<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tracy Clark-Flory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tracy_clark_flory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My sexual resolutions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five sex-related promises I'm making to myself for the new year -- and you should, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year around this time, I wrote about people's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/the_sexual_resolution/singleton/">sexual resolutions for the new year.</a> There were pledges to break dry spells, have more orgasms and abstain altogether. At the time, I didn't have any sex-related goals of my own, having completely failed at my single sexual resolution for that year (and within days of January 1, no less): waiting before jumping into bed with new partners.</p><p>But this past year was different: I waited to have sex for the first time since <em>my first time. </em>(It counts even though it was my partner who insisted on it, right?) I suppose you could say that I'm marginally less cynical about sexual resolutions this year and, as a result, I figured I would make some. This way, on December 31, 2013, I'll be able to see just how far I've come, so to speak, or at least be able to measure how horribly I've failed my "li'l Naomi." (I also appropriately <a href="http://prospect.org/article/vagina-myth">re-christened my vagina</a> this year.)</p><p>With the weighty authority of an online sex columnist with a bachelor's degree in English, I hereby recommend that you maybe possibly consider some of these resolutions for yourselves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think more about sex!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alain de Botton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new book, philosopher Alain de Botton urges us to consider the act more often -- but also more intelligently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem isn't that we're thinking too much about sex, it's that we're thinking about it in all the wrong ways. That's the argument of philosopher Alain de Botton in his latest digestible treatise, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/125003065X/?tag=saloncom08-20">"How to Think More About Sex,"</a> which attempts to set us straight without neutering us. It's a bite-sized book that applies a philosophical lens to our modern sexual reality -- from infidelity to impotence, intimacy to Internet porn (and those are just the i's).</p><p>But it's no Human Sexuality textbook: De Botton, author of the bestseller "How Proust Can Change Your Life," is more concerned with big ideas than hard evidence. For example, he writes, "The more closely we analyze what we consider 'sexy,' the more clearly we will understand that eroticism is the feeling of excitement we experience at finding another human being who shares our values and our sense of the meaning of existence."</p><p>This seems intuitively true and wise, doesn't it? But desire is not so easily explained. It requires great temerity to make such grand, un-footnoted generalizations given that sex researchers continue to devote their lives to finding empirical evidence to answer such big questions, and such research is often highly nuanced and not easily summarized.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year in sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristen Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50 Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Affairs! Mommy porn! Gay marriage! A look back at the moments that defined our sexual culture in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good year for sex (it always is). Whether it was K-Stew's infidelity or kinky "mommy porn," we just couldn't stop talking about it. Here's a handy guide to what defined our sexual culture in 2012.</p><p><strong>Infidelity, sex tapes and <strong>scandal </strong>-- oh my!</strong></p><p>You would think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewinsky_scandal">it was 1998 </a>from our shock at the power of sex to take down powerful men. But no, it's 2012, and we still find ourselves shaking our heads at the thought that David Petraeus could risk his position as head of the CIA by carrying on an extramarital affair with his biographer, that a team of Secret Service agents could put their jobs on the line for a Colombian prostitute or that Chinese politicians could be captured in flagrante at a <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/racy-online-photos-chinese-sex-party-viral-speculation-communist-party-officials-involved-article-1.1137584">sex party</a> or fall for a so-called <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/sex-tape-bribe-chinese-official-viral-article-1.1208844">"honey trap."</a> We're astounded that Kristen Stewart could possibly desire more than Edward Cullen himself or that 76-year-old <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/21/poor_fred_willard/">Fred Willard</a> could be arrested at an adult theater. And when our upstanding neighbors are revealed to be clients of <a href="http://bostinno.com/2012/11/26/alexis-wright-client-list-police-reveal-more-johns-in-zumba-prostitution-case-photos/">the "Zumba prostitute,"</a> we still clasp our pearls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My X-rated sex-ed class</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_x_rated_sex_ed_class/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_x_rated_sex_ed_class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A porn studio offers graphic workshops on everything from oral to dirty talk. More shocking is how much we need it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The model, naked from the waist down, looked at the man sitting next to me in the front row and smiled. "You're in the splash zone," she said. Without missing a beat, he took off his leather jacket, draped it over the back of his chair, and then made the international hand gesture for "bring it on." And that she did: As the demonstration got underway, liquid so explosively gushed forth from in-between her legs that it sent me, but not my enthusiastic neighbor, ducking for cover.</p><p>Welcome to San Francisco porn studio Kink.com's <a href="http://www.armorystudios.com/workshops/">new sex-ed classes for adults.</a> Forget the sober diagrams and condom-clad bananas of your high school days; these classes feature real, live naked people having real, live sex. Instead of a sterile classroom, these workshops take place on elaborately designed porn sets (without cameras present). The class subjects range from oral sex to dirty talk, but this week I happened to attend a "g-spot and female ejaculation" class led by adult performer and director Madison Young. Our set: an ornate Edwardian living room filled with oriental rugs, red velvet curtains and dark wood paneling.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_x_rated_sex_ed_class/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_x_rated_sex_ed_class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A legal defense of donkey sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man accused of feeling up a farm animal argues an anti-bestiality law is unconstitutional. Does he have a point?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prosecution of a Florida man accused of having sexual contact with a miniature donkey is unconstitutional, according to his lawyers.</p><p>In a court motion, the <a href="http://www.ocala.com/article/20121211/ARTICLES/121219937?p=2&amp;tc=pg">defense claims</a> that the state law against bestiality deprives 32-year-old Carlos Romero of his "personal liberty and autonomy when it comes to private intimate activities."</p><p>But it's actually not <em>quite</em> as crazy a move as it might seem. The lawyers aren't arguing that Romero necessarily has a right to sex with donkeys, or any other farm animals for that matter. They're specifically targeting the language of <a href="http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0344/BillText/Filed/PDF">Florida's anti-bestiality law</a>, which does not require proof that an animal has been harmed or "of the sexual activity being non-consensual," or even of penetrative sexual contact.</p><p>The attorneys write, "Therefore, the only possible rational basis for the statute is a moral objection to sexual acts considered deviant or downright 'disgusting.'" And that, they argue, is unconstitutional: "The personal morals of the majority, whether based on religion or traditions, cannot be used as a reason to deprive a person of their personal liberties."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: There is no &#8220;gay gene&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/study_there_is_no_gay_gene/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/study_there_is_no_gay_gene/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that homosexuality is passed from parents to opposite-sex offspring through epi-genetics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers announced today that homosexuality isn't strictly genetic. But before the homophobes break out their party hats to celebrate this as proof of same-sex attraction being "unnatural," note that the study in the Quarterly Review of Biology argues that homosexuality is passed from parent to child.</p><p>The key here is epi-marks, which control how genes are expressed, and they just might explain the evolutionary stumper of why, if homosexuality is hereditary, it hasn't been eliminated from the gene pool.</p><p>As a press release explains in almost comprehensible terms, the study finds "sex-specific epi-marks, which normally do not pass between generations and are thus 'erased,' can lead to homosexuality when they escape erasure and are transmitted from father to daughter or mother to son."</p><p>U.S. News translates that: "A lesbian will almost always get the trait from her father, while a gay man will get the trait from his mother."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/study_there_is_no_gay_gene/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/study_there_is_no_gay_gene/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than actual porn!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boom in X-rated animated photos and GIFs may evidence shrinking attention spans, but they're unlikely to take over]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that X-rated GIFs had truly come of age when porn star Kimberly Kane <a href="https://twitter.com/kimberlykane/status/276576034986532865">tweeted</a> earlier this week that they were "better than actual porn." I'd heard similar proclamations from pornoisseur friends, but a celebrated adult performer calling it the pinnacle of smut? Now that is something.</p><p>For those of you who are visiting the World Wide Web for the first time ever, a GIF is a <a href="http://www.techterms.com/definition/gif">static or animated, looped image</a> that's been compressed for quick loading. The rest of you have probably come across your fair share of GIFs showing <a href="http://www.gifbin.com/981986">dramatic reactions</a>, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/fjelstud/the-definitive-collection-of-cat-gifs">catly shenanigans</a>, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/the-animated-gif-guide-to-hillary-clintons-adorab">dancing politicians</a> or Ryan Gosling doing <a href="http://www.vh1.com/celebrity/2011-08-08/the-ultimate-ryan-gosling-gif-wall/">any number of things.</a> Most GIFs are meant for laughs, but, increasingly, they're being designed to tickle a different bone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world&#8217;s worst online daters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From shirtless pics to graphic come-ons, sites are calling out dating profiles for a laugh -- and commiseration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's an overabundance of men flexing their abs while taking selfies in the bathroom mirror. Worse are the guys lifting their shirts, Situation-style, or hoisting up their strained biceps. It's a cornucopia of Weiner-esque chest-shaving and torso-gazing, and it is intended for our comedic entertainment.</p><p>Just ... not originally.</p><p>The shots are found on the Instagram account <a href="http://instagram.com/antidates/">Antidates</a>, which carries the explanatory tag line, "actual responses to dating ads. they never had a chance." It's one of several sites that have popped up with the express purpose of making fun of tactless online daters -- and the vast majority happen to be men attempting to court women. (This is no doubt in large part because men are more often the initiators on online dating sites, and there is something inherently awkward about initiating contact with a person you've only met virtually.) It isn't just absurd self-portraits -- most of the sites focus on outrageous come-ons, off-putting self-descriptions and horrific misspellings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hunter Moore: I lied!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunter moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The king of revenge porn says his new site won’t allow stalking after all -- and gets personal with Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out the whole reason I called Hunter Moore in the first place was because of a lie -- or a "semi-lie," as he preferred to put it.</p><p>Earlier this week, the king of the now-defunct revenge-porn site "Is Anyone Up?" announced that he would be returning with a new site, HunterMoore.tv, featuring his tried-and-true formula of jilted lovers sending in naked photos of their exes, along with links to their social media profiles and Moore's unique brand of body-snarking. Only, in an <a href="http://betabeat.com/2012/11/hunter-moores-scary-as-shit-revenge-porn-site-will-map-submitted-photos-to-peoples-addresses/">interview</a> with the New York Observer's Beta Beat, he claimed that he was also going to introduce a mapping feature "so you can stalk people." That inspired <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2012/11/hunter-moores-new-revenge-porn-site-even-more-repulsive-his-old-one/59448/">a flurry</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5964233/leaked-naked-sext-site-wants-your-address++so-strangers-can-stalk-you">of media</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=hunter%20moore%20stalk&amp;source=web&amp;cd=5&amp;ved=0CEkQFjAE&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2F2012%2F11%2F29%2Fhunter_moores_new_revenge_porn_site_is_scarier_than_his_last_one%2Fsingleton%2F&amp;ei=eza5UPOdJsvMigL3n4D4AQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNEqb_RryY1Y0V7OBD6abIVKucdO3Q&amp;cad=rja">attention</a>: Moore was back, and more villainous than ever! There was a barely concealed puritanical glee in even the disapproving chatter about this brave new world of punishment-porn, and a gruesome awe at just how far he was willing to take this Web-smut version of the "Saw" franchise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Porn stars aren&#8217;t &#8220;damaged&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/study_porn_stars_arent_damaged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/study_porn_stars_arent_damaged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report finds adult actresses are happier than the rest of us -- and that being naked might lead to self-esteem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common stereotype of a female porn star is an insecure, sexually abused, mentally ill and/or drug-addled woman. It's one supported by anecdotes (most memorably by Linda Lovelace's harrowing autobiography) and rhetoric (the feminist scholar Catharine MacKinnon went so far as to claim that all porn actresses were sexually abused as children). But as for actual research? Eh, not so much.</p><p>Now, a <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2012.719168">new study</a> claims to have debunked this truism, which is known as the "damaged goods hypothesis."</p><p>Some performers were amused by the news. "As a happy, healthy female porn performer, my reaction is: thanks, science, thanks so much for proving I am real," says writer and porn performer <a href="https://twitter.com/MissLoreleiLee">Lorelei Lee</a> in an email.</p><p>On a similar note, porn actress <a href="https://twitter.com/thedylanryan">Dylan Ryan</a> tells me, "It's about time that research catches up to the realities for a great many women who perform in porn," she says in an email. "It's important to me as a performer that the conversation evolve and develop to make space for the (as in any community and population) diversity of experiences, personalities and lifestyles of porn performers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/study_porn_stars_arent_damaged/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/study_porn_stars_arent_damaged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How porn became a civil right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/how_porn_became_a_civil_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/how_porn_became_a_civil_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playboy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We didn't always believe that Playboy was constitutionally protected. An expert explains how sexual rights evolved]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you feel if your partner brought pornography home? That was the question history professor Leigh Ann Wheeler asked her students 15 years ago at the University of Minnesota. Almost every female student responded that she was "uncomfortable" with pornography, but that she wouldn't violate her partner's right to free speech by prohibiting it.</p><p>Wheeler, now a professor at Binghamton University, found this curious. In her new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/How-Sex-Became-Civil-Liberty/dp/0199754233/ref=la_B001KHONS2_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1353451577&amp;sr=1-1 ">"How Sex Became a Civil Liberty,"</a> she writes, "At the end of the 20th century, these students equated criticizing pornography and exercising control over their private space with advocating censorship, eliding, in the process, critical distinctions between private conduct and state action." Just a few decades earlier it was unthinkable that sexual rights could be protected by the Constitution. But here her students were conflating "personal opinions, private relationships, and civil liberties," she says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/how_porn_became_a_civil_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/how_porn_became_a_civil_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expert: Guys don&#8217;t want casual sex!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/expert_guys_dont_want_casual_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/expert_guys_dont_want_casual_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most men aren't sex-crazed Casanovas, a researcher argues. They're in search of relationships, not one-night stands]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's got one thing on his mind and one thing only: sex. Namely, how to get it as often and with as many different women as humanly possible. He's become a staple of modern comedies, from "Porky's" to "American Pie" to "Superbad," and he's what research psychologist Andrew P. Smiler calls the "Casanova stereotype."</p><p>This popular conception of young men is the subject of Smiler's new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Challenging-Casanova-Beyond-Stereotype-Promiscuous/dp/1118072669">"Challenging Casanova: Beyond the Stereotype of the Promiscuous Young Male."</a> This stereotype "tells us that guys are primarily interested in sex, not relationships," he writes. "This contributes to the notion that guys are emotional clods who are incapable of connecting with their partners because, hey, they're just guys, and guys are only interested in sex. " The result is the belief that "guys shouldn't be expected to achieve any type of 'real' emotional intimacy with their partners."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/expert_guys_dont_want_casual_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/expert_guys_dont_want_casual_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon&#8217;s Sexiest Man of 2012: The interview</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_man_of_2012_the_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_man_of_2012_the_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFL star Chris Kluwe is one of same-sex marriage's most surprising and vocal defenders. That's hot -- and so is he]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year,  Minnesota Vikings punter and passionate same-sex marriage defender Chris Kluwe scored the No. 1 spot on our list of the sexiest men of the year. (Check out our complete list <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_men_of_2012_2/singleton/">here.)</a> This gave us an excuse to call up the highly principled hunk to talk about his own homophobic past, locker room ribbing and what it's like as a straight man to become a gay sex symbol.</p><p><strong>So, every year Salon comes up with a list to counter People magazine’s “sexiest men” issue — a group of guys who are more than just beefcakes. </strong></p><p>[Cracks up]</p><p><strong> This time around we’ve chosen you as our No. 1 “sexiest man.”</strong></p><p>Well ... thank you. I appreciate that.</p><p><strong>How does it feel?</strong></p><p>A little strange. I don’t think I’ve thought of being chosen as a “sexiest man” before.</p><p><strong>Those <a href="http://www.out.com/entertainment/sports/2012/10/02/chris-kluwe-vikings-warcraft">shirtless photos for Out magazine</a>, I’ve seen them circulated online by men and women alike. What’s it like suddenly becoming not only a sex symbol, but a sexuality-spanning sex symbol?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_man_of_2012_the_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_man_of_2012_the_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon&#8217;s Sexiest Men of 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_men_of_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_men_of_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget People's airbrushed list. For us, sexiness is about brain as much as brawn. What's hotter than that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Forget People's airbrushed list. For us, sexiness is about brain as much as brawn. What's hotter than that?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_men_of_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets of T-rex sex!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/secrets_of_t_rex_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/secrets_of_t_rex_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think sex is strange? A new book that examines the evolution of copulation since the dinosaur era will amaze]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John A. Long wasn't particularly interested in ancient animal sex. A successful paleontologist, he was more concerned with bones than the history of boning -- but then he stumbled on "the mother fish": a 380-million-year-old fossil of a <a href="http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placodermi%E2%80%9D">jawed placoderm</a> carrying an embryo. It was, and is, the earliest proof of internal fertilization (or sex, as we know it). Before long he was directing his very own "paleo porn," as he calls it: An animated video of this ancient creature getting it on.</p><p>That’s how Long ended up writing his new book about the evolution of copulation, which is cheekily titled, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0226492540/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Dawn of the Deed: The Prehistoric Origins of Sex."</a> From sharks that mate while doing a headstand on the ocean floor to ducks with enormous corkscrew penises, he humorously details the how and why of that funny little act we call sex. At times, the book is a bit heavy on autobiography of his paleontological finds, but that’s more than made up for by copious entertaining anecdotes about things like fruit bat fellatio and necrophilic snakes. Also, two words: T-rex sex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/secrets_of_t_rex_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/secrets_of_t_rex_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, goblin porn exists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/so_goblin_porn_exists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/so_goblin_porn_exists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the world of 3-D erotica, where all the characters from your local Halloween store get it on]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Internet porn, I thought I’d seen it all -- and then I stumbled on a goblin gang-bang. I’m talking 3-D animation of a group of bony, pale little creatures with bug-eyes and gnarled noses having their way with a buxom virtual woman. Every wart, every diseased fingernail, rendered in painstaking detail.</p><p>This was my introduction to the world of computer-generated X-rated fare via Renderotica, the leading purveyor of such content, and goblins are only the start of it. There are zombies, aliens, demons, werewolves, vampires -- virtually every ghoulish character found at your local Halloween emporium -- and, folks, they are butt-naked and boning. Most often, these are interspecies pairings between a female human and a male otherworldly beast of some sort (or beasts, plural). It isn't all action shots, though: There are pinups of virtual girls, ranging from the tame (i.e., bikini poses) to the bizarre (i.e., a woman rendered with a vagina for a mouth).</p><p>And there's more! The site also sells tools for making your own virtual porn, including special packs of designer "naughty bits" (e.g., the "Hot Beef Injection" download for $12), fetish gear, sex toys, positions and, yes, even artfully constructed pubic hair.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/so_goblin_porn_exists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/so_goblin_porn_exists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your homemade porn is safe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/your_homemade_porn_is_safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/your_homemade_porn_is_safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media's abuzz about a salacious study that says most amateur porn unwittingly lands online. It's just not true]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now here's a headline that will make many hearts stop: "Study: Vast Majority Of Homemade Porn, Private Photos End Up Online." <a href="http://www.wtsp.com/news/watercooler/article/279344/58/Study-Majority-of-homemade-porn-private-pics-end-up-online ">CBS alarmingly reports</a> today that "The vast majority of homemade pornography and private images on personal computers ends up on public websites called 'parasites.'" To which I exclaimed a string of expletives that I won't repeat here.</p><p>But, dude. It's just not true.</p><p>Contrary to the headlines, the study in question looked specifically at teenagers' self-made sexual content that was posted online. Researchers from Britain's Internet Watch Foundation found that 88 percent of the "self-generated, sexually explicit online images and videos of young people" encountered by researchers "had been taken from their original location and uploaded onto other websites," which are referred to as "parasite websites." That's <em>very</em> different from saying that 88 percent of private, self-made porn unwittingly ends up online. As IWF notes in a <a href="http://www.iwf.org.uk/about-iwf/news/post/334-young-people-are-warned-they-may-lose-control-over-their-images-and-videos-once-they-are-uploaded-online">press release</a>, "a parasite website is defined as a website created for the purpose of displaying sexual content ... which have apparently been taken/harvested from the website to which they were originally uploaded" -- typically a social networking or webcam site.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/your_homemade_porn_is_safe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/your_homemade_porn_is_safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amanda Todd&#8217;s only the start</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/amanda_todds_only_the_start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/amanda_todds_only_the_start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amanda Todd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedophilia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bullying from "cappers" pushed the teen to suicide. She's not the only young woman being pursued by Web creeps]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up the phone and dialed the number for the local field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. "I've found what I think is child porn," I told the operator, my voice shaking.</p><p>I was researching a popular "jailbait" message board this week when I discovered a thread filled with webcam screengrabs and videos of what looked to be pubescent girls in various states of undress and sexual activity. I've come across "barely legal" porn before, but this was different: These girls looked like they weren't a day over 13. The intimate webcam context lent an additional believability to it: It was easy to imagine someone convincing each of these seemingly underage girls via video chat to take off their clothes, all the while recording the action to later distribute far and wide or even to use as a bribe to get future "shows" out of them.</p><p>That is what so-called "cappers" do -- and they are what brought me to the jailbait message board in the first place, and ultimately to the FBI. They screen-capture live webcam chats -- which can involve anywhere from two to several hundred people -- while pressuring girls and young women to strip down. It starts with "show your stomach!" and quickly progresses from there like an online game of Truth or Dare. Sometimes all they get is a quick bra flash; other times they get a full-on "bate" (when a girl masturbates on camera). In the capper community, the latter would be called a "win."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/amanda_todds_only_the_start/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/amanda_todds_only_the_start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johns on Zumba prostitution ring</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/johns_on_zumba_prostitution_ring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/johns_on_zumba_prostitution_ring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13042482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As alleged clients' names are released in the Kennebunk, Maine, scandal, "hobbyists" take to the Web to vent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alleged prostitution ring run out of -- where else? -- a Zumba fitness studio is <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/maine-alleged-prostitution/index.html">rocking Kennebunk, Maine.</a> But the small-town community isn't the only one rattled by the scandal -- so is the larger nationwide network of johns, and they're taking about it online.</p><p>Some dedicated buyers-of-sex, or "hobbyists," as they call themselves, regularly take to specialized message boards for everything from reviewing escorts' various talents to debating presidential politics. As the names of 21 alleged clients of Alexis Wright, the accused instructor, are circulated, the Zumba case has become a hot topic.</p><p>Unsurprisingly, hobbyists seem chiefly concerned with the issue of law enforcement naming and shaming johns, an <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/shaming-johns-maine-case-reflects-trend-of-police-publicizing-names-of-prostitute-patrons/2012/10/13/e13d76f0-1544-11e2-9a39-1f5a7f6fe945_story.html">increasingly popular approach.</a> "I think the world needs to evolve a little," says "flyboyfromca" on the Erotic Review, the so-called Yelp for prostitution. "As a member of the community, I support our right to spend time with the people we choose, and I support a woman's choice to do what she wants with her time."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/johns_on_zumba_prostitution_ring/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/johns_on_zumba_prostitution_ring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I unleashed my freak!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/the_freak_in_all_of_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/the_freak_in_all_of_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDSM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative journalist sets out to explore the sexual fringe in this country -- and is most surprised by herself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn't expect to find Suzy Spencer -- a mostly celibate, middle-aged Southern Baptist with a self-described "terror of touch" -- on Craigslist's "casual encounters." But for a year, the true crime writer and New York Times bestselling author took to the site, along with Adult Friend Finder, to interview kinky strangers about their most intimate moments for the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0425219364">"Secret Sex Lives: A Year on the Fringes of American Sexuality."<br /> </a><br /> Spencer, who felt sexually "dead inside," figured her detachment made her just the person to write a sober, unbiased assessment of American sexuality -- but her journalistic remove quickly dissolved. She found herself flattered by her subjects' come-ons, titillated by dirty photos they had sent her and, by the end of the book, becoming more participant than observer. (Spoiler alert: The final chapter features her surprising sexual encounter with a swinger couple.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/the_freak_in_all_of_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/the_freak_in_all_of_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>