<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tom Jacobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tom_jacobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, GOP: Mexican immigrants aren&#8217;t necessarily Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests they're all over the political spectrum -- and that right-wingers are more likely to vote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Once you get past all of the posturing, <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/06/immigration-reform" target="_blank">opposition to immigration reform</a> among congressional Republicans is at least partially based on self-preservation. There is a widespread belief that Mexican immigrants who become citizens are overwhelmingly disposed to vote Democratic.</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379413000802" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests that’s a complete misreading of the facts. According to this analysis, politically engaged Mexicans who move to the U.S. fall all over the ideological spectrum, very much like native-born Americans.</p><p>What’s more, according to University of Nebraska-Lincoln political scientist <a href="http://polisci.unl.edu/dr-sergio-wals" target="_blank">Sergio Wals</a>, those on the right are more inclined to participate in the American electoral process than those on the left.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Mozart helps you focus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows people work better and faster when listening to the soothing sounds of his minuets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Score another one for Wolfgang Amadeus. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778307" target="_blank">Researchers report</a> the soothing sounds of a Mozart minuet boosts the ability of children and seniors to focus on a task and ignore extraneous information.</p><p>Dissonant music has the opposite effect, according to <a href="http://community.frontiersin.org/people/_NobuoMasataka/11411" target="_blank">Nobuo Masataka</a> of Japan’s Kyoto University and <a href="http://www.leonid-perlovsky.com/" target="_blank">Leonard Perlovsky</a> of Harvard University. Their findings help make the case that music, sometimes thought of as a pleasant byproduct of evolution, has in fact played an active role in human development.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dim lighting sparks creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New German research finds a darkened room encourages freedom of thought and inspires innovation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There are certain times when you want the lights turned way down low. One such time, according to <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494413000261" target="_blank">recent research</a>, is when you need to think creatively.</p><p>“Darkness increases freedom from constraints, which in turn promotes creativity,” report  <a href="http://www.people-inside.de/index.php?&amp;page=816" target="_blank">Anna Steidle</a> of the University of Stuttgart and Lioba Werth of the University of Hohenheim. A dimly lit environment, they explain in the <em>Journal of Environmental Psychology,</em> “elicits a feeling of freedom, self-determination, and reduced inhibition,” all of which encourage innovative thinking.</p><p>Steidle and Werth describe six experiments which provide evidence for their thesis. The key one featured 114 German undergraduates, who were seated in groups of two or three in a small room designed to simulate an office.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials likely aren&#8217;t as conservative as they think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests a disconnect between how young people identify politically and their actual stances on issues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Conservatism the brand seems to be faring better than conservatism the philosophy. That’s the conclusion of <a href="http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/06/12/1948550613492825.abstract" target="_blank">new research</a> that finds a serious disconnect between the way people under 30 identify themselves politically, and their actual stances on the issues.</p><p>In three experiments described in the journal <em>Social Psychological and Personality Science,</em> researchers found “a systematic bias among young adults to perceive themselves as somewhat more conservative than they actually are.”</p><p>“Commentators have presumed that America is a ‘center-right’ nation,” write psychologists <a href="http://zell.socialpsychology.org/" target="_blank">Ethan Zell</a> of the University of North Carolina-Greensboro and <a href="http://www.abington.psu.edu/academics/faculty/dr-michael-bernstein" target="_blank">Michael Bernstein</a> of Pennsylvania State University-Abington. “The present findings challenge this assumption.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Reading novels makes us better thinkers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research says reading literary fiction helps people embrace ambiguous ideas and avoid snap judgments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Are you uncomfortable with ambiguity? It’s a common condition, but a highly problematic one. The compulsion to quell that unease can inspire snap judgments, rigid thinking, and bad decision-making.</p><p>Fortunately, <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10400419.2013.783735#preview" target="_blank">new research</a> suggests a simple anecdote for this affliction: Read more literary fiction.</p><p>A trio of University of Toronto scholars, led by psychologist <a href="http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/FacultyAndResearch/Faculty/InstructorBios/Maja%20Djikic.aspx" target="_blank">Maja Djikic</a>, report that people who have just read a short story have less need for what psychologists call “cognitive closure.” Compared with peers who have just read an essay, they expressed more comfort with disorder and uncertainty—attitudes that allow for both sophisticated thinking and greater creativity.</p><p>“Exposure to literature,” the researchers write in the <em>Creativity Research Journal,</em> “may offer a (way for people) to become more likely to open their minds.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Liberals, conservatives see mixed-race people differently</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research suggests right-wingers are more likely to interpret racially ambiguous faces as black rather than white]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Did you notice that mixed-race gentleman who passed you on the sidewalk yesterday? During the split second as he walked by, did he register in your mind as black or white?</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113001054" target="_blank">Disturbing new research</a> suggests the answer to that question may depend on your political ideology.</p><p>In three experiments, “we found that conservatives were more likely than liberals to categorize a racially ambiguous person as black than white,” a research team led by New York University psychologist <a href="http://social-neuroscience.org/people/students" target="_blank">Amy Krosch</a> writes in the <em>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.</em></p><p>Intriguingly, this dynamic disappeared when the study participants—white Americans—were told they were judging Canadian faces. The tendency for those on the right to more quickly categorize someone as “black” only occurred when they were evaluating their fellow countrymen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samantha Power: I&#8217;m a &#8220;humanitarian hawk&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samantha Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next ambassador to the UN reflects on the need to combat genocide and other human rights abuses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> President Obama <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/05/18776098-samantha-power-white-houses-un-ambassador-nominee-has-seen-evil-at-its-worst?lite" target="_blank">nominated</a> Samantha Power to be the next American ambassador to the United Nations on Wednesday. As a journalist, academic, and sometime presidential advisor, she has consistently argued in favor of international action to prevent genocide and other abuses of human rights. She discussed her philosophy—and the role of the U.N.—in a 2008 interview with <em>Miller-McCune</em> magazine, the precursor to <em>Pacific Standard</em>, which we’ve reproduced below.</p><p>Samantha Power teaches at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, and it’s worth noting her official title: “Professor of Practice of Global Leadership and Public Policy.” As a teacher, Pulitzer Prize-winning writer and until recently a senior adviser to Barack Obama, she has focused on how leadership can be effectively exercised in an increasingly fragmented world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you should stop watching TV while you eat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study finds we're less satisfied by sweet, salty and sour treats when we're mentally distracted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Our eating habits have changed radically in recent decades, in at least two distinct ways. We increasingly multitask as we consume our meals, munching as we work at our desk or <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15000965?dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">watch television</a>. And, to the dismay of nutritionists, our food has higher concentrations of <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/robert-lustig-sugar-obesity-diet-50948/" target="_blank">sugar</a> and <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/stop-worrying-about-salt-reduction-58334/" target="_blank">salt</a>.</p><p><a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/29/0956797612471953.abstract" target="_blank">New research</a> from the Netherlands suggests the two phenomena may be directly related.</p><p>A study just published in the journal <em>Psychological Science</em> finds people eating or drinking while mentally distracted require greater concentrations of sweetness, sourness, or saltiness to feel satisfied. A slightly sweet dish may be delicious when you’re concentrating on each bite, but it tastes bland if you’re eating while your attention is divided.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compassion is a trainable skill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compassion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altruism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin-Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study published in the journal Psychological Science shows that compassion and altruism are learnable   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a><br /> Can people be taught to act more altruistically? <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/20/0956797612469537.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a>, measuring both brain activity and behavior, suggests the answer just may be yes.</p><p>“Our findings support the possibility that compassion and altruism can be viewed as trainable skills rather than stable traits,” a research team led by <a href="http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/personnel/director.html" target="_blank">Richard J. Davidson</a>and <a href="http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/personnel/grads.html" target="_blank">Helen Weng</a> of the University of Wisconsin-Madison writes in the journal <em>Psychological Science</em>.</p><p>Specifically, they report that taking a course in compassion leads to increased engagement of certain neural systems, which prompts higher levels of altruistic behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happiness is the best medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/happiness_is_the_best_medicine_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/happiness_is_the_best_medicine_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that mood-enhancing activities can serve as a nutrient for the human body]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> We’ve all experienced downward spirals, in which dark emotions lead to destructive behavior that damages our health, strains our relationships, and leaves us feeling even worse than when we started. Wouldn’t it be nice if there was an uplifting equivalent to that destructive chain of events?</p><p><a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/06/0956797612470827.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests there is. What’s more, this delightful dynamic helps explain the <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-03/uok-uok030209.php" target="_blank">well-documented link</a> between joy, appreciation, and good health.</p><p>“Positive emotion, positive social connections, and physical health influence one another in a self-sustaining, upward-spiral dynamic,” concludes a research team led by psychologist <a href="http://www.bethanykok.com/" target="_blank">Bethany Kok</a> of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences. It found upbeat emotions inspired by a meditative practice led to greater feelings of connectedness with others, which positively impacted “a biological resource that has been linked to numerous health benefits.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/happiness_is_the_best_medicine_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/happiness_is_the_best_medicine_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;Sports Illustrated&#8221; sexist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_sports_illustrated_sexist_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_sports_illustrated_sexist_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Illustrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serena Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that men appeared on 95 percent of the magazine's covers from 2000 to 2011   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> That recent <em>Sports Illustrated</em> cover <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/cover/toc/12057/index.htm" target="_blank">featuring Jason Collins</a> was, in one obvious respect, a landmark. But in another way, it was business as usual for the venerable weekly.</p><p>The openly gay Collins is, after all, a man—and men are featured on the cover of <em>SI </em>about 95 percent of the time. That’s the conclusion of <a href="http://irs.sagepub.com/content/48/2/196.abstract" target="_blank">recently published research</a>, which finds that, from 2000 through 2011, women appeared on just 4.9 percent of <em>Sports Illustrated</em> covers.</p><p>That figure is “comparable to levels reported for the 1980s,” write University of Louisville sociologists  <a href="http://louisville.edu/sociology/faculty-staff-students/faculty/adjunct-faculty.html">Jonetta Weber</a> and <a href="http://louisville.edu/sociology/faculty-staff-students/faculty-cvs/Carini%20CV%2008-15-12.pdf">Robert Carini</a>. “Indeed, women were depicted on a higher percentage of covers from 1954-1965 than from 2000-2011.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_sports_illustrated_sexist_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/is_sports_illustrated_sexist_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fame may not last 15 minutes after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/fame_may_not_last_15_minutes_after_all_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/fame_may_not_last_15_minutes_after_all_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Warhol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Sociological Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that famous people tend to stay famous for the rest of their lives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> According to artist Andy Warhol’s <a href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/fifteen-minutes-of-fame.html" target="_blank">much-quoted prophecy</a>, in the future, everyone will be world famous for 15 minutes.</p><p>In fact, it’s more likely that 0.15 percent of us will have fame for a lifetime.</p><p><a href="http://asr.sagepub.com/content/78/2/266.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> concludes that, contrary to Warhol’s prediction, genuine celebrity status does not disappear as quickly as it appeared. Once you become famous, you tend to stay famous.</p><p>“Fame exhibits strong continuity even in entertainment, on television, and on blogs, where it has been thought to be most ephemeral,” writes a research team led by Stony Brook University sociologist <a href="http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/sociology/people/faculty/vanderijt.html" target="_blank">Arnout van de Rijt</a>. Its analysis finds fleeting celebrity status occurs “only at the bottom of the public-attention hierarchy.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/fame_may_not_last_15_minutes_after_all_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/fame_may_not_last_15_minutes_after_all_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are millennials delusional?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that members of "Generation Me" are warped by a profound sense of entitlement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Young people coming of age over the past decade or so have been referred to as Millennials, or, in a nod to their individualistic nature, <a href="http://eubie.com/genme.pdf" target="_blank">Generation Me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/01/0146167213484586.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests they could also be called the generation with unrealistic expectations.</p><p>An analysis of the values and ambitions of American 12th graders finds “a growing discrepancy between the desire for material rewards and the willingness to do the work usually required to earn them.” Psychologists <a href="http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/people/jean-twenge/" target="_blank">Jean Twenge</a> of San Diego State University and <a href="http://www.knox.edu/academics/faculty/kasser-tim.html" target="_blank">Tim Kasser</a> of Knox College report that, for high school seniors in 2005, 2006, and 2007, materialism remained at historically high levels, even as commitment to hard work declined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do atheists secretly believe in God?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Finnish study suggests that non-believers become emotionally aroused when daring God to harm their loved ones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>The heads and hearts of atheists may not be on precisely the same page. That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508619.2013.771991" target="_blank">recently published research</a> from Finland, which finds avowed non-believers become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things.</p><p>“The results imply that atheists’ attitudes toward God are ambivalent, in that their explicit beliefs conflict with their affective response,” concludes a research team led by University of Helsinki psychologist <a href="http://www.psyko.helsinki.fi/psyko/Psykolog.nsf/Personnel/LindemanMarjaana?OpenDocument" target="_blank">Marjaana Lindeman</a>. Its study is published in the <em>International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.</em></p><p>Lindeman and her colleagues describe two small-scale experiments. The first featured 17 Finns, recruited online, who expressed high levels of belief, or disbelief, in God. They read out loud a series of statements while skin conductance data was collected via electrodes placed on two of their fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>229</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can yoga boost your immune system?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oslo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that practicing yoga produces internal changes on a genetic level]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> If we’re finished obsessing about <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/the-great-lululemon-panic-its-not-just-about-the-see-through-pants/274156/" target="_blank">yoga jeans</a>, perhaps it’s time to think about yoga and genes.</p><p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0061910" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> from Norway suggests that a comprehensive yoga program rapidly produces internal changes on a genetic level. The results help explain the <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193654/" target="_blank">well-documented health benefits</a> of this ancient practice.</p><p>“These data suggest that previously reported (therapeutic) effects of yoga practices have an integral physiological component at the molecular level, which is initiated immediately during practice,” writes a research team led by Fahri Saatcioglu of the University of Oslo. The team’s study is published in the online journal <em>PLOS ONE</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men may not understand women after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that men have trouble reading female facial expressions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /> Ladies: Do you often feel misunderstood by men? Do they fail to pick up on fairly obvious nonverbal signals, such as expressions of fear or disgust? <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060278" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests your perception is entirely valid — but it’s not his fault.</p><p>A study from Germany finds that men do a much better job of interpreting one vital set of signals — the emotions conveyed by the eyes — when they’re communicating with another man, compared to another woman.</p><p>“The finding that men are superior in recognizing emotions/mental states of other men, as compared to women, might be surprising,” a research team led by psychiatrist <a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Boris_Schiffer/" target="_blank">Boris Schiffer</a> reports in the journal PLOS ONE. They add, however, that it makes considerable sense in evolutionary terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Working together&#8221; won&#8217;t fix climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers say the best way to encourage activism is by emphasizing individual, rather than collective, action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to climate change, we’re all in this dilemma together, and forcefully addressing it will require collaboration and cooperation. A stirring sentiment, but if you’re looking to spur white Americans to action, <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/24/2/189.abstract" target="_blank">it’s actually counterproductive</a>.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the conclusion of a Stanford University research team, which found invoking the idea of interdependence undermined the motivation of European-American students to take a course in environmental sustainability.</p><p>The researchers, led by <a href="https://ccsre.stanford.edu/people-profiles/maryam-hamedani" target="_blank">MarYam Hamedani</a> of Stanford’s Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, argue that in mainstream European-American culture, independence functions as a “foundational schema” — that is, an underlying design or blueprint that guides behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Facebook is being used to spread racism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon Rauch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kimberley Schanz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequent users are likely susceptible to negative messages ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Facebook a particularly powerful medium to spread racist messages? That’s the disturbing implication of a <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563212003160" target="_blank">newly published study</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a><br /> “Frequent users are particularly disposed to be influenced by negative racial messages,” psychologists <a href="http://www.providence.edu/psychology/Pages/social-lab.aspx" target="_blank">Shannon Rauch</a> and <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kimberley-schanz/31/60b/357" target="_blank">Kimberley Schanz</a> write in the journal Computers in Human Behavior.</p><p>They argue these heavy users log onto the site in search of social inclusion rather than information — and as such, they’re prone to express agreement with the material they see without thinking about it too deeply. This combination of “a need to connect and an ethos of shallow processing” creates an atmosphere conducive to the spread of racist thoughts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does studying science make you a better person?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests that scientists are more likely to have a strong moral compass than those outside the field]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to be a better person? Spend more time thinking about science.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0057989" target="_blank">newly published research</a>, which finds people who study science — or who are even momentarily exposed to the idea of scientific research — are more likely to condemn unethical behavior and more inclined to help others.</p><p>“Thinking about science leads individuals to endorse more stringent moral norms,” report psychologists <a href="http://christinemakellams.com/cv/" target="_blank">Christine Ma-Kellams</a> of Harvard University and <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/blascovich/" target="_blank">Jim Blascovich</a> of the University of California, Santa Barbara. Their research is published in the online journal PLOS One.</p><p>The researchers describe four experiments, all conducted at UCSB, that back up their surprising conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Literature isn&#8217;t as &#8220;moody&#8221; as it used to be</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Bristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Acerbi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that contemporary English-language books use less emotionally charged words than ever before]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There’s a widespread perception that we’ve gotten more touchy-feely over the past couple of generations—increasingly willing to express our emotions.</p><p>If so, it’s not reflected in our writing.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0059030" target="_blank">new study</a> finds that, in a large dataset of English-language books, the use of terms expressing six basic emotions steadily decreased over the course of the 20th century. “We believe the changes (in word usage) do reflect changes in culture,” writes the research team, led by anthropologist <a href="http://acerbialberto.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Alberto Acerbi</a> of the University of Bristol.</p><p>Writing in the online journal <a href="http://www.plosone.org/home.action" target="_blank"><em>PLOS One</em></a>, they note that their findings mirror social conditions, with terms reflecting happy moods peaking in the 1920s and 1960s, and those suggesting sad moods reaching their apex in the war years of the 1940s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>