<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sarah Elizabeth Richards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/sarah_elizabeth_richards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Deadly prose</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/20/creative_writing_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/20/creative_writing_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/20/creative_writing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How should creative writing teachers handle students who turn in gruesome stories?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two disturbing plays that Cho Seung-Hui turned in to his creative writing class at Virginia Tech, teenage sex crime victims fantasize about killing their molesters. In "Mr. Brownstone," three 17-year-old high school students sneak into a casino to escape a teacher who they say has sodomized them. "I wanna kill him," says a character named John. "If he's a leech, we'll be able to yank it off and squash him beneath our boots," adds Joe. Jane follows shortly with: "I wanna watch him bleed like the way he made us kids bleed." </p><p>In the second play, "Richard McBeef," a 13-year-old boy accuses his new stepfather of molesting him and murdering his father. After unleashing his rage with a tirade of insults, he tries to choke him by shoving a half-eaten cereal bar down his throat. Earlier, he throws darts at a target resembling the man's face, shouting "Must kill Dick. Dick must die. Kill Dick ... You don't think I can kill you, Dick? ... Gotcha. Got one eye. Got the other eye." </p><p>The violent imagery in the plays, and similar works by Cho, had alarmed faculty of the Virginia Tech English department, who repeatedly tried to get him help. In October 2005, one professor, poet Nikki Giovanni, kicked him out of her class because his work was "intimidating" and scared students. Her female students stopped coming to class after they said Cho was photographing their legs with his cellphone. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/20/creative_writing_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/20/creative_writing_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The suicide test</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/09/suicide_25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/09/suicide_25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2007/03/09/suicide</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alarmed by recent reports of student depression and fearing malpractice lawsuits, colleges are struggling with ways to treat suicidal students -- including expelling them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a chilly afternoon in the fall of 2005, "Jane," a 19-year-old junior at Brown University, sat on her dorm bed and decided to follow through with her plan to kill herself. In despair over a psychology paper she couldn't finish, and unable to shake her choking depression, she swallowed, two by two, the 120 pills she had stashed -- the antidepressant Lexapro, Tylenol and sleep aids. When she failed to pass out, she got nervous and asked a friend to take her to the hospital, where doctors gave her charcoal to soak up the drugs. </p><p>Somehow, the school learned what Jane had done. So when she returned to campus a week later, a Brown dean and a campus psychologist called her into a meeting with this message: "We need to talk about where you're going from here." They meant it literally -- the school would encourage her to take a leave of absence. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/09/suicide_25/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/09/suicide_25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skin scare tactics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/skin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/skin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/08/07/skin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sure you don't have age spots? Companies hawking skin creams find new ways to freak women out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by chance you've made peace with your skin -- pores, pits and all -- the latest <a target="new" href="http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB115448298622724190.html">news</a> from the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) warns of a new sales tactic that threatens to awaken your inner critic. According to the Journal, sellers of beauty products are installing fancy skin-analyzing machines in drugstores and retail outlets that will expose your skin's worst flaws. They're hoping that just as you're rounding the skin care aisle, you'll use one to get a good look at your face and then shout, "Holy cow! My skin is so aged and dull! I wonder if there's a new cream that can help that. What's this by L'Or&eacute;al? </p><p>"I can tell you that when you have a photo of what's happening underneath your skin, you get committed to preserving it," Helena Foulkes, senior vice president of marketing and advertising at CVS Corp., told the Journal. That undoubtedly means buying more bottles and jars to line up on your sink. The executive claims that the Vichy video microscope and hydrometer by L'Or&eacute;al helped boost sales in drugstores three years in a row. Other companies are getting in the game: Procter & Gamble plans to put microscopes in stores by winter. Est&eacute;e Lauder will launch a new skin-analysis tool by next year. (Its Rodan & Fields division already uses cameras to show sun damage and other skin maladies.) And this week, beauty giant Sephora is unveiling devices that will evaluate your complexion and teeth brightness. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/skin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/07/skin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/what_else_65/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/what_else_65/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/12/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The college gender gap, working women eating junk food and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/12/education/12gender.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print">New York Times:</a> New examination of data on men and women in college gives a more nuanced view of the gender gap. It turns out that men of <i>all</i> races (not just white) in the highest income groups were <i>more</i> likely than women to attend college. Tamar Lewin gives a thorough rundown of the progress of men from various economic groups and backgrounds. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fresno11jul11,0,64599,print.story?coll=la-home-local">Los Angeles Times:</a> Football players at Fresno City College are questioned by police about the alleged rape of an 11-year-old girl. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13829216/">Reuters:</a> Women who work long hours are more likely to smoke, drink coffee and eat junk food than are men who work long hours, according to a British study. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.cjrdaily.org/behind_the_news/jemele_hill_on_being_black_fem.php">Columbia Journalism Review:</a> Interesting Q&A with Jemele Hill on what it's like to be the only black female sportswriter in 305 newspapers surveyed. Says Hill: "I don't mind being considered a 'black columnist,' because I bring those experiences to my column. On the other hand, it's sad. What does it say about our business that I'm the only one?" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/what_else_65/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/what_else_65/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Troubling ties in pregnancy and antidepressants study</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/antidepressants_expose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/antidepressants_expose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/12/antidepressants_expose</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authors of study on pregnant women and antidepressants were paid consultants for drug makers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that influential <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/02/07/antidepressants/index.html">study</a> published last February in the Journal of the American Medical Association that found that depressed women who stopped taking antidepressants during their pregnancies were two and a half times more likely to relapse than women who continued taking them? In the piece, the authors predicted that the results would encourage more pregnant women to stay on the drugs. Well, Tuesday's Wall Street Journal published a wallop of an <a target="new" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115257995935002947.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">expos&eacute;</a> (subscription required) alleging that the majority of the 13 authors, who are mostly psychiatrists at Massachusetts General Hospital, the University of California at Los Angeles and Emory University, work as paid consultants or lecturers for the pharmaceutical companies that make the antidepressants. In all, they had 60 different financial ties to numerous drug firms. However, the study failed to disclose any of that information. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/antidepressants_expose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/antidepressants_expose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls get ADHD, too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/girls_adhd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/girls_adhd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/12/girls_adhd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The may not be as rowdy, but a surprising long-term study shows that girls are just as much at risk as boys for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What with all the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2006/07/10/boys_who_coast/index.html">furor</a> these days over whether females outperform males at school, it's interesting to note that there's one way that boys and girls are equal in the classroom: Both genders can get attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. A story in Tuesday's Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/10/AR2006071000703.html">debunks</a> the long-held perception that elementary-school girls are less likely than boys to suffer from the condition; girls may be less disruptive in class or less frenzied on the playground, but they get ADHD, too, and their symptoms are just as serious. </p><p>Research on the disorder traditionally has focused on boys. But a recent federally funded study, in which researchers at the University of California at Berkeley tracked 200 girls ages 6 to 12 over five years, found that girls with ADHD are at increased risk for substance abuse, emotional difficulties and academic problems during their teen years. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/girls_adhd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/girls_adhd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should a rape victim, at age 14, be called a woman?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/rape_age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/rape_age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/12/rape_age</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists first called the victim a "young woman." But now that they know she's 14, why haven't some stopped?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When news broke a few weeks ago alleging that American servicemen had raped an Iraqi female and killed her family, reporters could not confirm the victim's age, which was estimated to be anywhere from 15 to 25. So they understandably took the safe route and called her a "young Iraqi woman." But yesterday, Editor and Publisher ran a thought-provoking <a target="new" href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002803062">article</a> revealing that several days after Reuters and other agencies reported that the victim's passport and identity card showed she's 14, many news agencies have still not changed how they refer to her. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/rape_age/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/rape_age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting for the right to diet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/force_feeding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/force_feeding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/12/force_feeding</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Mauritanian women are fighting their fat-worshiping society by putting on their walking shoes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A country where big is considered beautiful sounds like a welcome refuge from the Western obesession with jutting hip bones. But even the hailing of female heft doesn't necessarily free women from pressure to conform to an unrealistic beauty standard. The Christian Science Monitor <a target="new" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0711/p04s01-woaf.htm">carried</a> a surprising article Tuesday about how Mauritanian women suffer to stay obese -- and how a growing number are thwarting cultural norms by resisting force-feeding and even daring to drop a few pounds. </p><p>The story would be an amusing look at the battle of the bulge gone topsy-turvy if it didn't include such a disturbing glimpse of what women have endured to stay heavy. It's a "tradition that's as old as the desert," the Monitor's Claire Soares writes to describe the practice of "gavage": the force-feeding of young girls so they fatten up and attract men, who believe that a woman's corpulence is a reflection of their wealth. (And yes, that's the same word the French use to describe pumping ducks and geese full of corn so they produce succulent foie gras.) Mothers concerned about their daughters' futures funnel sweetened milk and millet porridge down the girls' throats. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/force_feeding/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/12/force_feeding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diagnosing Mom&#8217;s depression</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/mom_s_depression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/mom_s_depression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/06/mom_s_depression</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study shows that pediatricians should ask about mothers' health, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a hopeful sign that expectant mothers may have a chance to learn about postpartum depression from a source other than that Tom Cruise-Brooke Shields <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2005/10/28/brooke_shields/index.html">tiff.</a> Yesterday, the Boston Globe reported on a new <a href="http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/women/articles/2006/07/05/pediatricians_urged_to_focus_on_moms_too/" target="window_name">study</a> that found that a few questions from their pediatricians can help depressed moms get treatment. </p><p>This may seem like it belongs in the Department of Duh, but the Globe points out that pediatricians generally focus on the health of the baby, not the mother. So the whopping 10 percent of mothers who are estimated to be depressed may not get diagnosed. The study, which was published last month in the journal Pediatrics, found that pediatricians who ask a mom two quick questions -- whether she has lost interest and pleasure in doing things lately and whether she has been feeling down -- made a big difference in identifying the disorder. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/mom_s_depression/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/06/mom_s_depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women, aim your glue guns!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/crafts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/crafts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/05/crafts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entrepreneurs take arts and crafts out of the church parking lot and into the business world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knew there was such opportunity in Popsicle sticks and pine cones? Rob Walker reports on the exploding craft industry in his "Consumed" <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/magazine/02wwln_consumed.html?ex=1152763200&amp;en=e5610c73c4d0bf22&amp;ei=5070&amp;emc=eta1">column</a> in the New York Times Magazine this past weekend. Not only do crafts offer a unique alternative to mass-produced goods sold in big-box stores, but they may provide good business opportunities for women. </p><p>Walker tells the story of how 28-year-old Heidi Kenney was able to quit her daily grind at an insurance company and spend more time being a "working mom on her own terms" by making dolls in the shape of tampons. She also makes stuffed doughnuts, toast pillows and toilet seat covers and sells them on her Web site, <a target="new" href="http://www.mypapercrane.com">My Paper Crane,</a> which she started a few years ago. (She now fills between 100 and 150 orders a month.) Kenney has joined the growing wave of small, independent entrepreneurs who sell handmade toys, clothing, bath products and jewelry, among other things. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/crafts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/crafts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dads in the delivery room</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/delivering_dads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/delivering_dads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/07/05/delivering_dads</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even today's new breed of super-dad still gets a bit freaked out watching his partner give birth, which is why hospitals are now offering prenatal classes for men.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Father's Day unleashed a spate of <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/06/19/dad_jealousy/index.html">stories</a> about how today's dads eagerly bathe and burp their offspring, but according to yesterday's <a target="new" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/03/AR2006070300790.html">Washington Post,</a> even the most evolved man may still get a little woozy in the delivery room. </p><p>Before they bask in the wonder of a life and cut the umbilical cord, men may first have to experience watching their partners writhe in pain -- not to mention seeing all that blood. Nowadays, many hospitals encourage dads to be present even during Caesarean deliveries. "Imagine if you were watching somebody stick a knife in your wife's belly," obstetrician David Downing told the Post. For most men, he says, "that's a horrible thought; it is a horrible sight." </p><p>As a result, hospitals are increasingly offering prenatal classes that do more than merely show birthing videos. These classes aim to prepare future dads to anticipate and manage their own overwhelming feelings, which in turn may help their partners have a calmer -- and some say less painful -- delivery. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/delivering_dads/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/07/05/delivering_dads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/whatelse_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/whatelse_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/28/whatelse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World Cup marketers drop the ball on women, the female testosterone patch, British raunchiness and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060627/od_nm/worldcup_women1_dc;_ylt=ApBXhSTfeH5A4Egc9d2I5w2s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3NW1oMDRpBHNlYwM3NTc">Reuters:</a> If nearly 40 percent of women around the world are digging the World Cup, why are marketers hawking stuff mostly to men? </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_35380.html">Health Day:</a> Testosterone patch for women: helps mood and libido, triples risk of heart problems. Hmm. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060627/hl_nm/trafficking_dc">Reuters (again):</a> No surprise, but a first-of-its-kind study found that trafficked women suffer a similar level of post-traumatic stress as torture victims. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2144505/?nav=tap3">Slate:</a> Meghan O'Rourke adds to <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/06/15/hirshman/index.html">Linda Hirshman's</a> soup on why women should work. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-06-27-kids-pregnancy-dropout_x.htm">Associated Press/USA Today:</a> Good news: Fewer teens are having babies and dropping out of school. Bad news: More are living in poverty. (Children are "treading water," said Annie E. Casey Foundation president Doug Nelson.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/whatelse_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/whatelse_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do women deal with aging better than men do?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/men_aging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/men_aging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/28/men_aging</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After watching her elderly husband develop a short fuse, a writer ponders the stereotypes of "sweet old ladies" and "grumpy old men."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this phenomenon only happened in my family. For years, I've been dismayed as I've watched the elderly men in my life -- grandfathers, great uncles, family friends -- slowly lose it. I've observed these once reasonable, good-humored men suddenly be reduced to barking at waitresses, flinging troublesome seat belts or cursing at relatives for imagined slights. </p><p>So I was pleased to read Ellen Graham's insightful <a target="new" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115083664591585508.html?mod=todays_us_the_journal_report">essay</a> Monday (subscription required) in a special section on retirement in Monday's Wall Street Journal on how men deal with aging. She questions why at 70 years old, her formerly affable husband, Don, suddenly fell victim to what she calls "elder combustion" by freaking out about traffic injustices, misplaced items and automated telephone "help" lines. </p><p>"If aging, in part, is about declining powers, men seem to take it harder -- and more personally -- than women. I know, that's a sweeping generalization. But think about the stereotypes: sweet little old ladies, but grumpy old men. I wonder: Do men, after decades of work, still have their toughest job ahead of them? How do our husbands, and brothers and uncles and fathers, make peace with aging?" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/men_aging/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/28/men_aging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More pain for war widows</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/war_widows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/war_widows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/27/war_widows</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During their worst grief, war widows are at the whim of the notorious military bureaucracy to get survivor benefits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that the military is a big fumbling bureaucracy isn't exactly news. But the New York Times today published a disturbing <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/27/us/27benefits.html?hp&ex=1151467200&en=6e3a4c39045cb093&ei=5094&partner=homepage">look</a> at the burdens it puts on those people who should least have to deal with it -- war widows. Lizette Alvarez tells the shocking stories of recent widows who, while reeling from the loss of their husbands, have to chase down death and survivor benefits and navigate hair-pulling legal snafus, lost files, outrageous delays and bad information. Many learn that they don't qualify for certain benefits because of legal technicalities, such as whether their husbands died before eligibility cutoff dates, or were killed in training instead of combat. </p><p>This comes at a time when widows -- many of whom are young, stay-at-home mothers -- must often deal with finding new housing, comforting grieving children and coming to terms with the fact that they are single parents. "A few widows simply fall through the cracks altogether," writes Alvarez. "The consequences are hard felt: they run up credit card bills, move in with relatives to save money, pull their children from private schools, spend money on lawyers or dedicate countless frustrating hours to unraveling the mix-ups." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/war_widows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/war_widows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another reason to blame your mother</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/younger_mothers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/younger_mothers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/27/younger_mothers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at data from the late 1800s, researchers find that children born to young mothers have double the chance of living to 100.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother sent me this <a target="new" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13510559/from/ET/">link</a> over the weekend with the cryptic note: "You can thank me later." Since the story was about research findings that children born to mothers younger than 25 have double the chance of living to age 100, I quickly got her point: My mother had me at age 20. So I'll thank her now and start thinking more seriously about retirement. </p><p>According to Reuters, researchers from the University of Chicago's Center on Aging combed through U.S. Census data, the Social Security Administration database and genealogical records to find 198 centenarians who were born in the U.S. from 1890 to 1893. Then they looked at family histories to see if they could figure out what predicted such longevity. The husband-and-wife research team of Leonid Gavrilov and Natalia Gavrilova found that the mother's age seemed to matter, but the father's did not. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/younger_mothers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/27/younger_mothers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More from the abortion battleground</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/abortion_developments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/abortion_developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/20/abortion_developments</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louisiana governor signs abortion ban into law and Supreme Court will reconsider federal abortion case. In better news, South Dakotans get repeal initiative on ballot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been a busy few days on the abortion battleground: On Saturday, taking a page out of South Dakota's playbook, the governor of Louisiana <a target="new" href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-06-17T235515Z_01_N17239603_RTRUKOC_0_US-RIGHTS-ABORTION.xml&archived=False">signed</a> into law a ban on abortion that would go into effect should the U.S. Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that gave women the right to have an abortion. </p><p>And yesterday, the highest court in the land <a target="new" href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-06-19T175319Z_01_N13435477_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-COURT-ABORTION-DC.XML&archived=False">decided</a> it would further reexamine whether the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, which was signed by Congress and President Bush in 2003, is unconstitutional because it provides no exceptions for the health of women. (Back in February, the Supreme Court <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/01/04/gonzales_v_carhart/index.html">agreed</a> to hear a similar case from Nebraska, which opposed the law because it didn't include such health protections. Though the act was signed three years ago, it has never gone into effect because it has been tied up in court.) The new case, brought by Planned Parenthood of California, charges that the federal law is too vague and imposes an undue burden on women. "This abortion ban would forbid doctors from providing their patients with the care they believe is safest and best, and would give Congress and states a green light to endanger women's health when they restrict women's access to abortion," said Eve Gartner, who represents Planned Parenthood. "This dangerous law should be struck down, sending a message to politicians to stop legislating medicine." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/abortion_developments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/abortion_developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What else we&#8217;re reading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/what_else_55/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/what_else_55/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/19/what_else</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pink fishing accessories, divorced dads and family court, sex and migraines, and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="new" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13347180/">Reuters:</a> Study shows migraine sufferers may have increased libido. And guess what? Sex may alleviate the pain. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/TRAVEL/06/19/trend.fishing.ap/">Associated Press:</a> Since nearly 30 percent of Florida women fish, why not ply them with mimosas and really cute pink boots and lures? </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/fashion/sundaystyles/18PEACH.html?pagewanted=print">New York Times:</a> Yahoo parents' group called Peachhead has become formidable force. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/opinion/18perrine.html">New York Times (again):</a> Op-Ed argues that the family court system penalizes fathers if they miss child support payments, but doesn't protect their custody rights. </p><p><a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/opinion/17legato.html">New York Times (yet again):</a> Has the focus on women's health shortchanged men? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/what_else_55/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/20/what_else_55/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lesbian custody tragedy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/lesbian_custody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/lesbian_custody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/19/lesbian_custody</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both women cared for the child, but Kentucky law only allowed one woman to adopt her. The one who couldn't sign the document lost custody.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nine years ago, a lesbian couple decided they wanted a child. Unable to conceive one through artificial insemination, they decided to adopt. Since Kentucky law forbade a gay couple to formally adopt the child, Brenda Fawbush decided to let her partner sign the paperwork. Although both women cared for their daughter until the couple split three years ago, the Kentucky Supreme Court <a target="new" href="http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060616/NEWS01/606160395/1008">ruled</a> last week that Fawbush had no legal custody of her child. </p><p>Fawbush had sued for custody and visitation rights when her former partner didn't let her see the girl following the bitter separation. But the judges unanimously agreed that Fawbush was not the girl's "de facto custodian" because she was not the primary caregiver, despite "participating substantially in the support and rearing of a child for a significant period of time." A lower court had ruled that she couldn't apply for such rights because although she was the primary breadwinner, she was not the primary caregiver. Under state law, she had to be both. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/lesbian_custody/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/lesbian_custody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bittersweet tribute to amazing dads</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/dad_jealousy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/dad_jealousy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/19/dad_jealousy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Father's Day coverage celebrated today's involved dads, two writers wish they'd had one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media coverage of Father's Day was a virtual lovefest, a celebration of how fabulous and <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/06/01/educated_dads/">involved</a> todays dads are. According to a <a target="new" href="http://www.thebostonchannel.com/asseenon5/9373551/detail.html">survey</a> by the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly half of men said they'd take a pay cut to spend more time with their kids. Even hands-on <a href="/mwt/broadsheet/2006/06/12/involved_granddads/index.html">grandfathers</a> got a nod. And yesterday Boston Globe columnist Beverly Beckham <a target="new" href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/06/18/celebrating_todays_do_it_all_dads_1150491820?mode=PF">marveled</a> at what unbelievable fathers her sons-in-law have become: They bathe their kids, load the dishwasher <i>and</i> sing lullabies. </p><p>These are things neither her husband -- nor his father -- ever did, she writes rather wistfully. Rather, her father-in-law served as a disciplinarian, policing his children's table manners. "But he never sang a lullaby to his children. Fathers didn't used to sing lullabies," she writes of the former generation of dads. "They didn't know the names of their children's teachers. They didn't help with homework. They didn't take time off in the middle of a workday to go to their child's school for a concert or a field day or to eat chicken kabobs in the school cafeteria. And they certainly didn't cart their babies everywhere or stay home and play with them while their wives went out with friends for an evening." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/dad_jealousy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/dad_jealousy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Episcopal Church elects its first female leader</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/episcopalian_leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/episcopalian_leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2006/06/19/episcopalian_leader</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First a gay man, now a woman! The American arm of the Anglican Communion does more trailblazing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American electorate has yet to put a woman in the top political post. But the Episcopal Church made history Sunday by <a target="new" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060619/ap_on_re_us/episcopalians;_ylt=AkSOa5dYt59Ne39r_uOMSEZK2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA4dW1uZXIwBHNlYwMyNzQ3">electing</a> Katharine Jefferts Schori, 52, as the first woman in the world to lead a branch of the global Anglican Communion -- nearly 30 years after the American church started ordaining women. </p><p>Though praised by many, the choice to elect Jefferts Schori, bishop of Nevada, has the potential to further strain the unity of the Episcopal Church, which has been in internal turmoil since it shocked the international Anglican Communion by consecrating the church's first <a target="new" href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/08/05/bishop/">gay bishop</a> three years ago. As a result of that decision, some American congregations left the Episcopal Church and branches overseas threatened to break away. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/episcopalian_leader/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/19/episcopalian_leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
