<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Max Garrone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/max_garrone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>yet another test by max</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/01/13/anothertest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/01/13/anothertest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//blog/2004/01/13/anothertest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yet another test by max]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yet another test by max</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/01/13/anothertest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/01/13/anothertest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Willie Nelson: &#8220;Crazy: The Demo Sessions&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/29/nelson_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/29/nelson_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/audio/music/2003/04/29/nelson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of early '60s recordings by the Red-Headed Stranger shows a chiseled young man with a sweet, sweet voice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You'd hardly recognize the voice because it's too sweet to be the Red-Headed Stranger. The clean-shorn young man on the inside-sleeve photos of "Crazy: The Demo Sessions" makes you think of anyone but Willie Nelson. But it's him -- a 20-something Nelson long before the disheveled looks, the battles with drugs and the IRS. He made these recordings as a newcomer to Nashville, between 1960 and 1966, to demonstrate his songwriting talent and to sell songs to the stars of the era like Patsy Cline, who picked up Nelson's "Crazy" and made it a hit. </p><p>"Crazy: The Demo Sessions" includes several short takes that appear to be fragments of songs, but also tracks that Nelson would revisit later in his career, such as "Opportunity to Cry" and "Half a Man." Throughout, Willie's youthful voice makes you reach for the adjectives. It's sweet, haunting and tender but always informed by a nuanced delivery reminiscent of Frank Sinatra's. Often he accompanies himself with just an acoustic guitar, making his songs shimmer with the honesty and simplicity of the early-'60s country music ethos. </p><p> "Crazy: The Demo Sessions" is out now on <a href="http://www.sugarhillrecords.com" target="new">Sugar Hill Records.</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/29/nelson_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/29/nelson_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music preview: Karrin Allyson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/13/allyson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/13/allyson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/audio/music/2002/09/13/allyson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On her latest album, "In Blue," vocalist Allyson slides effortlessly through blues classics by Bobby Troup, Bonnie Raitt, Max Roach, Joni Mitchell and others. Listen in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Karrin Allyson<br />"In Blue"</b><br />Out now on <a href="http://www.concordrecords.com/" target="new">Concord Records</a> </p><p>Karrin Allyson's new album comes on the heels of her 2001 Grammy-nominated "Ballads: Remembering John Coltrane." On <a href="http://www.concordrecords.com/dap/in_blue.html" target="new">"In Blue"</a> she again slides effortlessly through a pantheon of classic songs, this time with a focus on the blues. The album includes remakes of works by Ira Gershwin, Blossom Dearie and Bobby Troup ("The Meaning of the Blues") as well as by more contemporary artists such as Bonnie Raitt ("Love Me Like a Man") and Joni Mitchell ("Blue Motel Room"). </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/09/13/allyson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/13/allyson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music preview: Miss Kittin &amp; the Hacker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/15/misskittin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/15/misskittin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/audio/music/2002/07/15/misskittin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This "First Album" is a provocative cabaret act, filled with X-rated lyrics and sinister, new-millennium dance beats. Listen in.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Miss Kittin &amp; the Hacker<br /> "First Album"</b><br /> Out now on <a href="http://www.emperornorton.com" target="new">Emperor Norton Records</a> </p><p>Caroline Herve, aka Miss Kittin, and Michael Amato (the Hacker) first made a name for themselves in the dance music underground with the 1998 EP "Champagne." It contained the single "Frank Sinatra," on which Herve, backed by cheesy 1980s synths, conjured one of the more succinct images of fame and power, deadpanning, "To be famous is so nice, suck my dick, kiss my ass, so nice." </p><p>It's no surprise then that on "First Album," which includes "Frank Sinatra," Miss Kittin and the Hacker are mainly concerned with the world of dance music, the sex industry and indulging in nostalgia for the '80s. On "Life on MTV" and "1982" (listen to this track below) the two revel in recycled sounds from the glory days of new wave. Then, on "Stripper," Miss Kittin intones "my girlfriend is a stripper, in a Swiss peep show, dancing on a carousel, looking like a hologram." It's a business she knows from working as an exotic dancer before leaping into Europe's dance scene. She also delivers an unabashed valentine to that scene with the song "You and Us." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/07/15/misskittin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/15/misskittin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music preview: Jucifer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/20/jucifer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/20/jucifer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/audio/music/2002/06/20/jucifer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This two-person outfit tries to reinvigorate the stale world of rock with lots of noise on the new album "I Name You Destroyer."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Jucifer<br /> "I Name You Destroyer"</b><br /> Out now on <a href="http://www.velocetterecords.com/" target="new">Velocette Records</a> </p><p> Amber Valentine and Edgar Livergood, aka Jucifer, hail from the vaunted indie-rock breeding ground of Athens, Ga. Much like current industry darlings the White Stripes, Jucifer is a two-person outfit trying to reinvigorate the stale world of rock music with lots of noise while staying as far away from technological gimmicks as possible. The liner notes to "I Name You Destroyer" specify that the album was "recorded without pro tools, loops, samples, studio musicians, big shots or lackeys" and the music bears out their claim: "I Name You Destroyer" is vivid, rough and ready rock 'n' roll. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/06/20/jucifer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/20/jucifer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strange sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/22/swingers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/22/swingers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/02/22/swingers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documentarians Joe and Harry Gantz, creators of HBO's "Taxicab Confessions," talk about their new film: A stark, disturbing portrait of three couples who swing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe and Harry Gantz are documentary filmmaking veterans who hammer away at the more revealing corners of reality TV and film with series like "Couples Arguing" and HBO's "Taxicab Confessions" (now in its sixth season). Their new film, "Sex With Strangers" (which premieres Feb. 22 in San Francisco), delivers a kaleidoscopic perspective on swinging and confronts the audience with one of the starkest pictures in recent memory of sex and relationships. </p><p>The Gantz brothers spent a year filming the lives of three swinging couples. James and Theresa are middle-aged veterans of what they call "the Lifestyle" who see every weekend as a new opportunity to find women. Shannon and Girard are a married couple with a child, just entering the scene, who find their sexual encounters fraught with jealousy. Calvin is the center of a complicated threesome with Sarah and Julie. </p><p>It's like <a href="/ent/tv/temptation/index.html">"Temptation Island"</a> with deeper complications, or <a href="/directory/topics/survivor/index.html">"Survivor"</a> without the wildlife. It can get ugly. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/02/22/swingers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/22/swingers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we victorious yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/20/victory_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/20/victory_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/01/19/victory</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the al-Qaida network shattered but Osama bin Laden still at large, "Black Hawk Down" author Mark Bowden and other national security experts discuss when the U.S. will be able to declare victory over terrorism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the war be over? Does the U.S. have to capture or kill Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar before we can declare victory? Or must we also eliminate terrorists in other dangerous corners of the world before the parades can begin? Salon recently put these questions to three terrorism and national security experts: <a target="new" href="http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/people/Jessica_Stern">Jessica Stern</a>, a lecturer at the John F. Kennedy School of Government; <a href="http://www.salon.com/directory/topics/mark_bowden/">Mark Bowden,</a>, author of "Black Hawk Down" and "Killing Pablo"; and <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/int/2001/09/11/zanini/">Michele Zanini</a>, former graduate fellow at the RAND Corporation now with a major consulting firm. </p><p> <b>Do you think terminating bin Laden is essential for a U.S. victory in Afghanistan, or is his organization, al-Qaida, more important?</b> </p><p> <b>Jessica Stern</b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/01/20/victory_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/01/20/victory_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balthus&#8217; provocative poses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/balthus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/balthus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/11/30/balthus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of modern art's lions shows us that sexual moments and nudity aren't necessarily erotic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surrounded as we are by blatant and pervasive sex, looking back at the work of Balthus can give us respite -- and a more nuanced, playful vision of eroticism. </p><p>All the great modernist painters of the 20th century -- Picasso, Dali, Matisse -- drew frequently from the female nude and erotic themes for their art. Balthazar Klossowski, aka Balthus, presented a new vision that blended explicitly erotic and high art. His paintings are full of women and girls with their bodies on display, but they meander between the erotic and a direct confrontation of his audience. One of his hallmarks is a testy, teasing, relationship with his audience as he pulls them between considerations of the sexual and exquisite compositions in the same moment. </p><p>A new book is out from Rizzoli to accompany the largest exhibit of his work (now at the Palazzo Grassi in Venice through Jan. 6, 2002) and to commemorate his death in February, 2001. </p><p>Balthus' most notorious and compelling painting, "The Guitar Lesson," is a perfect example of his vision. It presents a woman with a girl draped over her lap. The girl's skirt has ridden up to her belly as the woman pulls her hair and has her hand poised over the girl's vagina. The girl's hand is raised to pinch the woman's erect nipple. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/balthus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/balthus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After the fall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Taliban is on the run. What happens now? Who should govern Afghanistan? And how hard will it be to win the war of the caves?	]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Taliban forces retreated Tuesday from Kabul, Afghanistan's capital, the U.S.-supported Northern Alliance took control of the city. The White House said that President Bush was "very pleased" with the advance. The Taliban's unexpectedly sudden withdrawal -- on the heels of defeats in Herat and Mazar-e-Sharif -- represented an important military triumph for the U.S. (On Tuesday, it was reported that Northern Alliance troops had pushed on from Kabul to the Taliban's stronghold, Kandahar.) But the Taliban's unexpectedly sudden withdrawal also gave new urgency to major issues -- Afghanistan's political future, the trustworthiness of the Northern Alliance, the next step in the military campaign, the status of humanitarian aid and the relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan. </p><p>Several experts on the region spoke with Salon about what the future holds for Afghanistan and the region and what the United States should do next. </p><p><b>Joel Charny, Asia expert from Refugees International </b> </p><p>The Northern Alliance progress means that 70 to 80 percent of the Afghans in need of assistance are now in Northern Alliance territory. This is critical. We need the Northern Alliance to provide enough stability and security so we can provide humanitarian aid. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sorrow of war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/31/civilian_casualties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/31/civilian_casualties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/31/civilian_casualties</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With every heartbreaking picture of innocent victims, more of the world turns against the U.S. bombing. But the American military has taken more care to minimize civilian casualties than any other armed force in the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP photos that appeared in the New York Times on Monday were heartbreaking: Afghan men, including a father, weeping over the lifeless bodies of four small children, killed by errant American bombs. Coming on top of last week's reports that American planes had accidentally bombed a Red Cross facility in Kabul for the second time in as many weeks, the images forced the world to confront one of the most painful issues connected with any war -- and an extraordinarily sensitive one in this war -- civilian casualties. </p><p>To date, human rights groups have confirmed that American bombs dropped on Afghanistan have resulted in at least 48 civilian deaths. America's enemy, the Taliban, has claimed hundreds if not thousands have been killed -- figures the United States asserts are vastly exaggerated for propaganda purposes. But for much of the Islamic world, already deeply suspicious of America's motives and rectitude, any civilian casualties are evidence that the U.S. campaign is not against terrorism but against Islam itself. Key Islamic supporters of the campaign, like Pakistan, are nervous about how news of civilian casualties will resonate with their citizens and are calling for the air war to be quick and decisive. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/31/civilian_casualties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/31/civilian_casualties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything you were afraid to ask about &#8220;Mulholland Drive&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/mulholland_drive_analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/mulholland_drive_analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2001 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2001/10/23/mulholland_drive_analysis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revised and updated: The scary cowboy! The mysterious box! All that sex! We answer all your questions about David Lynch's latest outrage -- the weirdest movie of the year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/ent/movies/review/2001/10/12/mulholland_drive/index.html">"Mulholland Drive,"</a> the latest feature from director <a href="/ent/col/srag/1999/10/28/lynch/index.html">David Lynch,</a> is exhilarating -- two hours and 25 minutes of macabre thrills, highly charged erotica and indelible images. But it's also confusing. Bits and pieces of plot dribble out; characters appear and disappear; the film takes an incomprehensible turn two-thirds of the way through; and there seem to be three or four disparate story lines that have virtually nothing to do with one another. </p><p>In this way, the film is similar to Lynch's <a href="/feb97/highway970228.html">"Lost Highway,"</a> his cinematic scud missile of 1997. In that film, the 40-something Bill Pullman languishes in a locked prison cell. He then, without explanation, turns into the 20-something Balthazar Getty and is released from prison, and the movie goes off on a new story tangent. That was just one puzzling development in a film whose plot was regularly described as a M&ouml;bius strip by reviewers. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/mulholland_drive_analysis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/mulholland_drive_analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fundamental problems</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/22/armstrong_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/22/armstrong_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2001 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2001/10/22/armstrong</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Religious writer Karen Armstrong explains why Muslim nations have difficulty with democracy and the qualities that all forms of fundamentalism share.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are scrambling to learn about Islam in record numbers, and when they do, chances are they're turning to the works of Karen Armstrong, a British theologian, former Roman Catholic nun and the author of "Islam" and "The Battle for God," as well as "Buddha" and several other books about the world's religions. The breadth and liberality of Armstrong's views on faith in all its myriad varieties makes her the ideal interpreter for those who are frightened and baffled by the dramatic clash between Islam and the West. Salon spoke with her recently by phone. </p><p> <b>Where's the line in the Islamic world between fundamentalists and extreme actions like terrorism?</b> </p><p> In many Muslim countries there's a strong dislike of American foreign policy and that makes it difficult for them to dissociate many fundamentalist leaders. Many of the middle and professional classes have a degree of sympathy for fundamentalist actions while they deplore things like Sept. 11. That atmosphere can encourage radicalism. </p><p> <b>How did Islamic fundamentalism develop?</b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/22/armstrong_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/22/armstrong_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Iran card?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/02/iran_52/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/02/iran_52/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2001 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/01/iran</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The complex nation whose leader once called America "the Great Satan" -- and whose people cheer our soccer teams -- may play an increasingly important role in American strategic planning. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the United States struggles to put together a coalition against world terrorism, it is being forced to take a crash course in the topsy-turvy politics of the Middle East, where yesterday's enemies may be tomorrow's friends. And one of the most intriguing players -- and a potential U.S. strategic partner -- is a state that just a few years ago was one of America's most implacable enemies: Iran. </p><p>In an act reflecting a convergence of U.S.-Iranian interests -- not the first such overlap in recent years -- the Iranian government gave tacit support to the United States' efforts to target Osama bin Laden, whom the Bush administration has described as the prime suspect in the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. President Mohammad Khatami has reportedly signaled to the U.S. that his government would not oppose military strikes against specific targets in Afghanistan. </p><p>Iran's support for U.S. action is highly qualified. But the fact that it signed on at all to Bush's campaign against terrorism opens the possibility of a thaw between the two nations. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/02/iran_52/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/02/iran_52/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hunting Osama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/19/bowden_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/19/bowden_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/19/bowden</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of "Black Hawk Down" and "Killing Pablo" says that American special forces have been training to go after bin Laden for years and are more than ready.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the United States continues to <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/20/military_options/index.html">plan its retaliation</a> for last week's terrorist attacks, a consensus has formed among military experts that special forces units will play a key role in any military action. Salon spoke to <a href="/directory/topics/mark_bowden/index.html">Mark Bowden,</a> the author of <a href="/directory/topics/black_hawk_down/index.html">"Black Hawk Down"</a> and <a href="/news/feature/2001/05/24/bowden/index.html">"Killing Pablo,"</a> to talk about the readiness and character of American special forces and how they may be used in America's military response. </p><p> <b>How do the potential special forces missions in Afghanistan compare with what they've done before in places like Somalia and Colombia?</b> </p><p> Of course none of us know what they're going to do, but if Somalia and Colombia were any indication they are going to painstakingly identify the members of Osama bin Laden's organization and the other organizations and systematically take them apart. By painstakingly finding and then either arresting or killing them. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/19/bowden_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/19/bowden_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has bin Laden made himself expendable?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/kakar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/kakar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/18/kakar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the Taliban's main opposition leader is dead, a scholar argues, the group may be more willing to hand over Osama bin Laden.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Taliban rebels took control of Kabul in 1996, the Taliban relied on financial and military support from a number of "Afghan Arabs" -- wealthy Arabs from the Middle East who supported the rise of an Islamic government in Central Asia. Among them was Osama bin Laden, who used his personal fortune on Afghani infrastructure like roads and housing, and funding a military operation to help the Taliban defeat its internal enemies. </p><p> "The Taliban have gained more from bin Laden's assistance than they have lost by remaining an international pariah," says Michael Rubin in the London Daily Telegraph. </p><p> In essence, the relationship between bin Laden and the Taliban has always been symbiotic. Bin Laden agreed to bankroll the Taliban and help them fight their internal enemies and, in return, bin Laden had a place to train his armies of Islamic radicals and seek refuge while remaining the target of a worldwide manhunt. During the course of his many legendary all-night sessions discussing theology, bin Laden was able to leverage his financial support to radicalize the Taliban's form of Islamic fundamentalism and, in exchange, bin Laden assisted the Taliban in its struggle against the last remaining rebel group, the Northern Alliance. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/kakar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/kakar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news, bad news</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/15/terrorists_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/15/terrorists_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2001 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/14/terrorists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts say that terrorists will probably strike again, soon, but that biological and chemical attacks are still unlikely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of Tuesday's bombings the Federal Aviation Administration has introduced a raft of new security measures, while pundits advocate even more draconian measures. But will any of them work? What will terrorists do next and how can we prepare ourselves? </p><p>Short of instituting a totalitarian regime, it's impossible to secure ourselves from all threats, says <a target=new href= "http://www.cato.org/people/eland.html">Ivan Eland,</a> Director of Defense Policy Studies at the Cato Institute. "Someone on TV last night was saying cut off curb-side check-in, and I'm thinking, 'Why not shut down airports all together?' Because terrorists can shift their tactics at a moment's notice." </p><p> Eland says terrorists have effectively exploited temporary weaknesses in American security. "Terrorists used to hijack planes, then they went to truck bombings like in Beruit [in 1983]. Then you saw all these pilings and concrete pots appear in front of buildings and embassies are being moved further back from the road so terrorists are moving away from truck bombs, now they're going back to hijacking ... Terrorism is like a river in that it flows around rocks, logs and the like. This was a very creative plan brilliantly executed. It's absolutely horrendous. There's nothing worse than a person competent at doing a bad thing, but who knows what other things they're applying their creativity to?" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/15/terrorists_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/15/terrorists_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Asia is like the Middle East, except everyone has nuclear weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/14/pakistan_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/14/pakistan_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/13/pakistan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. wants Pakistan to use its influence with the Taliban to hunt Osama bin Laden and his allies, but regional geopolitics will make that tricky.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the public cry for a military response to Tuesday's terrorist bombings grew louder Thursday, it was clear that a full-blown diplomatic effort is already underway to enlist other nations to help smoke out those responsible for the attacks and turn them over to the United States. American diplomats, led by Secretary of State Colin Powell, have focused on pressuring Pakistan to find terrorists that may be hiding in Afghanistan. Topping that list, of course, is Osama bin Laden. </p><p> Pakistan is the linchpin of the current diplomatic push because of its influence with the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan. According to many experts, the Pakistani intelligence service, ISI, played a key role in the training of Taliban rebels during the early 1990s, and has maintained continuous intelligence contacts with the Taliban since the Islamic fundamentalist group took control of the country in 1996. </p><p> Thursday, Powell sent a strong message to Pakistani leaders in public as well as through private diplomatic channels. "We thought as we gathered information and as we look at possible sources of the attack it would be useful to point out to the Pakistani leadership at every level that we are looking for (and) expecting their fullest cooperation," Powell said. Pakistan should be considered a U.S. ally, the secretary of state said, but he noted that the relationship between the two nations had been through "its ups and downs." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/14/pakistan_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/14/pakistan_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A venture capitalist for terrorists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/cohen_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/cohen_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/12/cohen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Cohen explains how Osama bin Laden's organization functions and what the U.S. has to look forward to if it really wants to fight terrorism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American government and law-enforcement officials are pointing their fingers at <a href="/news/feature/2001/09/11/bin_laden/index.html">Osama bin Laden</a> as the only figure capable of coordinating Tuesday's attacks on New York and Washington, but little is known about the man and his shadowy world in Afghanistan, where he is thought to be living. Salon spoke to Stephen Cohen, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute who served as a member of the U.S. Department of State's policy planning staff from 1985 to 1987, about the Saudi-born terrorist. </p><p><b>What can you tell us about bin Laden's organization and how he operates?</b> </p><p> Generally bin Laden operates not only on his own but also as a foundation for the terrorist community. Other terrorists will come to him with proposals and he'll decide whether to fund them or not. It's really a large group of small organizations loosely arrayed around him from the Middle East and Southeast Asia. </p><p> They're like old Communist organizations with small autonomous cells all fighting for a common cause who seldom talk to one another. It's not a new or innovative structure, nor is it aimed exclusively at the United States. Every major power is picked on by disillusioned or angry people for their own problems. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/cohen_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/cohen_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Thelma and Louise&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/21/thelma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/21/thelma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/dvd/review/2001/06/21/thelma</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ridley Scott is so tone-deaf that he misses what's  great about his own feminist buddy flick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1" color="#000000"><b>"Thelma and Louise"</b> <br>Directed by Ridley Scott<br />Starring Geena Davis, Susan Sarandon, Harvey Keitel, Brad Pitt<br /> MGM Home Entertainment; anamorphic widescreen (2.35:1 aspect ratio)<br /> Extras: Director's commentary and alternate ending</font> </p><p>Actors are important, really. So's the script. That's what Ridley Scott tells us in his commentary track on "Thelma and Louise" when he's not waxing on and on about the technical details of the film. Much of Scott's commentary makes you wonder whether this guy has anything interesting to say about his movie. Then there are moments that make you uncomfortable for all the wrong reasons. </p><p>"Thelma and Louise" tells the story of two women just trying to get out of town for the weekend. Spurred on by a vigilante reaction to a terrible crime, the duo ends up screaming across the country in a convertible, running into or away from good guys like Detective Hal Slocumb (Harvey Keitel) who's the only man in the movie who really understands Thelma and Louise's plight or the chorus of bad ones like J.D. (Brad Pitt) who steals all their money. When the film was released in 1991 it caused a minor sensation, particularly with a female audience that finally found an outlaw story that gave them a feminist script to cheer for. (The script won the Oscar that year.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/21/thelma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/21/thelma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Blazing Saddles&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/blazing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/blazing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/dvd/review/2001/05/08/blazing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mel Brooks remembers working with Richard Pryor, and a time when farting jokes were as offensive as it gets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1" color="#000000"><b>"Blazing Saddles"</b> <br />Directed by Mel Brooks<br />Starring Cleavon Little, Gene Wilder, Madeline Kahn<br />Warner Home Video; anamorphic widescreen pan and scan (2.35:1 aspect ratio)<br />Extras: Interview with Mel Brooks, cast and crew biographies</font> </p><p>Mel Brooks' "Blazing Saddles" skewers race in the West, Hollywood westerns, manifest destiny and everything else under John Ford's sun. The antic picture is a leaner and meaner version of Brooks' "History of the World -- Part 1." Here, he pulls out every trick in his bag: Jewish humor, racial satires, furious verbal gaffes and wicked visual gags. The DVD release doesn't offer more than a few additional yuks, but it does include a delightful interview where Brooks recounts how he made the film. </p><p>All is not well in the Old West at the start of the picture. The railroad, laying track across the country, has hit a patch of quicksand. The only way around it is through the small hamlet of Rock Ridge, populated by a group of inbreds all seemingly with the surname Johnson. The state attorney general (Harvey Korman) figures that the railroad's dilemma makes Rock Ridge ripe for a land grab. He dispatches his deputy Taggart (Slim Pickens) to scare the townspeople away. When that doesn't work, he figures that a black sheriff would terrify the local racists. He summarily dispatches an unwitting Black Bart (Cleavon Little) to do his dirty work. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/blazing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/blazing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
