<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Suzanne Goldenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/suzanne_goldenberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Brazil won&#8217;t be bullied</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/04/brazil_aids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/04/brazil_aids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/05/04/brazil_aids</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation declines $40 million in AIDS funds from the Bush administration, refusing to condemn prostitution as required.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brazil Tuesday became the first country to take a public stand against the Bush administration's massive AIDS program, which is seen by many as seeking increasingly to press its anti-abortion, pro-abstinence sexual agenda on poorer countries. </p><p>Campaigners applauded Brazil's rejection of $40 million for its AIDS programs because it refuses to agree to a declaration condemning prostitution. The government and many AIDS organizations believe such a declaration would be a serious barrier to helping sex workers protect themselves and their clients from infection. </p><p>The demand from the U.S. administration, heavily influenced by the religious right, follows what is known as the "global gag" -- a ban on U.S. government funds to any foreign-based organization that has links to abortion. This has resulted in the removal of millions of dollars of funding from family-planning clinics worldwide. </p><p>Tuesday Pedro Chequer, the director of Brazil's HIV/AIDS program, said the government had managed to resist U.S. pressure during negotiations on the AIDS funding to focus on promoting abstinence and fidelity rather than condoms -- another ideological battle being waged by the religious right. But the U.S. negotiators insisted that the clause on prostitution had to stay. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/04/brazil_aids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/04/brazil_aids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;20th man&#8221; ruled competent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/21/moussaoui_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/21/moussaoui_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/04/21/moussaoui</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An embarrassing case in the war on terror may be wrapping up as Zacarias Moussaoui prepares to plead guilty in the 9/11 attacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged in the United States for the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, is set to appear in court this week to register a guilty plea. </p><p>In a notice issued by the U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va., court officials Wednesday said that the hearing was convened with the express purpose of entering a guilty plea from Moussaoui, and to move forward on a case that has become an embarrassment to the Bush administration. More than three years after the attacks, the administration has failed to bring any captured al-Qaida figures to trial. </p><p>In Moussaoui's case, delays, legal wrangling and courtroom outbursts turned the test case into a bizarre spectacle punctuated by the suspect's outbursts and volatile behavior. Moussaoui's mental state was the prime consideration before the U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, who issued her decision after a one-hour private meeting with Moussaoui Wednesday morning. </p><p>The meeting was convened two weeks after Moussaoui wrote to the judge indicating that after more than three and a half years in prison he was willing to plead guilty to conspiracy and terrorism, even though these admissions would carry the death penalty. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/21/moussaoui_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/21/moussaoui_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking tough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/20/condi_moscow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/20/condi_moscow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/04/20/condi_moscow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her first official visit to Moscow, Condi Rice crusades for democracy and defends the freedom of the press.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kremlin's alleged backsliding on democracy is "very worrying," the U.S. secretary of state said Tuesday on the eve of her meeting with the Russian president in Moscow. Condoleezza Rice expressed increasing concern at the consolidation of power inside the Kremlin, and warned Vladimir Putin not to cling to power beyond his present term. </p><p>The comments, made to reporters traveling with her on her first official visit to Moscow, carried even greater resonance because of her status within the Bush administration, where she is one of President Bush's most trusted confidantes. In addition, she was an expert on the former Soviet Union before becoming involved in Republican politics and joining the government. </p><p>In the harsher of two attacks on Putin's reforms since her appointment, she told reporters Tuesday that "trends [in Russia] have not been positive on the democratic side." The secretary of state had been expected to water down her past criticism of the Kremlin as the United States attempts to draw Russia closer to the West with trade incentives. </p><p>She will meet Putin Wednesday to smooth the way for a summit meeting between him and Bush when the U.S. president attends the 60th anniversary Victory Day celebrations in Moscow on May 9. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/20/condi_moscow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/20/condi_moscow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The life of a female spy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/02/cia_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/02/cia_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2005/04/01/cia_life</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her book "Denial and Deception," former CIA agent Melissa Mahle talks about giving birth in the morning and, with no maternity leave, returning to work the same evening.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are books full of prohibitions for the pregnant woman: Don't drink alcohol, don't eat sushi, don't take saunas, don't embark on lengthy air journeys without getting up every hour to revive circulation. But not many bother with the warning: Do not try to dismantle volatile explosives during the second trimester. </p><p>It might have proved helpful to former CIA operative Melissa Mahle. In 1998, Mahle was the CIA station chief in Jerusalem when a call came in that Palestinian police had seized two bags of explosives at the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. She was five months' pregnant -- a fact that she overlooked after arriving at the scene. "At the time I was focused on mission accomplished; I didn't even think about my baby," she says. Over dinner that evening, she learned that the friction of opening a a bag -- or wayward cigarette ash -- could have detonated an explosion that would have flattened the police station as well as Christendom's holiest shrine. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/02/cia_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/02/cia_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The darkest hour in the history of our tribe&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/23/school_shooting_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/23/school_shooting_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2005/03/23/school_shooting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police look for clues on neo-Nazi Web sites visited by the teenage shooter at a school on the Red Lake Chippewa reservation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the neo-Nazi Web sites where the teenage loner aired his admiration for Adolf Hitler's notions of ethnic purity, he was known as Todesengel -- German for Angel of Death. Late on Monday, at a secluded Indian reservation in northern Minnesota, he played out those dark fantasies. Jeff Weise, 16, shot dead his grandfather, five teenagers, a teacher and two other adults before turning the gun on himself. A dozen others were wounded, with two in a critical condition. </p><p>It was the deadliest school shooting since April 20, 1999, when two students at Colorado's Columbine High School killed 12 students and a teacher before killing themselves. The scale of the violence overwhelmed the emergency services in the remote community, forcing the evacuation of some of the more seriously wounded. "We've never dealt with anything like this before," Sherri Binkeland, spokeswoman for North County Regional Hospital, told reporters. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/23/school_shooting_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/23/school_shooting_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting for $108 million in overcharges</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/16/halliburton_14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/16/halliburton_14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/16/halliburton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Waxman accuses the Bush administration of deliberately withholding U.N. auditors' findings on Halliburton contracts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pentagon stood accused of sitting on a damaging report from its own auditors on a $108.4 million overcharge by Halliburton for its services in Iraq on Tuesday. </p><p>In a scathing letter to President Bush, Democratic Reps. Henry Waxman of California and John Dingell of Michigan said the Defense Contract Audit Agency's audit was completed last October -- before the election. They also note that 12 separate requests to the Pentagon to view the completed audits on the contractor's $2.5 billion contract to supply fuel and other services in postwar Iraq had been ignored. </p><p>"We would like to know why this audit report -- and audit reports on nine additional task orders -- are being withheld from Congress," they wrote. "We also want to know what steps you are taking to recover these funds from Halliburton." </p><p>In a second public letter Tuesday, Waxman accused Bush administration officials of deliberately withholding information on overcharges by Halliburton from U.N. auditors -- at its behest. Some $1.6 billion of the $2.5 billion Halliburton contract was funded from Iraqi oil revenues overseen by the U.N. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/16/halliburton_14/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/16/halliburton_14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;ve had a really long day&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/15/atlanta_hero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/15/atlanta_hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/15/atlanta_hero</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The suspect in the Atlanta murders opens up to a kind and courageous woman who serves him eggs and pancakes, then surrenders peacefully to police.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ordeal began with a gun in the ribs in the middle of the night. By morning, after a pancake breakfast, the man accused of killing four in an Atlanta courthouse rampage was offering to hang curtains in his hostage's flat, and she was an American hero. On Monday, Ashley Smith, 26, described by her family as a soft touch, a drifter between dead-end jobs who couldn't earn enough to look after her own daughter, was hailed by police for her courage and negotiating skills. </p><p>Through the course of that night, she won the trust of a man accused in a rash of killings, bringing a peaceful end to a 26-hour manhunt. </p><p>Brian Nichols, the alleged gunman, was in a federal prison Monday after surrendering peacefully to the authorities. He was expected to be formally charged with shooting dead a judge, a court reporter and a police deputy, and the subsequent killing of a customs agent. </p><p>Their encounter began at 2 a.m. on Saturday when Smith took a break from unpacking boxes in her new flat and went on a cigarette run. As she unlocked the door, Nichols appeared, jabbing a gun in her side. He removed his baseball cap to make sure Smith recognized him as the armed and dangerous outlaw accused of killing four people that day. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/15/atlanta_hero/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/15/atlanta_hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P.R. fiasco on Guantanamo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/14/prison_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/14/prison_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/14/prison_abuse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge rules prisoners cannot be transferred to Yemen as the Pentagon confirms allegations that four female interrogators sexually humiliated detainees at the base.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration ran into its first roadblock in its plans to sharply reduce the prison population at Guant&aacute;namo Bay over the weekend when a U.S. judge forbade the transfer of 13 inmates to Yemen for fear they would be tortured. The March 12 ruling by a U.S. federal judge in New York marks an early victory for human rights organizations in their efforts to bar the administration from carrying out plans to reduce the prison population at Guant&aacute;namo by transferring inmates to Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Yemen. It bans the transfer of the Yemenis until a hearing can be held on their lawyers' request for 30 days' notice before any transfer. </p><p>"We're relieved," Marc Falkoff, a lawyer for the Yemenis, told the New York Times. </p><p>Human rights organizations say such transfers place the detainees at grave risk of torture, and lawyers have prepared a series of legal challenges to such moves. The Pentagon, however, appears equally determined to carry out the transfers, and halve the prison population at Guant&aacute;namo. Over the weekend, it rendered three inmates to Afghanistan, Maldives and Pakistan. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/14/prison_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/14/prison_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disturbing pattern</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/08/abuse_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/08/abuse_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/08/abuse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Army investigation of abuse by U.S. soldiers --  involving alleged rape of Iraqi women -- ends for lack of evidence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soldiers from the 3rd Infantry Brigade -- the same military unit whose troops fired on the car carrying freed Italian hostage Giuliana Sgrena -- were under investigation last year for raping Iraqi women, U.S. Army documents reveal. Four soldiers were alleged to have raped two women while on guard duty in a Baghdad shopping precinct. A U.S. Army investigator interviewed several soldiers from the military unit, the 1-15th battalion of the 3rd Infantry Brigade, but did not locate or interview the Iraqi women involved before shutting down the inquiry for lack of evidence. </p><p>Transcripts of the investigation, obtained by the Guardian from the American Civil Liberties Union, show only the most cursory attempts by the investigator to establish whether the women were raped. The soldiers claimed the women were prostitutes, or denied any knowledge of anyone in their unit having sex while deployed in Iraq. The statements went largely unchallenged. "I know the women were Iraqi. I however don't know if they were raped, or were prostitutes, or just wanted sex," one soldier told investigators. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/08/abuse_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/08/abuse_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eroding equality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/01/status_of_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/01/status_of_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/01/status_of_women</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration declines to ratify an international treaty on women, saying the U.N. must first renounce abortion rights.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration was accused Monday of trying to roll back efforts to improve the status of the world's women by demanding that the United Nations publicly renounce abortion rights. America's demand overshadowed the opening Monday of a conference intended to mark the 10th anniversary of the Beijing Commission on the Status of Women, an event seen as a landmark in efforts to promote global cooperation on women's equality. </p><p>The U.S. stand was also widely seen as further evidence of the sweeping policy change in Washington under the Bush presidency. The last four years have seen a steady erosion of government support for international population projects as a result of the administration's opposition to abortion. </p><p>The U.N.'s Commission on the Status of Women had drafted a brief declaration reaffirming support for the Beijing declaration and calling for further effort to implement its recommendations. Organizers had hoped that informal discussions last week would reach a consensus on the draft, leaving the next fortnight clear for government officials and women's activists to hold more substantive talks on advancing economic equality and political participation, and fighting violence against women. But those hopes were crushed in a closed-door session late last week when Washington demanded that the declaration reaffirm its support for the declarations made in Beijing 10 years ago only if "they do not include the right to abortion," says a copy of the U.S. text obtained by the Guardian. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/01/status_of_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/01/status_of_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New claims of detainee torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/afghanistan_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/afghanistan_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/18/afghanistan_abuse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documents obtained by the ACLU indicate that the U.S. used interrogation methods in Afghanistan as harsh as those employed at Abu Ghraib.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New evidence has emerged that U.S. forces in Afghanistan engaged in widespread Abu Ghraib-style abuse, taking "trophy photographs" of detainees and carrying out rape and sexual humiliation. Documents obtained by the Guardian contain evidence that such abuses took place in the main detention center at Bagram, near the capital Kabul, as well as at a smaller U.S. installation near the southern city of Kandahar. The documents also indicate that U.S. soldiers covered up abuse in Afghanistan and in Iraq -- even after the Abu Ghraib scandal came to light last year. </p><p>A thousand pages of evidence from U.S. Army investigations released to the American Civil Liberties Union after a long legal battle, and made available to the Guardian, show that an Iraqi detained at Tikrit, Iraq, in September 2003 was forced to withdraw his report of abuse after soldiers told him he would be held indefinitely. </p><p>Meanwhile, photographs taken in southern Afghanistan showing U.S. soldiers from the 22nd Infantry Battalion posing in mock executions of blindfolded and bound detainees, were purposely destroyed after the Abu Ghraib scandal to avoid "another public outrage," the documents show. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/afghanistan_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/afghanistan_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academic revolt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/17/harvard_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/17/harvard_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/17/harvard</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remarks last month by Harvard's president about why women lag in the sciences prompt intense criticism of his leadership style by faculty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvard University suffered a rebellion in the faculty ranks Wednesday as some professors sought the departure of its controversial president. In an unusual atmosphere of confrontation, Harvard professors are to gather next week to air their discontent with the president, Lawrence Summers, and there was speculation Wednesday that he could resign, or be confronted with a humiliating motion of no confidence by his colleagues. </p><p>Summers provoked an uproar last month with ill-judged comments on women in science, a gaffe that brought resentment about his leadership style to a crisis point. On Tuesday night the anger broke into the open at a stormy faculty meeting at which he was accused of instituting a reign of fear and intimidation. He can expect equally harsh treatment next week, since several professors say they are determined to bring about real change in the university's management. </p><p>"He has apologized many times. Now the question is, Can we put in place structures that -- if he stays -- will mean that his relationship with the faculties and others in various parts of the administration will be much better," said Everett Mendelsohn, a professor of the history of science. He added: "If a no-confidence vote is what it would take to bring about the change, then sure." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/17/harvard_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/17/harvard_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia is for lovers, but not underpants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/virginia_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/virginia_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/10/virginia_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a crusade against the "coarsening" of culture, the state's House of Delegates passes a bill that would levy a $50 fine for exposing one's undergarments in an offensive manner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a trend that has baffled parents, delighted teenagers everywhere and created a raging business for Calvin Klein. And it has got up the nose of Algie Howell, a lawmaker from Virginia, who has launched a crusade to have it banned. </p><p>Howell's ire is directed against publicly visible boxers, briefs and thongs. His targets are those who follow the trend of wearing low-rise or baggy trousers that put such garments on display. Earlier this week, Virginia's House of Delegates signed on to Howell's campaign, passing a bill that would levy a $50 fine on anyone who "exposes his below-waist undergarments in an offensive manner." </p><p>Howell, 67, told local reporters that his campaign was inspired by a visit to his barber shop where customers complained bitterly about the fashion sense of a younger generation that favors low-slung trousers. "That's why they're called undergarments," he told the Virginian-Pilot. "They're supposed to be worn under something else." </p><p>Virginia's lawmakers apparently agreed, adopting Howell's bill by a margin of 60-34, in what they described as a blow against the "coarsening" of American culture. The bill still has to clear the state Senate to become law. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/virginia_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/virginia_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Integrity at risk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/oil_for_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/oil_for_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/04/oil_for_food</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of the U.N.'s oil-for-food program faces disciplinary action for allegedly accepting bribes from Saddam Hussein's regime.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations suffered grave damage to its international reputation Thursday after it emerged that the official who headed the oil-for-food program for Iraq sought and obtained bribes from Saddam Hussein's regime. In a highly critical report, Benon Sevan was rebuked for actions that were "ethically improper and seriously undermined the integrity of the U.N." </p><p>"This is a painful episode for everyone in the U.N.," said the head of the investigation, former U.S. Federal Reserve chief Paul Volcker. He went on to accuse Sevan of offering to use his influence at the U.N. in return for the granting of vouchers to purchase Iraqi oil at favorable prices on behalf of a small Panamanian-registered firm. "Mr. Sevan created a grave and continuing conflict of interest," he said. </p><p>Sevan, a Cypriot who has spent 40 years as a career diplomat at the U.N., has denied wrongdoing. However, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan issued a statement later Thursday saying the U.N. would take disciplinary action against Sevan and Joseph Stephanides, the former chief of the U.N. sanctions branch, who was also criticized in the report. "Should any findings of the inquiry give rise to criminal charges, the U.N. will cooperate with national law enforcement authorities pursuing those charges, and in the interests of justice I will waive the diplomatic immunity of the staff member concerned," Annan said. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/oil_for_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/oil_for_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Righting wrongs for Guantanamo detainees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/01/detainee_ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/01/detainee_ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/01/detainee_ruling</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge rules that the war on terror "cannot negate the existence of the most basic fundamental rights for which the people of this country have fought and died for well over 200 years."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration suffered a legal setback over its conduct of the war on terror Monday when a federal judge ruled that the special military tribunals at Guant&aacute;namo Bay were unlawful. The judgment was seen as a victory for the 540 detainees in Guant&aacute;namo, and for civil rights organizations that have campaigned for three years for inmates to have the right to challenge their detentions in court. </p><p>"This means that these folks are actually going to get a hearing," said Barbara Olshansky, of the Center for Constitutional Rights. The judge "is saying that the rule of law in this country cannot be disregarded by executive fiat -- despite what this administration might want." </p><p>The judgment was highly critical of the Pentagon's military tribunals, set up in June 2004 to decide whether to continue holding the inmates at Guant&aacute;namo. Judge Joyce Hens Green ruled that prisoners were entitled to the protection of the U.S. Constitution and the <a href=http://archive.salon.com/opinion/feature/2005/01/18/geneva_convention/>Geneva Convention</a> even during the war on terror. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/01/detainee_ruling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/01/detainee_ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misleading by example</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/human_rights_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/human_rights_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/01/14/human_rights</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A watchdog group's report decries U.S. prisoner abuse, saying "the pictures from Abu Ghraib have become the recruiting posters for Terrorism, Inc."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> America's human rights abuses have provided a rallying cry for terrorists and set a bad example for regimes seeking to justify their own poor rights records, a leading independent watchdog said Thursday. The torture and degrading treatment of prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guant&aacute;namo Bay have undermined the credibility of the United States as a defender of human rights and opponent of terrorism, the New York-based Human Rights Watch says in its annual report.</p><p>"The U.S. government is less and less able to push for justice abroad because it is unwilling to see justice done at home," says Kenneth Roth, the group's executive director. The report comes as the Bush administration prepares for the presidential inauguration next week. But the administration has shown little interest in moderating its aggressive approach to its "global war on terror." </p><p>Thursday's scathing report argues that the United States has weakened its own moral authority at a time when that authority is most needed, "in the midst of a seeming epidemic of suicide bombings, beheadings, and other attacks on civilians and noncombatants."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/human_rights_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/human_rights_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professional ethics in a time of war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/07/docs_and_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/07/docs_and_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/01/07/docs_and_torture</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the New England Journal of Medicine alleges that doctors were active participants in prisoner abuse at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctors at Guant&aacute;namo Bay and Abu Ghraib used their medical knowledge to help devise coercive interrogation methods for detainees, including sleep deprivation, stress positions and other abuse, it was reported Thursday. An article in the New England Journal of Medicine provides the most authoritative account so far that doctors were active participants in the abuse of prisoners in America's "war on terror." </p><p>"Clearly, the medical personnel who helped to develop and execute aggressive counterresistance plans thereby breached the laws of war," says the article, which is based on interviews with more than two dozen military personnel and recently released official documents. It adds: "The conclusion that doctors participated in torture is premature, but there is probable cause for suspecting it." </p><p>The issue that the administration had encouraged the use of coercive interrogation techniques was raised Thursday in the Senate confirmation hearings of Alberto Gonzales, President Bush's nominee for attorney general. Gonzales was attacked for a memo that said only the most severe types of torture were not permissible under U.S. law. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/07/docs_and_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/07/docs_and_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No aberration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/guantanamo_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/guantanamo_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/12/22/guantanamo_torture</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Memos from FBI agents complaining about treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo provide the clearest account yet of abuse sanctioned by the Bush administration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FBI agents repeatedly complained about the torture of detainees at Guant&aacute;namo Bay and in Iraq and believed their eyewitness accounts of beatings, strangulation and other abuse were being repressed, official memos show. Even after heavy censorship, the memos, obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union, contain graphic details of abuse in which military and government interrogators put lighted cigarettes in detainees' ears, spat on them, knocked them unconscious or resorted to deliberate humiliation. In an e-mail dated July 30, one FBI official writes: "I saw a detainee sitting on the floor of the interview room with an Israeli flag draped around him, loud music being played and a strobe light flashing." </p><p>The documents, which largely appear to be e-mails from field agents to their superiors, describe growing FBI discomfort with the interrogation methods in use at Guant&aacute;namo and in Iraq. They provide the most detailed account yet of the methods of interrogation sanctioned by the Bush administration in the "war on terror." They also reinforce the position of human rights groups that the abuse of detainees at Guant&aacute;namo and in Afghanistan and Iraq was a product of a new gloves-off policy. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/guantanamo_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/guantanamo_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One more reason to head north?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/canada_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/canada_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/12/10/canada_gays</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada's highest court backs same-sex marriage,  
paving the way for legislation to force conservative provinces to recognize gay unions. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada came a step closer to becoming the third country to approve same-sex marriages Thursday when the Supreme Court ruled that they are constitutional and prodded the federal government to introduce national legislation. If, as expected, the decision is endorsed by Parliament, Canada will join Belgium and the Netherlands as the only countries in the world formally to recognize same-sex unions. New Zealand has also taken steps toward sanctioning gay unions, approving a bill that recognizes civil unions between unmarried couples, gay and straight, but has stopped short of legalizing same-sex marriages. </p><p>"Several centuries ago it would have been understood that marriage be available only to opposite-sex couples," the Canadian ruling said. "The recognition of same-sex marriage in several Canadian jurisdictions, as well as two European countries, belies the assertion that the same is true today." </p><p>The 9-0 judgment paves the way for legislation to be introduced shortly after Christmas formally legalizing same-sex marriages. The verdict is to some extent symbolic, however. Six provinces and the Yukon territory already recognize gay marriage rights. About 3,000 same-sex couples, including many Americans, have tied the knot since June 2003, when Canada's most populous province, Ontario, began solemnizing such unions. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/canada_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/canada_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dogmatic intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/cia_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/cia_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/12/10/cia_lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A veteran CIA operative sues the agency for firing him after he refused orders to falsify his reports on Iraq's WMD.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A senior CIA analyst who was once decorated for his work on weapons proliferation in the Middle East has accused the spy agency of ruining his career as punishment for his refusal to adhere to official prewar "dogma" on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. In a lawsuit filed in a U.S. district court, the unnamed agent, described as a 22-year veteran of the agency's counterproliferation department, accuses his former supervisors of demanding that he alter his intelligence reporting to conform to the views of CIA management in the run-up to the war on Iraq. </p><p>The action marks the first time the CIA, which proclaimed that Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, has been publicly accused by one of its employees of exerting pressure to produce reports that would help the Bush administration make its case to go to war on Saddam. However, one former CIA employee said the process described by the analyst -- pressure and retaliation -- was a familiar bureaucratic response to agents who did not conform. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/cia_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/10/cia_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

