<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tom Engelhardt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tom_engelhardt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>National Intelligence Council: U.S. is a &#8220;global security provider&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Intelligence Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The center's new "Global Trends 2030" offers a predictably myopic view of America's future place in the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it as a simple formula: if you’ve been hired (and paid handsomely) to protect what is, you’re going to be congenitally ill-equipped to imagine what might be.  And yet the urge not just to know the contours of the future, but to plant the Stars and Stripes in that future has had the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) in its grip since the mid-1990s.  That was the moment when it first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">occurred</a> to some in Washington that U.S. power might be capable of controlling just about everything worth the bother globally for, if not an eternity, then long enough to make the future American property.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Intelligence emerges from the shadows</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guatemala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's covert wars continue, but on a far grander scale than we ever could have imagined a generation ago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren’t those the greatest of days if you were in the American spy game?  Governments went down in Guatemala and Iran thanks to you.  In distant Indonesia, Laos, and Vietnam, what a role you played!  And even that botch-up of an invasion in Cuba was nothing to sneeze at.  In those days, unfortunately, you -- particularly those of you in the CIA -- didn’t get the credit you deserved.</p><p>You had to live privately with your successes.  Sometimes, as with the Bay of Pigs, the failures came back to haunt you (so, in the <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175267/stephan_kinzer_BP_in_the_Gulf" target="_blank">case of Iran</a>, would your “success,” though so many years later), but you couldn’t with pride talk publicly about what you, in your secret world, had done, or see instant movies and TV shows about your triumphs.  You couldn’t launch a “covert” air war that was reported on, generally positively, almost every week, or bask in the pleasure of having your director <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/05/cia-chief-drones-only-game-in-town-for-stopping-al-qaeda/" target="_blank">claim</a> publicly that it was “the only game in town.”  You couldn’t, that is, come out of what were then called “the shadows,” and soak up the glow of attention, be hailed as a hero, join Americans in watching some (fantasy) version of your efforts weekly on television, or get the credit for anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/u_s_intelligence_emerges_from_the_shadows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Barack: Stop terrorizing the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An open letter to the president to end his lethal -- and ever-expanding -- drone wars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama<br /> The White House<br /> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW<br /> Washington, D.C. 20500</p><p>Dear President Obama,</p><p>Nothing you don’t know, but let me just say it: the world’s a weird place. In my younger years, I might have said “crazy,” but that was back when I thought being crazy was a cool thing and only regretted I wasn’t.</p><p>I mean, do you ever think about how you ended up where you are? And I'm not actually talking about the Oval Office, though <em>that’s</em> undoubtedly a weird enough story in its own right.</p><p>After all, you were a community organizer and a constitutional law professor and now, if you stop to think about it, here’s where you’ve ended up: you’re using robots to <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175551/engelhardt_assassin-in-chief" target="_blank">assassinate</a> people you personally pick as targets.  You’ve overseen and escalated off-the-books robot air wars in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/29/americas-drone-campaign-terror" target="_blank">Pakistan</a>, <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/08/somalia-drones/all/" target="_blank">Somalia</a>, and <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/09/yemen-drone-war/" target="_blank">Yemen</a>, and are evidently considering <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-secret-meetings-examine-al-qaeda-threat-in-north-africa/2012/10/01/f485b9d2-0bdc-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html" target="_blank">expanding them</a> to Mali and maybe even <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/ondeadline/2012/10/15/libya-drones-special-forces-al-qaeda/1635181/" target="_blank">Libya</a>.  You’ve employed what will someday be defined as a weapon of mass destruction, launching history’s first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175607/karen_greenberg_a_digital_9.11" target="_blank">genuine cyberwar</a> against a country that isn’t threatening to attack us.  You’ve agreed to the surveillance of <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175524/engelhardt_datamining_you" target="_blank">more Americans</a> every which way from Sunday than have ever been listened in on or (given emailing, texting, and tweeting) read.  You came into office proclaiming a “<a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/index.htm" target="_blank">sunshine</a>” policy and yet your administration has classified more documents (<a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175570/engelhardt_that_makes_no_sense" target="_blank">92,064,862</a> in 2011) than any other in our history.  Despite <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/president-obama-signs-law-upgrading-whistleblower-protections" target="_blank">signing</a> a Whistleblower Enhancement Protection Act, you’ve <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175500/peter_van_buren_fear_the_silence" target="_blank">used</a> the Espionage Act on more government whistleblowers and leakers than all previous administrations combined, and yet your officials continue to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html" target="_blank">leak</a> secret material they see as advantageous to the White House without fear of prosecution.  Though you <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175057/ira_chernus_gwot_rip" target="_blank">deep-sixed</a> the Bush administration name for it -- “the Global War on Terror” (ridding the world of GWOT, one of the worst acronyms ever) -- you’ve accepted the idea that we are “at war” with terror and on a “global battlefield” which (see above) you’re actually expanding.  You’re <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/some-guantanamo-bay-detainees-names-disclosed/2012/09/21/e3611e76-0434-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_story.html" target="_blank">still keeping</a> uncharged, untried prisoners of not-quite-war in an offshore military prison camp of injustice that, on the day you came into office, you <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/203727-obama-promise-to-close-prison-at-guantanamo-still-unfulfilled" target="_blank">promised</a> to close within a year.  You’re overseeing planning that, according to recent reports, will continue the Afghan War in some form until at least <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/world/asia/us-planning-a-force-to-stay-in-afghanistan.html" target="_blank">2017</a> or possibly <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2012/11/29/panetta-us-will-battle-al-qaeda-in-afghanistan-for-years-to-come/" target="_blank">well beyond</a>.  You preside over an administration that has encouraged the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-blurring-of-cia-and-military/2011/05/31/AGsLhkGH_story.html" target="_blank">further militarization</a> of the CIA (to which you <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/petraeus_13/" target="_blank">appointed</a> as director not a civilian but a four-star general you assumedly wanted to tuck safely away during campaign season).  You’ve overseen the further <a href="http://wemeantwell.com/blog/2012/08/13/the-militarization-of-the-state-department/" target="_blank">militarization</a> of the State Department; you’ve encouraged a <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175426/nick_turse_a_secret_war_in_120_countries" target="_blank">major expansion</a> of the <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175547/andrew_bacevich_the_golden_age_of_special_operations" target="_blank">special operations forces</a> and its secret presidential army, the Joint Special Operations Command, cocooned inside the U.S. military/  You’ve overseen the further post-9/11 expansion of an already <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175545/" target="_blank">staggering</a> national security budget and the further growth of our labyrinthine “Intelligence Community” -- and though who remembers anymore, you even won what must have been the first <em>prospective</em> Nobel Prize for Peace more or less before you did a damn thing, and then thanked the Nobel Committee with a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/barack-obamas-oslo-speech_b_389791.html" target="_blank">full-throated defense</a> of the right of the U.S. to do what it pleased, militarily, on the planet! And if that isn’t a weird legacy-in-formation, what is?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petraeus: American decline writ small</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former general was once billed as the man who could save Iraq. Maybe that's why his downfall feels so symbolic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History, it is said, arrives first as tragedy, then as farce.  First as Karl Marx, then as the Marx Brothers.  In the case of twenty-first century America, history arrived first as George W. Bush (and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith and the Project for a New America -- a shadow government <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">masquerading</a> as a think tank -- and an assorted crew of ambitious neocons and neo-pundits); only later did David Petraeus make it onto the scene.</p><p>It couldn’t be clearer now that, from the <a href="http://cdn.ph.upi.com/sv/i/para/upi/UPI-6291353014900/2012/3/13530173326368/Shirtless-FBI-agent-unmasked-PHOTO.jpg" target="_blank">shirtless FBI agent</a> to the “<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/broadwells-bio-says-embedded-with-petraeus/2012/11/12/7a0c8a8c-2cd9-11e2-a99d-5c4203af7b7a_blog.html" target="_blank">embedded</a>”<strong> </strong>biographer and the <a href="http://www.starztrax.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/nypost1.jpg" target="_blank">“other other woman,”</a> the “fall” of David Petraeus is playing out as farce of the first order.  What’s less obvious is that Petraeus, America’s military golden boy and <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174924/engelhardt_falling_upwards" target="_blank">Caesar of celebrity</a>, was always smoke and mirrors, always the farce, even if the denizens of Washington didn’t know it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/petraeus_american_decline_writ_small/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four more years &#8212; of gridlock!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six billion dollars of campaign spending later, America is right back where it started]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 1948, Harry Truman barnstormed the country by train, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1948#General_election" target="_blank">repeatedly bashing</a> a “do-nothing Congress,” and so snatched victory from the jaws of <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HemMnHs7SCg/TNNNmocp1cI/AAAAAAAAAmc/kMSFG2loNtQ/s320/dewey-truman-1948.jpg" target="_blank">defeat</a> in that year’s presidential campaign.  This year, neither presidential candidate focused on blasting a do-nothing Congress or, in Obama’s case, “Republican obstructionism,” demanding that the voters give them a legislative body that would mean an actual mandate for change.</p><p>We now know the results of such a campaign and, after all the tumult and the nation’s first <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/10/2012-election-spending-will-reach-6.html" target="_blank">$6 billion election</a>, they couldn’t be more familiar.  Only days later, you can watch a remarkably recognizable cast of characters from the reelected president and Speaker of the House John Boehner to the massed pundits of the mainstream media picking up the pages of a well-thumbed script.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/four_more_years_of_gridlock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s supersized elections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/americas_supersized_elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/americas_supersized_elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate cycle has mercifully come to a close, but campaign big business is here to stay -- democracy be damned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obesity is an American plague -- and no, I’m not talking about overweight Americans.  I’m talking about our overweight, supersized presidential campaign.  I’m talking about Big Election, the thing that’s moved into our homes and, especially if you live in a “swing state,” is now hogging your television almost 24/7.</p><p>There’s a wonderful old American postcard tradition of gigantism, a mixture of (and gentle mocking of) a national, but especially Western, urge toward bravado, braggadocio, and pride when it comes to this country.  The imagery on those cards once ranged from <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-q_fE0xMZzvA/T0m-F37uo_I/AAAAAAAAFwM/1UCjQhE62lE/s1600/giant+oranges.jpg" target="_blank">giant navel oranges</a> on railroad flatcars to saddled <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/37257689@N00/3700819783/" target="_blank">jackalopes</a> (rabbits with antlers) mounted by cowboy riders on the range.  Think of the 2012 election season as just such a postcard -- without the charm.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/americas_supersized_elections/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/americas_supersized_elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humbled giant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/humbled_giant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/humbled_giant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jihad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fall of the Soviet Union left the U.S. the last military superpower. Where did it all go so wrong?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans lived in a “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/155849586X/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20" target="_blank">victory culture</a>” for much of the twentieth century. You could say that we experienced an almost 75-year stretch of triumphalism -- think of it as the real “American Century” -- from World War I to the end of the Cold War, with time off for a destructive stalemate in Korea and a defeat in Vietnam too shocking to absorb or shake off.</p><p>When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, it all seemed so obvious. Fate had clearly dealt Washington a royal flush. It was victory with a capital V. The United States was, after all, the last standing superpower, after centuries of unceasing great power rivalries on the planet. It had a military beyond compare and no enemy, hardly a “rogue state,” on the horizon. It was almost unnerving, such clear sailing into a dominant future, but a moment for the ages nonetheless. Within a decade, pundits in Washington were <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2001/03/05/doctrine.html" target="_blank">hailing us</a> as “the dominant power in the world, more dominant than any since Rome.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/humbled_giant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/humbled_giant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s true challenge: Foreign policy, not Mitt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/obamas_true_challenge_foreign_policy_not_mitt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/obamas_true_challenge_foreign_policy_not_mitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13020174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the president make it to the election without a catastrophic October surprise?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this is my version of an election piece, I plan to get the usual stuff out of the way fast.</p><p>So yes, the smartest political <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/sept-20-obamas-convention-bounce-may-not-be-receding/" target="_blank">odds-givers</a> around <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/09/20/is-the-2012-election-tilting-toward-democrats/?hpid=z1" target="_blank">believe</a> President Obama has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/us/politics/romney-faces-an-uphill-fight-to-win-at-polls.html" target="_blank">distinct edge</a>over Mitt Romney coming out of the conventions, the Senate is <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/senate-forecast-what-has-gone-wrong-for-g-o-p-candidates/" target="_blank">trending</a> Democratic, and who knows about the House.  In fact, it almost seems as if the Republicans put forward the only man in America incapable of defeating an economically wounded and deeply vulnerable president (other than, of course, the roster of candidates he ran against for the nomination).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/obamas_true_challenge_foreign_policy_not_mitt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/obamas_true_challenge_foreign_policy_not_mitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s war monopoly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/americas_war_monopoly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/americas_war_monopoly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13010216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US is involved in military operations in countries you'd never expect. Further proof that war's what we do best]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s pop-quiz time when it comes to the American way of war: three questions, torn from the latest news, just for you.  Here’s the first of them, and good luck!</p><p><em>Two weeks ago, 200 U.S. Marines began armed operations in…?</em>:</p><blockquote><p><strong>a) </strong><em>Afghanistan</em><br /> <strong>b) </strong><em>Pakistan</em><br /> <strong>c) </strong><em>Iran</em><br /> <strong>d) </strong><em>Somalia</em><br /> <strong>e) </strong><em>Yemen</em><br /> <strong>f) </strong><em>Central Africa</em><br /> <strong>g)</strong> <em>Northern Mali</em><br /> <strong>h) </strong><em>The Philippines</em><br /> <strong>i) </strong><em>Guatemala</em></p></blockquote><p>If you opted for any answer, “a” through “h,” you took a reasonable shot at it.  After all, there’s an <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175587/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_losing_it_in_washington/" target="_blank">ongoing American war</a> in Afghanistan and somewhere in the southern part of that country, 200 armed U.S. Marines could well have been involved in an operation.  In Pakistan, an undeclared, CIA-run air war has long been underway, and in the past there have been <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/09/us-special-oper/" target="_blank">armed border crossings</a> by U.S. special operations forces as well as U.S. piloted <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/world/asia/pakistan-says-nato-helicopters-kill-dozens-of-soldiers.html" target="_blank">cross-border air strikes</a>, but no Marines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/americas_war_monopoly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/americas_war_monopoly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Losing in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/losing_in_afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/losing_in_afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12993529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. plans to withdraw troops by the end of 2014, but it's likely to occupy the country for years to come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of several deaths among its contingent of troops in a previously peaceful province in Afghanistan, New Zealand (like <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-10/france-to-begin-afghan-pullout-next-month/4062482" target="_blank">France</a> and <a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2012/08/205_114963.html" target="_blank">South Korea</a>) is now <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/nz-afghan-withdrawal-set-for-april-20120820-24hy6.html" target="_blank">expediting</a> the departure of its 140 soldiers.  That’s not exactly headline-making news here in the U.S.  If you’re an American, you probably didn’t even know that New Zealand was playing a small part in our Afghan War.  In fact, you may hardly have known about the part Americans are playing in a war that, over the last decade-plus, has <a href="http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-17/nation/33233481_1_bloodiest-month-helmand-province-afghan-security-forces" target="_blank">repeatedly</a> been labeled “<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/americans-tune-afghan-war-fighting-rages-185225577.html" target="_blank">the forgotten war</a>.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/losing_in_afghanistan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/losing_in_afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghanistan&#8217;s escalating violence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/01/afghanistans_escalating_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/01/afghanistans_escalating_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12970361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American mission in Afghanistan failed years ago. We've just refused to notice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine for a moment that almost once a week for the last six months somebody somewhere in this country had burst, well-armed, into a movie theater showing a superhero film and fired into the audience. That would get your attention, wouldn’t it? James Holmes times 21?  It would dominate the news.  We would certainly be consulting experts, trying to make sense of the pattern, groping for explanations. And what if the same thing had also happened almost once every two weeks in 2011? Imagine the shock, imagine the reaction here.</p><p>Well, the equivalent <em>has </em>happened in Afghanistan (minus, of course, the superhero movies).  It even has a name: green-on-blue violence. In 2012 -- and twice last week -- Afghan soldiers, policemen, or security guards, largely in units being trained or mentored by the U.S. or its NATO allies, have turned their guns on those mentors, the people who are funding, supporting, and teaching them, and pulled the trigger.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/01/afghanistans_escalating_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/01/afghanistans_escalating_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The outrageous economics of maintaining classified information</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/that_makes_no_sense_your_security%e2%80%99s_a_joke_and_you%e2%80%99re_the_butt_of_it_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/that_makes_no_sense_your_security%e2%80%99s_a_joke_and_you%e2%80%99re_the_butt_of_it_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12960721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And lack of transparency probably doesn't make you any safer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my daughter was little and I read to her regularly, one <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/158717183X/?tag=saloncom08-20" target="_blank">illustrated book</a> was a favorite of ours. In a series of scenes, it described frustrating incidents in the life of a young girl, each ending with the line -- which my tiny daughter would boom out with remarkable force -- “That makes me mad!” It was the book’s title and a repetitively cathartic moment in our reading lives. And it came to mind recently as, in my daily reading, I stumbled across repetitively mind-boggling numbers from the everyday life of our "National Security Complex."</p><p>For our present national security moment, however, I might amend the book’s punch line slightly to: <em>That makes no sense!</em></p><p>Now, think of something you learned about the Complex that fried your brain, try the line yourself... and we’ll get started.</p><p>Are you, for instance, worried about the safety of America’s “secrets”?  Then you should breathe a sigh of relief and consider <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/us/politics/cost-to-protect-us-secrets-doubles-in-decade-to-11-billion.html" target="_blank">this headline</a> from a recent article on the inside pages of my hometown paper: “Cost to Protect U.S. Secrets Doubles to Over $11 Billion.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/that_makes_no_sense_your_security%e2%80%99s_a_joke_and_you%e2%80%99re_the_butt_of_it_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/that_makes_no_sense_your_security%e2%80%99s_a_joke_and_you%e2%80%99re_the_butt_of_it_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington&#8217;s default military solution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/05/washingtons_default_military_solution_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/05/washingtons_default_military_solution_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12951045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Washington can't learn from the failure of the Military option]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans may feel more distant from war than at any time since World War II began.  Certainly, a smaller percentage of us -- <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/25/us/civilian-military-gap-grows-as-fewer-americans-serve.html">less than 1%</a> -- serves in the military in this all-volunteer era of ours and, on the face of it, Washington’s constant warring in distant lands seems barely to touch the lives of most Americans.</p><p>And yet the militarization of the United States and the strengthening of the National Security Complex continues to accelerate.  The Pentagon is, by now, a world unto itself, with a staggering budget at a moment when no other power or combination of powers <a href="http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/resultoutput/trends">comes</a><strong> </strong>near to<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-need-more-than-rhetoric-on-defense/2012/02/07/gIQA5SF1zQ_story.html">challenging</a> this country’s might.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/05/washingtons_default_military_solution_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/05/washingtons_default_military_solution_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Class of 2012, life isn&#8217;t easy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/dear_class_of_2012_life_isnt_easy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/dear_class_of_2012_life_isnt_easy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12945717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A speech to graduates beginning a life on our overheated planet ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class of 2012, greetings! It’s a deceptively glorious day, even under this tent in the broiling heat of an August-style afternoon in mid-June on this northeastern campus.  Another local temperature record is being set: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2012/06/20/records-hold-on-but-high-temperatures-do-too/">98</a> degrees.  And yes, let’s admit it, the heat, the sun, the clearness of the azure blue sky stretching without a cloud to the horizon, the sense of summer descending with a passion, it’s not quite as reassuring as it might once have been, is it?  I suspect that few of you, readying yourselves to leave this campus, many mortgaged to your eyeballs (some for life no matter what you do), and heading into a country on edge, imagine personal clear skies to the horizon.</p><p>And while we’re admitting things, let’s admit something else about the heat today, as you bake under your graduation gowns: whether or not you have the figures at your fingertips, whether or not you know the details, who doesn’t sense that this planet is on edge, too?  I mean, here you are, the class of 2012, and like the classes of 2011, 2010, and so on, you are surely going to spend your first months out of college enduring one of history's <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2011-temps.html">top ten</a> heat years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/dear_class_of_2012_life_isnt_easy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/dear_class_of_2012_life_isnt_easy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It couldn’t happen here, it does happen there</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/it_couldn%e2%80%99t_happen_here_it_does_happen_there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/it_couldn%e2%80%99t_happen_here_it_does_happen_there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12941147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The value of American -- and Afghan -- lives ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Do you do this in the United States? There is police action every day in the United States... They don't call in airplanes to bomb the place." -- <em>Afghan President Hamid Karzai denouncing</em><a href="http://www.bradenton.com/2012/06/12/4074260/afghan-leader-no-airstrikes-on.html" target="_blank"><em>U.S. air strikes</em></a><em> on homes in his country, June 12, 2012</em></p><p>It was almost closing time when the siege began at a small Wells Fargo Bank branch in a suburb of San Diego, and it was a nightmare.  The three gunmen entered with the intent to rob, but as they herded the 18 customers and bank employees toward a back room, they were spotted by a pedestrian outside who promptly called 911.  Within minutes, police cars were pulling up, the bank was surrounded, and back-up was being called in from neighboring communities.  The gunmen promptly barricaded themselves inside with their hostages, including women and small children, and refused to let anyone leave.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/it_couldn%e2%80%99t_happen_here_it_does_happen_there/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/it_couldn%e2%80%99t_happen_here_it_does_happen_there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electing an assassin-in-chief</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/05/electing_an_assassin_in_chief_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/05/electing_an_assassin_in_chief_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12932959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don\'t expect America\'s drone policy to change any time soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be assured of one thing: whichever candidate you choose at the polls in November, you aren’t just electing a president of the United States; you are also electing an assassin-in-chief. The last two presidents may not have been emperors or kings, but they -- and the vast national-security structure that continues to be built-up and institutionalized around the presidential self -- are certainly one of the nightmares the founding fathers of this country warned us against. They are one of the reasons those founders put significant war powers in the hands of Congress, which they knew would be a slow, recalcitrant, deliberative body.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/05/electing_an_assassin_in_chief_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/05/electing_an_assassin_in_chief_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorial Day&#8217;s lessons in amnesia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_days_lessons_in_amnesia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_days_lessons_in_amnesia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If nothing else, the holiday allows us to reflect on our commitment to forgetting bloody conflicts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s the saddest reading around: the little announcements that dribble out of the Pentagon every day or two -- those terse, relatively uninformative death notices: rank; name; age; small town, suburb, or second-level city of origin; means of death (“small arms fire,” “improvised explosive device,” “the result of gunshot wounds inflicted by an individual wearing an Afghan National Army uniform,” or sometimes something vaguer like “while conducting combat operations,” “supporting Operation Enduring Freedom,” or simply no explanation at all); and the unit the dead soldier belonged to.  They are seldom 100 words, even with the usual opening line: “The Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.” Sometimes they include more than one death.</p><p>They are essentially bureaucratic notices designed to draw little attention to themselves.  Yet cumulatively, in their hundreds over the last decade, they represent a grim archive of America’s still ongoing, already largely forgotten <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">second Afghan War</a>, and I’ve read them obsessively for years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_days_lessons_in_amnesia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_days_lessons_in_amnesia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s drone exceptionalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/americas_drone_exceptionalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/americas_drone_exceptionalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Always the world leader, our country has pioneered terrifyingly expansive new rules for drone warfare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the essence of it: you can trust America’s <em>crème de la crème</em>, the most elevated, responsible people, no matter what weapons, what powers, you put in their hands.  No need to constantly look over <em>their</em> shoulders.</p><p>Placed in the hands of evildoers, those weapons and powers could create a living nightmare; controlled by the best of people, they lead to measured, thoughtful, precise decisions in which bad things are (with rare and understandable exceptions) done only to truly terrible types.  In the process, you simply couldn’t be better protected.</p><p>And in case you were wondering, there is no question who among us are the best, most lawful, moral, ethical, considerate, and judicious people: the officials of our national security state.  Trust them implicitly.  They will never give you a bum steer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/americas_drone_exceptionalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/americas_drone_exceptionalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghanistan syndrome</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/afghanistan_syndrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/afghanistan_syndrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12846061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's endless war has overtaken Vietnam in our collective consciousness as America's great military nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take off your hat. Taps is playing. Almost four decades late, the Vietnam War and its post-war spawn, the Vietnam Syndrome, are finally heading for their American grave.  It may qualify as the longest attempted burial in history.  Last words -- both eulogies and curses -- have been offered too many times to mention, and yet no American administration found the silver bullet that would put that war away for keeps.</p><p>Richard Nixon tried to get rid of it while it was still going on by “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnamization">Vietnamizing</a>” it.  Seven years after it ended, Ronald Reagan tried to praise it into the dustbin of history, hailing it as “<a href="http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/reference/8.18.80.html">a noble cause</a>.” Instead, it morphed from a defeat in the imperium into a “syndrome,” an <a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/2011/022811.html">unhealthy aversion</a> to war-making believed to afflict the American people to their core.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/afghanistan_syndrome/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/afghanistan_syndrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The final unraveling of Afghanistan?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_final_unraveling_of_afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_final_unraveling_of_afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12446841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The massive anti-Quran-burning protests may mark the beginning of the end of America's military misadventure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it all over but the (anti-American) shouting -- and the killing? Are the exits finally coming into view?</p><p>Sometimes, in a moment, the fog lifts, the clouds shift, and you can finally see the landscape ahead with startling clarity. In Afghanistan, Washington may be reaching that moment in a state of panic, horror and confusion. Even as an anxious U.S. commander <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/02/us-commander-pulls-back-advisers-from-afghan-ministries.html">withdrew</a> American and NATO advisors from Afghan ministries around Kabul last weekend -- approximately 300, military spokesman James Williams tells TomDispatch -- the ability of American soldiers to remain on giant fortified bases eating pizza and fried chicken into the distant future is not in doubt.</p><p>No set of Taliban guerrillas, suicide bombers or armed Afghan “allies” turning their guns on their American “brothers” can alter that -- not as long as Washington is ready to bring the necessary supplies into <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia-pacific/police-say-they-have-arrested-an-american-at-a-pakistani-airport-with-bullets-in-his-luggage/2012/02/14/gIQAtLZTCR_story.html">semi-blockaded Afghanistan</a> at <a href="http://www.military.com/news/article/costs-soar-for-new-war-supply-routes.html">staggering cost</a>. But sometimes that’s the least of the matter, not the essence of it. So if you’re in a mood to mark your calendars, late February 2012 may be the moment when the end game for America’s second Afghan War, launched in October 2001, was initially glimpsed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_final_unraveling_of_afghanistan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_final_unraveling_of_afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>