<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sally Kohn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/sally_kohn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: The latest watered-down compromise GOP hates anyway</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New proposal will do little to fix our broken system, and passing it will cost Obama real capital. Sound familiar?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The road to citizenship isn’t exactly shovel ready. In fact, even calling it a road might be a stretch. It’s more like a long on-ramp. With a tollbooth. And potholes. And a guard station. And a giant electrified fence.</p><p>In their desire to find a compromise acceptable to the chronically short-sighted and self-destructive Republican Party, Democrats have crafted an immigration bill that is for the most part as unobjectionable as it is uninspired. The bill cobbles together a series of pragmatic concessions that, while perhaps sufficient to overcome conservative objections, will likely prove wholly insufficient at actually addressing the problem it was designed to solve — that is, fixing our broken immigration system. The tangle of hurdles and exclusions, loopholes for businesses and pitfalls for immigrants, is precisely the mess we should be cleaning up, not making worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck&#8217;s favorite immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/glenn_becks_favorite_kind_of_immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/glenn_becks_favorite_kind_of_immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans for Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Schooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives rally around a controversial family facing deportation. Take one guess why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that Glenn Beck has <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/18/there-is-nothing-more-un-american-than-this-becks-interview-with-the-lawyer-representing-homeschooling-familys-fight-to-stay-in-the-u-s/" target="_blank">pledged $50,000</a> to the legal fund of an immigrant family facing deportation from the United States? As of April 9, a <a href="http://www.hslda.org/legal/cases/romeike.asp" target="_blank">petition</a> to the White House to grant the family permanent asylum, organized by Christian conservative groups, topped 100,000 signatories, the threshold to trigger a response from the administration.</p><p>Confused? I can explain. The Romeike family aren’t just any immigrants. They are evangelical Christians from Germany. And, oh yeah, they’re white.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/us/01homeschool.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">Uwe and Hannelore Romeike</a> are devout Christians who want to home-school their five children. But under German law, attendance at an officially recognized school — whether a public school or a private religious or secular school — is mandatory. Facing over $10,000 in mounting fines and police escorting their children to school daily, the Romeikes were <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1968099,00.html" target="_blank">contacted by</a> the Virginia-based Home School Legal Defense Association — which was looking to expand its work internationally --  and suggested the Romeike’s resettle in Morristown, Tenn., and apply for political asylum.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/glenn_becks_favorite_kind_of_immigrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/glenn_becks_favorite_kind_of_immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>185</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New spill reveals how horrible Keystone could be</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TransCanada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsure what to think of Keystone pipeline? Check out this video of a shorter pipeline leaking oil all over a street]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Keystone XL pipeline was already a bad idea three days ago. It is a <em>terrible</em> idea today.</p><p>This weekend, the Orwellian-named Exxon Pegasus pipeline <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/31/exxon-pipeline-spill-idUSL2N0CN00D20130331" target="_blank">spilled thousands of barrels of oil</a> into a residential neighborhood in Mayflower, Ark. Twenty-two families were evacuated from their homes, and cleanup, days later, continues. Check out this appalling video of crude oil leaking into the streets of this everyday American community:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/u30m8U6VP3E" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p>The oil is the same heavy crude from tar sands that oil companies behind the Keystone XL pipeline want to extract. In fact, the only difference between the Pegasus pipeline that leaked and the proposed Keystone XL? The proposed Keystone XL is <em><a href="http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html" target="_blank">longer</a></em> --- over <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/31/arkansas-oil-spill-2013-exxon_n_2986754.html" target="_blank">300 miles longer</a> than the pipeline that leaked in Arkansas on Friday. That means the Keystone XL pipeline is even more likely to leak. Not exactly a comforting prospect.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/new_spill_reveals_how_horrible_keystone_could_be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.E. Cupp is wrong on marriage, but not why you might think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.E. Cupp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative commentator and I disagree on gay marriage. It's her promotion of it that I find worrying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if we needed further evidence of the malleable nature of ideology, this week conservative pundit S.E. Cupp responded to my critique of conservative “marriage promotion” arguments for supporting gay marriage by defending the cause of marriage equality:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=JD3GZ22W618T6305&amp;content_type=content_item&amp;layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;widget_type_cid=svp&amp;read_more=1" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="420" height="421"></iframe></p><p>Here’s what I wrote in my <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/are_gop_gay_marriage_supporters_hurting_the_cause/" target="_blank">original Salon essay</a>:</p><blockquote> <div>In the interest of expediency and bringing as many unlikely conservative allies on board, the gay rights movement may give cover to or even amplify a set of narrow values that rank married families as better than unmarried families, two parents as better than one parent — norms that continue to divide America into good people and deserving families versus everyone else. And even if we temporarily succeed in getting gay folks added to the “good” category, is it worth it? Plus do we really think that’s the way we or anyone else will be treated equally?</div> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are GOP gay marriage supporters hurting the cause?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/are_gop_gay_marriage_supporters_hurting_the_cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/are_gop_gay_marriage_supporters_hurting_the_cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If conservative support of marriage equality is an attempt to further reinforce strict societal norms, no thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I'm genuinely thrilled that more and more Republicans are coming out to support marriage equality, it's important to consider <em>why</em> that is -- because the ends may not justify the means. To the extent Republican support for gay marriage is based on imposing restrictive and regressive conservative social norms, it ultimately hurts gays — and all of us — more than it helps.</p><p>Sure, Republican Sen. Rob Portman announced his support for same-sex marriage because he wants equality for his own gay son, but Portman also rationalized his views within a conservative values framework. In <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2013/03/15/gay-couples-also-deserve-chance-to-get-married.html" target="_blank">an Op-Ed</a> announcing his change of heart, Portman wrote that he supports allowing gay couples to marry <em>because</em> he is a conservative, not in spite of it:</p><blockquote><p>We conservatives believe in personal liberty and minimal government interference in people’s lives. We also consider the family unit to be the fundamental building block of society. We should encourage people to make long-term commitments to each other and build families, so as to foster strong, stable communities and promote personal responsibility.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/are_gop_gay_marriage_supporters_hurting_the_cause/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/are_gop_gay_marriage_supporters_hurting_the_cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t let me down, Obama!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/dont_let_me_down_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/dont_let_me_down_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Inaugural Address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressivism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your second inaugural address raised my hopes -- again. But I don't know how much disappointment I can take]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear President Obama,</p><p>I was with you from the very beginning. OK, well, not the <em>very </em>beginning. But in December of 2007, I helped organize the country’s first ever grassroots presidential forum — where folks from community organizations shared the stage with you and other candidates and asked all the questions. When that event started, I was backing another candidate. But by the end of the day, you had me.</p><p>“This idea of community values,” you said to the audience of farmers and farmworkers and families on welfare, “is not just the cause of a campaign for me, it is the cause of my life.”</p><p>And I believed you. Maybe because I wanted to believe you. Maybe because I needed someone in whom to believe. But I believed you.</p><p>Sure, I had friends from Illinois progressive circles who warned me that, no matter the rhetoric, you were a proven centrist at heart. They shouted and waved their hands. But I didn’t listen. I was enthralled and excited and brimming with hope.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/dont_let_me_down_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/dont_let_me_down_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>’Twas the night before the fiscal cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/twas_the_night_before_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/twas_the_night_before_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fiscal cliff in verse -- with apologies to Clement Clarke Moore (but not the politicians skewered)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>’Twas the night before the fiscal cliff, and all through the Senate and House<br /> Not a Republican was budging, not even an ounce.<br /> Back from vacation the President came<br /> In hopes that Republicans might now act sane.</p><p>The cowardly Democrats put it all on the table<br /> Like cuts to the elderly, poor and disabled.<br /> So Republicans, thinking their ploy was a score,<br /> Figured why not hold out until Democrats cut more!</p><p>Even with taxes the lowest in years<br /> Republican donors clung tight to their Lears.<br /> If taxes were raised there would be hell to pay<br /> And less money to beg for come re-election day.</p><p>Plus unlike Democrats, Republicans were clear<br /> They wanted to drown government, and this was their year.<br /> Never mind the election or the poll trackings<br /> Democrats missed the message and their weak spines were cracking.</p><p>With one little press conference, lively and quick,<br /> Obama pulled out the rug from under seniors like St. Nick.<br /> And conservative Democrats are disgustingly jolly<br /> Pretending that poor folks can live off of holly.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/twas_the_night_before_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/twas_the_night_before_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even more reasons for gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/even_more_reasons_for_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/even_more_reasons_for_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The massacre in Sandy Hook could lead to sensible reforms. But there were 12,000 other reasons this year for change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>If 2011 numbers are predictive, <a href="http://m.guardiannews.com/news/datablog/2011/jan/10/gun-crime-us-state">more than 12,000 people</a> will be killed by guns in America this year.</p> <p>That’s four times the number of people who died in the Sept. 11 attacks. Yet while we mourned together as a nation after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and then went to war against al-Qaida and two sovereign nations, it appears to have taken 20 schoolchildren being gunned down in Connecticut for politicians of either party to challenge the power of the NRA.</p> <p>And this when even a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/24/gun_owners_vs_nra_leadership_salpart/" target="_blank">strong majority of NRA <em>members</em></a> support common-sense gun control! Exactly how many bodies have to pile up for Washington to find the will to act?</p> <p>Every day in America, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/aurora-daily-violence-city-streets-gun-control-wait-article-1.1121153">34 Americans are killed by guns.</a> Every day in America, at least one of those killed is under the age of 14. In the wake of all-too-frequent mass shootings, we tend to ignore the even <em>more</em> frequent, quotidian gun deaths that are devastating our communities, destroying families and endangering our children. Here are just a few stories about lives that might have been saved with sensible gun laws.</p> <p><strong>Linkin Leatham, 2</strong></p> <p>Linkin’s parents called their son the “miracle baby” for having overcome several complications at birth and defying doctors’ expectations that he wouldn’t survive.  Then, <a href="http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&amp;sid=22175824" target="_blank">in September</a>, 2-year-old Linkin picked up his father’s handgun and shot himself in the eye, ultimately dying from his wounds. Linkin’s father is a Utah police officer, though the weapon involved in the shooting was not his service weapon.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/even_more_reasons_for_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/even_more_reasons_for_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrate the heroes, not the shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/celebrate_the_heroes_not_the_shooter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/celebrate_the_heroes_not_the_shooter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don't know the Newtown gunman's motive. But the coverage could inspire other troubled people to become copycats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not going to use his name in this essay. None of us should use his name. Ever again.</p><p>Following a shooting at a school in England in early 2009, a forensic psychiatrist told the BBC about <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/media/2012/07/how-media-shouldnt-cover-mass-murder" target="_blank">his plea</a> to media outlets worldwide:</p><blockquote><p>If you don't want to propagate more mass murders...</p> <p>Don't start the story with sirens blaring.</p> <p>Don't have photographs of the killer.</p> <p>Don't make this 24/7 coverage.</p> <p>Do everything you can <em>not</em> to make the body count the lead story … <em>not </em>to make the killer some kind of anti-hero.</p> <p>Do localize this story to the affected community and as boring as possible in every other market.</p></blockquote><p>Why don’t we listen?</p><p>There is compelling evidence that the way we cover mass shootings, especially in America, gives too much attention to the shooter, in effect turning him into a celebrity and creating a perverse incentive for other social outcasts to seek the spotlight through carnage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/celebrate_the_heroes_not_the_shooter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/celebrate_the_heroes_not_the_shooter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ann Coulter: Voice of reason?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ellen degeneres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Million Moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.C. Penney's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've embraced Ellen, gay marriage and progress. If Ann Coulter knows, why are radical right groups still fighting?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do Ellen DeGeneres and the "fiscal cliff" have in common? They’re both signs of the inevitability of social progress and the demise of the radical right.</p><p>In case you missed it, DeGeneres stars in a new JC Penney’s ad in which the openly gay TV host flagrantly tries to persuade three of Santa’s elves to make more toys for Christmas. While at first glance, a naive viewer might think the ad is a ploy by a crumbling department store to boost holiday business by promising free stuff, the trained eyes at the conservative One Million Moms group <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/08/ellen-degeneres-one-million-moms-moving-on-jc-penney-protest_n_2264504.html" target="_blank">know better</a>.</p><p>Vulnerable Americans watching their televisions will obviously be brainwashed. Hmm, what should I get Uncle Sid for Christmas this year? I know, homosexuality! JC Penney’s is practically giving it away!</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-XtS7I50Gwk" frameborder="0" width="640" height="360"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/ann_coulter_voice_of_reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Mr. President: Please fight to overturn Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dear_mr_president_please_fight_to_overturn_citizens_united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dear_mr_president_please_fight_to_overturn_citizens_united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One request for President obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the most important legacy you could leave, President Obama? Clean elections]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. President, perhaps the most important legacy you could achieve on the heels of your reelection is the preservation of the electoral process itself.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/charlie-mahtesian/2012/08/election-price-tag-billion-130856.html">Estimates suggest</a> that, between political party spending and super PAC largess around the presidential and congressional races, this past election cost as much as $6 billion.  That is just astonishing.  And astonishingly wasteful.</p><p><a href="http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/11/11854/biggest-loser-2012-election-karl-rove">Karl Rove</a> alone raised and spent upward of $400 million to influence the election.  Instead, Rove and the hidden donors behind his super PAC could have given over $1,500 to every unemployed person in <a href="http://www.deptofnumbers.com/unemployment/virginia/">Virginia</a> — that is, he could have actually done something good with the money, and maybe won the state.  Leave aside the fact that Republicans oppose unemployment assistance; the point is, our electoral spending is wildly out of proportion with the realities of voters and even the proportions of the recent past.  In 2004, the record $1 billion in campaign spending <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,129628,00.html">made headlines</a> and set records.  Now we’ve eclipsed that sixfold.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dear_mr_president_please_fight_to_overturn_citizens_united/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dear_mr_president_please_fight_to_overturn_citizens_united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Obama can turn a campaign into a movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/how_obama_can_turn_a_campaign_into_a_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/how_obama_can_turn_a_campaign_into_a_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his first term, the president largely ignored his most energized supporters. He can't make that mistake again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the 2008 election, President Obama actively chose to not turn his broad and energized base of supporters into an independent force for change in America. So, for the last four years, when Obama desperately needed a fiery but loyal liberal movement helping tilt the wind toward his sails, he was instead isolated and stranded. The next four years do not look to be any easier for the president politically. This time around, if he hopes to succeed where he has struggled in the past, his supporters should be actively mobilized, not sidelined.</p><p>Since the 2008 election, President Obama has been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ari-berman/what-obama-2010-can-learn_b_787451.html">widely</a> <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/10/03/334230/the-cost-of-a-demobilized-left/">criticized</a> (including by <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/20/republicans-embrace-theatrics-it-s-time-for-barack-obama-to-do-the-same.html">yours truly</a>) for demobilizing his electoral base, funneling his massive volunteer and voter outreach operation into the bowels of the Democratic National Committee instead of encouraging and allowing it to thrive as an independent, movement-like entity. With a mobilized base exerting its will on Congress, President Obama could have won a bigger stimulus package, stronger banking reform, and a more progressive healthcare reform bill. Then again, the base could have mobilized against the president — for instance, to oppose extending the Bush-era tax cuts for the rich or to condemn the expansion of drone strikes. The fact is that President Obama and his White House spent an extraordinary amount of energy in his first term trying not to cooperate with the movement-left but to control it, organizing <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0811/Tense_moments_at_Common_Purpose_meet.html">meetings</a> at which White House flacks would try to dictate messages and strategy to progressive advocacy groups.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/how_obama_can_turn_a_campaign_into_a_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/how_obama_can_turn_a_campaign_into_a_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Sarah Palin should endorse Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_sarah_palin_should_endorse_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_sarah_palin_should_endorse_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal aid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the former Alaska governor is looking out for her home state, her choice is clear]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin has said a lot of outrageous things about President Obama.  She tapped into the racist lexicon to accuse him of a <a href="http://abcn.ws/R96CHA">“shuck and jive”</a> regarding Libya; she urged Mitt Romney to specifically use words like <a href="http://yhoo.it/R974p6">“incompetent, dangerous, socialist”</a> to describe him;  and she accused him of <a href="http://fxn.ws/R96uHY">using Hurricane Sandy</a> as photo op.</p><p>But if Sarah Palin were paying attention to the needs and best interests of her home state of Alaska, it would not be outrageous for her to endorse President Obama for reelection.  In fact, it would be entirely sensible and sane.  Ironically, most red states that vote for Republican leaders fare better economically under Democrats.  In fact, under President Obama, Alaska has fared even better than most.</p><p>Alaska received <a href="http://nyti.ms/R98tfx">more stimulus dollars</a> per capita than any other state in the nation.  For instance, as of August of 2010 (when the bulk of stimulus spending had been dispatched), Alaska had an unemployment rate of 7.9 percent (two points below the national average) but received $3,145 per person in federal stimulus dollars.  But Florida, with an unemployment rate at 11.4 percent got just $914 in per capita stimulus spending.  And, incidentally, Alaska is not a poor state — with <a href="http://nyti.ms/R98tfx">oil revenues</a> that make up 88 percent of the state’s general fund.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_sarah_palin_should_endorse_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/why_sarah_palin_should_endorse_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mitt Romney is no Chris Christie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/why_mitt_romney_is_no_chris_christie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/why_mitt_romney_is_no_chris_christie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all his many faults, the New Jersey governor has leadership qualities the GOP nominee sorely lacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most promising Republican leader on the national stage is confident, consistent and charismatic.  And he sometimes curses, too.  That leader is Chris Christie.  And Mitt Romney is no Chris Christie.</p><p>I’m not saying I support much of what Chris Christie stands for.  As governor of New Jersey, Christie <a href="http://nyti.ms/V6bJMN" target="_blank">raised taxes</a> on the poor and middle classes while advocating tax breaks for the rich.  Christie <a href="http://nyti.ms/V6bxxd" target="_blank">vetoed</a> marriage equality legislation and said that civil rights <a href="http://bit.ly/V6cK7u" target="_blank">should have been</a> subject to a “popular” vote in the 1960s. Christie pushed <a href="http://bit.ly/V6bod6" target="_blank">a voucher plan</a> to drain money from public schools to fund private education while <a href="http://bit.ly/V6axJg" target="_blank">bashing</a> teachers and other public sector unions.  And after all this, New Jersey’s unemployment rate hovers <a href="http://bit.ly/V6cXYt" target="_blank">around 9.8 percent</a> as of September — a full 2 percentage points higher than the rest of the nation.  Not much to be proud of there.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/why_mitt_romney_is_no_chris_christie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/why_mitt_romney_is_no_chris_christie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign policy: Is Mitt running as Dubya or Obama &#8212; or both?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/foreign_policy_is_mitt_running_as_dubya_or_obama_or_both/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/foreign_policy_is_mitt_running_as_dubya_or_obama_or_both/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Mitt Romney's foreign policy resemble Obama's or Bush's, or both? He probably doesn't know himself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“No one anywhere, friend or foe, will doubt America’s capability to back up our words.”</em></p><p><em>“We will back up our words with actions.”</em></p><p><a href="http://politi.co/Vj72jI">The first quote</a> is from a speech on foreign policy Mitt Romney delivered in early October at the Virginia Military Institute.  <a href="http://bit.ly/Vj6PwY">The second</a> is from a policy meeting between George W. Bush and leaders of Lebanon.</p><p>Much as Romney is trying to distinguish himself on foreign policy, the fact is that if Barack Obama and George W. Bush had a foreign policy love child, it would be Mitt Romney. Rhetorically, Romney sounds almost exactly like George W. Bush.  In terms of what he’d do on the ground in places like Iran and Syria, Romney sounds exactly like Barack Obama.  So what will Mitt Romney do on foreign policy if elected?  As with everything else about Romney, he’s so mercurial it’s impossible to know.  But the signals are ominous.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/foreign_policy_is_mitt_running_as_dubya_or_obama_or_both/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/foreign_policy_is_mitt_running_as_dubya_or_obama_or_both/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why most celebs are for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/why_most_celebs_are_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/why_most_celebs_are_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's no secret that popular culture is dominated by liberals. The reasons why might surprise you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Bruce Springsteen became the latest celebrity to <a href="http://wapo.st/Tv5lJ2">publicly support</a> the president's reelection campaign, following, most recently, Scarlett Johansson, Eva Longoria and Kerry Washington, who appeared in <a href="http://bit.ly/Tv5hJ2">a pro-Obama video</a> by <a href="http://moveon.org/">MoveOn.org</a>.</p><p>In general, the list of celebrities contributing to, stumping for and endorsing President Obama is far too long for this column. But a week ago, when a little-known actress named Stacey Dash (who, ahem, is black) announced her support for Mitt Romney, conservatives went nuts. According to Glenn Beck’s the Blaze website, <a href="http://bit.ly/Tv4ojH">“Twitter exploded”</a> with the news. Or at least his feed did. But the point is, just as Republicans were so excited to nab Clint Eastwood that they let him ramble unscripted to an empty chair for 10 minutes, Romney backers were so excited to have a black actress endorse Romney that it didn’t seem to matter no one had ever heard of her.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/why_most_celebs_are_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/why_most_celebs_are_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five crazy things Paul Ryan actually believes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/5_crazy_things_paul_ryan_actually_believes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/5_crazy_things_paul_ryan_actually_believes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the vice-presidential candidate's bizarro universe, some rapes are worse than others and abortions are never OK]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Mitt Romney’s defining quality seems to be his inability to define any consistent viewpoints on the driving issues of the day, Paul Ryan is running on a pretty clear and consistent record.  And unlike Romney, who changes his stance according to his audience, Paul Ryan has clung to extremely unpopular ideas even in the face of public backlash.</p><p>Of course, now that he’s the GOP candidate for vice president, Paul Ryan insists that Romney’s views are the ones driving their swerving, accident-prone limousine of a campaign — but since Paul Ryan is in the running to be a heartbeat away from taking the wheel, we shouldn’t lose sight of his vision for America.</p><p><strong>1. Some rapes are worse than others</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/5_crazy_things_paul_ryan_actually_believes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/5_crazy_things_paul_ryan_actually_believes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Democrats still suck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/why_democrats_still_suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/why_democrats_still_suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13028025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They remain the party committed to getting in office and then not doing anything powerful ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To borrow the old adage, with Democrats like Jerry Brown, who needs Republicans?</p><p>After all, the former mayor of the so-called People’s Republic of Oakland and now-repeat governor of California, was <a href="http://bit.ly/PrMUns">called</a> “more of a fiscal conservative than Governor Reagan” by American Conservative magazine and pilloried in a Dead Kennedy’s song as a “hippie-fascist.”  And now Gov. Brown has <a href="http://bit.ly/PrMGMU">vetoed</a> the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights, which would grant basic labor and wage protections to 200,000 nannies, housekeepers and home-health aides in the state.</p><p>Across the country, though voters are increasingly divided into increasingly fervent red-versus-blue camps, many Democratic leaders and candidates are little better than Brown.  Take Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who, when he ran for his seat in 2010, cut a TV commercial where he <a href="http://slate.me/VbwrKX">fired a rifle </a>through his party’s signature environmental legislation.  Or Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who was the only Democrat in 2011 to <a href="http://bit.ly/VbwpTh">vote against a spending bill</a> to keep the government operating until the following fall.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/why_democrats_still_suck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/why_democrats_still_suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s campaign-killing snobbery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/mitt_romney_adrift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/mitt_romney_adrift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you need help docking your large boat, Romney's your man. That's become a problem for voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a recent fundraiser, Bill Marriott, chairman of the international hotel conglomerate, introduced Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney by noting that they both have summer houses on Lake Winnipesaukee in New Hampshire.  Marriott told a <a href="http://bit.ly/V6mexO">story</a> of taking his boat into town with his grandkids to get ice cream:</p><blockquote> <div>And we got into the docks and they were all full and I looked around, there was no place to park, so we stopped at the end of a dock. They all jumped off and ran up the dock. And I realized there was nobody in the boat to help me dock the boat, handle the ropes, do anything - they just left me out there at sea. So I finally found a place to park after about 20 minutes, and I pulled in, I said, 'Who's going to grab the rope?,' and I looked up and there was Mitt Romney. So he pulled me in, he tied up the boat for me. He rescued me just as he's going to rescue this great country.'</div> </blockquote><p>No doubt all of the big donors in the room who have boats so big it takes more than one person to dock them were nodding along and thinking, “Yeah, Mitt Romney understands us rich people and is here to help.”  Of course, for the 99 percent of other voters, that is precisely the problem.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/mitt_romney_adrift/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/mitt_romney_adrift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lies, gaffes, taxes: Mitt can never take responsibility</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/lies_gaffes_taxes_mitt_can_never_take_responsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/lies_gaffes_taxes_mitt_can_never_take_responsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13020592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP candidate can never admit he's wrong. What does that say about his character?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview this weekend on "60 Minutes," President Barack Obama, <a href="http://nydn.us/SObq2H">responding to questions</a> about the tone of the presidential campaign and the often-ugly TV ads made on his behalf, said this:</p><blockquote><p>Do we see sometimes us going overboard in our campaign — are there mistakes that are made or areas where there's no doubt that somebody could dispute how we are presenting things? You know, that happens in politics.</p></blockquote><p>Meanwhile, Mitt Romney still won’t release more than two years of full tax returns.</p><p>What do these two situations have to do with each other and the election? Everything.</p><p>Despite baseless Republican assertions to the contrary, Barack Obama has sought from Day One to take responsibility for his actions as president. So, after three and a half years in which Republicans have <a href="http://bit.ly/RQNBNo">blocked every piece of legislation</a> Obama has proposed and generally been as uncooperative as possible  — economic recovery be damned — Obama <a href="http://fxn.ws/SObvDz">repeated this weekend</a> what he has said before:  “I take full responsibility for everything that we do."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/lies_gaffes_taxes_mitt_can_never_take_responsibility/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/lies_gaffes_taxes_mitt_can_never_take_responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>