<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tracy Clark-Flory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tracy_clark_flory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why do men pretend to be women online?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the anonymity of cyberspace allows men to express their "feminine" side, which they might otherwise hide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking: Sometimes men pretend to be women online!</p><p>This shocking revelation comes courtesy of Markus Frind, founder of the immensely popular dating site Plenty of Fish, who <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/online-dating/10072961/Most-hot-women-seeking-hook-ups-online-are-men-says-dating-site-founder.html">explained</a> his reason for shutting down the site's casual sex section by announcing that of the site's 3.3 million daily U.K. users, there are only 6,041 "women" looking for a no-strings hookup -- and, even still, many of them are actually men. He told users that the "Intimate Encounters" section "can be summed up as a bunch of horny men talking to a bunch of horny men pretending to be women." Of course, I'm kidding about this being surprising news. Isn't it, like, Rule No. 1 of the Internet?</p><p>Speaking of, why is that the case? Why do men pretend to be women online?</p><p>In the 2004 academic article titled <a href="http://users.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/genderswap.html">“Do Boys (and Girls) Just Wanna Have Fun?”</a> psychologist John Suler lays out a handful of theories. First is the hypothesis of feminine exploration: “Due to the pressure of cultural stereotypes, it may be difficult for some men to explore within themselves what society labels as ‘feminine’ characteristics” and the “anonymity of cyberspace” allows them to “express their ‘feminine’ side which they feel they must otherwise hide.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most popular Tumblr porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site's users are afraid that Yahoo will make their smut disappear. We take a look at what there is to lose]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo's purchase of Tumblr has some devotees worried that what they love most about the micro-blogging platform -- the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/">GIF porn</a>, obvs -- will disappear. TechCrunch <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/business/how-much-tumblr-porn-stats/">calculated</a> that more than 10 percent of the service's most popular 200,000 sub-domains feature Yahoo-unfriendly adult material. The panic was barely lessened by CEO Marissa Mayer's <a href="http://jezebel.com/marissa-mayer-promises-to-leave-your-tumblr-porn-gifs-a-509046663">promise</a> to protect "the richness and breadth of content available on Tumblr." So I decided to take a look at what, exactly, Tumblr-ers have to lose -- by visiting the community's most popular adult blogs, of course. You know me, any excuse to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/">watch porn at work</a>!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will you marry me &#8212; once you&#8217;re done peeing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From popping the question while peeing to getting engaged for real estate, some proposals are charmingly unromantic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andi was sitting on the toilet peeing when her boyfriend bent down in front of her.</p><p>"It looks like you're proposing," she joked.</p><p>"Would you like me to?" he asked.</p><p>She laughed. "Yeah."</p><p>"Do you want a ring?"</p><p>"Yeah."</p><p>He went into the other room and came back with a diamond. He slid the family heirloom onto her finger before she even got up from the toilet. They're now happily married and it's a cherished story that they share "more frequently than is appropriate," she says.</p><p>After <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/">I wrote about </a>my own non-traditional proposal last week, people started sharing their own stories, like the toilet engagement above, with me. I couldn't get enough, so I started asking around for more. I was delighted to find that my feminism -- and basic critical thinking skills -- hadn't entirely inured me to romance. These stories of pragmatism, awkwardness and foiled plans were more enchanting than any viral YouTube proposal -- at least according to my warped sensibility. The traditional male proposal may still hold strong, as I wrote last week, but that doesn't mean that people aren't going against the ring-in-the-champagne grain -- or at least embracing the sweetness of imperfection.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does porn cause violence?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality in Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Slade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Weitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morality in Media says evidence proves that it does -- but the faith-based organization is wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today a press release from Morality in Media celebrating a supposed "anti-porn initiative" landed in my inbox -- and you can imagine my shock at realizing that I actually agree with the conservative, faith-based organization on something. Which is to say that I too believe that it was appropriate for Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel to announce last week, following an outrageously high estimate of sexual assault within the armed forces, that all military workplaces would be searched for inappropriate sexual material that might contribute to a hostile work environment.</p><p>Enforcing basic sexual boundaries in the workplace is one thing. Blaming sexual assault on pornography, which is what the MIM press release goes on to do, is another. It reads, "Research overwhelmingly demonstrates a link between pornography consumption and increased sexual violence." What that sentence suggests is that there is a demonstrated link between porn-watching and an increase in perpetration of sexual violence -- and that is patently untrue. The availability of Internet porn has been <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-sunny-side-of-smut&amp;page=2 ">shown</a> to be associated with a <em>decrease</em> in sex crimes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are men still proposing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage and gender roles are changing dramatically -- but we still expect guys to get down on one knee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn't have much of an audience. There was a couple just out of earshot reverently staring at the horizon, and a lone crow hovering in place a couple of feet in front of us, its glossy black body effortlessly buoyed by the lift of the ocean wind. "Hey, you," I told the bird, nonchalantly. "We just got engaged."</p><p>Christopher and I had hiked four miles through the mossy Point Reyes forest to a dramatic cliff overlooking the ocean. We sat in the dirt, which was pockmarked with mouse holes and accented with ice plant in electric-pink bloom. Turquoise waves churned below and a seagull took stomach-turning dives as we read each other letters we had written moments before alongside a shady creek. These notes -- our individual expressions of why we wanted to make this commitment -- said the same things with different words. We cried, hugged and then took turns asking, "Will you marry me?" We both said yes and, hands shaking, slipped engagement rings on each other's fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really, with the gay jokes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Samberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zach Galifianakis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week bro-medians are delighting in comedy about guy-on-guy action. Fellas, it's time for some new material]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bros, you are on notice: No more jokes about gay sex -- at least for the rest of the week. Between "Late Night With Jimmy Fallon's" homoerotic lip-sync skit and Zach Galifianakis' latest episode of "Between Two Ferns" featuring gay marriage as a punch line -- both of which took off today -- we have officially reached maximum capacity for jokes made by straight dudes about guy-on-guy sex.</p><p>In case you missed these viral videos, a recap: On Tuesday's "Late Night With Jimmy Fallon," the host challenged "The Office's" Krasinski to a lip-sync off. They went back and forth, taking turns performing songs of their choice -- notably, songs by high-pitched women for maximum laugh factor -- and ended with the grand finale of Krasinski pretending to sing "I'll Make Love to You" by Boyz II Men and waving Fallon onto the stage for an intimate embrace. This morning, several publications ran coverage of the skit with the apparently hilarious screenshot of the two faux-crooning <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/watch-john-krasinski-jimmy-fallon-wage-lip-sync-battle-article-1.1338357">with their faces inches apart.</a> (For the record, Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/jimmy_fallon_challenges_john_krasinski_to_a_lip_sync_off/singleton/">posted</a> the video, but ran with a different still.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst porn ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farrah Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backdoor teen Mom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the "Teen Mom" porno so that you don't have to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can never say I didn't do anything nice for you, because I just sat through all 70 minutes of the newly released "Teen Mom" porno, so that you don't have to. (And seriously, I recommend <em>not</em>.)</p><p>The video, unoriginally titled "Backdoor Teen Mom," helps to confirm Farrah Abraham's costar <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">James Deen's claim</a> that the scheme was to film the video in the style of a personal homemade sex tape and then pretend that it had been leaked against their will. (Shortly after filming it, he foiled that original plan by giving an honest answer to a reporter's probing question about the tape, which was being shopped around.) Deen is behind a hand-held camera for much of it; sometimes he sets it down down to catch the entire scene from a distance. Former "Teen Mom" star Abraham repeatedly calls him "baby" (actually, it's a grating whine of "baaayyybeeeee"), as though they're in an intimate relationship and not strangers filming a porno. At one point, she attempts to lead him up the stairs to the bedroom with, "Come on, boyfriend." She engages in baby talk -- "give me kisses," "come cuddle" -- that is creepily reminiscent of scenes of her interacting with her daughter on "Teen Mom." She even calls him "butthead" at one point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Kluwe: &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; if LGBT activism got me cut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_kluwe_i_dont_know_if_lgbt_activism_got_me_cut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_kluwe_i_dont_know_if_lgbt_activism_got_me_cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris kluwe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Vikings' punter tells Salon he's not sure why he's out of a job, and how much he supports Jason Collins]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Kluwe isn't ready to speculate on whether his getting cut from the Minnesota Vikings had anything to do with his LGBT activism.</p><p>"I don't know because I'm not in the meetings with the managers when they make decisions like that," he says. "The only thing I can affect is how well I go out and punt the ball."</p><p>For now, he's just "trying to earn a job with another team," says Kluwe, Salon's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/salons_sexiest_man_of_2012_the_interview/">"sexiest man" of 2012.</a></p><p>That said, <a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/04/28/kluwe-thinks-his-activism-for-human-rights-could-get-him-cut/">NBC quoted</a> a text message from him reading, "It's a shame that in a league with players given multiple second chances after arrests, including felony arrests, that speaking out on human rights has a chance of getting you cut." So it maybe played a part in his getting cut, but maybe not. Either way, he thinks it sucks that it's possible that it did.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_kluwe_i_dont_know_if_lgbt_activism_got_me_cut/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_kluwe_i_dont_know_if_lgbt_activism_got_me_cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The breakup coach: Sometimes ice cream and Alanis aren&#8217;t enough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_breakup_coach_sometimes_ice_cream_and_alanis_arent_enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_breakup_coach_sometimes_ice_cream_and_alanis_arent_enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breakups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breakup coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alanis Morrissette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new breed of life coach will charge good money to help you get over heartbreak ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to call him. That's a phrase Susan J. Elliott heard from a client just this week -- and one she hears most weeks. Newly single women will time and again try to get permission from her to call their ex. That's because the former therapist is a <a href="http://www.howaboutwe.com/date-report/got-10k-this-heartbreak-coach-says-she-can-get-you-over-your-breakup-in-a-day/">new breed</a> of personal motivator: The breakup coach.</p><p>There is no shortage of professed wisdom on getting through heartbreak: There are women's magazines, advice columnists, self-help books and, of course, the cliche Sunday brunch proclamations of "you deserve better." That's not to mention the prescriptions of a Katherine Heigl movie, a tub of ice cream and some "Jagged Little Pill" karaoke. And yet, enough people still find themselves in search of post-breakup help that Elliott now does breakup coaching full-time and has clients the world over. It was recently rumored, and totally unsubstantiated, that Katy Perry paid a high-priced breakup coach to get over her ex-husband Russell Brand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_breakup_coach_sometimes_ice_cream_and_alanis_arent_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_breakup_coach_sometimes_ice_cream_and_alanis_arent_enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academia does porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An editor at the first peer-reviewed journal on smut talks about why the topic deserves scholarly attention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ever there was a sign of the mainstreaming of pornography, this is it: British publishing house Routledge is producing an academic journal about smut.</p><p>No, this is not the plot of another hot-for-teacher flick -- although here's hoping this journal begets its own porn parody. (I can picture it now: An orgiastic "peer-review process" and dialogue along the lines of, "I'll show you some inter<em>sex</em>tionality.) According to a recent <a href="http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/cfp/rprncfp.pdf">call for papers</a>, Porn Studies is "the first dedicated, international, peer-reviewed journal to critically explore those cultural products and services designated as pornographic and their cultural, economic, historical, institutional, legal and social contexts," with an emphasis on "sexuality, gender, race, class, age and ability."</p><p>The journal's editors, Feona Attwood and Clarissa Smith, are looking for papers that examine "specifically sexual and explicit media forms, their connections to wider media landscapes and their links to the broader spheres of (sex) work across historical periods and national contexts." The journal won't be published until spring of 2014 -- because peer review takes time, ya'll -- but select articles will be published online as they're ready. From the first issue, you can expect discussions of everything from obscenity trials to Australian manga to "how we think of fantasy in relation to porn," Smith told me by phone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was a rapper sexually assaulted onstage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip-hop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumors have spread of an artist receiving oral sex during a show, but now a friend says it was non-consensual]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rumor was retweeted ad infinitum: Last week, a popular rapper got a blow job onstage from a female fan during a show in Minneapolis. When someone tweeted at the artist in question to ask if the rumor was true, he -- or someone using his Twitter handle -- responded, "and didn’t miss one bar." As the tale jumped from Twitter to various music blogs, the boastful tweet was deleted, but the buzz continued. Some virtually high-fived the rapper, while others found it just another story about misogyny and objectification of women in hip-hop. But today, rapper Kitty Pryde, who is currently on tour with the rapper in question and witnessed the incident in person, wrote a blog post reframing it as sexual assault. "It was an <em>actual sexual assault</em>, and somehow nobody gives a fuck about that but me," wrote Pryde, who refers to the rapper as her "best friend."</p><p>As you can probably tell, I've decided to not name the rapper. It isn't difficult to figure out who he is, of course, but it seems a matter of principle to keep his name out of this article. After all, we're talking about an incident that at least one person is calling a sexual assault, and which Pryde argues involved reverse sexism and double standards when it comes to sexual assault.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/was_a_rapper_sexually_assaulted_onstage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When she wants sex more</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stereotype is of a frigid wife, but plenty of women find themselves the more desiring partner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once in bed at night, Cathy's boyfriend would almost instantly curl up in the fetal position facing away from her and begin breathing heavily as though asleep. "But if I put my arm around him, he would stiffen up and hold his breath," she says. "A couple times, I even saw him hurriedly shut his eyes." Sometimes the 37-year-old from St. Louis, Mo., would take a more direct approach, telling him, "I want to be with you" -- but she often ended up being rebuffed. It wasn't uncommon for him to ask, "Why do we have to have sex all the time?"</p><p>This is the gender reversal of what we're used to hearing: stories about women complaining of a headache or offering a simple, "Not tonight, honey." Just this week, the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578438713861797052.html">published a piece</a> ostensibly about "differing expectations about sex" in relationships in general, but which fell back on the stereotype of the frigid wife who withholds sex. The piece presented only one real-life example of such a dynamic and, despite mentioning far, far down in the piece a study on desire that found no significant gender differences, the piece ran with the headline, "He Says 'More' and She Says 'No.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/when_she_wants_sex_more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Condoms shouldn&#8217;t be a crime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New York, rubbers are used as evidence of prostitution -- which only discourages people from using them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City loves condoms. The municipality has its very own brand of rubbers. Every month, the Department of Health hands out more than 3 million of them. But the NYPD considers those same city-issued condoms, along with your run-of-the-mill Trojan, to be evidence of a crime: prostitution. (Some have <a href="www.villagevoice.com/2013-03-06/news/nyc-s-condom-insanity/full/">suggested</a> that this is a blatant attempt by law enforcement to meet quotas.)</p><p>The health impact is clear: As Human Rights Watch <a href="http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/us0712ForUpload_1.pdf">reported</a>,"Police use of condoms as evidence of prostitution has the same effect everywhere: despite millions of dollars spent on promoting and distributing condoms as an effective method of HIV prevention, groups most at risk of infection ... are afraid to carry them and therefore engage in sex without protection as a result of police harassment." What's more, "Outreach workers and businesses are unable to distribute condoms freely and without fear of harassment as well."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/condoms_shouldnt_be_a_crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;No one has ever had more than one partner and not paid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at Pam Stenzel, the popular Christian speaker who has renewed controversy over abstinence-only education]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pam Stenzel impressively rattles off a list of diseases at an auctioneer's speed: "HPV, genital warts, syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes, chlamydia, trichomoniasis, vulvodynia, arthritis, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIV!" The Christian advocate is pacing the stage in her signature cool-mom denim jacket, warning an audience of teenagers about the potential consequences of sex. With a tone that would seem at home in a church-turned-comedy-club, she emphasizes the worst-case scenarios -- a radical hysterectomy, cancer, death! But there is one relevant thing that she doesn't bother to mention: condoms.</p><p>This is just <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il2JaN_0LdY">one scene</a> from several YouTube videos of Stenzel, the same speaker behind a recent controversy over abstinence-only education. After Stenzel gave a lecture at George Washington High School, 17-year-old Katelyn Campbell took to the national media to complain about being subjected to the activist's "slut-shaming" message. Campbell's bravery didn't stop there: As a result of exercising her right to free speech, her principal allegedly threatened to contact Wellesley College, where she had already been accepted, to complain about her "bad character" -- so, Campbell quickly lawyered up and filed an injunction against him. (Wellesley's official Twitter account soon sent out the following <a href="https://twitter.com/Wellesley/status/324624597012074496">tweet</a>: "Katelyn Campbell, #Wellesley is excited to welcome you this fall" -- and the Internet rejoiced at perhaps the only bit of sunny news this week.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/no_one_has_ever_had_more_than_one_partner_and_not_paid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>190</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young, gay and trying too hard</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research finds that male sexual minorities often compensate for stigma by overachieving]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his memoir-cum-manifesto, Yale Law School professor Kenji Yoshino <a href="”http://www.amazon.com/Covering-Hidden-Assault-Civil-Rights/dp/0375760210”">wrote of his college years</a>, “I sensed these bodies knew other bodies the way I knew calculus or Shakespeare,” he said. "On Saturday nights, I would sit in my cement-block dorm room with my face lit green by my IBM’s glow, agonizing not over women, or men, but line breaks." That's because Yoshino was gay and in the closet -- and, according to what's known as the "Best Little Boy in the World" hypothesis, perhaps overcompensating for the stigma he faced as a sexual minority.</p><p>This theory holds that closeted young men in bigoted environments often respond by overachieving in certain areas, like sports or academics -- the idea being that it's an adaptive means of finding a sense of self-worth where they can. It can also serve to distract from their sexuality: As Andrew Tobias wrote in his 1976 memoir, "The Best Little Boy in the World," a key "line of defense" was his endless list of activities. "No one could expect me to be out dating ... when I had a list of 17 urgent projects to complete," he wrote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/young_gay_and_trying_too_hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad advice for cheated wives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former escort turned "infidelity counselor" tells women to give their husbands more sex. It's not the answer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's an irresistible hook: A woman who used to charge cheating husbands for sex starts charging cheated wives for advice on how to prevent their husbands from cheating. It's no surprise that UK tabloid <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/real_life/4889529/hooker-turned-relationship-counsellor.html ">the Sun</a> went for it -- along with a fancy photo shoot of escort-turned-relationship-expert Rebecca Dakin and the splashy headline, "I had sex with 1,000 men as £700-a-time hooker ...now I’m an infidelity counsellor."</p><p>Normally it'd be the type of all-sorts-of-exploitative piece I'd barely roll my eyes at before moving along -- but it's the advice she's offering in particular that deserves a second look, if only because it's so pedestrian, and so misguided.</p><p>Her teaching? Have lots of sex with your husband.</p><p>To Dakin's credit, she acknowledges that there are "obviously other factors" to infidelity, but she argues that, as the Sun paraphrases, it most often "simply comes down to not giving their men enough sex." She also falls back on some classic gender stereotypes: "Men are sexual creatures -- unlike a lot of women, they can separate the act of sex from love," she said. (I will take a moment here to give Dakin the benefit of the doubt: It's hard to know where her advice ends and the Sun's sensationalist editorializing begins; I've contacted her but have yet to hear back.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bad_advice_for_cheated_wives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wait, men fake orgasms?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erectile dysfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book delivers surprising news about male sexuality -- including that, yes, some guys are really fooling you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago, a 25-year-old male patient walked into Dr. Abraham Morgentaler's office with a surprising problem: He was faking orgasms.</p><p>A man faking it? Morgentaler, an associate clinical professor of urology at Harvard Medical School, had never heard of such a thing. After he got over the puzzle of how a man could effectively pull off such a ... sleight of semen, he got to the patient's motivation. As Morgentaler writes in his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805094245/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Why Men Fake It: The Totally Unexpected Truth About Men and Sex,"</a> his patient was having trouble climaxing during sex with his girlfriend, so he feigned pleasure for her benefit. He "was simply trying to do what he believed was the right thing by her."</p><p>Morgentaler came to realize that faking it was more common among men than he had realized -- and that this general sexual sentiment was, too. "That is a refrain I hear regularly from men in one form or another, yet this admirable, loving aspect of male sexuality is hidden among the detritus that passes as wisdom about what men are all about," he writes. His book -- which paints a portrait of men who feel anxious about their erections, pressured into having sex and concerned about their partner's pleasure -- is all about correcting that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaunt it while you got it?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farrah Abrahams says that's her reason for getting naked in front of the camera -- and she's hardly the first]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former "Teen Mom" Farrah Abraham has come out to confirm that, yes, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">she filmed a "sex tape"</a> with James Deen, the world's most famous male porn star -- but she says she intended it for personal consumption only. (Unless someone wants to pay at least $2 million for the right to distribute it, she clarified.) Her story conflicts with that of her costar, who implied that the original plan was to professionally film a porno and then pretend that it was a homemade sex tape that had gotten leaked -- but whatever. What's more interesting is how she chose to explain her motivation for allegedly commissioning the film: "I wanted my own personal video made and photos taken for myself. When I am older I will have my best year to look back on." She added, "This is just something I personally needed for me."</p><p>Ah, the old "flaunt it while you've got it" rationale.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/flaunt_it_while_you_got_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Teen Mom&#8221;: The porno</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farrah Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex tape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult actor James Deen says reality-TV star Farrah Abraham wanted to stage a sex tape leak. She says he's lying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, former "Teen Mom" star Farrah Abraham took to Twitter to deny <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/09/james-deen-farrah-abraham-sex-tape-plot/">allegations</a> that she had "concocted" a sex tape plot -- and to call porn star James Deen a [sic] "lier." In case you've missed the kerfuffle, a recap: Word surfaced yesterday that a sex tape featuring 20-year-old Abraham was being shopped around. Then a photograph circulated of her <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/08/farrah-abraham-sex-tape-james-deen-vivid-teen-mom/">holding hands</a> with porn star James Deen. Meanwhile, Abraham denied the existence of such a video and then vaguely threatened legal action. She told TMZ, "If I had my own personal stuff, that's my own personal thing." <em>Ohhkidoki.</em></p><p>But then Deen claimed that he had actually been hired by an unnamed porn company to film a video with Abraham. <em>He</em> <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/09/james-deen-farrah-abraham-sex-tape-plot/">told TMZ</a>, "I think what happened is that they were going to pass it off as a 'sex tape,'" he said. But then "somebody saw us coming out of a building together ... and people asked me what's going on ... and I have this problem where I can't really lie, so I was like, 'We're making a porno!'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminalizing &#8220;revenge porn&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more people post naked pics of exes, the law has failed to keep up. Some activists are trying to change that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a woman does a Google search on her own name and up comes a page featuring a naked photo that she sent to an ex-boyfriend. There are links to her Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn account. In the comment thread, anonymous trolls critique every inch of her body. Perhaps her home phone number and address are also included. Say she contacts the local police in tears, only to be told that the post is perfectly legal -- or worse, that “boys will be boys.”</p><p>This is becoming an increasingly common scenario, activists say, given the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/">proliferation of “revenge porn"</a> and the legal system's failure to catch up with it.</p><p>A new bill in Florida is aiming to remedy that: It would make it a felony to publish online nude photos or videos of a person without their permission and along with identifying information. At the same time, activists around the country are petitioning for both state and federal laws to criminalize what they call “non-consensual porn.” A recent class action lawsuit filed by more than 20 women in Texas against revenge porn site Texxxan.com along with its host GoDaddy has only turned the heat up on the issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
