<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Steve Kettmann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/steve_kettmann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The new new world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/29/mann_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/29/mann_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2005/09/29/mann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles C. Mann's monumental retelling of pre-Columbian American history, "1491," illuminates the existence of civilizations as populous and sophisticated as those of the European latecomers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My father can't prove it, but he's convinced that one of his grandfathers was half Cherokee, and he can produce faded old pictures of his mother showing high, angled cheekbones that are distinctively non-European. My mother's side of the family has long taken outsize pride in having an ancestor who was the first governor of Baja, Calif.; only recently did we come across clear evidence that we were actually the adopted poor relations of this family, that is, not Spanish nobility but mestizos of mixed race. </p><p>I'd always been curious about this Native American blood flowing in my veins, but like most Americans, I felt confused trying to make sense of the legacy of the people who lived in the Americas before Europeans showed up. The stories we were fed as kids, starting with the tale of the happy local Indians showing up in Plymouth for the first Thanksgiving, always had a bogus, Disney-filtered feel to them, yet there was no alternative narrative beyond the famous image of a proud old Indian, Iron Eyes Cody, shedding a tear at the rape of his people's land. This weeping-Indian image, too, presented pity and guilt in lieu of a real understanding of who these people were and how they lived. There was always a sense that Native Americans had been robbed not only of their land, but of their historical importance as well. Yet, any such thoughts got lost in a gooey, dreamy kind of Indian chic, summed up by those phantasmagorical peyote scenes Oliver Stone tossed into his "Doors" movie. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/09/29/mann_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/29/mann_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s curtains for Okrent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/okrent_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/okrent_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/05/12/okrent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times public editor Daniel Okrent reflects on the paper's "very bad journalism" on WMD, its liberal slant, and William Safire's wisecracks about readers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jayson Blair fabrication scandal in 2003 left the New York Times with little choice but to join the Washington Post and other top newspapers in hiring an ombudsman, a reader representative to provide more scrutiny of Times' news-gathering practices. In late 2003, Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller chose Daniel Okrent as the paper's first public editor. This month, after an initially stormy and always provocative 18 months -- the set duration of the gig -- Okrent hands over the job to Byron Calame, a former Wall Street Journal editor. </p><p>Okrent was not an obvious choice for the highly visible role of second-guessing the Times in its own pages. He had only minimal newspaper experience, although he had been the managing editor of Life magazine and the editor of new media for Time Inc. He is also the author of "Great Fortune: The Epic of Rockefeller Center" and the baseball book "Nine Innings." No Times public editor could escape criticism and confrontation, but Okrent never shied away from controversy. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/okrent_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/12/okrent_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocked, shocked!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/04/steroids_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/04/steroids_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/12/03/steroids</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hand-wringing over Jason Giambi and Barry Bonds is stupid and hypocritical.  Everyone knows the score.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overnight, in the wake of another scoop in the San Francisco Chronicle ("Giambi admitted taking steroids"), the public's image of party-boy slugger Jason Giambi lurched sickeningly toward the lurid and obscene. Giambi has now been snared in a medieval hell of the media, our version of the public square, where he is being pelted with rocks and rotten vegetables and taunted for the unpardonable sin of robbing a few final holdouts of their illusions about the state of baseball. </p><p>The New York Post did its best to stir up a lynch-mob mentality with its front cover on Friday, "Boot the Bum," featuring a vintage picture of a young Giambi, shaggy-haired and tattooed, showing off the steroid-enhanced biceps that turned him from a talented doubles hitter and RBI man to a leading home-run threat capable of seducing Yankee owner George Steinbrenner to the tune of $120 million. </p><p>The Post used red ink for emphasis, adding: "Why the Yankees MUST fire ugly drug cheat Jason Giambi TODAY." </p><p>An accompanying editorial, beginning on the front page, blasted Giambi in terms usually reserved for the likes of Saddam Hussein, saying he has "disgraced the Yankee pinstripes and made a mockery of everything that is wonderful and good and pure about the game of baseball." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/04/steroids_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/04/steroids_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last great American rivalry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/kettmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/kettmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2004/09/24/kettmann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Red Sox may finally be on the verge of ending The Curse and beating the Yankees. But even if they don't, their fans have been blessed with that rarest of gifts -- passion. An exclusive excerpt from Steve Kettmann's "One Day at Fenway." 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm not a religious person, but spiritual. That was a religious experience, that Game Seven. When that Aaron Boone homer went out, I don't care who you were, you were hugging your fellow Yankee soulmate. I was like in a trance. I was cursing up a storm. They all looked at me like I was crazy. The cops looked at me like I was crazy. I was foaming at the mouth. I wasn't talking to anyone in particular, just screaming at the top of my lungs about how the Red Sox were never going to win." <br> <p align="right">-- Spike Lee</p><p> No one who set foot in the Red Sox clubhouse just after Aaron Boone's Game Seven, eleventh-inning homer at Yankee Stadium will ever forget what it was like to be there. It almost hurt to be in the room with the Red Sox. It almost hurt to step into the line of sight of hunched-over players staring galaxies away. They all sat around morosely, replaying the mental pictures of that Tim Wakefield knuckler that did not knuckle, the crack of Aaron Boone's bat and the instant certainty that the ball would land in a throng of bouncing, grinning Yankee fans. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/kettmann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/09/24/kettmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe&#8217;s impotent outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/14/europe_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/14/europe_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/02/14/europe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials across the Atlantic are steaming about President Bush's "axis of evil" rhetoric, but there's not much they can do about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, as in the infancy of the Bush presidency, European leaders are complaining about the arrogant unilateralism of his administration. Only this time, there's no room for debate over whether a new president might be mistakenly sending mixed signals to valued allies. It's all too clear that President Bush and his advisors knew his "axis of evil" State of the Union speech would stir up key European partners to varying degrees of anger -- and didn't care. </p><p> There is almost no support in European capitals for a military strike against Iraq, and even less backing for moves against Iran or North Korea, Iraq's putative partners in the so-called axis. The spectacle of normally consensus-building Secretary of State Colin Powell suggesting to Congress Tuesday that the U.S. might have to go it alone in a military action to topple Saddam Hussein pushed many partners over the edge. </p><p> On Wednesday, Turkey warned the U.S. it would "not tolerate" a strike against Iraq. "We do not want to experience chaos on our borders with unpredictable consequences," Deputy Prime Minister Mesut Yilmaz said in a speech. Turkey has been a key ally in the Afghanistan-based war on terror, a majority Muslim country lending not just verbal support but soldiers to U.S. efforts there. Turkish leaders -- along with other NATO allies -- are angry that the U.S. hasn't even shared whatever intelligence led Bush to threaten to widen the war beyond Afghanistan. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/02/14/europe_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/14/europe_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What real hockey looks like</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/09/hockey_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/09/hockey_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2002 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/02/09/hockey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Olympic hockey tournament is a golden opportunity for the NHL to make some long-overdue changes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Many Americans want the Salt Lake City Olympics to be a time for U.S. athletes to take the spotlight, and give us plenty of emotional flag-raising ceremonies as medals are handed out -- preferably gold ones. But sometimes the sports themselves have a way of derailing our prearranged story lines. </p><p> That could be especially true in the ice hockey competition, which in any objective terms will be the best hockey tournament ever staged. It will borrow top talent from the National Hockey League and showcase great hockey, pitting star-studded national team against star-studded national team. It will also offer the forever-underachieving NHL a chance to reinvent itself, and emulate Olympic hockey, if only it can seize the unprecedented opportunity. </p><p> One of the great disappointments of the Nagano Olympics was the way the American hockey team embarrassed all of us -- both on and off the ice. The Americans' listless performance, coupled with their subsequent trashing of their dorms, helped ensure that the U.S. television audience would see as little actual hockey from Nagano as possible, which may have been the most unfortunate development for hockey in decades. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/02/09/hockey_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/02/09/hockey_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art Howe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/16/howe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/16/howe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2001/10/16/howe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The laid-back manager of the hard-charging Oakland A's does it his way, laconically and happily. And that  drives his critics crazy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some labels are hard to shake. Get tagged as a self-promoter, or a horn dog, or a cheapskate, and that characterization is going to follow you around like a strip of toilet paper trailing from your heel. But none of those is half as tough to overcome as that most lethal of putdowns: being dismissed as a nice guy, mild but harmless. That was the situation Art Howe faced when he arrived in Oakland, Calif., late in 1995 to take over the job of A's manager from Tony La Russa, an intense man who vibrated like a Chihuahua and often gave the impression he would bite your nose off if you did not show him sufficient respect. </p><p> How did Howe handle that? His first move was to do nothing, and I mean that literally. It was my job back then to cover the A's for the San Francisco Chronicle, but I was gone in the off season, so the Chronicle's slash-and-burn columnist Glenn Dickey was handed the task of writing up Howe's arrival in town. Dickey had wrongly speculated in print earlier in the week that a likable bullshit artist named Jim Lefebvre, a former A's hitting coach, was the leading candidate to replace La Russa. In his article announcing Howe's hiring on the front page of the Chronicle sports section -- the morning Howe arrived for his welcome press conference -- Dickey went on at length about Lefebvre and made clear his low regard for Howe. He even ridiculed his hiring as "just another step toward anonymity for the A's, once the most colorful team in baseball." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/16/howe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/16/howe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating &#8220;many, many Osamas&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/vollman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/vollman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2001 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2001/09/27/vollman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Novelist William Vollmann says if the U.S. convinces Afghans of bin Laden's guilt, they'll support the move against him. If not, only "genocide" will defeat them. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Novelist William T. Vollmann, author of a dozen books including "The Rainbow Stories" and "An Afghanistan Picture Show," has a different perspective on the Taliban than most of us. Not only has he read the Quran at least twice, as he explained last year in <a target="new" href="http://www.newyorker.com/FROM_THE_ARCHIVE/ARCHIVES/?010924fr_archive05">a New Yorker article</a> about the Taliban, he has also interviewed Taliban leaders face to face and spoken with many ordinary Afghans about the regime. His experience with Afghanistan goes back to the early '80s, when as a young writer he joined the mujahedin in the mountains for several weeks. He did not actually fight, he said Wednesday in a phone interview with Salon -- that is, he did not fire a gun "at anyone." But he was very much with the fighters in their struggle. </p><p> Vollmann offered this sobering warning in that New Yorker piece: "Americans worry that Afghanistan has become a petri dish in which the germs of Islamic fanaticism are replicating -- soon Afghans will be hijacking American planes and bombing embassies everywhere. And their fears are not necessarily unfounded. The Taliban are unemployed war veterans, ready and even eager to return to the battlefield. 'In the nineteenth century, we beat the British more than once,' Afghans often told me. 'In the twentieth century, we beat the Russians. In the twenty-first, if we have to, we'll beat the Americans!'" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/vollman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/vollman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Central Asian chess game</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/25/former_soviet_republics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/25/former_soviet_republics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/25/former_soviet_republics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the United States goes to war in Afghanistan, it  will need the cooperation of former Soviet republics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osama bin Laden remains the prime suspect in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, but any hopes of actually capturing him may be more fantasy than reality -- at least for the time being. Instead, United States military planners appear to be focusing on more achievable goals, meaning a long campaign against countries that harbor or sponsor terrorists. </p><p>That probably will begin with military action in Afghanistan to oust the Taliban. One likely scenario will be for a renewed campaign by Afghanistan's umbrella rebel group, the Northern Alliance, reinforced with American and Russian weapons. In such a move, the Northern Alliance, which controls a stretch of Afghanistan's northern border region, would grind its way south, backed by American air power, and take the Afghan capital of Kabul, throwing the Taliban into disarray. </p><p>Monday, Russia announced it would step up its efforts to arm the group, which Russia has supported since the 1990s. One likely benefactor would be Mohammad Zahir Shah, the 86-year-old former king of Afghanistan, who lives in Italy and who has been in touch with the Northern Alliance about forming an anti-Taliban coalition. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/25/former_soviet_republics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/25/former_soviet_republics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solidarity forever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/22/europe_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/22/europe_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/22/europe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At an emergency meeting, European leaders back a "targeted" campaign against terrorism and applaud Bush's new internationalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case there were any doubts that Europeans are united behind President Bush and his anti-terrorism coalition, more proof came Friday night, when the 15 leaders of the European Union gathered in Brussels for an emergency meeting, and announced that they had lined up as one behind a range of counter-terrorism measures in support of U.S. efforts. </p><p> The internationalist tone of Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress Thursday night no doubt helped his cause. The loss of so many thousands of lives from dozens of countries in the World Trade Center attack has Europe determined to take tough action along with the United States. That applies even to the leaders of the generally pacifist Nordic states. </p><p> "Solidarity, that is important, that we stand united for democracy and open society," said the Swedish prime minister, Goeran Persson. "We have a very strong mandate to take military action and if the United States does so, they have our support." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/22/europe_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/22/europe_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more Lone Ranger</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/multilateralism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/multilateralism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/09/18/multilateralism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European leaders like the internationalist Bush who has emerged from last week's terror attacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until last week, President Bush had been almost flamboyant about alienating U.S. allies around the world, <a href="/news/feature/2001/04/06/europe/index.html">especially in Europe.</a> Now suddenly the former Texas governor is a committed multilateralist, trying to learn to play the role of global good citizen, mending fences with a sense of purpose sadly lacking in U.S. diplomacy in recent months. </p><p> Is it for real? Will it last? Impossible to say, of course. But it's not too early to welcome the rejection of the go-it-alone foreign policy of Bush's first nine months in office. Bush has in recent days opened the door to the rest of the world, diplomatically and in some sense personally, and there seems no going back to the days when he seemed eager to tune out everyone but Mexico and Russia. </p><p> Last week was a confirmation, if the Bush administration really needed one, that the problems festering in foreign countries really matter. Now top officials have set about lining up foreign leaders behind the effort to fight the terrorism sponsored by Osama bin Laden and his allies, in a way that previously seemed unthinkable under this president. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/multilateralism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/18/multilateralism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We are all Americans&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/13/germany</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the news that several hijackers studied in Hamburg, Germans throw their support behind Bush, and the tensions of his early months in office melt away -- for now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are not the only ones who have been glued to their television sets since Tuesday's horrific attacks in New York and Washington. All across Europe, TV stations have followed the story nonstop, often forgoing commercials, and a deep sense of horror has taken hold that could make it easier for President Bush to build international support for retaliation. </p><p> Many Germans saw Tuesday's events as an attack against them as well, since the terrorist strike was clearly intended as a blow to the West. But Germany's sense of being closely involved with the American drama was heightened Thursday when news broke that three of the men involved in the hijackings lived in Hamburg and may have planned part of the attacks from here in what is being described as a terrorist cell. </p><p> Mohammed Atta, the 33-year-old who likely flew American Airlines flight 11, and his cousin, Marvan Al-Shehhi, 23, who was on American Airlines Flight 175, lived in a $500-a-month apartment in Hamburg's Harburg neighborhood, according to the Bild Zeitung newspaper. The two men left Germany in March 2001 for Florida, where they enrolled in flight classes at Huffman Aviation in the Gulf Coast town of Venice. German commandos reportedly stormed eight apartments in Hamburg and arrested one suspect after being tipped off by the FBI Wednesday night. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Bonn surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/23/bonn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/23/bonn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/07/23/bonn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European leadership yields a new agreement on the Kyoto Protocol, isolating the U.S. as the only holdout on global warming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A funny thing happened at the end of the joint press conference held by U.S. President Bush and Russian President Putin Sunday in Genoa, Italy. Bush was so pleased about a potential breakthrough with Russia on missile defense, he was almost giddy. His answers were mostly relaxed and thoughtful. Then someone asked a question about global warming. </p><p> Bush blurted out an awkward joke, retreated into his familiar non sequiturs -- "I have a representative at the Bonn summit; I saw her on TV the other day" -- and curtly brought the press conference to a close, seeming a little too eager to escape follow-up questions on this difficult issue. </p><p> But Bush cannot escape the issue of global warming, as Monday's surprising news out of Bonn, Germany, demonstrated. Despite widespread predictions of failure, negotiators were able to pound out an agreement on a watered-down version of the Kyoto Protocol, paving the way for ratification next year. </p><p> Bush may indeed choose to stand by his March rejection of the protocol, as he repeatedly vowed in recent days. But he faces a bleak new set of <a href="/news/feature/2001/07/18/kyoto/index.html">political costs</a> to pay if he sticks with that decision. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/23/bonn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/23/bonn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Bush support the Kyoto Protocol?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/18/kyoto_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/18/kyoto_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/07/18/kyoto</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pressure here and abroad may  leave him no choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a prediction: Sometime in the next year, no matter how much it may run counter to his oilman's contempt for environmentalists, President Bush will change course and join the international effort to combat global warming. The stakes have become too high for Bush to continue to burn political capital so recklessly. His most likely approach will be to accept a watered-down version of the Kyoto Protocol he famously and hastily rejected earlier this year. </p><p>It didn't have to be this way for Bush. His many bewildering missteps and political miscalculations on environmental policy have already pointlessly eroded an already shaky public confidence. The same New York Times/CBS News poll that found Bush's job approval rating dipping to 53 percent late last month found that two-thirds of those polled, including a plurality of Republicans, believe that both Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are "too beholden to oil companies." But that was just the start of the bad news for the administration: Only 39 percent of those polled approved of Bush's handling of the environment; more than half favored ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, which would impose targets on industrialized nations to reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012, even if nonindustrialized nations like China and India get off easy; and 72 percent believed immediate steps were necessary to fight global warming, rather than pausing for more study. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/18/kyoto_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/18/kyoto_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The European education of George W.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/16/europe_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/16/europe_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/06/16/europe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They booed him, but the Europeans know they have to live with Bush. And though his speeches hint that travel might yet give him the vision thing,   Russia is a different story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However this stormy five-day visit to Europe goes down as a chapter in the second Bush's presidency, at least the president knows the map of Europe as he never did before. </p><p>If that sounds merely flippant, it shouldn't. Neither Bush nor his advisors have made much secret of the fact that this is a president who had a lot to learn about the world coming into this job. He's had a memorable education in recent days, even if his caution-to-the-wind cozying up to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the last day of the trip reinforced all the most extreme views of the man's never-never grasp on reality. </p><p>The smiles often looked forced in Brussels and Gvteborg earlier this week as heads of state scrunched together for the cameras during Bush's first trip to Europe. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice often sat rigidly behind Bush as he spoke, her gaze as fixed, her jaw as set and her imagination seemingly as filled with dark possibilities as any Secret Service agent ready to dash in front of a coming bullet. But as much as newspaper accounts are playing up the rift between Europe and the United States, in fact, this trip had more to do with easing that rift than widening it. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/16/europe_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/16/europe_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baseball boyfriend?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/26/gays_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/26/gays_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2001 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/sports/2001/05/26/gays</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Out magazine's editor claimed his lover plays in the majors, he set off a media frenzy. But it's only a matter of time before gays get their Jackie Robinson.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's only a matter of time before a gay trailblazer emerges to transform the way Americans see their sports heroes, doing for homosexuals what Jackie Robinson did for African-Americans. It will be painful, it will be sordid and it will be embarrassing for any sports fan who finds homophobia offensive -- but over a longer run it will also be good for sports and, more interestingly, good for America. </p><p> That does not mean last week's media frenzy on gays in sports moved us closer to that point. Only Brendan Lemon, editor in chief of Out magazine, knows for sure what his agenda was in going public with his contention that he has been in a relationship with a well-known baseball player the past year and a half. Could it be he's just trying to boost circulation? </p><p> Or maybe a baseball columnist friend of mine has it right: "It's like that joke where the guy is on a deserted island with the supermodel. In this case, the guy is sleeping with a big-time athlete who's good-looking, and he is pissed because no one knows about it. He wants to be able to tell his friends who his lover is. He probably does it now, and no one believes him." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/26/gays_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/26/gays_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#8217;s Euro-skeptics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/06/europe_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/06/europe_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/04/06/europe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In France they call him "an idiot." In Germany they call him a "big bully." Forget China -- Europe could turn out to be President Bush's biggest foreign policy problem yet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Bush administration ends up having to apologize to China, rather than see the Hainan Island standoff turn into a drawn-out international crisis, many in Europe will privately be cheering the American comeuppance. </p><p>Even as the potentially explosive situation has dragged on, and reaction in official Washington has been generally supportive of Bush and his foreign-policy team, there has been a notable lack of support from European leaders. That silence should not be ignored. It reflects genuine alarm over what is seen as a revival of Reagan-style unilateralism and high-handedness. No one should make the mistake, that is, of taking the new European anti-Americanism as the simple, shallow, knee-jerk sentiment of past years. This is something potentially more serious. </p><p>"The Americans and the Chinese are playing Cold War with each other, which is very strange," Dominique Moisi, a French political analyst, told the New York Times this week. "No one wants to support the Chinese. But they don't want to encourage the United States either. The silence is partly a measure of indifference and partly a measure of the embarrassment of the diplomatic elite." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/04/06/europe_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/06/europe_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of a weak euro</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/05/euro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/05/euro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/business/feature/2000/10/05/euro</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the nonstop decline in the value of its currency doesn't spell doom for the European Community.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think the sorry state of the euro means nothing to Americans but a chance to travel at bargain rates and guzzle cheap foreign beer? Think again. The dramatic decline of the euro below what many analysts peg as its true value sets it up as a potential investment alternative to the overvalued U.S. dollar. While the American business press is prone to treating the euro's nonstop decline as a failure for the European Community -- a tendency that was only accelerated by the recent rejection of the euro by the Danish electorate -- the euro's troubles can largely be written off as growing pains. In fact, a strong euro is more of a threat to the European economy than a weak one. </p><p>Eleven countries in Europe (plus Greece, early next year) peg the value of their currencies to the euro, and starting next year the common currency itself will be introduced. But the euro has had a rough time of it since being introduced in January 1999 at a value of $1.17. Since then, it has lost 30 percent of its value against the U.S. dollar, and threatens to dip still lower. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/05/euro/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/05/euro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Angell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/29/angell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/29/angell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2000/08/29/angell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long before he started writing about baseball for the New Yorker he was a fan of the game, and he has never been afraid to show it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most sportswriters, like most alternative-weekly film critics, worry they will look like saps if they let on they thrill in their subject. They labor to hide their rapture. This fear of looking like lightweights provides a road map to their predictable journeys on the page. But that has never been Roger Angell's concern. He goes where he goes, and does it with a clear eye, gentle honesty and a love of language. That's what makes him among the best ever at writing about sports. </p><p>Angell, who turns 80 this year, has been writing about baseball for the New Yorker since 1962, though until recently he devoted much of his time to other tasks at the magazine. A fiction writer whose collected volumes of New Yorker-published work include "The Stone Arbor and Other Stories," published in 1970, Angell was for years chief fiction editor. He made a name for himself as a champion of clarity, and nurtured such major talents as <a href="/directory/topics/garrison_keillor/index.html">Garrison Keillor,</a> <a href="/books/sneaks/1998/09/25sneaksa.html">William Trevor </a> and <a href="/books/review/2000/02/09/updike/index.html">John Updike.</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/29/angell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/29/angell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martina Navratilova</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/navratilova/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/navratilova/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2000/04/18/navratilova</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most daring player in the history of tennis, her attacking style and superb athleticism revolutionized the sport.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f it weren't for the quick cut to the tennis court, you might at first have trouble recognizing Martina Navratilova in the new Subaru commercials. Only six years have passed since she wrapped up the greatest career ever in women's tennis -- whether in terms of victories or just plain style -- but already Navratilova's tennis playing seems incidental, because there's simply no one out there now to remind us of her dynamic, attacking, serve-and-volley style (and that goes even for the amazing Williams sisters and for Navratilova's namesake, Czech-born Martina Hingis).</p><p>Navratilova, once too controversial for TV ads because she talked openly about her love of both men and women, is today as well known for her intelligence and willfulness as for her tennis game. This is the joke behind the TV spots, in which Navratilova plays off the idea that only men know cars. "What do I know about performance?" Navratilova says with easy, tart sarcasm, and then, at the close of the commercial, featuring her and other prominent female sports stars: "What do we know? We're just girls?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/navratilova/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/navratilova/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
