<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Steven Rosenfeld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/steven_rosenfeld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voters not taking failed gun control legislation lightly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinnipiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been drops in support for five different senators who did not vote for expanded background checks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> The backlash against Senators from both parties who voted on April 17 against an expanded background check law for gun buyers is growing, despite knee-jerk comments from mainstream media that gun control proponents lack the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/16/why-gun-control-laws-are-so-hard-to-pass/">fervor</a> and <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2013/04/gun-control-polls-to-comfort-the-left">commitment</a> of the NRA and its allies.</p><p>The first sign that some of the 54 senators who <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases">voted</a> against the background check bill were in trouble came from New Hampshire, where first-term Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte’s approval rating <a href="http://www.nationalmemo.com/kelly-ayottes-approval-rating-plummets-after-vote-against-background-checks/">fell</a> to 44 percent, a 15 percent drop from a survey last fall by Public Policy Polling. New Hampshire newspapers slammed her vote, with the <em>Concord Monitor </em><a href="http://www.concordmonitor.com/home/5771945-95/editorial-washington-gun-vote-was-a-double-abomination">calling</a> it “utter nonsense” and an “abomination.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief history of America&#8217;s homemade bombs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_brief_history_of_americas_homemade_bombs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_brief_history_of_americas_homemade_bombs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy McVeigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The improvised explosive devices used in the Boston Marathon attacks weren't the first of their kind]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Since the Oklahoma City in 1995 where Timothy McVeigh <a href="http://voices.yahoo.com/oklahoma-city-bombing-facts-figures-8300355.html">used</a> a homemade truck bomb with two tons of fertilizer, racing fuel and a blasting cap to destroy the federal building and kill 167 people, there have been a dozen domestic bombings where domestic or foreign-born attackers have sought or tried to kill people to send a message.</p><p>These bombing are distinct from the 34 police officers who have been “murdered by domestic right-wing political extremists” since Oklahoma City, according to the <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/terror-from-the-right/in-memoriam">Southern Poverty Law Center</a>. And they do not include the worst <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_events_named_massacres">gun massacres</a> in the U.S. since then, which include: Littleton, CO in 1999 (15 dead); Blacksburg, VA in 2007 (32 dead); Ft. Hood, TX in 2009 (12 dead); Tuscon, AZ in 2011 (6 dead); Oakland, CA in 2012 (7 dead); Aurora, CO in 2012 (12 dead); and Newtown, CN last December (28 dead).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_brief_history_of_americas_homemade_bombs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_brief_history_of_americas_homemade_bombs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 reasons state lotteries ruin the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Lotteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virgnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lottery tickets serve as a hidden tax on the poor and siphon up to $50 billion a year away from local businesses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> State lotteries amount to a hidden tax on the poor. They eat up about 9 percent of take-home incomes from households making less than $13,000 a year. They siphon $50 billion a year away from local businesses—besides stores where they’re sold. And they are encouraged by state-sponsored ads suggesting everyone can win, win, win!</p><p>State lotteries, which once were illegal, now exist in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotteries_in_the_United_States">most states</a>. What many people don’t know about lotteries is that they prey on those who can least afford it; most people never win anything big; and 11 states raise more money from lotteries than from corporate taxes. Beyond the moral, mental health or religious debates over gambling, lotteries are another example of how society preys on the poor and the working-class.</p><p>Let’s look at why state lotteries do far more harm than good—especially at the bottom of the economic ladder.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/10_reasons_state_lotteries_ruin_the_economy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 of the NRA&#8217;s frightening police-state &#8220;solutions&#8221; for our schools</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Federation of Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Wayne LaPierre had his way, every student and school employee would be a possible suspect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> The NRA doesn’t just want to put armed teachers, armed guards and volunteer vigilantes in schools to prevent more school shootings. It wants to turn schools into veritable prisons, where security staff patrol and lockdown schools, and indentify and spy on problem students and employees, according to an NRA-sponsored <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/133630146/NRA-s-National-School-Shield-Report" target="_blank">report</a> that included model legislation to allow such measures.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/03/randi-weingarten-nra-school-safety-report_n_3007940.html" target="_blank">National Federation of Teachers</a> and well-known civil rights <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2013/4/3/nras_school_shield_call_for_armed" target="_blank">advocates</a> slammed the <a href="http://www.nraschoolshield.com/" target="_blank">report</a>, issued by former GOP congressman and Department of Homeland Security official  <a href="http://hutchinson-group.com/index.php?page=asa" target="_blank">Asa Hutchinson</a>. They said militarizing schools with more guns was not the answer to gun violence. Nor was putting more police into schools, particularly in communities of color. That only increases hostilities for students, not safe learning environments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Scalia the most vile person in Washington?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/is_scalia_the_most_vile_person_in_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/is_scalia_the_most_vile_person_in_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a case for yes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A day after Justice Antonin Scalia caused gasps in the Supreme Court gallery by saying the 1965 Voting Rights Act had become a “racial entitlement” no congressperson could vote against, Rachel Maddow told The Daily Show she was in the courtroom and Scalia clearly enjoyed tormenting people. “I think he does know how that sounds,” she said. “He’s a troll. He’s saying this for effect. He knows it’s offensive.”</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>There’s no shortage of badly behaving Republicans in Washington. There’s the take-or-leave-it congressional leadership, who constantly show they value rightwing ideology more than its impact on people. There are intransigent obstructionists, like the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre, who believes the answer to gun violence is more guns. But Scalia isn’t simply another Republican bully; he may be the most venal and fascist Republican of all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/is_scalia_the_most_vile_person_in_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/is_scalia_the_most_vile_person_in_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP activists behind three troubling Supreme Court cases</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/gop_activists_behind_troubling_new_supreme_court_cases_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/gop_activists_behind_troubling_new_supreme_court_cases_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's highest court will be debating and deciding on the possibility of dismantling decades of progressive law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a></p><p>Three troubling U.S. Supreme Court cases -- one that has already undermined public participation in elections and two new ones threatening to further tilt the balance toward wealthier and whiter slices of society—have all been brought by Republican activists who want to change the rules to benefit their shrinking political party.</p><p>On Tuesday, the Supreme Court <a href="http://electionlawblog.org/?p=47461">agreed</a> to hear a campaign finance case in which a wealthy Alabama Republican <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/20/us/politics/supreme-court-to-hear-campaign-finance-case.html?smid=pl-share">sued</a> because he wanted to give more money than federal law allows in two-year election cycles. Shaun McCutcheon, the businessman-activist, joined by the Republican National Committee, challenged the $46,200 limit on donations to candidates and their committees, and $70,800 donation limit to other political committees. Less than 1 percent of Americans <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-25/money-corrupts-politics-even-more-than-you-thought.html">give</a> this much to campaigns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/gop_activists_behind_troubling_new_supreme_court_cases_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/gop_activists_behind_troubling_new_supreme_court_cases_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 uncovered quotes that reveal just how crazy the NRA&#8217;s become</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/7_uncovered_quotes_that_reveal_just_how_crazy_the_nras_become/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/7_uncovered_quotes_that_reveal_just_how_crazy_the_nras_become/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The organization once supported reasonable gun control laws. Now it's a lobby group for paranoid extremists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The 143-year-old National Rifle Association has not always been like today's NRA, fighting every gun control law as if the essence of American freedom depends on every citizen owning a gun. What follows are a series of shocking quotes taken from various academic histories of the NRA by top officials within the organization supporting reasonable gun control laws.</p><p>1. “I have never believed in the general practice of carrying weapons,” said NRA President Karl T. Frederick, a 1920 Olympic gold-medal winner for marksmanship who became a lawyer, praising state gun control laws in Congress. He testified before the 1938 federal gun control law passed. “I do not believe in the general promiscuous toting of guns. I think it should be sharply restricted and only under licenses.”</p><p>2. “We do think that any sane American, who calls himself an American, can object to placing into this bill the instrument which killed the president of the United States,” NRA Executive Vice-President Franklin Orth told Congress, shortly after Lee Harvey Oswald shot and killed President John F. Kennedy with an Italian military surplus rifle Oswald bought from a mail-order ad in the NRA’s<em>American Rifleman</em> magazine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/7_uncovered_quotes_that_reveal_just_how_crazy_the_nras_become/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/7_uncovered_quotes_that_reveal_just_how_crazy_the_nras_become/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NRA once supported gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may seem hard to believe, but for decades the organization helped write federal laws restricting gun use]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> For nearly a century after, its founding in 1871, the National Rifle Association was among America’s foremost pro-gun control organizations. It was not until 1977 when the NRA that Americans know today emerged, after libertarians who equated owning a gun with the epitome of freedom and fomented widespread distrust against government—if not armed insurrection—emerged after staging a hostile leadership coup.</p><p>In the years since, an NRA that once encouraged better markmanship and reasonable gun control laws gave way to an advocacy organization and political force that saw more guns as the answer to society’s worst violence, whether arming commercial airline pilots after 9/11 or teachers after the Newtown, while opposing new restrictions on gun usage.</p><p>It is hard to believe that the NRA was committed to gun-control laws for most of the 20th century—helping to write most of the federal laws restricting gun use until the 1980s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Guard in public schools?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/the_national_guard_in_public_schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/the_national_guard_in_public_schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Schools Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Barbara Boxer's outlandish proposal has triggered outrage from both the left and the right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Days after California’s liberal Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer gave an impassioned floor <a href="http://boxer.senate.gov/en/press/videos/121812.cfm">speech</a> saying that big steps must be taken to stop gun violence that is killing 87 people a day across America, she proposed a bill to give governors power to deploy National Guard troops in public schools—or assign them to local police departments, freeing them to put police in schools.</p><p>“Is it not part of the national defense to make sure that your children are safe?” Boxer said at a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-sen-boxer-national-guard-schools-20121219,0,7530900.story">press conference</a>, where she unveiled the Save Our Schools Act. “The slaughter of the innocents must stop....”</p><p>“Of all the bad ideas I've heard in the aftermath of the Newtown murders, the worst comes from Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-CA, who wants to provide federal funds for states to send the National Guard into schools,” <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-12-19/news/chi-send-the-national-guard-into-schools-20121219_1_bad-ideas-national-guard-school-shootings">wrote</a> the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>’s Steve Chapman:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/the_national_guard_in_public_schools/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/the_national_guard_in_public_schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>75 percent of states ignore mental illness checks for gun buyers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/most_states_ignore_mental_illness_background_checks_for_gun_buys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/most_states_ignore_mental_illness_background_checks_for_gun_buys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Wall Street Journal, 12 states account for most of the mental health records in the FBI database]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> As the White House eyes new gun-controls following the Sandy Hook school massacre and firearms dealers are seeing guns sales <a href="http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/7-states-where-gun-sales-are-surging-sandy-hook-school-shootings">spike</a>, a handful of recent investigative reports suggest that the nation’s state-run system of screening gun buyers for mental illness is mostly a mirage—except in a dozen states where governors want the system to work.</p><p>Federal law prohibits gun sales to anyone who was declared mentally unfit by a court. In Bill Clinton’s first term, Congress passed a law requiring states to report these mental health records to the FBI. But in 1997, the Supreme Court threw out that requirement, saying states could share whatever information they wanted to—or more likely not share it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/most_states_ignore_mental_illness_background_checks_for_gun_buys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/most_states_ignore_mental_illness_background_checks_for_gun_buys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four huge corporate power grabs possibly worse than Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/4_huge_corporate_power_grabs_that_never_came_to_pass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/4_huge_corporate_power_grabs_that_never_came_to_pass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doe v. Tanenbaum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These court cases offer a chilling reminder how close America has come to becoming an outright plutocracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Court-awarded corporate power is growing beyond the world of campaigns and elections, often at the expense of individual rights and Americans' ability to bring businesses to court.</p><p>A handful of recent decisions highlight this less-watched area of corporate clout. In two rulings this year, federal courts have concluded that secular for-profit businesses have First Amendment religious rights. In another ruling, a business that challenged its inclusion in a federal consumer product complaint database won and then successfully sealed federal court records, with the judge saying that protecting the firm’s economic reputation was a higher constitutional priority than keeping court records public.</p><p>In other instances, federal courts have upheld arbitration agreements that customers must sign for a range of services that include daily necessities, blocking people from going to court when disputes arise. And in the patent law arena, a range of individuals -- from farmers who want to protect their seed stock to health advocates concerned about privatized cancer research -- have been losing to corporations that have patented seeds and even human genes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/4_huge_corporate_power_grabs_that_never_came_to_pass/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/4_huge_corporate_power_grabs_that_never_came_to_pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 ways government undermines democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/5_ways_government_undermines_democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/5_ways_government_undermines_democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Campaign finance should be transparent. Sadly, the institutions designed to insure this are completely paralyzed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>  Is Barack Obama -- the former constitutional law professor and voting rights activist -- allergic to democracy reform? Perhaps congressional Republicans have thrown up such roadblocks that the White House has decided it’s not worthwhile to fight for the key federal agencies that defend democracy.</p><p>Whether the fault lies with the White House or with GOP obstructionists -- or both -- the results are the same: federal institutions created to make campaign finances more transparent and ensure that election technology is evolving are paralyzed by empty leadership positions, while the executive branch’s efforts to push ahead on its own have yielded little.</p><p>“I’ve felt like Diogenes looking for an intelligent Republican and never found one—I am hoping that will change,” said Craig Holman, Public Citizen’s Capitol Hill lobbyist, who puts the blame on the GOP for blocking Obama’s appointments. “But I’ve also been very critical of Obama for not taking on these fights. I’ve been asking Obama since 2009 to replace these commissioners and take on [GOP Senate leader] Mitch McConnell.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/5_ways_government_undermines_democracy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/5_ways_government_undermines_democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 right-wing election myths debunked by reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2012, the conservative information bubble finally popped. Here's what they should have learned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> One of the more stunning developments following President Obama’s re-election has been the number of ardent Republicans who have confessed that they <a href="http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/hopes-obamas-second-term?akid=9677.46423.zyIfWH&amp;rd=1&amp;src=newsletter743582&amp;t=7">believed</a> the anti-Democratic propaganda from Fox News—and got so much wrong as a result.</p><p>The voting rights part of this fact-averse bubble had many dimensions: from who is and isn’t registered to vote, to when and where people wanted to vote, to what a voter must do at the polls to get a ballot, to how voter lists are updated—and who can be trusted to oversee the process.</p><p>What follows are 10 lies the Right pedaled during the 2012 campaign. Some GOP partisans, like this Nevada <a href="http://ralstonreports.com/blog/clark-county-republicans-will-meet-assess-what-went-wrong-could-take-awhile#.UKKjToWWZlN">group</a>, are already trying to resurrect some of these fake issues. You can be sure you’ll see more as states and Congress look at 2012’s biggest problems, such as people having to wait hours and hours to vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/10_right_wing_election_myths_debunked_by_reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five reasons Rove won&#8217;t steal the election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/five_reasons_rove_wont_be_able_to_steal_the_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/five_reasons_rove_wont_be_able_to_steal_the_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13056431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too many activists are scaring people unnecessarily when they should be focusing on civil rights abuses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Progressives who fear that Karl Rove Republicans will steal the 2012 election through voting machine skullduggery should stop worrying.</p><p>There have been a rash of recent reports in national magazines like <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://harpers.org/blog/2012/10/an-excerpt-from-how-to-rig-an-election/"><em>Harpers</em></a></span>, websites like <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2012/4758">FreePress.org</a></span> and <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9628">BradBlog.com</a></span>, articles in <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/us/politics/cracks-in-maryland-and-washington-voter-databases.html"><em>The New York Times</em></a></span> and activists <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://networkedblogs.com/DF0V4">briefings</a></span> that suggest a range of scenarios where votes could be cast and disappear—or fabricated to steal the White House. Most of these scenarios are not just far-fetched or worse, but they distract from more visible and widespread issues that could impact the 2012 results. If you're nervous, vote early and help others to vote on Election Day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/five_reasons_rove_wont_be_able_to_steal_the_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/five_reasons_rove_wont_be_able_to_steal_the_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six fixes for American democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/six_ways_we_can_repair_our_democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/six_ways_we_can_repair_our_democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voter suppression. Endless fundraising. Dysfunctional debates. The need for reform has never been stronger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> As the 2012 election crests with all its chaos — <a href="http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/2012/pro-romney-super-pac-100-million-and-counting/">billionaire-driven</a> TV ad wars, legal fights over <a href="http://fairelectionsnetwork.com/voter_suppression_updates/voter-suppression-update-october-10-2012">voter suppression</a> tactics, endless fundraising e-mails and worries about <a href="http://harpers.org/">stealing the vote</a> — progressives need to remember what’s been destroying our democracy and what solutions are needed to restore the balance of power in America.</p><p>Now is the time to note precisely what’s wrong, what’s gotten worse and what’s completely broken in key corners of the electoral process. That’s because once the dust settles after Election Day, the impetus to fix things will wane among the political victors, media and much of the public, as it does after every big election. The winners will say there is not a problem because they won. The press will start covering the new administration. And weary voters will want to look ahead to solutions, not back to old problems.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/six_ways_we_can_repair_our_democracy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/six_ways_we_can_repair_our_democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three ways the GOP&#8217;s disenfranchised voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13006709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the party's tactics can be reversed. Many of them can't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party’s war on Democratic voting blocks is like a game of three-dimensional chess in which their strategies are intended to remain dormant until Election Day, and in the following days when votes are officially counted.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> But their game plan is simple. They want to discourage voters by complicating every step for new and existing voters from specific blue cohorts, such as students, poor people and minorities. They’ve adopted new laws or rules that target pathways surrounding polling place voting, while keeping voting by mail—a longtime GOP strategy—free from similar rules. And they are spreading fears that there will be vastly more policing of the process to scare away voters, when in reality that’s not likely to be the case.</p><p>While most of the GOP’s voter suppression strategies are designed to erupt in November, it is now possible to identify at least three major areas where hundreds of thousands of likely Democratic votes have already been thwarted—and where steps to reverse that process, if possible, must be taken soon before fall voter registration deadlines kick in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the plan to steal the election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/25/undercover_at_true_the_vote_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/25/undercover_at_true_the_vote_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12991974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative initiative True the Vote is designed to obstruct the voting process at every turn. Will it work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was nervous getting onto the flight to Denver. Since 2004, I have been a national radio producer, investigative reporter, author and consultant—writing about how elections are won, lost, bungled and improved, with a big focus on voter registration. But I had never snuck into a meeting of right-wing voting vigilantes who are the frontline of a national voter suppression strategy, and where the main speaker was a man whose new book I’d aggressively debunked days before, in an <em>AlterNet </em><a href="http://www.alternet.org/gop-voter-fraud-hucksters-latest-lie-felons-made-franken-us-senator">article</a> lauded by a leading election law <a href="http://electionlawblog.org/?p=38269">blog</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/lets-play-voter-fraud-whack-a-mole/2012/08/08/99f9b66c-e18e-11e1-89f7-76e23a982d06_blog.html"><em>Washington Post</em></a>. The meeting was a state summit organized by a group called <a href="http://www.truethevote.org/">True The Vote</a>. The author was John Fund, who absurdly claims that more than 1,000 felons voted illegally in Minnesota in 2008, sending Democrat Al Franken to the U.S. Senate, where he was the final vote that passed Obama's health care reform.<br /> <a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/25/undercover_at_true_the_vote_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/25/undercover_at_true_the_vote_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s dismal civil liberties record</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/obamas_dismal_civil_liberties_record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/obamas_dismal_civil_liberties_record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12892511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite vows to increase transparency, the president has made the government ever more authoritarian and intrusive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Barack Obama took office, he was the civil liberties communities’ great hope. Obama, a former constitutional law professor, pledged to shutter the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and run a transparent and open government. But he has become a civil libertarian’s nightmare: a supposedly liberal president who instead has expanded and fortified many of the Bush administration’s worst policies, lending bipartisan support for a more intrusive and authoritarian federal government.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>It started with the 9/11 attacks. Within a week, Congress, including many liberals, gave the White House blanket authority to wage a war on the terrorists. A month after that, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act, authorizing many anti-terrorism measure including expanded surveillance. By mid-November, the White House ordered creation of military tribunals to try terrorists who were not U.S. citizens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/obamas_dismal_civil_liberties_record/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/obamas_dismal_civil_liberties_record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP&#8217;s nightmare voting scenario</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/the_gops_nightmare_voting_scenario/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/the_gops_nightmare_voting_scenario/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12314291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From McConnell to the WSJ, right-wingers are citing absurd reasons to oppose a plan to scrap the Electoral College]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/12/09/senate-minority-leader-calls-national-popular-vote-absurd-dangerous-idea/tab/print/" target="_blank">calls</a> it “absurd and dangerous.” The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703578104575397100729241576.html" target="_blank">says</a> it deserves to “die.” The Heritage Foundation <a href="http://www.heritage.org/events/2011/10/national-popular-vote" target="_blank">calls</a> it “unconstitutional.” The Washington Post calls it “flawed.” A Republican National Committee <a href="http://www.tneagleforum.org/LEARN_ABOUT_THE_ISSUES/RNC_Resolution_Opposing_National_Popular_Vote/" target="_blank">resolution</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/5/rnc-nixes-national-popular-vote-initiative/" target="_blank">says</a> it is a radical, un-American, “questionable legal maneuver.”</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a><br /> It is awarding the presidency to the candidate who wins the most votes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/the_gops_nightmare_voting_scenario/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/the_gops_nightmare_voting_scenario/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hard truth about Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_hard_truth_of_citizens_united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_hard_truth_of_citizens_united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12200751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the second anniversary of a terrible decision, every proposed solution has a downside.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movement to overturn the Supreme Court’s controversial <em>Citizens United</em> ruling and confront the doctrine of "corporate personhood" stands at a perilous crossroads.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>Across the country, two distinct strategies are <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/issues/government-the-people/citizens-united-v-fec-constitutional-remedies-list-of-local-state-and-f" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">converging</span></a> on Congress. More than a million people have signed online petitions. State legislators, city and township governments, Democratic Party groups and unions have sponsored and passed measures in 23 states demanding that Congress pass a constitutional amendment to reassert and elevate the political speech of individual citizens and roll back the growing legal privileges of corporations.</p><p>The two approaches can be seen in the protest signs and sound bites proclaiming, “Money is Not Speech” and “Overturn Corporate Personhood.” But these slogans are not calling for the same remedy, especially when transformed into legal language in 10 proposals that have been introduced in the current Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_hard_truth_of_citizens_united/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/the_hard_truth_of_citizens_united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>