<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Thomas Schaller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/thomas_schaller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Same sex, opposite impact</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Mehlman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12457431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage equality always seemed a losing issue for the left. That's all changed. Just ask Ken Mehlman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/24/omalley-sign-md-same-sex-marriage-bill-thursday/">Maryland</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/13/washington-gay-marriage-signed-chris-gregoire_n_1273887.html">Washington</a> join six other states in approving same-sex marriage, it's clear that the era of politicians exploiting the issue for political game appears over. Just ask former Republican strategist Ken Mehlman, the man who managed George W. Bush’s 2004 campaign, noted for its aggressive anti-gay marriage stance.</p><p>“If you look at attitudes today and where they are headed, it’s clear to me that supporting equal rights, including the rights to civil marriage, is a net positive for winning elections, as well as the right thing to do,” Mehlman said in an interview. “By contrast, opposing equal rights is a net negative that gets problematic to more voters each year.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration rattles the Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/immigration_rattles_the_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/immigration_rattles_the_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12248331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Candidates juggle appeals to the xenophobic base and the growing Latino electorate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past 48 hours, immigration politics and the fight for the Latino vote hijacked the 2012 campaign. First came Wednesday’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/both_sides_win_in_brewer_obama_tiff/">tarmac dust-up</a> between President Obama and Republican Gov. Jan Brewer during the first of three stops the president made this week to Southwestern states with significant Latino populations critical to his reelection. Later that night during an interview with Univision, Obama made <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/72015.html">headlines</a> by lambasting the Republican Party for blocking passage of the DREAM Act.</p><p>On Thursday morning, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush joined the conversation with a Washington Post Op-Ed in which he <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-republicans-can-win-hispanics-back/2012/01/25/gIQAgy3PRQ_story.html">suggested four ways</a> the GOP can lure back Latino voters, including a recommendation that the party cast immigration as “an economic issue, not just a border security issue.” That afternoon Michelle Obama raised the stakes in the electoral fight for Latino votes with a “Let’s Move” national fitness agenda stop at Tampa’s Goya food processing plant, where the first lady <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/26/first-lady-michelle-obama-joins-goya-foods-announcing-mi-plato-resources">touted</a> the USDA’s new “Mi Plato” program, lamented the shortage of supermarkets in Latino neighborhoods, and applauded the National Hispanic Medical Association, the National Council of La Raza, and the League of United Latin American Citizens for their community nutrition efforts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/immigration_rattles_the_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/immigration_rattles_the_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama takes his case to the swing states</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/obama_takes_his_case_to_the_swing_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/obama_takes_his_case_to_the_swing_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12237121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president retails his general election message in five key battlegrounds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day after delivering his “America built to last” State of the Union <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/24/politics/sotu-transcript/index.html">address</a>, the president began his own three-day, five-state unofficial campaign tour in search of a second term. The selection of states for the trip—Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Michigan—was anything but random. Four of the five will <a href="http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-republican-primary-schedule/">hold</a> their Republican primaries or caucuses in February, and a fifth, Iowa, recently voted. At least four of the five are considered swing states, and a fifth, Michigan, could be competitive if native son Mitt Romney is the GOP nominee, as the White House has been anticipating for the past year. All five states feature key blocks of blue-collar white and Latino voters, and four of the five (save Colorado) elected or re-elected Republicans governors in 2010. Obama’s 2012 re-election bid is now underway.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/obama_takes_his_case_to_the_swing_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/obama_takes_his_case_to_the_swing_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obillionaire candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_obillionaire_candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_obillionaire_candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12197631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president may spend twice as much as he did in the 2008 general election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, Barack Obama may become America’s first billion-dollar candidate. Funds he raises for either his own reelection campaign or for the Democratic National Committee, or that “unaffiliated” friends raise for his super PAC, could eclipse the mythical, 10-figure threshold. Can he do it and, more to the point, will he even need all that much cash?</p><p>Obama enjoys the three advantages any incumbent president seeking reelection does: four full years to raise money for his own campaign or the national party committees; the political leverage of the office he holds to raise it; and, like incumbents in most cycles, the absence of a primary challenger who might draw down his coffers. Sure enough, and despite a crowded Republican field, by the midpoint of 2011 Obama had already <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/07/first-presidential-campaign-finance-reports-show.html">raised more money</a> ($48.7 million) than all of the GOP presidential hopefuls combined ($36.7 million). His campaign has since raised $42 million in both the <a href="http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-13/obama-re-election-campaign-says-more-than-70-million-raised-1-">third</a> and <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/12/obama-announces-big-fundraising-haul/?hpt=hp_bn3">fourth</a> quarters of 2011, with the Democratic National Committee hauling in an additional $51 million during the final six months of last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_obillionaire_candidate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_obillionaire_candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s Latino problem gets worse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/gops_latino_problem_gets_worse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/gops_latino_problem_gets_worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12087331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney\'s Spanish-language TV ads can\'t overcome the party\'s poor reputation among Hispanics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We have to fix our problems with the Hispanics,” <a href="http://univisionnews.tumblr.com/post/15400302556/mccain-gop-needs-to-fix-our-problems-with-the">said</a> John McCain last week when asked by MSNBC’s Chuck Todd about the Republican Party's competitiveness in the Southwest in the 2012 election.. “It starts with a way to address the issue of immigration in a humane and caring fashion, at the same time emphasizing the need to secure our borders because of the drug cartels and the people who transport people across our border and treat them terribly.”</p><p>A tip for McCain, front-runner Mitt Romney and other Republicans: drop the “the” in front of references to Hispanics. Use of the definite article sounds a bit too much like the cringe-worthy “that one” line McCain dropped on Barack Obama during their October 2008 presidential debate in Nashville, and smacks of the sort of “these/those people” phrases that only turn away the groups described. This week, Romney smartly released his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6PYDh6Wgts&amp;feature=player_embedded">first Spanish-language campaign ad</a>, a positive sign. But language is only a small part of the GOP’s problems with minorities, and Latino voters in particular.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/gops_latino_problem_gets_worse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/gops_latino_problem_gets_worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opportunity knocks for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/opportunity_knocks_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/opportunity_knocks_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10709561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By blocking the payroll tax cut, the Republicans have given the president a chance to redeem his promise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is it for President Obama.</p><p>This is the moment he and his presidency promised to deliver. The <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/poll-73-percent-support-the-buffett-rule-including-66-percent-of-republicans.php">fight over the payroll tax cut extension</a> gives Obama a chance — perhaps one, final chance — to elevate the more pinched, listing and frequently uninspired policy agenda he prosecuted from the White House these past three years toward his lofty rhetoric of 2008.</p><p>The payroll tax fight provides the president a rare opportunity to pull together so many of the loose threads of his presidency. This is the opportunity for the former law professor to be an educator-in-chief about the growing disparities between those who derived incomes from wealth and those who derive them from work. It is an  opportunity to prove that he can stare down and unmask the rump Republican national minority that pretends its House majority represents the public will. It is a chance to prove that Washington’s rigged game need not always result in the spoils of political victory going automatically, or at least disproportionately, to the economically spoiled. This is, in short, a moment  for the president to demonstrate the resolve that earned his hopeful believers’ support three years ago, and it comes as he begins asking the electorate for another four-year lease on the Oval Office.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/opportunity_knocks_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/opportunity_knocks_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s hopes go to Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mitts_hopes_go_to_florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mitts_hopes_go_to_florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10468561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Des Moines. To win the nomination, Romney needs senior voters in Dade County to blunt Gingrich's surge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Iowa caucuses less than three weeks away, the narrowed Republican presidential contest between Romney, Newt Gingrich, and the surging Ron Paul remains a muddle.  To lower expectations for his own performance and raise scrutiny on Gingrich, Romney this week began <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=AAE93A9C-4EEB-4BDD-AD90-B57F2C22F508">referring to the former speaker as the frontrunner</a>.</p><p>National and state polls suggest Gingrich is now in the driver’s seat for the nomination, and as <em>Talking Points Memo’s</em> Eric Kleefeld <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/mapping-out-the-primary-calendar-why-mitt-romney-is-in-trouble.php?ref=fpa">argues</a>, the primary calendar in January favors Gingrich. Accordingly, some are already <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/192043-romney-is-the-clinton-of-2012-but-that-could-work-this-time">comparing Romney</a> to Hillary Clinton in 2008—the inevitable candidate whose candidacy became, in campaign lingo, "evitable."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mitts_hopes_go_to_florida/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/mitts_hopes_go_to_florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The genius of my uncluttered home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/joy_of_living_minimally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/joy_of_living_minimally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/09/21/joy_of_living_minimally</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don't practice Feng Shui, or have OCD. But after years of relocating, I finally learned the joy of minimal living]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are gluttonous voyeurs: We prefer to witness excess, either in sex, violence, Kardashian-level celebrity drama or just plain clutter. So I don't kid myself to think A&amp;E or any other network will soon announce a new reality series, to balance out the network's popular show "<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/heather_havrilesky/2010/04/10/am_i_a_hoarder">Hoarders</a>," featuring people who live spare, minimalist lifestyles.</p><p>I am one. I live in a 700-square-foot condo in downtown Washington, DC. Divorced and childless, it's plenty of space for me. In fact, I have extra room in my closets, drawers, cabinets and cupboards for more stuff, were I inclined to start compiling and aggregating.</p><p>But that's the point: I don't want more stuff. I'm no Zen Buddhist, I don't practice Feng Shui, I have no plans to uproot and join the small house movement, nor do I suffer from obsessive compulsive disorder. I wasn't forced to scale down to a smaller residence because of a mortgage default, nor did I hawk all my possessions in service to a meth habit. It's just that in life, like at the airport, I like to travel light. One carry-on is fine by me, thankyouverymuch.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/joy_of_living_minimally/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/joy_of_living_minimally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Republicans should run in 2012 &#8212; to lose</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/13/schaller_2012_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/13/schaller_2012_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/13/schaller_2012_gop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some ambitious Republicans, President Obama's improving reelection prospects may not be bad news]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ides of March are almost upon us, but few potential 2012 Republican presidential candidates seem to have their eyes fixed squarely on the White House. As Salon's Steve Kornacki <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/03/01/obama_2012_comeback">argued recently</a>, the most obvious reason for the largely vacant GOP field -- sorry, Herman Cain -- is that the prospects of a Republican beating a once-again formidable Barack Obama seem rather bleak. The 2012 Republican nomination may be a prize not worth winning.</p><p>Because the nomination isn't worth winning, however, doesn't mean it is ill-advised for Republican hopefuls to run in 2012. In fact, if three historical patterns tell us anything, the smart play for any Republican who hopes someday to sit behind the desk in the Oval Office is to run in 2012 -- but to <em>lose</em> the nomination.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/13/schaller_2012_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/13/schaller_2012_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will the Democrats fare in the 2010 elections?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/salon_roundtable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/salon_roundtable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/01/12/salon_roundtable</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A round table of experts predicts the pitfalls and bright spots for the majority party in the midterms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Schaller:</strong> Welcome to Salon Conversations.</p><p>In the wake of the back-to-back-to-back announced retirements of Sens. Byron Dorgan and Chris Dodd, and Gov. Bill Ritter of Colorado -- all Democrats -- we've asked some of the country's top electoral analysts to talk about what the political environment looks like 10 months out from the 2010 midterms.</p><p><a href="http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com/2005/09/nathan-gonzales-bio.html">Nathan Gonzalez</a> is political editor of the Rothenberg Political Report and a contributing writer for Roll Call. <a href="http://www.leadingauthorities.com/24264/Walter_Amy.htm">Amy Walter</a> is with us; she's the editor in chief of the Hotline, Washington's premier daily briefing on American politics, and she writes her "On the Trail" column for the National Journal. And <a href="http://www.centerforpolitics.org/staff_isaac.html">Isaac Wood</a> is associate communications director for University of Virginia Center for American Politics, where he specializes in U.S. House race analysis. Thanks all for being here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/salon_roundtable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/salon_roundtable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNC pounces on GOP senators</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/19/dnc_pounces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/19/dnc_pounces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/dnc_pounces</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dems take less than 24 hours to use vote against military funding to pound GOP senators]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/18/first-on-the-ticker-dnc-ad-gop-playing-politics-with-our-troops/">that</a> didn't take long.</p><p>This morning I wondered how long it would take the Democrats to use the Senate Republicans' blockage of troop funding as a way to stall healthcare reform. Not even a full day.</p><p>It's not great, but it's simple and does what it's supposed to do. Here's the new ad already running on the cable nets calling Mitch McConnell and pals to the carpet:&#160;</p><p>
    <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UhlvR0ZPVLQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UhlvR0ZPVLQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/19/dnc_pounces/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/19/dnc_pounces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt merry-go-round</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/merry_goround/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/merry_goround/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/merry_goround</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fannie, Freddie, AIG and GMAC coming around again for more of our tax dollars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's hoping the Americans like going around in circles when it comes to our national debt. Because the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/business/17wards.html">article</a> today by Mary Williams Walsh about the situation at Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG and GMAC promises a carnival ride from hell for the U.S. taxpayer.</p><p>Describing them as institutions "in need of continuing infusions that make them look increasingly like long-term wards of the state," Williams Walsh essentially reports that the institutions will be needing to borrow future monies to pay off their existing obligations to the government:</p><blockquote>
<p>Like the big banks, these four companies would no doubt prefer to be free of government assistance, which comes with pay and other restrictions on their executives. But they appear at risk of getting onto a debt merry-go-round, where they have to draw new money from the government just to keep up with their existing government debts.</p>
<p>Fannie Mae recently warned, for example, that it could not pay the dividends it owes the Treasury, so &#8220;future dividend payments will be effectively funded with equity drawn from the Treasury.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/merry_goround/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/merry_goround/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Move south, be happy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/move_south/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/move_south/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/move_south</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warmer climes, bigger smiles, according to new study]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warmer climates make people happier, at least according to a <a href="http://www.livescience.com/culture/091217-happy-state-measures.html">new study</a> of American happiness discussed by LiveScience.com.</p><p>Of the top 10 happiest states, all but two -- Montana and Maine -- are in the Sun Belt. The top 10, in order, are: Louisiana, Hawaii, Florida, Tennessee, Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, South Carolina, Alabama and Maine.</p><p>Ah,&#160; but as LiveScience notes, these results contradict <a href="http://www.livescience.com/culture/091110-happy-states.html">another recent study</a> that suggests that wealthier, better educated and more tolerant states are home to the happiest Americans. The top 10 states in that study are:&#160; Utah, Hawaii, Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, Maryland, Washington, Massachusetts, California and Arizona.</p><p>That makes Hawaii and Arizona the only two states to make the top 10 in both.</p><p>Smart, tolerant, wealthy and tanned. Not a bad combination. Aloha!</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/move_south/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/move_south/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being anti-life in defense of pro-life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/anti_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/anti_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Nelson, D-Neb.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/anti_life</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nelson affirms the old saw about caring about the beginning and end of life -- but little in between]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sure you're familiar with the critique of&#160; the so-called "pro-life" movement as a group of people interested in protecting life at conception and on the death bed but caring little for what happens during the long stretch of life in between. Well, this morning Matt Yglesias <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/12/the-abortion-holdout.php">reminded us</a> that Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson's resistance to the healthcare reform's abortion provisions epitomizes this hypocrisy.</p><p>Yglesias' words are best left unaltered:</p><blockquote>
<p>Providing prenatal services to pregnant women is a pro-life gesture by any stretch of the imagination. As is providing health insurance to young children. As we saw the other day, uninsured children are over three times more likely to die from their trauma-related injuries than are commercially insured children, even after adjustment for other factors such as age, gender, race, injury severity and injury type.</p>
<p>But Nelson won&#8217;t let those lives be saved unless the bill is modified in an insulting and discriminatory way. And part of the insanity of it is that the actual impact on the number of abortions in America is going to be tiny. Middle-class women will be able to pay for abortions out of pocket, and the &#8220;Hyde Amendment&#8221; status quo already screws poor women. But it&#8217;s a nice symbolic dig at pro-choice America, and a further means of stigmatizing reproductive health services as somehow not real health care. And Nelson, Bart Stupack, and various bishops love the idea of holding the whole package hostage to this point, since I guess the dead kids with trauma injuries will go to heaven <em>anyway</em> or something.</p>
</blockquote><p>Nice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/anti_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/anti_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Dog vulnerability in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/blue_doggy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/blue_doggy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/blue_doggy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crystal Ball's Isaac Woods looks at how many, and which, Blue Dogs might be in trouble next year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though attention this week is squarely on dissenters and holdouts on the Senate side, Isaac Wood of UVa's Crystal Ball has a <a href="http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/article.php?id=ITW2009121701">nice, detailed post</a> about the status of House Blue Dog Democrats, how they voted on healthcare bill, and in general who among these 52 Blue Doggies may be vulnerable next November.</p><p>Short summary: Wood and the Crystal Ball rate 21, or fewer than half the 52, as safe incumbents running for re-election. In the other 31 cases there is a mix of members retiring (3), running for other office (1), plus 27 who are running for re-election in districts where the underlying demographics have Republicans licking their chops. "In fact, over a third of Blue Dogs hail from districts Obama won last November," writes Wood. 'While the coalition is often portrayed as a group of Southern congressmen who must vote conservatively or risk losing reelection, nineteen members represent districts Obama carried, with seven representing districts in which Obama won over 60 percent of the vote."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/blue_doggy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/blue_doggy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do Republicans hate our troops?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/hating_troops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/hating_troops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/hating_troops</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If shoe were on other foot, you know GOPers would be asking the same of Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/17/AR2009121703585.html?hpid=topnews">This Washington Post story</a> is, for lack of a better word, stupefying. Seriously, it may be best for you to sit down before reading the opening paragraph and the four graphs later in the piece I've excerpted here:</p><blockquote>
<p>Senate Republicans said Thursday that they would try to filibuster a massive Pentagon bill that funds the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, an unusual move <em><strong>that several acknowledged</strong></em> was an effort to delay President Obama's health-care legislation....</p>
<p>"I don't want health care," Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kansas) said in explaining his support of a filibuster. He is a member of the Appropriations Committee, which crafted the Pentagon funding bill.</p>
<p>Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Richard C. Shelby (Ala.) and Christopher "Kit" Bond (Mo.) admitted they support the spending bill but acknowledged they were considering opposing it because of the health-care debate.</p>
<p>Democrats were furious. They believed they had a deal with Sen. Thad Cochran (Miss.), the top Republican on the Appropriations Committee, to support the bill, but by Thursday night Cochran was saying he was unsure how he would vote.</p>
<p>"They are prepared to jeopardize funding for troops at war," Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) said Thursday evening. "If Democrats did that, there would be cries of treason."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/hating_troops/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/hating_troops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MoveOn raises $1M from Lieberman ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/moveon_ad_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/moveon_ad_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveOn.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/18/moveon_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lieberbulwark may shut down policy progress, but he opens wallets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MoveOn claims to already <a href="https://pol.moveon.org/donate/lieberman.html">have raised $1 million</a> on the backs of this very creative and frankly hysterical "Lieberman Socks" ad:&#160;</p><p>
    <object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8vS6kIbJu64&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8vS6kIbJu64&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>
  </p><p>I want a pony! Good stuff....</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/moveon_ad_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/18/moveon_ad_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woman charged in murder of pregnant friend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/baby_kidnapper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/baby_kidnapper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/17/baby_kidnapper</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charges filed in bizarre, sad case of woman who killed pregnant friend and cut out her fetus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an update to a bizarre and tragic story you may remember having read about earlier this year, and which left an impression on me I'd rather it didn't. Julie Corey, the woman who in July allegedly killed her eight-months pregnant friend and then cut the live fetus from her womb and kidnapped it, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8419682.stm">has been formally charged with murder</a>.</p><p>After allegedly killing Darlene Haynes by some combination of blunt head trauma and strangulation, Corey <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-14795-Page-One-Examiner~y2009m7d30-Darlene-Haynes-murder-Julie-Corey-held-and-baby-safe-and-well">showed up at a homeless shelter</a> in New Hampshire claiming to be the excised baby's mother. Corey had apparently been telling friends <em>she</em> was pregnant, but wasn't. It took a few days before authorities finally found Haynes' body in her apartment.</p><p>Haynes already <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2009/07/31/2009-07-31_julie_corey_found_with_baby_cut_from_womb_of_murder_victim_darlien_haynes_claime.html">had three other children</a>, the eldest two of whom already were living with her mother. Her then-18-month-old and the abducted baby are in custody of Massachusetts childrens services.</p><p>It's just such a sad case all the way around--a woman dead, two kids orphaned, and an alleged killer who most likely suffers from some form of mental illness.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/baby_kidnapper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/baby_kidnapper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Dog backs reform bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/bigdog_speaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/bigdog_speaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/17/bigdog_speaks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton speaks up in favor of passing reform plan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise here. Former President Bill Clinton has weighed in on the healthcare reform legislation, and he's in the take-what-you-can-get camp:</p><blockquote>
<p>Our only responsible choice is the path of action. Does this bill read exactly how I would write it? No. Does it contain everything everyone wants? Of course not. But America can't afford to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.</p>
</blockquote><p>Full statement <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/fmr-president-clinton-weighs-in-on-health-care-and-calls-it-good-bill.php">over at TPM</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/bigdog_speaks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/bigdog_speaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No closure-cloture deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/closure_cloture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/closure_cloture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Nelson, D-Neb.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/17/closure_cloture</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NE senator and healthcare reform holdout denies he was threatened with base closure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nebraska Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson, who along with Senators Joe Lieberman (I, CT) and Olympia Snowe (R, ME), remain the key holdouts in the Senate healthcare reform showdown, told a home state radio station today that he was not threatened with a base closure in his home state if he didn't get on board with reform.</p><p>Nelson <a href="http://www.cyberears.com/index.php/Browse/playaudio/8132">told</a> KLIN/Lincoln radio hosts <a href="http://www.klin.com/">Jack Mitchell and John Bishop</a> that he knows who started the rumors and when it comes to light it will be "embarrassing for the other side of the aisle," presumably meaning a Republican senator or senators is behind it.</p><p>The bad news for Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Obama is that Nelson continues to have problems with the abortion provisions in the bill, and although overtures have been made toward him, he continues to hold firm in his resistance until the abortions provisions he disapproves are stripped away.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/closure_cloture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/closure_cloture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

