<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Richard Rodriguez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/richard_rodriguez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judging the unmarried</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/sotomayor_proposition_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/sotomayor_proposition_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/05/28/sotomayor_proposition_8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 8 and the Sonia Sotomayor nomination expose the hypocritical state of the sexual revolution today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two events on Tuesday morning -- separated by a few hours and the span of the continent -- suggest the dimensions of the sexual revolution that American women are living and the power of men to support or to deny that revolution.</p><p>&#160;In Washington, President Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to be a United States Supreme Court justice -- his first appointment to the high court. A few hours later, in San Francisco, a majority of judges on the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8 -- the voter-approved definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.</p><p>&#160;While it had been widely expected that the president would appoint a woman to replace retiring Justice David Souter, Federal Appeals Judge Sotomayor was immediately described in the press and celebrated by Latino political leaders as the nation's "first Hispanic Supreme Court justice."</p><p>&#160;More pointedly, if the Senate confirms the appointment, she will be the first unmarried (and divorced) woman on the Supreme Court.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/sotomayor_proposition_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/sotomayor_proposition_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depressed? No! We&#8217;re angry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/economic_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/economic_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/02/13/economic_crisis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media says Americans have the economic blues. But we're meeting these down times the way we always have: Not with resignation but with grit, compassion and humor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to American legend, when the stock market crashed on Oct. 29, 1929, flocks of stockbrokers jumped to their death on Wall Street, in violent parody of down-trending graphs and ticker-tape parades and calendar pages flung from windows on New Year's Eve. It never happened.</p><p>The fallacy of American capitalism is the equation of our economic status and our mental well-being. In a country where we routinely define ourselves by our job, an economic downturn must lead to a psychological downturn. Right?</p><p>It becomes oddly pertinent to observe that, as the country faces an economic calamity unequaled since the Great Depression, the employees of the failed brokerage houses and banks in New York are not clustered on the ledges of skyscrapers above Wall Street. (I am afraid if they were, the cry from below would be "Jump! Jump!") The pope of Ponzi, Bernard Madoff, is required by a federal judge to wear an ankle bracelet not because he is a danger to himself, but because the judge fears that Madoff will skip town.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/economic_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/economic_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton, the first Latina in chief?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/09/latina_in_chief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/09/latina_in_chief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/02/09/latina_in_chief</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton's popularity with Latino voters reminds us that people of color do not walk in lock step. There's a lesson here for Obama.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_rodham_clinton/">Hillary Clinton</a>'s Super Tuesday success with Hispanic voters -- particularly female Hispanic voters -- suggests that the time has come to rethink the ways we have categorized people in "multicultural" America. </p><p> For a generation, the cultural and political left has, to its credit, forced institutional America to acknowledge complexity -- the nation's many colors and sexualities and ethnicities. The trouble with the left's sense of complexity was that it was dumped into a nondescript drum labeled "diversity," a word that meant less and less the more that it was used. </p><p> The immediate conclusion drawn by political analysts from Super Tuesday's big headline, "Hillary Clinton Wins Latino Votes," was that Hispanics refused to support an <i>African-American</i> candidate, and that all is not well among "people of color" (another cheap term from the multicultural dictionary). </p><p> In fact, people of color do not walk in lock step, are not necessarily united in their goals by their tincture or free from competition with each other. In fact, Hispanics, particularly immigrants -- legally or illegally here -- often find themselves, as newcomers, in fierce competition with working-class blacks and whites at the meat plant hiring office. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/09/latina_in_chief/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/09/latina_in_chief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>262</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration nation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/11/rodriguez_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/11/rodriguez_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2006/04/11/rodriguez</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The marches prove that immigrants are not alone. They have families -- and they're woven into our nation too deeply to tear out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crowds parading up the streets of America on Monday, and for the last two weeks, have been telling us with their bodies, if not always in English, that illegal immigrants are not alone in the United States of America. </p><p> Indeed, illegal immigrants, who were supposed to live a shadowy existence, belong to neighborhoods and to church congregations that were willing to stand alongside them. And most important: Many millions of illegal immigrants have U.S. relatives, sons and daughters, in-laws, cousins, grandchildren. </p><p> That family tie is the lesson of these parades. In Houston and Boston, in Phoenix and in San Jose, Calif., what we saw were not exactly "protests," nor were they political demonstrations, primarily. We were seeing huge family gatherings, celebrations of the clan. </p><p> In Los Angeles, I saw a veritable platoon of young women with baby strollers, the babies asleep or not, the women chatting, as though they were headed to the grocery store. I saw carnival balloons and comic oversize sombreros. I saw the Mexican Virgin of Guadalupe floating on somebody's shoulders. I saw the flags of several nations, often, of course, Mexico's. On one Mexican flag, an old man with an Indian face had taped the photographs of his sons, serving in Iraq. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/04/11/rodriguez_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/11/rodriguez_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Paul II Superstar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/05/rodriguez_pope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/05/rodriguez_pope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/04/05/rodriguez_pope</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pope and his made-for-TV papacy did more for the world at large than for his own church. But the cameras loved him to his final act.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a handsome young man, Karol Wojtyla was a playwright and an actor. In the course of his life, Wojtyla sensed as much about the role of the actor as Chaplin or Garbo or Winston Churchill. He was one of the great theatricals of the century. During the final years of his role as Pope John Paul II, he lost a great deal of control of his person, but he never lost control of his performance, or of the attention of his audience. </p><p> No one is a pope through and through. It is a role to be played in any of several ways. Karol Wojtyla took the role in a robust way, manly, more warrior than ascetic; never fussed with his skirts. He played the pope for the age of television, and fully one-half of the people alive on the Earth remember no other in the role. Cardinals and diplomats as stage supernumeraries; the planet his audience. He seemed never without an intuition of the camera. Kissing the tarmacs of airports! </p><p> Puritans, who do not trust the value of the theatrical, scorned the pop vulgarity of some of the trappings of his papacy -- the "pope-mobile," for example. It didn't matter. The pope-mobile served him, as did the pop music, the lights, the robes, the staging -- religious convocations modeled upon rock concerts. Indeed, the other night, Peter Jennings said of him, "He is not only the pope, he is a rock star." Jennings, of course, meant superstar -- the concept formulated by the pope's fellow Slavic genius, Andy Warhola. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/05/rodriguez_pope/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/05/rodriguez_pope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My sad gay church</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/14/rodriguez_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/14/rodriguez_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/06/14/rodriguez</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever decision the Catholic bishops make in Dallas this week, it's sure to lack a widespread or profound understanding of sexuality and the priesthood.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since adolescence, I have sat in Catholic churches, listening patiently, though not without irony, to priests in the pulpit describe (my) homosexuality as a "lifestyle." The devotion and passion I have felt for another man for the last 20 years have not been worthy, of course, of any sacramental blessing. My feeling does not deserve the name "love." </p><p>Like other Catholics, however, I have never regarded it as much of a secret that many priests are gay -- repressed, knowing, closeted, whatever. </p><p>Sociologists of the church have noted a growing proportion of gay priests, especially since the second Vatican Council. Sociologists tell us that the priesthood was often the refuge for the pious, troubled gay teenager. By becoming a priest, the boy could transform his guilt and disinclination for marriage into a life regarded as heroic by children and grandmothers alike. </p><p>In recent decades I have heard a growing candor, from priests I know, about their own homosexuality, tales of "special friendships" in seminaries and, ominously, stories of homosexual cabals in the Vatican or high church offices. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/06/14/rodriguez_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/14/rodriguez_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disunited we stand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/23/disunited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/23/disunited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/23/disunited</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jingoistic cries of unity since Sept. 11 are disturbing -- and fundamentally un-American.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In peacetime, America is the most original nation in the world. We are the maddest, most inventive; truly a splendid disorder are we. When America goes to war, we become a nation like any other. </p><p> Nowadays, I turn on TV and hear Americans gamely stumbling through the national anthem. At an intersection yesterday, I saw a Lexus carrying a socialite alongside a pickup with a kid who was absorbing the thump-thump-thump of rap music -- both cars wearing the Stars and Stripes. </p><p> Everywhere I walk in San Francisco, in shop windows, signs of uniform size, identical lettering, proclaim: United We Stand. </p><p> Odd. I had always assumed the reverse: That the strength of America derives from our variety and disparate opinions. Which is to say: Disunited We Stand. </p><p> In today's nation of wartime unity, television comedians, newspaper columnists, <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/19/appeasement/index.html">Berkeley politicians</a> and everyday loonies -- indeed, anyone who might voice an eccentric opinion about Sept. 11 and our government's response -- have been called down by their fellow Americans as unpatriotic. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/23/disunited/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/23/disunited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black and tan fantasy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/30/hispanics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/30/hispanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/05/30/hispanics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Census says Hispanics are poised to outnumber blacks as America's largest "minority" -- but can Hispanics really be compared to African-Americans?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dark little secret -- the divide at the heart of America's racial and ethnic politics -- has been exposed by <a href="/politics/feature/2001/04/02/los_angeles/index.html">the contest for mayor of Los Angeles.</a> In America's largest Hispanic city, a majority of African-American voters are expected to side with the white candidate, against the Hispanic candidate. </p><p>All is not well along the spectrum of America's rainbow, despite the tendency of some on the political left to describe "blacks and Latinos" in one breath. From Miami to Dallas to Compton, blacks and Latinos are engaged in a terrible competition for the meanest jobs; for the security of Civil Service positions; for political office; for white noise. It is no exaggeration to say that African-Americans have paid the price of Hispanic numerical ascendancy. In Los Angeles, for example, the famous "black neighborhoods" have suddenly become Hispanic -- immigrant, Spanish-speaking. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/30/hispanics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/30/hispanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prodigal father</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/mexico_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/mexico_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2000 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/12/07/mexico</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For decades, Mexico has looked down on Mexican- Americans, but its new president is challenging the nation to look to them instead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Bible, it's the prodigal son who realizes his error and is welcomed home by his loving father. In Mexico, it's the father who needs to ask forgiveness from his child. </p><p>This week, in his first public ceremony at the presidential residence, Mexico's new president, <a href="/news/feature/2000/12/02/fox/index.html">Vicente Fox,</a> apologized to his country's children who, for decades, have been scorned for going to the United States in desperate search of work and for survival. "The times are gone when Mexico viewed the emigrant and the emigrant's children with resentment," Fox said. </p><p>As a biblical confession, Fox's statement wasn't all that much. But in the history of Mexico, here was an important admission. For generations, Mexico has tended to cast itself as a victim in history and, thus, an innocent in the great world. </p><p>Mexico has most famously imagined itself in the figure of the Indian maiden, ravished by the 16th century conquistador. After independence from Spain, three centuries later, Mexico suffered various European invaders. Worse than any European was the United States -- the Gringo -- who absconded with half of Mexico's territory. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/mexico_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/07/mexico_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How race is really lived in America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/race_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/race_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/07/13/race</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times assures us that relations between "blacks" and "whites" are "generally good." What about the rest of us?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>ccording to the New York Times -- this nation's "newspaper of record," as we are accustomed to call it -- a discussion of U.S. race relations, even at this date, can only mean a discussion of the tensions between descendants of Europe and descendants of Africa. </p><p>Most Americans do not read the New York Times. But the Times is the newspaper that reflects and shapes elite liberal thinking, especially on the East Coast. So it is worth noting that, for the last six weeks, the Times has been running a series called "How Race is Lived in America," concerned exclusively with how "whites" and "blacks" perceive one another. </p><p>How should we expect the omniscient New York Times to settle all scores? Time and space forbid! But here we are in the new century and it is clear to just about everyone that our country has become Latino and Asian; and miscegenation among races is increasing. With citizens from every corner, America is creating a global society, the first in the world. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/race_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/race_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#039;s about spirituality, not sports</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/rodriguez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/rodriguez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/06/24/rodriguez</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The X Games fulfill the human need to test limits and risk death at a time when technology has created the illusion that we&#039;re in control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Y</b>our dentist is climbing Mount Everest. The mother of four is mountain-biking through the desert. The boy next door skateboards on asphalt at 60 mph.</p><p>Beyond this summer's baseball scores or news of PGA tournaments or tennis matches, something is going on in the world that newspapers and television sportscasters barely know how to report as "sports." But this week the wise guys with orange hair and blue sports jackets at ESPN and ABC Sports are heading out to San Francisco, to televise what they call "The X Games" -- a tournament of rock-climbing, bungee-jumping, sky-surfing, street luge and other death-defying exploits.  It's an odd idea, since extreme sports have arisen in opposition to regular athletics.</p><p>In many extreme sporting events, it's true, there are celebrities, even organized competitions. But while other American kids might want to get into the NBA and make a million bucks, most persons who are addicted to extreme sports belong on a very different page of the morning paper -- not the sports page, but maybe the religion page, instead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/rodriguez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/24/rodriguez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magic&#039;s seductive hold</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/16/magic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/16/magic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/06/16/magic</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The murder of Mexican talk-show host Paco Stanley reveals the growing disjunction between illusion and reality in Mexico.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n the Americas, few countries are as expert in the business of magic as Mexico. Romance, illusion, cocaine  -- fantasy is Mexico's growing export, more important than burritos or the eager hands of its migrant workers.</p><p>Last week's midday murder of Paco Stanley, Mexico's beloved comic and TV talk-show host, forced millions of Mexicans to recognize reality: Mexico has become a violent, criminal society. Over and over, Stanley's bullet-ridden minivan was shown on TV.</p><p>Within a day, Mexico City's attorney general announced that Stanley (in whose face were embedded 26 rounds) was in possession of cocaine at the time of his death. Suddenly Mexicans were forced to wonder if Paco Stanley's real life was more complicated than his TV persona.</p><p>The disjunction between reality and illusion is not only a Mexican problem. While the U.S. Border Patrol has tried to stop Mexican peasants from slipping into San Diego,  American teenagers have developed a taste for a style of professional wrestling known in Mexico as lucha libre. Luchadors specialize in sequins and bluster and high-risk acrobatics. And while some American nativists may still worry about Spanish becoming our second language, the more important language coming from Mexico is a surreal grammar of love. Or haven't you noticed? "Days of Our Lives" is suddenly starting to look like a Mexican telenovela with nuns and magic and the demonic -- all part of the drama of love.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/16/magic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/16/magic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darkest Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/04/05/rodriguez_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/04/05/rodriguez_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/04/05/rodriguez</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's heart of darkness lies at the far end of the Danube, and the savages have white skin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>ir fares to Europe are inexpensive now. So why not? And what a lovely time, April, to see the Adriatic or sail the Danube! For many Americans, Europe is a happy tourist attraction -- old castles, gold churches -- despite the fact that most Americans don't speak the lingo and most Americans are the descendants of immigrants who fled one European calamity or another.</p><p>Immigrant Americans -- Ellis Island Americans -- spoke of Europe as "the old country," glad to be out of it. But it took only a generation for their sons and daughters to forget the reasons their parents left. By the 19th century, native-born Americans were feeling embarrassed by the rawness of this country. "All educated Americans, first or last, go to Europe," opined Ralph Waldo Emerson. And newly rich Americans went to Europe for the "grand tour" -- anxious for culture, to marry a title, learn how to read a French menu or, at least, to gaze upon something older than anything they might find in Pittsburgh.</p><p>This terrible, dark European century began, as it is ending, with bloodshed in the Balkans. Between then and now came the slaughter of a generation in the trenches of World War I, the Nazi ovens and Communist purges, to say nothing of English vs. Irish or Greeks against Turks or, today, skinheads in Bavaria prowling the streets for anyone who might not be Aryan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/04/05/rodriguez_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/04/05/rodriguez_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A resounding moral defeat for the moralizers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/newsc950314416/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/newsc950314416/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/11/05/newsc950314416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Rodriguez declares Tuesday&#039;s elections to be a resounding moral defeat for the moralizers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">I</font>t turns out that Americans were prepared to vote for  pro wrestlers and incompetent incumbents -- we could even tolerate a  womanizing president -- but we had no appetite for politicians posing as  moralists.</p><p>In recent years, Republican politicians and their partisans in the media  have been flirting with the so-called religious right. They assumed that  the future of their party and their own vain ambitions rested with the  likes of Pat Robertson and Gary Bauer and Jerry Falwell. It was a foolish  assumption.</p><p>Most of the GOP moralists were male, many of them were white, some of  them spoke with Southern accents. On Sunday morning talk shows they  wanted us to know what they thought about feminism and homosexuality and  abortion. They promised salvation, something they described vaguely in  pastel colors as an America governed by "traditional family values."</p><p>Americans -- to their credit, many Americans -- would have none of it. They  recognized the politician and the media huckster for what he was. Voters  in Alaska and Hawaii may not have been willing to legalize gay weddings,  but a larger number of Americans did not need Trent Lott's preachments on  homosexuality -- for example, his recent comparison of gay life to  kleptomania.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/newsc950314416/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/newsc950314416/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A resounding moral defeat for the moralizers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/cov_05newsc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/cov_05newsc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1998 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/11/05/cov_05newsc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American voters refuse to bow before the high priests of scolding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">I</font>t turns out that Americans were prepared to vote for<br />
pro wrestlers and incompetent incumbents -- we could even tolerate a<br />
womanizing president -- but we had no appetite for politicians posing as<br />
moralists.</p><p>In recent years, Republican politicians and their partisans in the media<br />
have been flirting with the so-called religious right. They assumed that<br />
the future of their party and their own vain ambitions rested with the<br />
likes of Pat Robertson and Gary Bauer and Jerry Falwell. It was a foolish<br />
assumption.</p><p>Most of the GOP moralists were male, many of them were white, some of<br />
them spoke with Southern accents. On Sunday morning talk shows they<br />
wanted us to know what they thought about feminism and homosexuality and<br />
abortion. They promised salvation, something they described vaguely in<br />
pastel colors as an America governed by "traditional family values."</p><p>Americans -- to their credit, many Americans -- would have none of it. They<br />
recognized the politician and the media huckster for what he was. Voters<br />
in Alaska and Hawaii may not have been willing to legalize gay weddings,<br />
but a larger number of Americans did not need Trent Lott's preachments on<br />
homosexuality -- for example, his recent comparison of gay life to<br />
kleptomania.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/cov_05newsc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/11/05/cov_05newsc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My heterosexual dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/10/19/news_132/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/10/19/news_132/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 1998 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/10/19/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone please explain how flirting can lead to murder?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">C</font>all it my heterosexual dilemma. Gay, queer, a fag -- call me what you will. All my life I have been trying to figure you out, to make sense of you -- the heterosexuals in my life -- how you think, what you feel.</p><p>A young man, Matthew Shepard, is pistol-whipped, tied to a fence and left to die in the Wyoming night. The girlfriend of one of the two men accused of the crime explains to a reporter that Shepard had embarrassed her boyfriend by flirting with him at a bar.</p><p>Let's assume that the flirtation actually happened. It's not, in any case, a new defense. It isn't the first time vacant-eyed youths have been excused of murder by juries by claiming an unwanted homosexual advance. The question left begging is this: What does it tell us about heterosexual insecurity that a gay wink in a bar would unleash such murderous rage?</p><p>For all our talk about sex, despite Sigmund Freud and <a target="_top" href="http://www.salonmagazine.com/aug97/stupid970820.html">Dr. Laura Schlessinger,</a> despite our postmodern promiscuities and the porn industry that is our nation's mass entertainment, despite our jokes about our philandering president, we know surprisingly little about the mysteries of sexuality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/10/19/news_132/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/10/19/news_132/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: Defending the right to pry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/01/29/news_391/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/01/29/news_391/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/01/29/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many commentators, notably feminists, dismiss stories
about the sex life of President Clinton as irrelevant to his public role. But this drawing of a line between public and private
lives, says a homosexual writer, cannot work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000">W</font>ell before Americans ever heard of Monica Lewinsky, the nation's most important feminist organizations turned silent on the subject of President Clinton's treatment of women like Gennifer Flowers. But then, who cared about Flowers, with her tall hair and cheap perfume. In the grand scheme of things, the need was for a "progressive" in the White House to advance a feminist agenda.</p><p>That still seems to be the case. Referring to Clinton's latest alleged scandal, Molly Ivins, a feminist journalist in Texas, declares in her cowboy prose style: "I, for one, do not think the president's sex life has squat to do with his job."</p><p>I disagree. I think Americans had every right to know that President John F. Kennedy was having an affair with a Mafia moll. Kennedy's famous libido, so carefully protected by the Secret Service and by crony journalists, jeopardized the entire nation.</p><p>History is full of famous disparities. The cruel dictator dotes on his granddaughters. The eminent educator abuses his children. But such lives are gross distortions. For us, there cannot be this clear line separating our public from our private life. The kind of people we are in private should influence the kind of people we are in public. And vice versa.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/01/29/news_391/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/01/29/news_391/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: The odd couple</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1998/01/19/news_267/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1998/01/19/news_267/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1998 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1998/01/19/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pope&#039;s upcoming visit to Cuba and meeting with Fidel Castro is being depicted as a sort of ideological shootout: believer vs. atheist, Catholic vs. Communist, Old World vs. New. But the reality is much more complex.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">P</font>ope John Paul II is coming to Cuba. The pope who helped liberate  the Soviet empire is the guest of the world's last Marxist hero. An unlikely pair, yes. And why not?</p><p>Americans, especially non-Catholic Americans, tend to admire this pope. A former Time magazine "Man of the Year," he seems exceptional among world leaders -- a man of fierce moral principle who speaks his mind. Americans, too, see him as the anti-communist pope, the Polish freedom fighter who provided critical support for the Solidarity trade union movement that overthrew the communist regime there.</p><p>But this same anti-communist pope has also been a fierce critic of capitalism -- particularly the cruelties and social Darwinism of the free-market economy.</p><p>The Polish pope belongs more to the communal East. After demonstrations against his papacy in Holland and Germany in the 1980s, one sensed his  growing disdain toward the individualist and decadent West. Financially, the church worldwide is largely supported by the United States and by Germany, by dollars and deutsch marks. But the great strides for Catholicism are being taken in the Third World, in Africa and Asia and in a resurgent Eastern Europe. Not in the West.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1998/01/19/news_267/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1998/01/19/news_267/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsreal: It&#039;s class, stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/10/news_42/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/10/news_42/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1997 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1997/11/10/news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It still doesn&#039;t occur to many that affirmative action might be unfair to poor whites, or that minority kids drop out of college not because of their color but because they are poor. It should be class, not race, that matters in the post-affirmative action era.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000">Some</font> weeks ago, a law professor at the University of Texas got in trouble for saying that African Americans and Mexicans are at a disadvantage in higher education because they come from cultures that tolerate failure. Jesse Jackson flew to Austin to deliver a fiery speech; students demanded the professor's ouster.</p><p>It was all typical of the way we have debated affirmative action for years. Both sides ended up arguing about race and ethnicity; both sides ignored the deeper issue of social inequality. Even now, as affirmative action is finished in California and is being challenged in many other states, nobody is really saying what was wrong with affirmative action: It was unfair to poor whites.</p><p>Americans find it hard to talk about what Europeans more easily call the lower class. We find it easier to sneer at the white poor -- the "rednecks," the trailer-park trash. The rural white male is  Hollywood's politically correct villain du jour.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/11/10/news_42/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/11/10/news_42/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mouse That Squeaked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1996/12/04/media_182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1996/12/04/media_182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1996 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/circus/1996/12/04/media</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t believe that Disney&#039;s defense of the Dalai Lama is a brave stand for artistic expression. The entertainment colossus simply realized it
was more expedient to give in to Hollywood&#039;s New Age orthodoxy than to Chinese bureaucrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="futura medium,arial" color="#CC0000"><b>To tell you the truth, </b></font> I've never been very keen on Mickey Mouse. And the more I see his hideous grin all over the world, the more I suspect George Orwell got it all wrong: The nightmare totalitarian future may well be ruled by a relentlessly happy face instead of some glowering dictator's gaze.</p><p>Last week, however, the Mouse was a hero to many in what is loosely called Hollywood's "creative community." Editorial writers sang Mickey's praise too. "The Mouse Makes a Stand," thundered the New York Times in a lead editorial. ("The Walt Disney Company demonstrated that it would not accept censorship as the price of doing business in China or anywhere else." )</p><p>For weeks now, the rumor on the financial pages had been that the Disney Company was under pressure from Chinese government officials. Disney is the co-producer and the distributor of an upcoming film biography of the Dalai Lama being directed by Martin Scorsese.</p><p>As China looms on the horizon as the major economic force of the next century, Chinese officials are increasingly disdainful of American "cultural imperialism" -- versions of history that might differ from Beijing's. In sum, China regards its seizure of Tibet in the 1950s as an internal matter and sees any glorification of the Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled leader, as provocative in the extreme.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1996/12/04/media_182/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1996/12/04/media_182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

