<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mike Madden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/mike_madden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And now, for something completely different</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/mike_madden_says_goodbye_to_salon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/mike_madden_says_goodbye_to_salon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/11/mike_madden_says_goodbye_to_salon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for reading over the last two-and-a-half years -- today's my last day at Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day after Christmas 2007, I caught a flight from Washington, D.C., to the Midwest, and made my way through the snow to watch Hillary Clinton address a crowd in a packed high school gym in <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2007/12/28/Clinton">Mt. Pleasant, Iowa</a>. And thus began my career at Salon, and my close-up view of an astounding presidential campaign. The primaries alone took me from <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/02/03/funeral">Salt Lake City</a> to <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/06/02/pr_primary">San Juan</a>. (I even got to watch Barack Obama <a href="http://www.postgazette.com/pg/08090/869171-457.stm">bowl</a>, badly.) Once that was done, the general election managed to match the primaries for excitement, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2008/07/16/obama_data">innovative campaign techniques</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2008/08/18/sunday_at_saddleback">unusual venues</a>. Not to mention <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2008/09/03/palin">plenty</a> of <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2008/09/10/fight_back">chances</a> to write about <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2008/10/03/palin_biden">Sarah</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2008_elections/index.html?story=/news/feature/2008/10/28/palin_va">Palin</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/mike_madden_says_goodbye_to_salon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/mike_madden_says_goodbye_to_salon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open mic catches Fiorina on Boxer&#8217;s hair: &#8220;So yesterday&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Senate race gets off to an awkward start, as the Republican mocks her Democratic opponent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the first day was any indication, the California campaign between Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer and Republican ex-CEO&#160;Carly Fiorina is going to be nasty.</p><p>Fiorina was caught on an open mic and camera feed Wednesday, mocking Boxer's hair. A friend of Fiorina's, it seems, had seen Boxer on TV earlier in the morning. And she "said what everyone says," Fiorina blurted. "God, what is that hair? So yesterday!"</p><p>That's about four minutes into the video. Boxer shouldn't feel too bad, though, because Fiorina spent the vast majority of the time the camera was rolling bashing her fellow Republican, Meg Whitman, for going on Sean Hannity's Fox News Channel show on the first day of the general election campaign for governor.</p><p>Watch here:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does Wall Street hate America (in the World Cup)?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/wall_street_banks_hate_america_soccer_world_cup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/wall_street_banks_hate_america_soccer_world_cup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/wall_street_banks_hate_america_soccer_world_cup</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs, UBS and JP Morgan all predict a quick exit for the U.S. in the big soccer tournament]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Destroying the global economy and plunging the world into recession is one thing. But now Wall Street has gone too far.</p><p>Preparing for the World Cup, three big banks issued data-heavy reports predicting which nation will bring home the trophy (<strong>Update:</strong> That trophy is no longer named for&#160;<a href="http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/history/worldcup/julesrimettrophy.html">Jules Rimet</a>, as this post originally stated): UBS, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs. And none of them show much love to the United States -- no matter how much Washington has agreed to help them stay on top of global commerce in the wake of the economic collapse.</p><p>The recipient of <a href="http://www.jpmorgan.com/cm/cs?pagename=JPM_redesign/JPM_Content_C/Generic_Detail_Page_Template&amp;cid=1159389444475&amp;c=JPM_Content_C">$25 billion</a> in TARP funds in 2008, Morgan is by far the worst offender. Its <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/31537878/JP-Morgan-Quantitative-Guide-to-World-Cup-2010">guide to the tournament</a>, produced by the bank's "quants" (yes, that's the same term used for the math wizards whose models utterly failed to predict the collapse of the housing market), expects the U.S. to lose to England on Saturday, follow that up with a loss to unheralded Slovenia on June 18, then finally salvage some pride with a win over Algeria on June 23 -- which would be too little, too late to advance to the tournament's knockout stage. And just like that, the Yanks would head home, losers, along with the likes of New Zealand, Paraguay and North Korea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/wall_street_banks_hate_america_soccer_world_cup/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/wall_street_banks_hate_america_soccer_world_cup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney sends Sharron Angle some love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/mitt_romney_endorses_sharron_angle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/mitt_romney_endorses_sharron_angle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/mitt_romney_endorses_sharron_angle</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The once (and future?) GOP presidential candidate cuts a $5,000 check to the Nevada Tea Party favorite]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney knows how to pick a winner. Especially after the winner has already been picked by the voters. So sure enough, this afternoon brought news that he has taken a side in the Nevada Senate race.&#160;</p><p>Romney sent Sharron Angle, Harry Reid's new opponent (and, possibly, political savior) a $5,000 check from his PAC, the maximum donation allowed by campaign finance law. He also endorsed Brian Sandoval, after he knocked off Gov. Jim Gibbons in a GOP primary.&#160;"Instead of focusing on turning our economy around and fostering job creation and economic growth, too many of our leaders are instead focused on growing the size of government," Romney said in a statement. "That is why Nevada is fortunate to have leaders like Brian Sandoval and Sharron Angle, who will work to get our economy back on track."</p><p>With the 2012 Republican presidential primary set to start on Nov. 3, the day after the midterm elections, Romney has been busy endorsing candidates all over the country, and especially in early primary states like Nevada. Last night was a good one for one of his picks, Nikki Haley, who fell just short of winning the GOP gubernatorial nod in South Carolina and seems sure to win a runoff. But Romney hadn't gotten involved in the Nevada race up to now -- which was probably wise, since the GOP establishment backed loser Sue Lowden, and endorsing Angle before she won the nomination might have made Romney look a bit <em>too</em>&#160;enthusiastic about the Tea Party set.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/mitt_romney_endorses_sharron_angle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/mitt_romney_endorses_sharron_angle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharron Angle wins primary, will face Harry Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/sharron_angle_nevada_republican_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/sharron_angle_nevada_republican_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/08/sharron_angle_nevada_republican_primary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be the Tea Party favorite vs. the Senate majority leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have Nevada Republicans just seized defeat from the jaws of victory?</p><p>Facing Harry Reid, a Senate majority leader even more vulnerable than Tom Daschle was six months before he lost his reelection race in 2004, the party opted Tuesday to nominate, as their champion, Sharron Angle -- a little-known, poorly funded Tea Party favorite who might make Rand Paul look experienced and polished. She wants to abolish Social Security, phase out Medicare, once said alcohol should be illegal and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/04/15/tea_party_express_backs_sharron_angle/index.html">whined in April</a> that she couldn't bring her guns to Washington.</p><p>Then again, the folks Angle beat to win the nomination weren't exactly world class politicians, either. Establishment pick Sue Lowden -- who Tea Party activists in Nevada hated because, as party chairwoman, she had dared to cross Ron Paul during the 2008 presidential primary campaign -- was leading for months. Until she collapsed suddenly, after babbling about people bartering chickens for healthcare and drawing legal challenges over a campaign bus. Businessman Danny Tarkanian never managed to get any buzz for his own race, which seemed to be grounded entirely in the fact that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Tarkanian">his father</a> had coached the UNLV Runnin' Rebels.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/sharron_angle_nevada_republican_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/sharron_angle_nevada_republican_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln stuns Bill Halter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/08/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defying expectations, the two-term Democrat prevails in a runoff. But she'll be a prohibitive underdog in the fall]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when it looked like the powers-that-be in Congress would have to start setting aside meeting space for another group besides just Democrats and Republicans -- call it the lame duck caucus -- Sen. Blanche Lincoln defied the anti-incumbent odds Tuesday night.</p><p>Lincoln narrowly escaped becoming became the fifth member of a not-so-illustrious club of incumbents who lost primary challenges Tuesday, beating Lieutenant Gov. Bill Halter in a runoff election for the Democratic nomination for the job she holds now. It was a defeat for progressives, who had longed to dump the moderate-to-conservative Lincoln; unions spent millions supporting Halter -- and attacking Lincoln for voting for NAFTA, opposing the Employee Free Choice Act and wavering on healthcare reform, among other perceived heresies. MoveOn.org kicked in another few million, and groups like the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Daily Kos readers sent <a href="http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/23963">several hundred thousand dollars each</a>. (The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, meanwhile -- which almost always supports Republicans -- spent $300,000 on <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/04/27/chamber_of_commerce_tv_ad_supports_blanche_lincoln">ads for Lincoln</a>, though labor officials noted that the Chamber more or less let Lincoln go once the race went to a runoff.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to watch in tonight&#8217;s primary elections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Halter vs. Lincoln, Sharron Angle, Nikki Haley and other highlights of a wild day of primaries in 12 states]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political world hasn't seen a primary day like today since the 2008 presidential election. By the end of the night, Republicans will have chosen a challenger to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in Nevada; Democrats will have finally settled a nasty civil war in Arkansas; and the world will know whether we'll still have <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/06/02/nikki_haley_husband_ad">Nikki Haley</a> to kick around any longer.</p><p>With closely watched elections in California, Nevada, Arkansas and South Carolina (and less well-known contests in eight other states), here's a guide -- in chronological order -- of what to watch for as the returns come in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week in crazy: Tony Hayward</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/05/this_week_in_crazy_bp_tony_hayward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/05/this_week_in_crazy_bp_tony_hayward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week in Crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/05/this_week_in_crazy_bp_tony_hayward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP may not know how to clean up the devastating oil spill, but its CEO sure knows how to whine about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you're the guy at the top of the corporate ladder that's ultimately responsible for spewing millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico (and, soon, probably fouling the <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/06/bp_oil_spills_potential_path_c.html">East Coast</a> as well), it's not easy to make your reputation even worse than it already is. But Tony Hayward didn't get to become CEO of BP by doing what was easy.</p><p>And so this week, more than a month into the horrific Gulf oil spill, Hayward managed to sink to a new low.</p><p>"There's no one who wants this over more than I do," the beleaguered oilman told the "Today Show" on Sunday. "You know, I'd like my life back."</p><p>Watch here:</p><p>
    <object height="262" width="430"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MTdKa9eWNFw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="262" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MTdKa9eWNFw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="430"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/05/this_week_in_crazy_bp_tony_hayward/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/05/this_week_in_crazy_bp_tony_hayward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Bill Halter should beat Blanche Lincoln Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lower turnout than in last month's primary could be bad news for Sen. Blanche Lincoln, the incumbent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Blanche Lincoln could be the next incumbent to lose a party primary on Tuesday, when she faces Lieutenant Gov. Bill Halter in a run-off for the Arkansas Democratic nomination.</p><p>The first round of voting last month left Lincoln short of the 50 percent threshold needed to win the nod outright -- as a surprising 13 percent of votes went to D.C. Morrison, seen as a protest candidate -- and set up Tuesday's election. Turnout next week could be far lower than in the first round, though, which probably doesn't bode well for Lincoln. The most committed voters are likely to be the ones who want a change; that probably means they're backing Halter.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/6/4/872884/-AR-Sen:-Halter-maintains-narrow-lead,-49-45">new poll out Friday</a> by Research 2000 for the Daily Kos showed Halter leading, 49-45 -- slightly up from last week's result. Among people who voted for Morrison who plan to turn out again, Halter led by 10 points.</p><p>Lincoln's campaign has been pushing harder and harder on the idea that Halter is the candidate of outside interests, not Arkansans, playing up his support from MoveOn.org and big labor unions (which, though they have members in Arkansas, aren't wildly popular there).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House made itself vulnerable to bogus bribe charges</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/03/sestak_romanoff_white_house_political_operation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/03/sestak_romanoff_white_house_political_operation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter vs. Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/03/sestak_romanoff_white_house_political_operation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the administration had actually managed to get Joe Sestak and Andrew Romanoff out, the story would be dead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is, without a doubt, a major scandal hidden in the news that the White House suggested to both Joe Sestak and Andrew Romanoff that the administration might be able to help them find jobs if they didn't run for Senate in Pennsylvania and Colorado. But it's not the scandal cable news anchors and <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20006649-503544.html">blaring headlines</a> would have you believe.</p><p>Ignore Republicans, like Rep. Darrell Issa, who want you to think there's been some nefarious violation of the law here. After all, there's no indication any actual promises of jobs were made -- which means even former Bush administration officials are <a href="http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/05/28/mukasey-really-a-stretch-to-say-sestak-offer-was-a-crime/">saying</a> there doesn't seem to be any evidence of any crime. (And Romanoff had already applied online for jobs with the administration when deputy White House chief of staff Jim Messina contacted him to discuss options.) What the disclosures about Sestak and Romanoff <em>really</em> show is that the White House political machine isn't doing its job very well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/03/sestak_romanoff_white_house_political_operation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/03/sestak_romanoff_white_house_political_operation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arrest in Florida could be bad news for Crist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/charlie_crist_jim_greer_republican_party_florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/charlie_crist_jim_greer_republican_party_florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/02/charlie_crist_jim_greer_republican_party_florida</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former GOP boss in Florida is charged with corruption -- and Charlie Crist helped put him in the job]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-republican-jim-greer-arrested-20100602,0,7350232.story">arrest</a> of former Florida Republican Party chairman Jim Greer might still be bad news for Gov. Charlie Crist, even though he fled the party weeks ago.</p><p>Florida authorities say Greer took at least $125,000 in GOP funds for his own personal use, and they charged him with four counts of grand theft, one count of money laundering and one count of running an organized fraud scheme. Officials say Greer set up a company, Victory Strategies, and hired it for the Florida party to raise money -- and keep 10 percent of what it brought in. Greer had resigned his post in February, facing questions about the party's extravagant credit card spending.</p><p>But Crist had <a href="http://mobile.orlandosentinel.com/inf/infomo;jsessionid=180AB9B258950D0D35D4.413?view=webarticle&amp;feed:a=sentinel_1min&amp;feed:c=topstories&amp;feed:i=53360782&amp;nopaging=1">been a patron</a> of Greer's, taking advantage of his post as governor to install him as chairman of the state party. Crist <a href="http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2007-01-28/news/MAXWELL28_1_greer-party-chairmen-crist">pushed hard</a> for Greer in 2007, after Greer had raised money for Crist's gubernatorial campaign the year before.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/charlie_crist_jim_greer_republican_party_florida/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/charlie_crist_jim_greer_republican_party_florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010: Not the year for party-switchers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/parker_griffith_arlen_specter_establishment_defeats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/parker_griffith_arlen_specter_establishment_defeats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter vs. Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker Griffith, R-Ala.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/02/parker_griffith_arlen_specter_establishment_defeats</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parker Griffith and Arlen Specter both learned that establishment support won't help you avoid voters' fury]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should have been obvious all along that party-switching <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/parker_griffith_rala/index.html">Rep. Parker Griffith</a> was heading to defeat in Tuesday's Alabama GOP primary. (And actually, to many Democrats hoping for Griffith to fall, it was.) Politicians have been getting away with jumping from one side of the aisle to the other for a long time -- but 2010 is clearly not the year for it.</p><p>Griffith quit the Democratic Party in December, citing healthcare reform -- and a generalized dislike for, oh, pretty much everything the party stands for -- as his reason. The Republican establishment welcomed him with open arms, trumpeting the leap as another good omen for the GOP's November 2010. (Mostly open arms, that is, except when they accidentally <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0210/NRCC_still_attacking_Griffith_in_the_mail.html">attacked him</a> in party-funded mailings.) At the time, Griffith seemed to be making the right move -- Democrats had stalled in their push for the healthcare bill, President Obama (never particularly popular in Griffith's district) was watching his approval ratings plunge and elections the month before had mostly gone well for the GOP. But on the ground back home, activists weren't so quick to get on board. In Madison County, Alabama, the local party endorsed <a href="http://blog.al.com/breaking/2010/01/madison_county_republicans_end.html">anyone but Griffith</a> in a three-way race. The Tea Party blasted Griffith, calling him a Republican in name only -- which was hard to refute, since he'd only been a Republican for a few months.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/parker_griffith_arlen_specter_establishment_defeats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/parker_griffith_arlen_specter_establishment_defeats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharron Angle has her own newspaper</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/sharron_angle_starts_her_own_newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/sharron_angle_starts_her_own_newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/28/sharron_angle_starts_her_own_newspaper</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party candidate in Nevada's Senate race has all the news that's fit to print]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a very important story recently that the entire media missed, except one small, dogged newspaper based in Reno, Nev., which -- thankfully -- dug it up and spread the word to the world.</p><p>What was this urgent dispatch? "Reid Waterboarding The Economy." And the dogged newspaper that ran it? The Angle Examiner.</p><p>Yes, Sharron Angle -- the surging Tea Party candidate in Nevada's Republican Senate primary -- has her own four-page "newspaper," which her campaign prints up and she <a href="http://www.lvrj.com/news/gop-senate-hopeful-sharron-angle-is-counting-on-conservative-credentials-88756137.html">hands out</a> at events. Other headlines in the <a href="http://www.sharronangle.com/AngleExaminer/AngleExaminerMarch2010.pdf">most recent issue</a> -- which is labeled "Important Primary Voter Edition, 2010" -- include "The Right Angle: One of Us for U.S. Senate," "Angle Says Reid's Grasp on Reality Disappearing Faster than Jobs," and "Angle Attends 14 Nevada Tea Parties."</p><p>Obviously, the Angle Examiner is, in some ways, just a quirkier form of the campaign pamphlets and literature every candidate for office produces. But the breathless tone of its writing, and the very un-slick design, makes it seem like <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/24/sharron_angle_jobs_americans">one more</a> piece of evidence that Angle may not be quite ready for prime time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/sharron_angle_starts_her_own_newspaper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/sharron_angle_starts_her_own_newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The press attacks Joe Sestak over &#8220;scandal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/joe_sestak_story_will_not_die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/joe_sestak_story_will_not_die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/27/joe_sestak_story_will_not_die</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania Democrat is besieged by reporters over the alleged job offer from the White House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About an hour ago, the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/story/?story=/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/26/darrell_issa_judd_gregg_joe_sestak">non-story</a> about whether the White House offered Joe Sestak a job if he dropped out of the Pennsylvania Senate race officially became a ludicrous Washington obsession.</p><p>After a vote in the House, Sestak wandered out of the chamber and was immediately surrounded by nearly a dozen reporters. There was serious business to investigate, after all; someone somewhere had engaged in a political act, in a way that might have influenced politics! Many candidates would have walked away immediately. Sestak, though, is congenitally unable to ignore people waiting to talk to him (and constantly apologizes when, inevitably, the conversation <em>does</em> come to an end). So after waiting five minutes or so for a reporter from the Allentown, Pa., Morning Call to show up, he started taking questions about the "scandal" over the job offer.</p><p>As it turned out, he had very little to say. "All this will come all out tomorrow," he said, stumbling over his words as he tried to assure the media scrum that President Obama's promise that the White House would issue a statement on the matter "shortly" would, in fact, come true. "All this will come out, I think, as soon as the White House decides to speak, and then I'll have something to say."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/joe_sestak_story_will_not_die/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/joe_sestak_story_will_not_die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Drudge, classy as ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/matt_drudge_still_classy_as_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/matt_drudge_still_classy_as_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/27/matt_drudge_still_classy_as_ever</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gossip maven can't resist a salacious image and headline after President Obama mentions Malia's question]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <img class='wp-image-10012917' src='http://media.salon.com/2010/05/Screen_shot_2010-05-27_at_3.37.33_PM.png' />
  </p><p>Ah, Drudge. Don't ever change!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/matt_drudge_still_classy_as_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/matt_drudge_still_classy_as_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New House GOP site costs more money if it succeeds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/house_gop_site_costs_more_money_with_more_traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/house_gop_site_costs_more_money_with_more_traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/27/house_gop_site_costs_more_money_with_more_traffic</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fees to run America Speaking Out, paid for by tax dollars, will go up as traffic to the site increases]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans rolled out AmericaSpeakingOut.com, their new <strike>campaign website</strike> website for hearing from America earlier this week, with quite a bit of fanfare. "We recognize that Americans don't want an agenda imposed on them from Washington," Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., who's in charge of the whole thing, <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/house-republicans-seek-input-with-new-web-site/">told reporters</a>. "They know that the best ideas don't come from Washington, they come from the people. America Speaking Out will return them their voice, and we're here to listen."</p><p>The way it works is, basically, anyone who wants to can post whatever they want, and Republicans will use their comments in town halls and campaign manifestoes this fall. So far, the site has mostly been notable for two things. The first is strange comments: "Congressmen and women should wear Saran Wrap to work" was featured on the site's "<a href="http://www.americaspeakingout.com/browse/questions/in/transparency-open-government">Transparency/Open Government</a>" section on Thursday morning, and the featured idea under "<a href="http://www.americaspeakingout.com/browse/questions/in/constitutional-limits">Constitutional Limits</a>" was, "We should apologize to King George III. He was mentally handicapped, and he couldn't help but horribly mismanage the government." The second, of course, is the fact that taxpayer dollars are <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/99741-gop-insists-new-web-project-unrelated-to-2010-campaign">funding the whole thing</a>. The site is being paid for out of the GOP leadership budget, despite its dot-com (not dot-gov) name.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/house_gop_site_costs_more_money_with_more_traffic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/house_gop_site_costs_more_money_with_more_traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Clint Didier, Sarah Palin&#8217;s favorite in Washington state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/clint_didier_tea_party_dino_rossi_palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/clint_didier_tea_party_dino_rossi_palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray, D-Wash.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/27/clint_didier_tea_party_dino_rossi_palin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former football star is running as a Tea Party candidate in Washington, and could spoil Dino Rossi's Senate bid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in Washington, D.C., and Washington state were pretty pleased with themselves on Wednesday, as their top recruit to run against Democratic Sen. Patty Murray -- two-time gubernatorial loser Dino Rossi -- <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/dino-rossi-officially-kicks-of.html?wprss=thefix">finally got into the race</a> after months of hemming and hawing about it.</p><p>"Families, seniors, and job-creators in the Evergreen State deserve an independent-minded leader who will represent their values and fight for their best interests -- not another rubberstamp for President Obama and the Democrat party leaders in D.C.," National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee spokeswoman Amber Marchand said in a statement welcoming Rossi. "That's why we are confident that voters will hold Patty Murray accountable for her out-of-step voting record and elect a Republican as their next U.S. Senator this November."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/clint_didier_tea_party_dino_rossi_palin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/clint_didier_tea_party_dino_rossi_palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issa&#8217;s office calls Gregg deal just as bad as Sestak&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/darrell_issa_judd_gregg_joe_sestak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/darrell_issa_judd_gregg_joe_sestak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Gregg, R-N.H.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/26/darrell_issa_judd_gregg_joe_sestak</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An aide to Issa says the New Hampshire lawmaker shouldn't have cut a deal with the White House, either]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The zeal that Rep. Darrell Issa has brought to his pursuit of the allegations that the White House dangled some kind of job in front of Joe Sestak last year while they were trying to muscle him out of the Pennsylvania Senate primary is impressive, if also a little amusing. Issa, the ranking Republican on the House Oversight Committee, has been thundering about an alleged bribe, using scary words like "<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/25/congressman-white-house-job-offer-sestak-impeachable-offense/">impeachable</a>," "crime" and "ethics complaint." (Actually, considering how rarely the House Ethics Committee can be roused to do anything about lawmakers, that last one isn't so scary.)</p><p>But as Alex Pareene has <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/judd_gregg_rnh/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/05/26/judd_gregg_sestak_bribe">already noted</a>, this isn't exactly the first time someone in politics cut a deal for a job. When Sen. Judd Gregg was going to leave Congress to join the Obama administration -- which, in the end, he didn't do, because he realized he disagreed with everything President Obama stands for -- he wasn't going to take the appointment to become commerce secretary unless his replacement in New Hampshire's Senate seat would caucus with the GOP.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/darrell_issa_judd_gregg_joe_sestak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/darrell_issa_judd_gregg_joe_sestak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Club for Growth ad attacks Sue Lowden in Nevada</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/club_for_growth_ad_attacks_lowden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/club_for_growth_ad_attacks_lowden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/26/club_for_growth_ad_attacks_lowden</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-tax group is backing Sharron Angle in the GOP primary. The winner takes on Harry Reid in November]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Club for Growth has launched a new ad in Nevada, piling on erstwhile front-runner Sue Lowden in the state's Republican Senate primary. The winner goes on to face vulnerable Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in the fall.</p><p>"She voted to raise taxes, supported huge spending increases, and backed Harry Reid for years," the ad says. It also blasts Lowden for her own ads attacking <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/24/sharron_angle_jobs_americans">Sharron Angle</a>, the right-wing candidate the Club for Growth endorsed last week.</p><p>Lowden has been plunging <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/nv/10-nv-sen-reppr.php">in polls</a> for weeks, helped along by her bizarre assertions that healthcare delivery was better back in the days when you could barter for medical services (trading things like, oh, chickens). Reid's campaign has tried to hasten Lowden's decline, figuring Angle poses less of a threat in the general election; lately, Reid and Nevada Democrats have been sending frequent updates to the press on a mini-scandal involving a <a href="http://www.lvrj.com/news/nevada-democrats-plan-fec-filing-over-lowden-bus-94200079.html">motor home</a> Lowden received, possibly in violation of campaign finance rules.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/club_for_growth_ad_attacks_lowden/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/26/club_for_growth_ad_attacks_lowden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;candid&#8221; lunch with Senate Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/obama_lunch_senate_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/obama_lunch_senate_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/25/obama_lunch_senate_republicans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After debate on immigration and climate, the GOP says the meeting went badly; the White House says it was just fine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting elected in a statewide campaign sometimes takes more political savvy than winning in a narrowly drawn district designed to put like-minded voters together and consolidate one party's base. Which may explain why, when Senate Republicans met with President Obama Tuesday, they didn't make the same mistake their House counterparts made <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/01/29/obama_gop">in January</a> and put the whole thing on TV.</p><p>But the end result of both get-togethers seemed to be about the same: Obama and the Republicans didn't find much they agreed on. (The main difference this time, of course, is that the president didn't get to humiliate his adversaries in public.) "It was a good exchange, a candid exchange on both sides," said GOP leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., after lunch. Translated out of the diplomatic niceties of institutional Senate-speak, that means they didn't get along so well; Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts described Obama as "thin-skinned" afterwards.</p><p>"You can't tell when someone gets a little irritated?" Roberts asked reporters, sounding a little irritated, when pressed to elaborate. "Just little things that went on."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/obama_lunch_senate_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/obama_lunch_senate_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

