call him "an honorable man" who was just "being funny." They say that "People are way to [sic] sensitive in this day and age." But when Steve Kush, the executive director of Bernalillo County's (New Mexico) Republican Party, went on a social media rampage during a local commissioners' meeting about the minimum wage earlier this week, his party chairman, Frank Ruvelo, saw things differently.</p><p>Seems his fellow Republicans did not appreciate what Kush said on Twitter and Facebook regarding a 19-year-old female at the meeting, "Nice hat Working America chick but damn you are a radical bitch." Nor did it enjoy his remarks depicting the organization's state director Chelsey Evans as "Uh oh another Working America chick," or his observation that she had "nice boots…I know she makes more than min wage." And they definitely didn't find it too amusing when he declared that she "was hot enough to almost make me register democrat."</p><p>He's currently suspended, indefinitely, without pay.</p><p><a href="http://newmexico.watchdog.org/17738/i-absolutely-crossed-the-line-bernallio-county-gop-exec-suspended-for-facebook-comments/">"It was an ill-fated attempt at humor,</a>" Kush told Watchdog.org Wednesday. "Do I regret it? Yes … I absolutely crossed the line."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What really happened to Sunil Tripathi?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/what_really_happened_to_sunil_tripathi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/what_really_happened_to_sunil_tripathi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunil Tripathi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: As a body is discovered in Providence, we're reminded of the human cost of the despicable need to be first]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the ways in which last week's horror in Boston showed the resilience and cooperation of a community in the wake of disaster, the tragedy will also inevitably go down as a shining example of the desperate, despicable scramble to hunt, to accuse, to blame first – and worry about ethics and responsibility later. If ever.</p><p>We saw it in the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_cnns_frantic_news_coverage/">epic bungling of mainstream media outlets</a> like CNN and the New York Post. We saw it in the frenzy of Redditors and overeager tweeters. We saw it, most cruelly, in the story of a missing student, a young man whose body <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/body-pulled-river-brown-university-student-sunil-tripathi/story?id=19031402#.UXg-WFpASnY">may have been pulled Tuesday night</a> from the Providence harbor.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/what_really_happened_to_sunil_tripathi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/what_really_happened_to_sunil_tripathi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postal Service to Lance Armstrong: Pay up!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nascar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POstal service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USPS claims disgraced cyclist "unjustly enriched" himself. But why did they sponsor him in the first place?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lance Armstrong beatdown continues apace. The disgraced former cycling superstar, who recently capped several years of vehement, passionate denials of doping with a half-assed admission and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrongs_unmoving_confession/">a mea culpa to Oprah Winfre</a>y, has been trying to salvage his decimated public image. After withdrawing from his leadership role at his Livestrong charity and losing sponsors faster <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/is_jimmy_fallon_nbcs_last_best_hope/">than NBC can lose viewers</a>, he's made a few noises about returning to competition, but has largely receded from the public eye.</p><p>But Armstrong has not been forgotten – especially by the U.S. government. On Tuesday, the Justice Department filed a 28-page complaint against the man, detailing what USA Today plain-spokenly refers to as "several years of lying, cheating and manipulating" Uncle Sam during the six years he was sponsored by the Postal Service.</p><p>The suit claims "the USPS paid approximately $40 million to sponsor [Armstrong's] USPS cycling team from 1998 to 2004," a period Armstrong is charged with using "prohibited drugs" in violation of his contract. Under the False Claims Act, Armstrong could be held accountable for $100 million in damages. On the bright side, it looks like the government has come up with a plan to help the economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Reese to A.J. Clemente, stupidity keeps going viral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny Or Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca Martinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Clemente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reese witherspoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael shannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention clueless anchormen, sorority girls and Oscar winners: Your careers are at stake when you screw up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clear up any confusion that you might have, not-terribly-bright person who may from time to time send emails or appear in front of a camera or interact with other humans: The cloak of invisibility is not yet a reality. We can all see and hear and read you here.</p><p>We, by the way, are your teachers and employers and future employers and law enforcement officers. But don't take my word for it. Instead, learn from the shining examples of very dumb and very public behavior in just the last few days, and then henceforth, I beg you, pause for just a moment before opening your mouth or hitting the "send" button.</p><p>The most recent unfortunate victim of a yawning gap in internal filtering devices is the newly unemployed A.J. Clemente. For about five minutes this weekend, Clemente was a news anchor at KFYR-TV in North Dakota. But in an apparent case of nerves not seen since <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7mp5u_broadcast-news-sweating-the-news_fun#.UXa54ytoRuo ">Albert Brooks perspired his way through the headlines</a> in "Broadcast News," Clemente obliviously kicked off his debut performance by looking downcast and muttering a short string of obscenities. He would later chalk up the mini-meltdown to fear of <a href="https://twitter.com/ClementeAJ/status/326256513641500672">flubbing the name of London marathon winner Tsegaye Kebede</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/from_reese_to_a_j_clemente_stupidity_keeps_going_viral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are female-friendly gyms sexist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Londoner sues over women-only hours and gets called a jerk and a "limey nutsack." But he might have a fair point]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a club has a policy of regularly excluding one gender, would you automatically assume it's being sexist? What if the group being shut out is guys?</p><p>That's the question that has set British gym shorts in a proverbial twist in recent weeks, after a man decided to sue London's Kentish Town Sports Centre for offering 442 hours a year for women-only hours.</p><p>Writing last week in the Daily Mail, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2311098/Peter-Lloyd-Why-Im-suing-gym-sexist-women-hours.html#ixzz2RI9kvgaK ">patron Peter Lloyd explained his beef</a> with the gym, noting that "they still charge them the same full-price membership fee as women, but refuse to offer the equivalent option of male-only sessions." Jezebel promptly labeled Lloyd a "jerk," who should <a href="http://jezebel.com/jackass-suing-his-gym-for-their-442-women-only-hours-pe-476604412">"give us our 442 hours a year and stop crying."</a> Wonkette, meanwhile, less charitably referred to him as a <a href="http://wonkette.com/513321/human-rights-hero-sues-sexist-gym-because-of-ladies-only-yoga-classes">"Limey nutsack." </a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/are_female_friendly_gyms_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boy Scouts: Still wrong on LGBT rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/boy_scouts_still_wrong_on_lgbt_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/boy_scouts_still_wrong_on_lgbt_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boy Scouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family research council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Perkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gay-averse organization takes halting, condescending steps toward equality -- and fails yet again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not really progress – or even compromise – if your gentle, glacial-paced attempts at moving into the 21st century reek of condescension and open up a whole big can of outright bigotry. So let's try this again, shall we, Boy Scouts?</p><p>The famously LGBT-averse organization has in recent months been taking awkward steps toward becoming more inclusive, thanks to a series of high-profile challenges and increasing pleas for greater tolerance within its ranks. In January, it announced it was "potentially discussing" changing its restrictions on gay members. Then, last month, it <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/do_boy_scouts_get_a_badge_for_surveying_members_if_its_ok_to_be_gay/ ">unveiled a new survey</a> it's sending to its members that will feel them out on a few scenarios that "could happen if the Boy Scouts keeps or changes its policy" – scenarios that bear no small resemblance to recent high-profile stories involving gay Scouts and adult leaders who've been shut out because of their orientation. It was a peculiar move – one that had the appearance of progress but the suggestion that equality toward those oddly classified "open homosexuals" is something that can be dictated by the tastes of an organization's members.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/boy_scouts_still_wrong_on_lgbt_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/boy_scouts_still_wrong_on_lgbt_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amanda Palmer&#8217;s trollish Dzhokhar poem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/amanda_palmers_trollish_dzhokhar_poem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/amanda_palmers_trollish_dzhokhar_poem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amanda Palmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet's abuzz about the singer's poem. But what's offensive isn't the verse, it's making a tragedy about her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you thought the "too soon" response applied only to jokes, or that trolling and poetry don't mix, behold what broke out when musician Amanda Palmer set her feelings about current events to verse.</p><p>Palmer, whose online community is nothing if not robust and vocal, posted <a href="http://amandapalmer.net/blog/20130421/">"A Poem for Dzhokhar"</a> on Sunday. The poem, which takes its title from the first name of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, imagines the things a young man might not yet know: "you don’t know how to make something, but the instructions are on the internet/you don’t know how to make sense of this massive parade/you don’t know how to believe anyone anymore … you don’t know why you let that guy go without shooting him dead and stuffing him in some bushes between cambridge and watertown." Underneath, she posted a link to the newly formed <a href="http://onefundboston.org/">One Fund</a> "to help the people most affected by the tragic events that occurred in Boston" -- noticeably right above a link to donate to "give me some help for the time and effort" of Palmer's own work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/amanda_palmers_trollish_dzhokhar_poem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/amanda_palmers_trollish_dzhokhar_poem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing is killing learning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race to the Top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Ravitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Core Learning Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standardized Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As public school children sit down to take standardized tests, educators explain why they don't work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's called a "prep rally." This week, New York public school students are taking their standardized tests, in line with the national <a href="http://www.edinformatics.com/testing/new_york_state/overview_of_common_core_sample_questions.pdf">Common Core Learning Standards</a>. Last week, the principal of my third grader's progressive, learn-by-doing school sent home a letter about the "overemphasis on assessments and the unintended consequences of using state tests to promote students and evaluate school," a letter in which she promised the education our students receive there "cannot be measured by a single test score."</p><p>And the next day, the faculty shepherded the entire student body into the gym to cheer for the students to "Do your best" and sing, to the tune of "Ghostbusters," that they were "test crushers."</p><p>The rally may have been a well-intentioned attempt to defuse students' pre-test jitters. A school administrator later told me, "It wasn't to further promote testing. It was just about increasing confidence." Our principal echoed the sentiment, saying, "We did a very intense test prep this year. We recognize that our kids were saturated and starting to feel overload. The kids seemed like they needed the let loose." And, she noted, "The idea of bringing a group together to garner enthusiasm is something we do all the time."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/testing_is_killing_learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay marriage advances in France &#8212; and so does hate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gay_marriage_advances_in_france_and_so_does_hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gay_marriage_advances_in_france_and_so_does_hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christiane Taubira]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage is approved, yes -- but amid an ugly backlash. Might something similar happen here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's nothing like progress to bring out the hardcore haters. They see bigotry melting away, they see people being happy, it drives them crazy. It makes them react.</p><p>On Friday, the French Senate voted to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/12/french-gay-marriage/2077039/">approve same-sex marriage and adoption</a>, a move that could bring about full change in the country as early as this summer (civil unions have been legal since 1999). France's justice minister Christiane Taubira, a vocal supporter of the measure, said Friday that the move would strengthen society "by granting the simple recognition of full citizenship to homosexual couples" and  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22126437">"move our institutions towards ever more freedom, equality and personal respect."</a> Yet conservatives in the French government vowed to continue to fight against the bill, declaring that "nothing is definitive and the debate continues."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gay_marriage_advances_in_france_and_so_does_hate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gay_marriage_advances_in_france_and_so_does_hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gabrielle Reece: I choose to serve my husband</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabby Reece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laird Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Reece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The volleyball star knows what's "truly" feminine. It's a strange definition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up is down. Black is white. And, according to Gabby Reece, submissive is strong.</p><p>In an interview Friday on the <a href="http://www.today.com/news/gabby-reece-women-being-submissive-sign-strength-1C9322181">"Today"</a> show, Reece, who is married to surfing superstar Laird Hamilton, discussed her new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451692668/?tag=saloncom08-20">"My Foot Is Too Big for the Glass Slipper"</a> and went at least a few shades of grey by declaring her submissiveness.</p><p>Reece, who was OF COURSE introduced as a "mother, model and former pro beach volleyball star" <em>in that order,</em> explains in the book, "to truly be feminine means being soft, receptive and – look out, here it comes – submissive."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/gabrielle_reece_i_choose_to_serve_my_husband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>167</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rape lyrics cost Rick Ross a Reebok deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/rape_lyrics_cost_rick_ross_a_reebok_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/rape_lyrics_cost_rick_ross_a_reebok_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reebok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reebok dumps Rick Ross for lyrics "misinterpreted" about sexual assault. Is this setting a dangerous precedent?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess Rick Ross' assurances that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/the_best_and_worst_apologies_of_the_week/">he doesn't "condone" rape</a> were not enough for him to keep his gig as a sneaker salesman. Late Thursday, <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/reebok-fires-rick-ross-alleged-rape-lyrics-148535">Reebok announced it was dumping him</a> as a spokesman.</p><p>At issue were the lyrics to the new track "U.O.E.N.O." – in which Ross brags that "Put Molly all in her champagne. She ain't even know it. I took her home and I enjoy that. She ain't even know it." ("Molly" is slang for Ecstasy, non-partiers.)</p><p>The song has been scrutinized ever since writer Rosa Clemente noted the "problematic" line last month on her YouTube channel. Soon after, Ross told New Orleans radio station Q 93.3, "I would never use the term 'rape' in my records and as far as my camp … Nobody condones that. So I just wanted to reach out to all my queens that’s on my timeline, all the sexy ladies, the beautiful ladies that have been reaching out to me with the misunderstanding: We don’t condone rape, and I’m not with that. I want to make sure this is clear, that woman is the most precious gift known to man. It was a misunderstanding with a lyric, a misinterpretation where the term rape wasn't used."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/rape_lyrics_cost_rick_ross_a_reebok_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/rape_lyrics_cost_rick_ross_a_reebok_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>