<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tom Jacobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tom_jacobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are millennials delusional?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that members of "Generation Me" are warped by a profound sense of entitlement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Young people coming of age over the past decade or so have been referred to as Millennials, or, in a nod to their individualistic nature, <a href="http://eubie.com/genme.pdf" target="_blank">Generation Me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/01/0146167213484586.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests they could also be called the generation with unrealistic expectations.</p><p>An analysis of the values and ambitions of American 12th graders finds “a growing discrepancy between the desire for material rewards and the willingness to do the work usually required to earn them.” Psychologists <a href="http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/people/jean-twenge/" target="_blank">Jean Twenge</a> of San Diego State University and <a href="http://www.knox.edu/academics/faculty/kasser-tim.html" target="_blank">Tim Kasser</a> of Knox College report that, for high school seniors in 2005, 2006, and 2007, materialism remained at historically high levels, even as commitment to hard work declined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>180</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do atheists secretly believe in God?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Finnish study suggests that non-believers become emotionally aroused when daring God to harm their loved ones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>The heads and hearts of atheists may not be on precisely the same page. That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508619.2013.771991" target="_blank">recently published research</a> from Finland, which finds avowed non-believers become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things.</p><p>“The results imply that atheists’ attitudes toward God are ambivalent, in that their explicit beliefs conflict with their affective response,” concludes a research team led by University of Helsinki psychologist <a href="http://www.psyko.helsinki.fi/psyko/Psykolog.nsf/Personnel/LindemanMarjaana?OpenDocument" target="_blank">Marjaana Lindeman</a>. Its study is published in the <em>International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.</em></p><p>Lindeman and her colleagues describe two small-scale experiments. The first featured 17 Finns, recruited online, who expressed high levels of belief, or disbelief, in God. They read out loud a series of statements while skin conductance data was collected via electrodes placed on two of their fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>213</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can yoga boost your immune system?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oslo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that practicing yoga produces internal changes on a genetic level]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> If we’re finished obsessing about <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/the-great-lululemon-panic-its-not-just-about-the-see-through-pants/274156/" target="_blank">yoga jeans</a>, perhaps it’s time to think about yoga and genes.</p><p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0061910" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> from Norway suggests that a comprehensive yoga program rapidly produces internal changes on a genetic level. The results help explain the <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193654/" target="_blank">well-documented health benefits</a> of this ancient practice.</p><p>“These data suggest that previously reported (therapeutic) effects of yoga practices have an integral physiological component at the molecular level, which is initiated immediately during practice,” writes a research team led by Fahri Saatcioglu of the University of Oslo. The team’s study is published in the online journal <em>PLOS ONE</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men may not understand women after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that men have trouble reading female facial expressions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /> Ladies: Do you often feel misunderstood by men? Do they fail to pick up on fairly obvious nonverbal signals, such as expressions of fear or disgust? <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060278" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests your perception is entirely valid — but it’s not his fault.</p><p>A study from Germany finds that men do a much better job of interpreting one vital set of signals — the emotions conveyed by the eyes — when they’re communicating with another man, compared to another woman.</p><p>“The finding that men are superior in recognizing emotions/mental states of other men, as compared to women, might be surprising,” a research team led by psychiatrist <a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Boris_Schiffer/" target="_blank">Boris Schiffer</a> reports in the journal PLOS ONE. They add, however, that it makes considerable sense in evolutionary terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Working together&#8221; won&#8217;t fix climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers say the best way to encourage activism is by emphasizing individual, rather than collective, action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to climate change, we’re all in this dilemma together, and forcefully addressing it will require collaboration and cooperation. A stirring sentiment, but if you’re looking to spur white Americans to action, <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/24/2/189.abstract" target="_blank">it’s actually counterproductive</a>.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the conclusion of a Stanford University research team, which found invoking the idea of interdependence undermined the motivation of European-American students to take a course in environmental sustainability.</p><p>The researchers, led by <a href="https://ccsre.stanford.edu/people-profiles/maryam-hamedani" target="_blank">MarYam Hamedani</a> of Stanford’s Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, argue that in mainstream European-American culture, independence functions as a “foundational schema” — that is, an underlying design or blueprint that guides behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Facebook is being used to spread racism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon Rauch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kimberley Schanz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequent users are likely susceptible to negative messages ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Facebook a particularly powerful medium to spread racist messages? That’s the disturbing implication of a <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563212003160" target="_blank">newly published study</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a><br /> “Frequent users are particularly disposed to be influenced by negative racial messages,” psychologists <a href="http://www.providence.edu/psychology/Pages/social-lab.aspx" target="_blank">Shannon Rauch</a> and <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kimberley-schanz/31/60b/357" target="_blank">Kimberley Schanz</a> write in the journal Computers in Human Behavior.</p><p>They argue these heavy users log onto the site in search of social inclusion rather than information — and as such, they’re prone to express agreement with the material they see without thinking about it too deeply. This combination of “a need to connect and an ethos of shallow processing” creates an atmosphere conducive to the spread of racist thoughts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does studying science make you a better person?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests that scientists are more likely to have a strong moral compass than those outside the field]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to be a better person? Spend more time thinking about science.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0057989" target="_blank">newly published research</a>, which finds people who study science — or who are even momentarily exposed to the idea of scientific research — are more likely to condemn unethical behavior and more inclined to help others.</p><p>“Thinking about science leads individuals to endorse more stringent moral norms,” report psychologists <a href="http://christinemakellams.com/cv/" target="_blank">Christine Ma-Kellams</a> of Harvard University and <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/blascovich/" target="_blank">Jim Blascovich</a> of the University of California, Santa Barbara. Their research is published in the online journal PLOS One.</p><p>The researchers describe four experiments, all conducted at UCSB, that back up their surprising conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Literature isn&#8217;t as &#8220;moody&#8221; as it used to be</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Bristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Acerbi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that contemporary English-language books use less emotionally charged words than ever before]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There’s a widespread perception that we’ve gotten more touchy-feely over the past couple of generations—increasingly willing to express our emotions.</p><p>If so, it’s not reflected in our writing.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0059030" target="_blank">new study</a> finds that, in a large dataset of English-language books, the use of terms expressing six basic emotions steadily decreased over the course of the 20th century. “We believe the changes (in word usage) do reflect changes in culture,” writes the research team, led by anthropologist <a href="http://acerbialberto.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Alberto Acerbi</a> of the University of Bristol.</p><p>Writing in the online journal <a href="http://www.plosone.org/home.action" target="_blank"><em>PLOS One</em></a>, they note that their findings mirror social conditions, with terms reflecting happy moods peaking in the 1920s and 1960s, and those suggesting sad moods reaching their apex in the war years of the 1940s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America has stopped worrying, loves the bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Strangelove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinatown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nagasaki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that more Americans support the use of nuclear warfare than originally thought]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Nuclear war is unthinkable. At least, that’s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/books/review/five-myths-about-nuclear-weapons-and-more.html" target="_blank">what we like to tell ourselves</a>. Given the mass death and devastation from an atomic strike, surely only a desperate despot would even consider such a strike.</p><div id="attachment_54073"> <p>Slim Pickens joyfully rides a nuclear bomb onto a Russian target in the classic satire, “Dr. Strangelove.”</p> </div><p>Well, think again. A new study finds that, among the American public, the taboo against the use of nukes is far weaker than you might imagine.</p><p>“When people are faced with scenarios they consider high-stakes, they end up supporting—or even preferring—actions that initially seem hard to imagine,” said <a href="http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dpress/about.htm" target="_blank">Daryl Press</a>, an associate professor at the Dartmouth College Department of Government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Vivaldi boosts mental vitality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/study_vivaldi_boosts_mental_vitality_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/study_vivaldi_boosts_mental_vitality_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivaldi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Four Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have a challenging mental task ahead of you? Try using Spring from Vivaldi’s The Four Seasons as background music ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> The <a href="http://www.psmag.com/culture-society/mozart-effect-real-for-some-3555/" target="_blank">Mozart Effect</a>—the notion that listening to certain pieces of classical music can boost one’s brainpower—was initially embraced, widely popularized, and then largely debunked. But like an operatic character who keeps singing robustly on her deathbed, it refuses to go quietly.</p><p>Now, <a href="http://www.psycontent.com/content/413668v6r47p3247/?p=e07b1daac38a4a36886310e1733c665d&amp;pi=0" target="_blank">new research</a> from the U.K. has found cognitive benefits from listening to one of the most popular pieces in the repertoire: Vivaldi’s <em>The Four Seasons.</em></p><p>In an experiment, the work’s evocative <em>Spring </em>section, “particularly the well-recognized, vibrant, emotive and uplifting first movement, had the ability to enhance mental alertness and brain measures of attention and memory,” reports Northumbria University psychologist <a href="http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/lifesciences/ad/psych/psychstaff/l_riby/" target="_blank">Leigh Riby</a>. He describes his study in the journal <em>Experimental Psychology.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/study_vivaldi_boosts_mental_vitality_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/study_vivaldi_boosts_mental_vitality_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Bach go blind?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/quack_surgeon_may_be_to_blame_for_bachs_blindness_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/quack_surgeon_may_be_to_blame_for_bachs_blindness_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johann Sebastian Bach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ophthalmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blindness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13216251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ophthalmologist posits that the composer suffered from secondary glaucoma following a botched eye operation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Among medical mysteries involving master musicians, it doesn’t quite match the still-mysterious <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MensHealthNews/strep-throat-infection-caused-mozarts-death/story?id=8349038" target="_blank">death of Mozart</a> at age 35. But precisely why Johann Sebastian Bach went totally blind less than four months before his death in 1750 remains an open question—as well as the portal to a poignant story.</p><p>More than two-and-a-half centuries after the fact, a prominent Finnish ophthalmologist is offering what he calls a “<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02366.x/abstract" target="_blank">plausible diagnosis</a>” of the great composer: intractable secondary glaucoma, brought on by a botched eye operation.</p><p>In a paper published in the journal <em>Acta Ophthalmologica,</em> Ahti Tarkkanen outlines the medical and historical information that led him to this conclusion. He also notes that Bach’s life might literally have been brighter—and perhaps even longer—if he had lived, or even traveled, about 500 miles to the west.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/quack_surgeon_may_be_to_blame_for_bachs_blindness_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/quack_surgeon_may_be_to_blame_for_bachs_blindness_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are gay men and straight women friends?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will and Grace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests the Will and Grace dynamic owes to swapping romantic advice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the title characters of "Will and Grace" to Kurt and Rachel on "Glee," television comedies have picked up on an <a href="http://fap.sagepub.com/content/20/2/205.full.pdf+html" target="_blank">apparently widespread phenomenon</a>: intense friendships between gay men and straight women. But in real life, what cements this often-close bond?<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.epjournal.net/articles/friends-with-benefits-but-without-the-sex-straight-women-and-gay-men-exchange-trustworthy-mating-advice/" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> provides a plausible, albeit partial, answer: their unique ability to provide clear-headed counsel regarding romantic relationships.</p><p>“Our results suggest that straight women and gay men perceive mating advice provided by each other to be more trustworthy than similar advice offered by other individuals,” a team led by psychologist <a href="http://davidmglewis.com/research-assistants.html" target="_blank">Eric Russell,</a> a visiting researcher at the University of Texas at Austin, writes in the journal Evolutionary Psychology.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you can&#8217;t stop perusing your Facebook profile</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/why_you_cant_stop_perusing_your_facebook_profile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/why_you_cant_stop_perusing_your_facebook_profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13197792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests regular checks don't make you narcissistic -- just human ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> How often do you check out your Facebook profile? If considering that question makes you blush—or raises the uncomfortable notion that you’re a narcissist—relax: You’re acting on an impulse that is as basic as it is benign.</p><p><a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/01/28/0146167212474694.abstract" target="_blank">New research</a> suggests that all that rereading, revising, and updating satisfies the fundamental human need to feel good about yourself, and your place in society. This reassurance and sense of security is a vital psychological resource, and Facebook may be the easiest, most convenient way to provide it yet been devised.</p><p>No wonder the social network has accumulated over one billion members over nine years.</p><p>“We do not claim this explains all of Facebook’s popularity,” said University of Wisconsin scholar <a href="http://ccr.commarts.wisc.edu/toma.htm" target="_blank">Catalina Toma</a>, who conducted the research with Cornell University psychologist <a href="http://gradfield.psych.cornell.edu/people.html?personid=118" target="_blank">Jeffrey Hancock</a>. “But we are showing that people turn to Facebook to meet a psychological need, and that it works.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/why_you_cant_stop_perusing_your_facebook_profile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/why_you_cant_stop_perusing_your_facebook_profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s a reason more liberals shop at Trader Joe&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/ever_wondered_why_conservatives_dont_like_trader_joes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/ever_wondered_why_conservatives_dont_like_trader_joes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trader Joe's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that Conservatives tend to prefer the brand-name products of Walmart]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>The cliché that liberals shop at Trader Joe’s, while conservatives prefer Walmart, is no doubt overstated. But where would the perception come from?</p><p>Newly published research provides a compelling answer: brand-name products. Conservatives gravitate toward them, and Walmart, unlike Trader Joe’s, is packed with them.</p><p>That provocative conclusion can be drawn from a study in the journal Psychological Science. A research team led by Vishal Singh of New York University’s Stern School of Business has discovered a relationship between voting behavior, high levels of religiosity, and “seemingly inconsequential product choices.”</p><p>They argue that your decision to vote for a certain candidate, and purchase a particular brand of detergent, springs from the same basic impulse:</p><p><em>“Our empirical results, based on extensive field data, provide strong evidence that more conservative ideology is associated with higher reliance on established national brands (as opposed to generics) and a slower uptake of new products.”</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/ever_wondered_why_conservatives_dont_like_trader_joes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/ever_wondered_why_conservatives_dont_like_trader_joes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Earning less than your wife is bad for your libido</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breadwinners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13192565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research in Denmark finds that husbands of female breadwinners are more likely to use erectile dysfunction drugs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Ladies: Has your income risen to the point where you now make more money than your husband? He might insist he’s perfectly OK with that, but the medicine cabinet may tell another story.</p><p>New research from Denmark finds that, compared to those who continue to outearn their wives, men in that ego-deflating situation are significantly more likely to use erectile dysfunction drugs.</p><p>“Even small differences in relative income are associated with large changes in ED medication usage when they shift the marriage from a male to a female breadwinner,” a research team led by Lamar Pierce of Washington University writes in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.</p><p>Furthermore, prescription drug records suggest wives suffer “increased stress or insomnia when they are the primary breadwinner,” the researchers write. “These results are consistent with a broad literature suggesting psychological and sexual costs from men losing their traditional marital role of breadwinner.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/earning_less_than_your_wife_can_be_bad_for_the_ego_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playing music may lower your blood pressure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/playing_music_may_lower_your_blood_pressure_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/playing_music_may_lower_your_blood_pressure_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study from the Netherlands finds neurocardial differences between young musicians and their non-musical peers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Want to lower your blood pressure? Pick up a musical instrument.</p><p>That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23283752" target="_blank">a pilot study</a> from the Netherlands, which suggests playing music is beneficial to one’s cardiovascular system.</p><p>“Our study suggests that active music making has some training effects that resemble those of physical exercise training,” researchers from the Leiden University Medical Center’s Department of Cardiology reports in the<em>Netherlands Heart Journal.</em></p><p>The researchers, including <a href="http://swenne.net/c.a/publications.htm" target="_blank">Cees Swenne</a>, measured the cardiovascular health of 25 musicians and 28 non-musicians, all healthy young adults between the age of 18 and 30. The groups were well-matched in terms of height and weight, as well as caffeine and alcohol consumption, and the amount of physical exercise they engaged in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/playing_music_may_lower_your_blood_pressure_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/26/playing_music_may_lower_your_blood_pressure_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Racism up post-Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_racism_up_post_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_racism_up_post_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that since 2008, "old-fashioned racism" has a greater influence on who we vote for ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> As he looks back on his first term, President Barack Obama can take satisfaction from a series of significant accomplishments. But according to <a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8793328&amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;fileId=S0022381612000904" target="_blank">a new analysis</a> by a Brown University political scientist, his rise to power has also produced a less-welcome result: A renewed alignment between political preference and “old-fashioned racism.”</p><p>Old-school racist beliefs were “unrelated to white Americans’ partisan preferences throughout the post-civil rights era,” writes <a href="http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Political_Science/faculty/facultypage.php?id=1310581369" target="_blank">Michael Tesler</a>. But his analysis of survey data, recently published in the <em>Journal of Politics, </em>suggests that changed with the 2008 election—and was also a factor in the 2010 mid-terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_racism_up_post_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_racism_up_post_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chick lit may be hazardous to your health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/chick_lit_may_be_hazardous_to_your_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/chick_lit_may_be_hazardous_to_your_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chick Lit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridget Jones' Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests novels in which characters agonize about their bodies lead female readers to do the same]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> We have been warned of the impact of <a href="http://www.psmag.com/culture/violent-video-games-and-behavior-the-latest-evidence-32962/" target="_blank">violent video games</a> and <a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/content/32/9/1165.abstract" target="_blank">sexually aggressive song lyrics</a>. But little attention has been paid to another media phenomenon that may influence its fans to think and act in unwanted ways.</p><p>Psychological danger may lurk between the covers of that beach book.</p><p>Reading “chick lit” may lead women to think of themselves as less attractive and express more concern about their weight. That’s the conclusion of <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144512001386" target="_blank">new research</a> from Virginia Tech, published in the journal <em>Body Image</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/chick_lit_may_be_hazardous_to_your_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/chick_lit_may_be_hazardous_to_your_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can evolution explain high heels?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Heels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Femininity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research offers an unexpected explanation for their allure -- one that has nothing to do with increased height]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Fashions in dress come and go, but a peculiar one has stayed in style for many generations, and shows no sign of fading away. It’s the <a href="http://www.randomhistory.com/1-50/036heels.html" target="_blank">high-heeled shoe</a>, which first became a fashion statement in 16th-century France, and has been a part of the modern woman’s wardrobe since the mid-19thcentury.</p><p>Ask a woman why she endures the awkwardness and discomfort, and she’ll probably respond, “They make me look, and feel, more attractive.” <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001225" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests this perception is accurate, but perhaps not for the reason you’d expect.</p><p>It’s not the artificially increased height that turns heads. Rather, it’s how such footwear changes the mechanics of a woman’s gait.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Solo rock stars die young</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock and Roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimi Hendrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that being part of a group can help protect musicians from self-destructive behavior]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Do you dream of being a rock star? Do you hope to live a long life?</p><p>If so, you’d better start prioritizing—or, at the very least, join a band. Because from Elvis Presley to Amy Winehouse, solo pop superstars are disproportionately likely to die young (<a href="http://www.bmj.com/press-releases/2011/12/20/27-really-dangerous-age-famous-musicians-retrospective-cohort-study" target="_blank">although not necessarily at age 27</a>).</p><p>That’s one finding of a study just published in the British journal <em>BMJ Open,</em>which takes a close look at mortality among rock and pop icons of the past half-century. And just like the rest of us, it finds, famous musicians are more likely to die from substance abuse if they had troubled childhoods.</p><p>A team of researchers led by <a href="http://www.who.int/violenceprevention/about/participants/cph/en/" target="_blank">Mark Bellis</a>, director of the <a href="http://www.cph.org.uk/" target="_blank">Centre for Public Health</a> at Liverpool John Moores University, looked at the mortality rates and childhood experiences of 1,489 rock and pop stars who gained fame between 1956 and 2006. Comparisons were made across the decades, and between European and American musicians.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>