<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Pam Martens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/pam_martens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Citigroup stays fraud-proof</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13005224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the lawyer who keeps getting the financial services company off the hook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> It’s one of the few things that's predictable on Wall Street; an immutable signature on the reply briefs whenever Citigroup is charged with fraud – and that is quite often.</p><p>Brad Karp, a partner at the 737-attorney-strong Wall Street law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison LLP, has been Citigroup’s go-to guy for fraud allegations since the company was born out of the too-big-to-fail merger of Travelers Group insurance, its myriad Wall Street investment banks, brokerage units, and Citicorp, parent of Citibank.</p><p>When the London-based private equity firm, Terra Firma, claimed it had been lied to and defrauded by Citigroup, making it overpay for the purchase of EMI, a British music label, in 2007, Karp and colleagues wrung an 8-0 decision from the jury in favor of Citigroup. Karp was also on hand to witness victory when the trustee for the bankrupt Italian dairy giant, Parmalat, charged Citigroup with fraud. Then there were fraud charges connected to Citigroup’s involvement in the collapse of WorldCom AND Enron -- along with auction rate securities, rigged stock research and understating its exposure to subprime debt by $39 billion. Karp, Karp, and more Karp.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/08/how_citigroup_stays_fraud_proof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Citigroup defraud billions from Abu Dhabi?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/did_citigroup_defraud_billions_from_abu_dhabi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/did_citigroup_defraud_billions_from_abu_dhabi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Dhabi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13002769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. ally learns firsthand how Wall Street does business. An investigative report into the company's dealings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Wikileaks, the U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi sent a communication to the U.S. Secretary of State and U.S. Treasury on December 22, 2009, alerting them to the fact that the investment arm of a U.S. ally, Abu Dhabi, believed it had been defrauded of $4 billion by Citigroup (Wall Street’s serial miscreant and recent ward of the taxpayer).  The cable relayed that William Brown, legal advisor to the Abu Dhabi investment arm, “unequivocally stated that Citi ‘lied’ and must be held accountable.”</p><p>Three years later, Abu Dhabi has likely figured out that in the U.S., gangsters have guns but banksters are far more dangerous – they have ivy league educated lawyers.  One group of lawyers writes the prospectuses that defraud investors; another group writes the contracts that bar these cases from ever seeing sunshine in a public courtroom; and the third group provides skillful white color criminal defense, including a speed dial to their pals in Washington, ensuring that justice will be as elusive as a Wall Street CEO clad in orange.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/did_citigroup_defraud_billions_from_abu_dhabi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/did_citigroup_defraud_billions_from_abu_dhabi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
