<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tracy Clark-Flory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tracy_clark_flory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Was a rapper sexually assaulted onstage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip-hop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumors have spread of an artist receiving oral sex during a show, but now a friend says it was non-consensual]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rumor was retweeted ad infinitum: Last week, a popular rapper got a blow job onstage from a female fan during a show in Minneapolis. When someone tweeted at the artist in question to ask if the rumor was true, he -- or someone using his Twitter handle -- responded, "and didn’t miss one bar." As the tale jumped from Twitter to various music blogs, the boastful tweet was deleted, but the buzz continued. Some virtually high-fived the rapper, while others found it just another story about misogyny and objectification of women in hip-hop. But today, rapper Kitty Pryde, who is currently on tour with the rapper in question and witnessed the incident in person, wrote a blog post reframing it as sexual assault. "It was an <em>actual sexual assault</em>, and somehow nobody gives a fuck about that but me," wrote Pryde, who refers to the rapper as her "best friend."</p><p>As you can probably tell, I've decided to not name the rapper. It isn't difficult to figure out who he is, of course, but it seems a matter of principle to keep his name out of this article. After all, we're talking about an incident that at least one person is calling a sexual assault, and which Pryde argues involved reverse sexism and double standards when it comes to sexual assault.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When she wants sex more</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stereotype is of a frigid wife, but plenty of women find themselves the more desiring partner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once in bed at night, Cathy's boyfriend would almost instantly curl up in the fetal position facing away from her and begin breathing heavily as though asleep. "But if I put my arm around him, he would stiffen up and hold his breath," she says. "A couple times, I even saw him hurriedly shut his eyes." Sometimes the 37-year-old from St. Louis, Mo., would take a more direct approach, telling him, "I want to be with you" -- but she often ended up being rebuffed. It wasn't uncommon for him to ask, "Why do we have to have sex all the time?"</p><p>This is the gender reversal of what we're used to hearing: stories about women complaining of a headache or offering a simple, "Not tonight, honey." Just this week, the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578438713861797052.html">published a piece</a> ostensibly about "differing expectations about sex" in relationships in general, but which fell back on the stereotype of the frigid wife who withholds sex. The piece presented only one real-life example of such a dynamic and, despite mentioning far, far down in the piece a study on desire that found no significant gender differences, the piece ran with the headline, "He Says 'More' and She Says 'No.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Condoms shouldn&#8217;t be a crime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New York, rubbers are used as evidence of prostitution -- which only discourages people from using them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City loves condoms. The municipality has its very own brand of rubbers. Every month, the Department of Health hands out more than 3 million of them. But the NYPD considers those same city-issued condoms, along with your run-of-the-mill Trojan, to be evidence of a crime: prostitution. (Some have <a href="www.villagevoice.com/2013-03-06/news/nyc-s-condom-insanity/full/">suggested</a> that this is a blatant attempt by law enforcement to meet quotas.)</p><p>The health impact is clear: As Human Rights Watch <a href="http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/us0712ForUpload_1.pdf">reported</a>,"Police use of condoms as evidence of prostitution has the same effect everywhere: despite millions of dollars spent on promoting and distributing condoms as an effective method of HIV prevention, groups most at risk of infection ... are afraid to carry them and therefore engage in sex without protection as a result of police harassment." What's more, "Outreach workers and businesses are unable to distribute condoms freely and without fear of harassment as well."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;No one has ever had more than one partner and not paid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at Pam Stenzel, the popular Christian speaker who has renewed controversy over abstinence-only education]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam Stenzel impressively rattles off a list of diseases at an auctioneer's speed: "HPV, genital warts, syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes, chlamydia, trichomoniasis, vulvodynia, arthritis, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIV!" The Christian advocate is pacing the stage in her signature cool-mom denim jacket, warning an audience of teenagers about the potential consequences of sex. With a tone that would seem at home in a church-turned-comedy-club, she emphasizes the worst-case scenarios -- a radical hysterectomy, cancer, death! But there is one relevant thing that she doesn't bother to mention: condoms.</p><p>This is just <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il2JaN_0LdY">one scene</a> from several YouTube videos of Stenzel, the same speaker behind a recent controversy over abstinence-only education. After Stenzel gave a lecture at George Washington High School, 17-year-old Katelyn Campbell took to the national media to complain about being subjected to the activist's "slut-shaming" message. Campbell's bravery didn't stop there: As a result of exercising her right to free speech, her principal allegedly threatened to contact Wellesley College, where she had already been accepted, to complain about her "bad character" -- so, Campbell quickly lawyered up and filed an injunction against him. (Wellesley's official Twitter account soon sent out the following <a href="https://twitter.com/Wellesley/status/324624597012074496">tweet</a>: "Katelyn Campbell, #Wellesley is excited to welcome you this fall" -- and the Internet rejoiced at perhaps the only bit of sunny news this week.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>190</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young, gay and trying too hard</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research finds that male sexual minorities often compensate for stigma by overachieving]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his memoir-cum-manifesto, Yale Law School professor Kenji Yoshino <a href="”http://www.amazon.com/Covering-Hidden-Assault-Civil-Rights/dp/0375760210”">wrote of his college years</a>, “I sensed these bodies knew other bodies the way I knew calculus or Shakespeare,” he said. "On Saturday nights, I would sit in my cement-block dorm room with my face lit green by my IBM’s glow, agonizing not over women, or men, but line breaks." That's because Yoshino was gay and in the closet -- and, according to what's known as the "Best Little Boy in the World" hypothesis, perhaps overcompensating for the stigma he faced as a sexual minority.</p><p>This theory holds that closeted young men in bigoted environments often respond by overachieving in certain areas, like sports or academics -- the idea being that it's an adaptive means of finding a sense of self-worth where they can. It can also serve to distract from their sexuality: As Andrew Tobias wrote in his 1976 memoir, "The Best Little Boy in the World," a key "line of defense" was his endless list of activities. "No one could expect me to be out dating ... when I had a list of 17 urgent projects to complete," he wrote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad advice for cheated wives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former escort turned "infidelity counselor" tells women to give their husbands more sex. It's not the answer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's an irresistible hook: A woman who used to charge cheating husbands for sex starts charging cheated wives for advice on how to prevent their husbands from cheating. It's no surprise that UK tabloid <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/real_life/4889529/hooker-turned-relationship-counsellor.html ">the Sun</a> went for it -- along with a fancy photo shoot of escort-turned-relationship-expert Rebecca Dakin and the splashy headline, "I had sex with 1,000 men as £700-a-time hooker ...now I’m an infidelity counsellor."</p><p>Normally it'd be the type of all-sorts-of-exploitative piece I'd barely roll my eyes at before moving along -- but it's the advice she's offering in particular that deserves a second look, if only because it's so pedestrian, and so misguided.</p><p>Her teaching? Have lots of sex with your husband.</p><p>To Dakin's credit, she acknowledges that there are "obviously other factors" to infidelity, but she argues that, as the Sun paraphrases, it most often "simply comes down to not giving their men enough sex." She also falls back on some classic gender stereotypes: "Men are sexual creatures -- unlike a lot of women, they can separate the act of sex from love," she said. (I will take a moment here to give Dakin the benefit of the doubt: It's hard to know where her advice ends and the Sun's sensationalist editorializing begins; I've contacted her but have yet to hear back.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wait, men fake orgasms?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erectile dysfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book delivers surprising news about male sexuality -- including that, yes, some guys are really fooling you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago, a 25-year-old male patient walked into Dr. Abraham Morgentaler's office with a surprising problem: He was faking orgasms.</p><p>A man faking it? Morgentaler, an associate clinical professor of urology at Harvard Medical School, had never heard of such a thing. After he got over the puzzle of how a man could effectively pull off such a ... sleight of semen, he got to the patient's motivation. As Morgentaler writes in his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805094245/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Why Men Fake It: The Totally Unexpected Truth About Men and Sex,"</a> his patient was having trouble climaxing during sex with his girlfriend, so he feigned pleasure for her benefit. He "was simply trying to do what he believed was the right thing by her."</p><p>Morgentaler came to realize that faking it was more common among men than he had realized -- and that this general sexual sentiment was, too. "That is a refrain I hear regularly from men in one form or another, yet this admirable, loving aspect of male sexuality is hidden among the detritus that passes as wisdom about what men are all about," he writes. His book -- which paints a portrait of men who feel anxious about their erections, pressured into having sex and concerned about their partner's pleasure -- is all about correcting that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaunt it while you got it?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farrah Abrahams says that's her reason for getting naked in front of the camera -- and she's hardly the first]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former "Teen Mom" Farrah Abraham has come out to confirm that, yes, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">she filmed a "sex tape"</a> with James Deen, the world's most famous male porn star -- but she says she intended it for personal consumption only. (Unless someone wants to pay at least $2 million for the right to distribute it, she clarified.) Her story conflicts with that of her costar, who implied that the original plan was to professionally film a porno and then pretend that it was a homemade sex tape that had gotten leaked -- but whatever. What's more interesting is how she chose to explain her motivation for allegedly commissioning the film: "I wanted my own personal video made and photos taken for myself. When I am older I will have my best year to look back on." She added, "This is just something I personally needed for me."</p><p>Ah, the old "flaunt it while you've got it" rationale.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Teen Mom&#8221;: The porno</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farrah Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex tape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult actor James Deen says reality-TV star Farrah Abraham wanted to stage a sex tape leak. She says he's lying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, former "Teen Mom" star Farrah Abraham took to Twitter to deny <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/09/james-deen-farrah-abraham-sex-tape-plot/">allegations</a> that she had "concocted" a sex tape plot -- and to call porn star James Deen a [sic] "lier." In case you've missed the kerfuffle, a recap: Word surfaced yesterday that a sex tape featuring 20-year-old Abraham was being shopped around. Then a photograph circulated of her <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/08/farrah-abraham-sex-tape-james-deen-vivid-teen-mom/">holding hands</a> with porn star James Deen. Meanwhile, Abraham denied the existence of such a video and then vaguely threatened legal action. She told TMZ, "If I had my own personal stuff, that's my own personal thing." <em>Ohhkidoki.</em></p><p>But then Deen claimed that he had actually been hired by an unnamed porn company to film a video with Abraham. <em>He</em> <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/09/james-deen-farrah-abraham-sex-tape-plot/">told TMZ</a>, "I think what happened is that they were going to pass it off as a 'sex tape,'" he said. But then "somebody saw us coming out of a building together ... and people asked me what's going on ... and I have this problem where I can't really lie, so I was like, 'We're making a porno!'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminalizing &#8220;revenge porn&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more people post naked pics of exes, the law has failed to keep up. Some activists are trying to change that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a woman does a Google search on her own name and up comes a page featuring a naked photo that she sent to an ex-boyfriend. There are links to her Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn account. In the comment thread, anonymous trolls critique every inch of her body. Perhaps her home phone number and address are also included. Say she contacts the local police in tears, only to be told that the post is perfectly legal -- or worse, that “boys will be boys.”</p><p>This is becoming an increasingly common scenario, activists say, given the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/">proliferation of “revenge porn"</a> and the legal system's failure to catch up with it.</p><p>A new bill in Florida is aiming to remedy that: It would make it a felony to publish online nude photos or videos of a person without their permission and along with identifying information. At the same time, activists around the country are petitioning for both state and federal laws to criminalize what they call “non-consensual porn.” A recent class action lawsuit filed by more than 20 women in Texas against revenge porn site Texxxan.com along with its host GoDaddy has only turned the heat up on the issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond hooking up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/beyond_hooking_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/beyond_hooking_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hookup culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The End of Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donna Freitas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its timing is poor, given the Princeton mom debacle, but this book isn't another attack on young women's sex lives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week has felt like a flashback to 2008. That year a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/01/chastity_books/">handful of pro-chastity books</a> hit shelves and Lori Gottlieb published her article in the Atlantic titled "Marry Him!: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough." Now, roughly five years after that outpouring of hand-wringing over how women use their vaginas, there’s been an explosion of unsolicited advice about how women should marry young. On top of that, there was the release Tuesday of a new book out about the perils of hookup culture, Donna Freitas' <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-End-Sex-Generation-Unfulfilled/dp/0465002153/saloncom08-20">"The End of Sex: How Hookup Culture Is Leaving a Generation Unhappy, Sexually Unfulfilled, and Confused About Intimacy."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/beyond_hooking_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/beyond_hooking_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adolescents aren&#8217;t having sex!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/sex_crazed_kids_hardly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/sex_crazed_kids_hardly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perception of rampant adolescent sexual activity is wrong. In fact, they're waiting longer than you did]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids these days, with their "sex" bracelets and rainbow parties! Back in my middle school days, we went on chaperoned dates to watch movies like "Space Jam" and avoided touching at all costs. Now 11-year-olds are staging orgies in their parents' basements and live-streaming it online. Am I right or <em>am I right</em>?</p><p><em></em>Actually, no. According to <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/27/peds.2012-3495">a new study</a> published in the May issue of the journal Pediatrics, adolescents are having less sex than you think. The study's lead author, Lawrence Finer, says, "Policymakers and the media often sensationalize teen sexual behavior, suggesting that adolescents as young as 10 or 11 are increasingly sexually active. But the data just don't support that concern," he said. "Rather, we are seeing teens waiting longer to have sex, using contraceptives more frequently when they start having sex, and being less likely to become pregnant than their peers of past decades."</p><p>Go ahead and reread that paragraph above. Let it sink in. Teens are waiting longer to have sex than you and your peers did at their age. They're also more likely to use contraception and less likely to get pregnant than previous generations. In other words: Kids these days are doing it (or not doing it) better than you did.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/sex_crazed_kids_hardly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/sex_crazed_kids_hardly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will gays save marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage is but one of many historical changes to the institution. An expert considers what's next]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many conservatives would have you believe that same-sex unions turn the institution of marriage upside-down -- but it's actually rather fitting with tradition. That is, if you consider the historical trajectory of marriage: It's changed tremendously over the decades, from a financial transaction to the romantic one that we know today. It would be naive to think that major changes won't continue in the decades to come.</p><p>Given this, and the Supreme Court hearings this week on the Defense of Marriage Act, I started thinking about what the future of marriage might look like. I wondered -- out of liberal glee, rather than conservative terror, mind you -- whether same-sex unions could open up the institution to even bigger changes. Might we someday extend marriage's 1,000-plus legal benefits and protections to people regardless of relationship status? Would we ever institutionally separate monogamy from marriage? What about allowing for polygamy or group parenthood?</p><p>I called up Barbara Risman, a senior scholar at the Council on Contemporary Families and sociology professor at University of Illinois at Chicago, to get her predictions. We talked about everything from monogamy to polygamy, utilitarian marriages to romance. One thing became clear: Marriage isn't going anywhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Victoria&#8217;s Secret targeting teens?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_victorias_secret_targeting_teens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_victorias_secret_targeting_teens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria's Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company has courted controversy yet again by launching its Spring Break-themed "Bright Young Things" campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victoria’s Secret is coming under attack for its new “Bright Young Things” campaign advertising a Spring Break-themed line featuring undies emblazoned with slogans like “dare you,” “wild,” “feeling lucky” and “call me.” (Victoria’s Secret doing something tacky? I am <em>shocked</em>, you guys.) More than 2,000 people have signed a <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/victoria-s-secret-pull-bright-young-things-from-shelves">Change.org petition</a> for the company to shut down the campaign and pull the collection from shelves. Diana Cherry, the mother of four who started the campaign, wrote in the petition that she was “appalled that Victoria's Secret is aiming its marketing reach younger and younger.” She argues:</p><blockquote><p>Children are not sex objects; children are not things. Middle schoolers are not old enough to make responsible, safe decisions about sex. This marketing sends the message, ‘the younger, the better,’ which harms young girls’ self-esteem and pressures them into engaging in risky sexual behavior before they are ready to make informed, consenting decisions about sex and their bodies.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_victorias_secret_targeting_teens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_victorias_secret_targeting_teens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Body-shaming sex products</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Body-shaming sex products</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say goodbye to the penis pump. Today's insecurity-inducing erotic novelty items are much more insidious]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be limited to penis pumps and padded bras. But where there is insecurity -- especially when it comes to sexual attraction -- there is financial opportunity. It's no surprise, then, that we now have everything from breast augmentation to labiaplasties, pectoral implants to penis-enhancing pills. Lately, I've noticed a whole new breed of body-shaming products effectively marketed as sex toys. They target everything from "vaginal looseness" to funky-tasting ejaculate, but the general message is the same: Your genitals are gross. Let's take a critical look, shall we?</p><p>[slide_show id="13249078"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/body_shaming_sex_products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farting in love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/farting_in_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/farting_in_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a dreaded but inevitable stage in every relationship: Admitting the basic fact of our human digestive tracts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I placed headphones on my boyfriend's ears with a sheepish grin, picked the most beat-heavy tune I could find and cranked up the volume. Then I went into the bathroom of our rented Hawaiian cottage and yelled, “Babe! Baby! Can you hear me?” No response. But just for good measure, I turned on the shower. Then I sat down on the toilet and spent the next several minutes staring right at a framed note beseeching me to please conserve water.</p><p>There’s nothing like a vacation to bring a relationship to the next level. I’m not talking about novelty, shared adventure or lifelong memories -- although, yes, those things are important. I’m talking about flatulence, y’all. From that point on during the rest of our stay in those tight quarters, we developed a code: “I’m gonna go take a fake shower now,” he would tell me. Or I would ask with a knowing look, “Could you go somewhere far, far away?” The subtext always being: Noises are going to come out of my butt, and I don’t want you to hear them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/farting_in_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/farting_in_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making sex &#8220;normal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/making_sex_normal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/making_sex_normal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new blog attempts to normalize everything from vulva puppets to rainbow-clad llamas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a day goes by where you don't hear a lament in the media about our hyper-sexualized culture. Teen pregnancy rates, the decline in marriage, sexual assault -- they're erroneously linked to everything from pop music tarts to pornography. But the truth is, that despite its seeming prevalence, sex is rarely talked about with any openness or honesty.</p><p>That's why Debby Herbenick, a research scientist at Indiana University and sexual health educator at the Kinsey Institute, just launched the site <a href="http://makesexnormal.tumblr.com">Make Sex Normal.</a> In an email announcing the project, she explains that it's her response to "a pretty tough 2012 election season in which I felt depressingly and repeatedly reminded how little information and comfort there is about sexuality and reproductive health issues." She "kept wondering what to do," she writes. Then she realized that she and all her sex-positive colleagues "have experienced firsthand how quickly sex becomes normal and everyday when we're in a bubble of people who talk about it, who have sex books on their bookshelves, who teach about it, and who talk about it like it's no big deal." She wondered, "If more people engaged in everyday acts of sex-positivity, would change happen more quickly?" With Make Sex Normal, Herbenick is betting on it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/making_sex_normal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/making_sex_normal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This isn&#8217;t &#8220;mommy porn&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/this_isnt_mommy_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/this_isnt_mommy_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erotica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50 Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleshbot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fleshbot Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fleshbot premieres its erotic e-book imprint, hoping that good writing matters more than particular kinks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are no Anastasia Steele wannabes. The female protagonists in sex-blog Fleshbot's new erotica imprint are not pliant naifs; they know what they want and aren't ashamed to ask for it. They talk of going to the office bathroom to "jerk off" and coolly refer to past partners as an "incredible fuck." These ladies are nerdy and irreverent; they say things like, "It always blows my mind to touch the inside of my own body. It makes me feel like Carl Sagan or something."</p><p>While the rest of the world attempts to cash in on "Fifty Shades" fanaticism, Fleshbot Fiction is trying for something different. As CEO <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/19/a_new_breed_of_porn_ceo_female/">Lux Alptraum</a> tells me, she's interested in courting "people who like good stories and good smut." She isn't concerned with appealing to a particular gender demographic (so far, the e-books have featured only female protagonists, but that will change soon) or certain fetishes, so much as publishing good writing. Alptraum believes that craft can trump particular kinks: A well-written story can make cross-dressing hot, even if it isn't your thing, she says. This pansexual, or trysexual, mind-set is no surprise, given that Fleshbot's distinguishing feature in the porn world is that it publishes straight and gay content side by side.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/this_isnt_mommy_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/this_isnt_mommy_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Cannibal Cop&#8221; debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_cannibal_cop_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_cannibal_cop_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannibal cop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannibalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts disagree on whether today's guilty verdict is an attack on fantasy or the prevention of a gruesome crime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When news broke this morning of the conviction of Gilberto Valle, the so-called Cannibal Cop, I didn't know what to think. Was this verdict a dangerous assault on fantasy or the prevention of a grisly crime? How can we tell the difference between disturbingly realistic role-play and actual criminal plotting? I went to some smart thinkers -- in the worlds of psychiatry, civil liberties and BDSM -- for clarity on the trial, but what I found was that there are no easy answers.</p><p>The facts are as follows: Valle engaged in elaborate conversations online with fellow fetishists about kidnapping and eating real-life women. The former NYPD officer unlawfully accessed a federal law enforcement database to research potential "victims" and did Web searches for everything from chloroform to human meat recipes. The prosecution claimed that he showed up on the street of one of the women he'd talked about kidnapping (although <a href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/02/06/judge-cell-phone-evidence-in-cannibal-cop-case-is-unclear/">doubts were raised</a> about the reliability of the evidence). But he never met with his online pals in person or committed the talked-about crimes, and the defense says Valle was engaging in make-believe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_cannibal_cop_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/the_cannibal_cop_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>