<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sara Breselor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/sara_breselor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is candy really a food?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/morality_candy_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/morality_candy_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/05/21/morality_candy_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a new Washington tax tries to distinguish "candy" from "food," an expert dissects our feelings about sweets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Washington state <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/05/17/candy-taxes-struggle-to-define-candy/">joined</a> more than a dozen state governments that have passed or proposed a tax on sweets: Starting on June 1, the state will begin adding sales tax to the price of candy. The hard part, it turns out, is figuring out exactly what "candy" is. Does a chocolate-covered pretzel qualify? What about a yogurt-covered raisin? Where does "candy" end and "food" begin?</p><p>Washington, apparently, <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nicolebrodeur/2011860776_nicole14m.html">draws the line at flour</a>. It defines candy as "a preparation of sugar, honey, or other natural or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruits, nuts, or other ingredients or flavorings and formed into bars, drops, or pieces." But any sweet that contains flour is considered food, and thus not taxable -- which sounds logical enough until you start looking at what is exempt. A Nestle Crunch bar is not candy, but a Hershey Bar is. Gummy Bears are candy, licorice is not. Milky Way Midnight? Candy. Milky Way? Not candy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/morality_candy_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/morality_candy_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bold new faces of urban farming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/community_gardens_slide_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/community_gardens_slide_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growers and Producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/05/17/community_gardens_slide_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not just kids and dirt. From indoor fish farms to business training for refugees, a slide show of 11 pioneers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urban farmers are coming to the rescue in dozens of city neighborhoods where you're about as likely to find a fresh tomato as you are to find a unicorn on the sidewalk. But if "urban farmer" calls up visions of an old hippie hoeing a quaint little patch of sunflowers in the shadow of high-rises, think again. Modern urban farming is about block parties with DJs and cooking lessons. It's raising fish in indoor tanks and getting outdoor education in city schools. It creates meaningful jobs for inner city youth who learn to plan food systems and cultivate crops. But most of all, it's about ingenuity. Urban agriculturists see potential where others sees blight, seeking out vacant lots and neglected open spaces, looking at what they have within arm's reach rather than thinking about what's missing.</p><p>This slide show is a tour of some of the country's most innovative approaches to urban agriculture. These are farms and gardens created in the service of education and activism. Whether they're training entrepreneurs, teaching kids to grow organic kale, or producing food from plots no bigger than your living room, the urban approach to farming is about feeding, not being fed.</p><p>     <a class="invokeSlideshow" href="/food/feature/2010/05/17/community_gardens_slide_show/slideshow.html">View the slide show</a>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/community_gardens_slide_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/community_gardens_slide_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Web is changing the way we eat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/internet_changing_eating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/internet_changing_eating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/05/10/internet_changing_eating</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A restaurant chain shrinks plate size to appeal to the social networking crowd. Is this the way of the future?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, a trend takes a mysterious turn. Here we are, in the midst of an era in which portion sizes have been growing steadily for decades, and suddenly, small plates are making a comeback. As USA Today writer Bruce Horovitz <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2010-03-30-smallplates30_ST_N.htm">pointed out last week</a>, bite-size menu options are a hot new thing at casual chain restaurants like California Pizza Kitchen and Houlihan's. Of course, small plates are a concession to budget-conscious eaters and possibly an attempt at a more upscale feel, but in a surprising twist, Bob Hartnett, CEO of Houlihan's, claims that the change is specially targeted at younger, Web-savvy customers. Small plates, he explains, are for diners who are "just as comfortable sharing a plate of food as they are sharing social media."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/internet_changing_eating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/internet_changing_eating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mom really does make the best cakes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/neurologist_explains_mom_s_cooking_nostalgia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/neurologist_explains_mom_s_cooking_nostalgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/05/07/neurologist_explains_mom_s_cooking_nostalgia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A neurologist tells us about our mothers, what the smell of baking does to us, and how we taste food in the womb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother is a great cook, and an adventurous one. Throughout my childhood, she made flan and souffl&#233; and once, memorably, a dish called "pungent fish balls." But she was also busy and often didn't have time to cook from scratch, and I wonder sometimes about my longing for small memories of her culinary non-grandeur. Mac and cheese from a box, for instance, or "cheese toast" for lunch: wheat bread in the toaster oven with cheddar cheese and paprika. I can find all the necessary ingredients for this particular snack within 50 feet of my apartment, but I have never once made it for myself. I never really want cheese toast, it turns out. Cheese and bread tastes like cheese and bread. So why is it that I'll still eat it in a heartbeat if my mom makes it?</p><p>To investigate, I talked to Dr. Alan Hirsch, founder and neurological director of the <a href="http://www.smellandtaste.org/">Smell &amp; Taste Treatment and Research Foundation</a> in Chicago, about the ways mom's cooking shapes our memories of childhood and our preferences as adults.</p><p>     <strong>Why is our mothers' cooking so special to us?</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/neurologist_explains_mom_s_cooking_nostalgia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/07/neurologist_explains_mom_s_cooking_nostalgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the USDA doom locally produced meat?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/26/usda_testing_end_local_meat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/26/usda_testing_end_local_meat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growers and Producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/04/26/usda_testing_end_local_meat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New testing regulations may end small-scale meat production -- and keep the market safe for the big boys]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That wailing you hear in the distance is the sound of small meat processors begging the USDA for mercy. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety Inspection Service recently proposed a set of <a href="http://www.farm-news.com/page/content.detail/id/501134/Small-meat-plants-feel-threatened-by-USDA-s-new-regs.html?nav=5005">new regulations</a> that will require all meat processors to submit their products to a new series of tests, a procedure that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars for even a modestly scaled operation, enough to cripple many small processors.</p><p>What worries fans of small farms and locally produced food is that the closing of small processors will mean the closing of small farms. Slaughter and processing is the biggest challenge for small-scale meat; they're operations simply too costly and complex for farms to handle themselves. As it is, farmers have few options for meat processing without selling their animals to massive feedlot-meat operations, and without that piece of the puzzle, many farmers may quit. Why is the USDA considering the new testing regime? Some producers wonder if the machinations of Big Food are in play.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/26/usda_testing_end_local_meat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/26/usda_testing_end_local_meat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pigford case: Justice for black farmers on hold</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/john_boyd_pigford_glickman_settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/john_boyd_pigford_glickman_settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growers and Producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/04/08/john_boyd_pigford_glickman_settlement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eleven years after the USDA settled a discrimination suit, over $1 billion promised goes unpaid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia farmer John Boyd describes a scene from a painful past: a white U.S. Department of Agriculture loan officer only allows black farmers to apply for loans one day a week. "Black Wednesday," the farmers call it, and they line up outside the USDA office in Richmond, Va. The loan officer, James Garnett, leaves the door to his office open so that all the farmers in the hallway can hear the loan requests of their colleagues be summarily, and vehemently, denied.</p><p>But Black Wednesday was not an artifact of the '50s. This was the America of the '80s and '90s, and in 1994, the USDA itself commissioned a review of the treatment of minorities in its Farm Service Agency programs. The commission's study <a href="http://nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RS20430.pdf">found that</a> "minorities received less than their fair share of USDA money for crop payments, disaster payments, and loans."</p><p>The result was a massive class-action lawsuit, Pigford v. Glickman, which the USDA settled out of court in 1999, admitting to widespread racial discrimination against black farmers in its loan programs between 1981 and 1996. About 15,000 farmers were paid a total of more than $900 million in the settlement. But tens of thousands of farmers filed claims after the deadline, and many charged that the government's outreach had been insufficient, causing them to miss their opportunity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/john_boyd_pigford_glickman_settlement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/john_boyd_pigford_glickman_settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The weird world of food obsessives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/slideshow_food_museums/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/slideshow_food_museums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/03/24/slideshow_food_museums</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slide show: As a famous banana exhibit faces closure, a look at some of the world's most curious collections]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone with an unfulfilled dream of holding a world record, Ken Bannister is offering the deal of a lifetime. Tuesday's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704534904575131660097881550.html">Wall Street Journal</a> reported that the Hesperia Recreation and Park District is evicting Bannister's <a href="http://www.bananaclub.com/">International Banana Club and Museum</a> after housing the museum, rent-free, since 2005. Bannister is the founder, curator and self-proclaimed "top banana" of the museum, and holds the Guinness Book of World Records title for the "world's largest collection devoted to any one fruit." Now he's put his entire collection of more than 17,000 banana-themed curios <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/International-Banana-Club-MUSEUM-Established-1972_W0QQitemZ280480389296QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item414def18b0#ht_3113wt_986">for sale on eBay</a>.&#160;</p><p>Bannister isn't the only one with a food fixation so singular that a private collection balloons into a homegrown museum. Here's a look at some other self-made curators whose devotion to edibles has gone a little nuts.</p><p>     <a class="invokeSlideshow" href="/food/feature/2010/03/24/slideshow_food_museums/slideshow.html">View the slide show</a>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/slideshow_food_museums/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/slideshow_food_museums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet MSG&#8217;s little-known brother</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/13/hvp_salmonell_recall_msg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/13/hvp_salmonell_recall_msg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/2010/03/13/hvp_salmonell_recall_msg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent massive snack recalls are turning attention to HVP, a "substitute" for MSG that's basically the same thing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week has seen a <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-03-05-HVPrecall05_ST_N.htm">rash of foods recalled</a> due to possible contamination with Salmonella Tennessee, ranging from selected flavors of Pringles to Herb-Ox bouillon to Quaker brand snack mix (see the <a href="http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/HVPCP/">complete list here</a>). The common ingredient in all these products is hydrolyzed vegetable protein, or HVP, manufactured by Basic Food Flavors, in Nevada, where Salmonella bacteria were found on the processing equipment.</p><p>As the story unfolds, however, possible Salmonella contamination is not the only thing raising eyebrows about HVP, a flavor enhancer commonly used in processed foods. It turns out that the amino acid in HVP that is responsible for "enhancing" the taste of foods is glutamic acid. In its crystalline form, glutamic acid is more commonly known as monosodium glutamate, or MSG. Using HVP is a way for manufacturers to use glutamic acid to add flavor without using MSG -- and having to put those oft-avoided letters on the label.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/13/hvp_salmonell_recall_msg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/13/hvp_salmonell_recall_msg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meathead fad? The rock star butcher</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/rock_star_butcher_parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/rock_star_butcher_parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chefs and Cooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faddy foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/03/11/rock_star_butcher_parties</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sexy tattoos! Butchering parties in trendy bars! The latest hip food trend already faces a backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The first butcher party," Ryan Farr says, "was called 'Hop, Hop, Hop, Into the Burning Ring of Fire.' That was on Easter last year, and we did rabbits."</p><p>Farr is the star of San Francisco's <a href="http://www.4505meats.com">4505 Meats</a>, "Home of Revival Butchery," and he is taking his gospel to the barroom. He is one of a handful of young practitioners across the country who are staging bacchanalian "<a href="http://www.bohemian.com/bohemian/11.18.09/eats-0946.html">butcher parties</a>," where they bring whole carcasses -- from rabbits to steer -- to bars, hang them up, take them apart, and cook them while wide-eyed partyers wash down the resultant meaty snacks with cocktails and beer. The resurgence of artisan butchery is supposed to be about respect for traditional craft, an emphasis on ethical, sustainable meat eating, and a renewed awareness of where our meat really comes from. Do blood-and-booze-soaked butcher parties cheapen these ideals?</p><p>Farr doesn't think so. "It's very educational," he says. "You get to see the whole animal, it gets processed in front of you, and then you eat it. And at the same time you get to have martinis or beer. It's just a good time all around."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/rock_star_butcher_parties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/rock_star_butcher_parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot young thing: Why we love the Easy-Bake Oven</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/why_we_love_the_easy_bake_oven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/why_we_love_the_easy_bake_oven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chefs and Cooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/2010/02/28/why_we_love_the_easy_bake_oven</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chefs and psychologists agree: This iconic toy has a recipe for success. Plus: A slide show of its past versions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 50 years ago, walking through New York City, inventor Ronald Howes was struck by the way street vendors kept their food warm using heating lamps. In the cartoon version of this scene, we can see the light bulb from a vendor's cart float to the air above Howes' head, where it pops in a flash of genius. Light bulb ... heat ... cooking ... There among the pretzel carts, Howes conceived of the <a href="http://www.hasbro.com/easybake/default.cfm?page=History">Easy-Bake Oven</a>, a child-size appliance that uses 100-watt incandescents to bake tiny cakes.</p><p>Howes died last week at age 83, but even before <a href="http://jezebel.com/5475977/easy+bake-oven-creator-ronald-howes-dies-at-83">memorials</a> started flooding the Internet, Web sites like Feeling Retro had archived hundreds of <a href="http://www.feelingretro.com/toys/Misc-Toys/easy-bake-oven.php">Easy-Bake memories</a>. Salon spoke with professional chefs who credit their Easy-Bakes for career inspiration, and even research scientists who engage in very serious studies about play were not immune to nostalgic pangs. It might seem easy to explain the Easy-Bake Oven's power over children: It is a toy that makes cakes; a perfect storm of passionate kid desire. But let's face it: Not even the most swooning devotee was in it for the plasticky taste of the treats. So why does the Easy-Bake Oven have such power over us?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/why_we_love_the_easy_bake_oven/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/why_we_love_the_easy_bake_oven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://nifplay.org/movies/ted_polar_bear_240.mov" length="9392551" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sugar high: Why your food is getting sweeter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/15/why_your_food_is_getting_sweeter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/15/why_your_food_is_getting_sweeter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/2010/02/14/why_your_food_is_getting_sweeter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domino's just banked its future on sauce that tastes more like candy ... and it was probably a good bet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What tastes better than cardboard? Sweet cardboard! After being told by customers that their food tasted like paper products, Domino's announced, in a painfully earnest <a href="http://www.pizzaturnaround.com/">mea culpa ad campaign</a>, that it was revitalizing its pizza, featuring a new, sweeter sauce. A company on the ropes, losing money for six straight quarters, was confident banking its future on sauce that tastes more like candy than it already did.</p><p>But just a week before Domino's announced its "Pizza Turnaround," General Mills took out a full-page ad in the New York Times to announce that it would, at some uncertain point, lower the sugar content in its cereal to "single digit" levels. The two campaigns illustrate our complicated relationship with sugar.</p><p>There is a big psychological difference between "sweetness" and "sugar." Sweetness is good. It tastes good, and it feels good, going all the way back to our reptilian brains. But our nutritional superego constantly battles our sweet-toothed id: Sugar is bad, it's tooth decay and empty calories. We call in a seemingly endless string of substitutes, from rat-killing chemicals to low-glycemic-index nectars, to exorcise the demon of sugar from the deliciousness of sweet things.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/15/why_your_food_is_getting_sweeter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/15/why_your_food_is_getting_sweeter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the fat-fetish restaurants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/heart_attack_grill_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/heart_attack_grill_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/02/02/heart_attack_grill_lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bizarre lawsuit pits two heart attack-themed obesity-celebrating establishments against each other]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To call something the saddest news of the month this early in February isn't saying much, but I suspect the gloom I feel after reading reports of a lawsuit between two American fast food restaurants will last at least through Presidents' Day.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.heartattackgrill.com/">Heart Attack Grill</a> in Chandler, Arizona ("A Taste Worth Dying For") is suing Heart Stoppers Sports Grill in Delray Beach, Florida for stealing its ideas. The Heart Attack Grill, whose menu features single through quadruple bypass burgers (one beef patty for each bypass), "flatliner fries" deep fried in pure lard, unfiltered cigarettes, and Jolt Cola, filed a lawsuit against Heart Stoppers that, according to <a href="http://www.slashfood.com/2010/02/01/restaurants-battle-over-who-was-unhealthy-first/">SlashFood.com</a>, "outlines about 30 ways Heart Stoppers is similar, including signs with EKG heart monitors on them, waitresses dressed as nurses and offers of free food to patrons weighing more than 350 pounds."</p><p>Yes, that's right, free food for people who weigh more than 350 pounds. The Quadruple Bypass Burger packs an estimated 8,000 calories (which presumably doesn't include a side of flatliner fries), and this, enough calories for four full days, is free to anyone who weighs over 350 pounds.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/heart_attack_grill_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/heart_attack_grill_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing&#8217;s baffling chocolate wonderland</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/china_chocolate_museum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/china_chocolate_museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/01/29/china_chocolate_museum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China's newest theme park opens with a bizarre fashion show -- and edible Louis Vuitton bags]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How hard can it be to make Chinese people eat chocolate? While we're struggling to convince Americans to eat less candy, China is trying to get its newly solvent consumer class hooked on the sweets&#8212;and wants reel in some international candy business investment while they're at it. How? By opening World Chocolate Wonderland, a chocolate theme park in Beijing that welcomed its first visitors today.</p><p>Looking at the Wonderland exhibit, it becomes obvious that the Chinese are not all that familiar with chocolate. The museum misses the mark so many times it's almost hard to watch. A <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinkpicturegalleries/7079946/The-World-Chocolate-Wonderland-theme-park-in-Beijing.html?image=3">30-foot replica of The Great Wall</a>? OK. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinkpicturegalleries/7079946/The-World-Chocolate-Wonderland-theme-park-in-Beijing.html?image=7">Louis Vuitton handbags?</a> Not so delicious. A chocolate basketball player suspended from the ceiling, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinkpicturegalleries/7079946/The-World-Chocolate-Wonderland-theme-park-in-Beijing.html?image=14">about to make a slam-dunk</a>? Let's just say that if you made that in the US you would never be allowed to touch another Hershey bar. The worst of it, though, is the legion of <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinkpicturegalleries/7079946/The-World-Chocolate-Wonderland-theme-park-in-Beijing.html?image=6">chocolate soldiers</a>, replicas of the famed Terracotta soldiers buried with the First Qin emperor. This stern-faced, armored candy crew is scary like a clown; something that's supposed to be fun turns desperately creepy. And for the ultimate in yuck, the opening ceremony featured a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_vuI35Aplk">fashion show</a> with models not only working chocolate garments but also sporting chocolate wigs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/china_chocolate_museum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/china_chocolate_museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is why we&#8217;re fat: Won&#8217;t anybody order the salad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/chain_restaurants_healthy_meals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/chain_restaurants_healthy_meals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/01/27/chain_restaurants_healthy_meals</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chain restaurants continue to roll out low-calorie menu items. Too bad nobody's buying them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704381604575005530811257728.html">heralded</a> yet another introduction of healthy, low-calorie menu options at chains like Applebee's and Starbucks. But "healthier" fast-food items are nothing new. Chain restaurants have been spinning out grilled chicken salads and yogurt parfaits ever since everyone caught on to the fact that their food made people fat. McDonald's added salads to its menu in 1987, three years before it opened its first restaurant behind the Iron Curtain. But if they keep rolling these items out seemingly year after year like they're the next big thing, they really never seem to be the current big thing. Does anyone order these things? And if not, why do they keep getting introduced?</p><p>The WSJ article suggests that the new wave of low-calorie menu items stems from possible federal legislation requiring chains to post calorie counts on their menus. The science is still out on the effectiveness of menu calorie counts -- a Stanford University <a href="http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/starbucks.html">study</a> showed that the posting of nutritional information reduced overall calorie consumption at Starbucks, but another <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.28.6.w1110">study</a>, by the New York University School of Medicine, found that the calorie information had virtually no effect on what people ordered in low-income areas, which are areas particularly high in rates of obesity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/chain_restaurants_healthy_meals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/chain_restaurants_healthy_meals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.K.&#8217;s chocolate war gets personal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/kraft_cadbury_takeover_british_reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/kraft_cadbury_takeover_british_reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/2010/01/20/kraft_cadbury_takeover_british_reaction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kraft's Cadbury takeover becomes an issue of British pride]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kraft's $19.5 billion takeover bid for the beloved British candy institution Cadbury -- to make it the world's largest candy maker -- is ripe for puns: just try to find a report that doesn't riff on the idea that Kraft "sweetened" the deal after their initial bid, a paltry $17.1 billion. Amidst the jokes about Velveeta-filled Creme Eggs, however, the public response to the merger has been fiercely emotional. Cadbury employs over 6,000 people in the United Kingdom, and the labor union Unite <a href="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/kraft%5Cs-cadbury-takeover-may-put-30k-jobs-at-risk-unite/83147/on">fears</a> a takeover could threaten as many as 30,000 jobs, but it's not exactly clear whether that's the injury or the insult: Cadbury's sweets are a British culinary institution, from its creamy 95-year-old Milk Tray bon-bon line -- whose ads for decades featured a James Bond-lookalike delivering them to ladies &#8211; to its signature Creme Eggs. As Kraft prepares to eat Cadbury (or gobble it, devour it, chomp it; whichever you like), the chocolate maker has become a symbol of British identity in the face of a crass American attack. Salon gathered some reactions from around the media:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/kraft_cadbury_takeover_british_reaction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/kraft_cadbury_takeover_british_reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
