<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tracy Clark-Flory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tracy_clark_flory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay marriage? Ca-ching!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wedding industry is beginning to court same-sex dollars -- with caution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very same day that the Supreme Court handed down rulings in favor of marriage equality, popular wedding site The Knot premiered its <a href="http://wedding.theknot.com/real-weddings/same-sex-weddings.aspx">digital magazine</a> for LGBT brides- and grooms-to-be. It was a powerful reminder: There's a lot of money to be made on gay marriage. Same-sex weddings will bring California businesses $492 million in the next three years, according to one <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-weddings-economy-20130626,0,1659205.story">recent estimate</a>. In 2004, Forbes <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2004/04/05/cx_al_0405gaymarriage.html">predicted</a> that if legalized in all states, same-sex weddings could generate $16.8 billion from LGBT couples who decided to get hitched. It’s already an estimated $55 to $70 billion industry. Major brands have begun to take note.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to be a straight ally in post-DOMA America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to SCOTUS, actress Kristen Bell has ended her equality-minded marriage protest. Do such protests matter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday morning, actress Kristen Bell <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kristen-bell-proposes-to-dax-shepard-after-doma-overturned-2013266">proposed</a> to Dax Shepard, the father of her 3-month-old daughter, via tweet. She wrote to him, "will you marry me? Xo #marriageequality #loveislove." You see, as the "Veronica Mars" star told Larry King last year, "The reason we're not rushing to get married is because I don't feel appropriate taking advantage of a right that's denied to my [gay and lesbian] friends.”</p><p>But then the Supreme Court ruled the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional and dismissed a Proposition 8 appeal, clearing the way for same-sex marriage in California.</p><p>Bell is far from the first straight person to boycott the institution in the name of marriage equality. Back in 2003, the Village Voice ran <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2003-12-09/news/standing-on-ceremony/2/">a piece</a> about the trend of doing just that among progressive heterosexual couples. <a href="http://www.nationalmarriageboycott.com">The National Marriage Boycott</a> has gotten more than 15,000 signatures from gays and straights alike who have pledged to wait to marry until "full federal marriage equality" is achieved. Shortly after Bell's announcement, a straight couple that had "always said we wouldn't marry while our queer friends couldn't" <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/243623/Should-we-get-straightmarried-in-California-this-week">took to MetaFilter</a> to ask whether they should marry now, given the SCOTUS news.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get chicks without being a jerk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/how_to_get_chicks_without_being_a_dick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/how_to_get_chicks_without_being_a_dick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pickup artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pickup artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken hoinsky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With pickup artist misogyny in the news once again, here's some advice on attracting women -- without the sexism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is all pickup advice sexist? That's what I found myself wondering after "pickup artist" Ken Hoinsky made headlines last week by raising more than $16,000 via a Kickstarter campaign to publish his book, "Above the Game: A Guide to Getting Awesome With Women." Critics say Hoinsky's idea of a pickup is actually predatory -- for example, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/pickup_artist_ken_hoinsky_apologizes_for_promoting_sexual_assault/">he advises</a> men to “continue to try to escalate physically" with a woman until she responds by shouting "STOP" or "GET AWAY FROM ME."</p><p>The controversy inspired Maria Bustillos at the Awl to write <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2013/06/ken-hoinsky-on-rape-culture-women-and-mistakes">a defense of Hoinsky</a> with a great big nod of sympathy to all the "shy fellows" out there. I disagree with her contention that Hoinsky's advice is harmless -- but we do agree on one thing: There is nothing wrong with wanting to attract women -- whether it's for a one-night stand or a long-term relationship. The problem arises when the advice is sexist, demeaning or hostile.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/how_to_get_chicks_without_being_a_dick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/how_to_get_chicks_without_being_a_dick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>241</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: &#8220;You should put a condom on that&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/review_you_should_put_a_condom_on_that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/review_you_should_put_a_condom_on_that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spicy subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I check out Birchbox's erotic-themed imitators -- and encounter a bit of sexiness and a whole lot of yuckiness]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't do product reviews. That's mainly because my modesty has funny boundaries -- writing a deeply personal essay about sex? Sure! Reviewing a vibrator? <em>Why, I could never. Who do you think I am?!</em> But the recent explosion of companies offering monthly mailings of sex toys and lingerie -- all of them modeled after the wildly popular Birchbox, a subscription service for sampling beauty products -- begs for an exception.</p><p>That said, allow me to express my general cynicism going into this. I tend to think that Birchbox, as with most things, is a capitalist invention that helps fuel consumer insecurity and delusion about the potential for the right product to make them finally love themselves. (I have also considered subscribing.) In the same way, Birchbox-for-sex products hold the promise of fixing your sex life, which, if it's really in ruins, can probably only be improved by things that money can't easily buy.</p><p>But the novelty and surprise of a monthly mailing service does seem well-suited to "spicing things up in the bedroom," as they say. So I will proceed under the assumption that none of us are expecting to magically gain self-esteem or fix an emotionally dead marriage with any of these products. Deal? Deal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/review_you_should_put_a_condom_on_that/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/review_you_should_put_a_condom_on_that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the government screwing pornographers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/is_the_government_screwing_pornographers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/is_the_government_screwing_pornographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2257 regularions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech Coalition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult movie producers and sex educators are taking the attorney general to trial over a record-keeping law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes up only a couple of seconds of screen time: a dry legal notice claiming that all performers are over 18 years of age and that proof is kept in such-and-such location. This <em>wankus interruptus</em> is mandated by the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act, which requires rigorous record keeping for all producers of "sexually explicit" content as a means of both identifying and preventing child pornography. This burden on pornographers might not seem an issue of great national import, but the Free Speech Coalition says that the requirements, otherwise known as 2257 Regulations, violate the Constitution. That’s why the organization -- along with individual plaintiffs who work in porn and sex education -- has taken Attorney General Eric Holder to court.</p><p>Thing is, this isn’t just relevant to people whose work intersects with sex. Jeffrey J. Douglas of the Free Speech Coalition tells me that because this law is overly broad, "every person who engages in 'sexting' images" violates it. Which is to say: EVERYONE AND THEIR MOM IS BREAKING THE LAW. Of course, 2257 is rarely, if ever, used to target people outside of the porn industry -- but that doesn’t change the fact that the law itself might permit it, he says. "Whenever the government is allowed to engage in systematic violations of the Fourth Amendment" -- which protects against unwarranted searches -- "everyone is at risk,” says Douglas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/is_the_government_screwing_pornographers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/is_the_government_screwing_pornographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confessions of a Playgirl editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/confessions_of_a_playgirl_editor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/confessions_of_a_playgirl_editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former insider dishes on the magazine's unmentionable gay fans, absurd photoshoots and bizarre reader mail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue vein meatroll, liver turner and purple-helmeted warrior of love. These were just a few of the words on the "13-page thesaurus of synonyms for penis" that Jessanne Collins collected as an editor at Playgirl magazine, which now only exists as an online brand and rare print publication. In her new e-book, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/how-to-be-a-playgirl-jessanne-collins/1115520872?ean=2940016707358">"How to Be a Playgirl,"</a> a bite-sized memoir of her time at the nudie mag, she writes, "Who were these people, who were turned on by words like <em>tickle gizzard</em>?"</p><p>Turns out the editors of the much-ridiculed magazine were often asking themselves the same questions as the general public: <em>Who reads this?</em></p><p>Those "tickle gizzard" fans -- "the wankership," as she puts it -- would flood her desk with letters. "Frequently, the handwriting on the envelopes [was] what one might call 'serial killer,'" she writes. "Just as frequently, it was heart-inflected in the manner of a giddy teenager. Sometimes the pages were tacky or crumby with substances better not wondered about." The mail was "totally creepy, a little bit heartwarming, and super tragic," she says. "Always, it made me need to immediately wash my hands." Among those were the often bizarre submissions from everyday men who wanted to appear in the magazine. She remembers one that read, "'I would like to pose in your prestigious magazine as a lumberjack and beside a nest of hornets."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/confessions_of_a_playgirl_editor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/confessions_of_a_playgirl_editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The crotch shot revenge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/the_crotch_shot_revenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/the_crotch_shot_revenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13323097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man sends a woman an unsolicited photo of his penis and she responds by contacting his mother]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When an Internet charmer by the name of Trevor sent a young woman an unsolicited dick pic, she responded with the situational equivalent of, "Would you speak to your mother with that mouth?" That is to say: She sent their correspondence to his mom. Then she posted screen captures of their conversation on her blog, aheartbeatchanged, which is currently down for unexplained reasons, with the warning, "Attention assholes: don’t sexually harass a girl when she can easily find you on Facebook and send your mom proof of your perpetuation of rape culture." Then it -- both the post and Trevor's "it" -- went viral.</p><p>It seems to be the year of female Internet vigilantes taking on male misbehavior. Just last week, as Salon's Anna North reported, a woman <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/alleged_cheating_husband_gets_shamed_on_facebook/">outed on Facebook</a> a stranger she allegedly overheard boasting about his marital infidelities. Naturally, the post went viral. A couple of months ago, Adria Richards tweeted a photo of men at a tech conference who she claimed were making sexually inappropriate jokes. It too blew up online, and one of the men was fired.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/the_crotch_shot_revenge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/the_crotch_shot_revenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>504</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A memoir of female lust</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/a_memoir_of_female_lust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/a_memoir_of_female_lust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unmastered]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katherine Angel bares all in a strikingly honest book about women's desire, and her own sexuality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When as a teenager Katherine Angel felt herself suddenly overflowing with lust, she began to wonder: Where are the similarly hungry women? In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Unmastered-Book-Desire-Most-Difficult/dp/0374280401">"Unmastered: A Book on Desire, Most Difficult to Tell,"</a> she says of her burgeoning erotic wanting, "The words I would have put this into, had I felt the urge -- the words I still put this into -- are these: I feel like a man."</p><p>This is a book for every woman who has ever felt like a man for being sexual.</p><p>It is largely a sexual autobiography, but also self-conscious proof-positive that women are capable of being just as desirous as men. She writes poetically about having her partner ejaculate on her: “I love this. The sudden wet coolness on me. The smell: summer rain on cement. Fresh, open windows.” Of her lover's swollen member, she says, "It is beautiful. It unnerves me, in its gorgeous attentiveness." It would be a daringly personal work for any woman to write, but perhaps especially so for Angel, a Cambridge-educated academic and feminist who has researched female sexual dysfunction.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/a_memoir_of_female_lust/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/a_memoir_of_female_lust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s a new macho sex boast</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/theres_a_new_macho_sex_boast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/theres_a_new_macho_sex_boast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cunnilingus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Douglas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it has nothing to do with penis size. Just ask Michael Douglas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly 15 years ago, an episode of "The Sopranos" showed just how emasculating some  men consider cunnilingus. Uncle Junior's lover Roberta tells him that he's "a real artist" when it comes to "kissing down there" -- but instead of puffing up his chest with pride and telling all his fellow mafiosi, he warns her not to dare spread the word. "They think if you suck pussy you'll suck anything," says Junior. "It's a sign of weakness and possibly a sign that you're a fanook." Tony finds out and humiliation ensues. Junior gets so enraged that he considers having his nephew murdered -- all over some oral.</p><p>Just contrast that scene with Michael Douglas' recent <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/the_worst_part_of_michael_douglas_cancer_brag/singleton/">proud profession</a> about going down.</p><p>Sure, the mafia may have a stricter definition of masculinity than the rest of society. It's also true that there are counter pop cultural examples from the late '90s; take Big Pun's rapping about his "thick tongue, known to make a chick come." But that "Sopranos" episode nonetheless expressed a widespread cultural attitude that has diminished tremendously in the last 15 years -- and how! But also, seriously, <em>how</em>?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/theres_a_new_macho_sex_boast/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/theres_a_new_macho_sex_boast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truth about female desire: It&#8217;s base, animalistic and ravenous</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/the_truth_about_female_desire_its_base_animalistic_and_ravenous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/the_truth_about_female_desire_its_base_animalistic_and_ravenous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female sexual dysfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Do Women Want?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Bergner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book on women's sexuality turns everything we think we know on its head]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a conspiracy theory at the heart of this book. Even to the most casual observer of human history, it isn’t news that women’s sexuality has been feared, suppressed and lied about. But <a href="http://www.amazon.com/What-Do-Women-Want-Adventures/dp/0061906085">"What Do Women Want?: Adventures in the Science of Female Desire"</a> by journalist Daniel Bergner uses groundbreaking sex research to show the ways in which our supposedly enlightened society still has female sexuality backward -- completely, utterly, profoundly.</p><p>In accessible and entertaining prose, "What Do Women Want?" details everything from individual women's fantasies to the search for a "female Viagra." More important, though, it represents a complete paradigm shift. The book, which grew from a much-discussed New York Times Magazine <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">cover story</a> in 2009, reveals how gender stereotypes have shaped scientific research and blinded researchers to evidence of female lust and sexual initiation throughout the animal kingdom, including among humans. It reveals how society's repression of female sexuality has reshaped women's desires and sex lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/the_truth_about_female_desire_its_base_animalistic_and_ravenous/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/the_truth_about_female_desire_its_base_animalistic_and_ravenous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>234</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: People lie about sex!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/breaking_people_lie_about_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/breaking_people_lie_about_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers discover that men and women fib about their sex lives to conform to gendered expectations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when science proves what we already know. A study out of Ohio State University has found that -- wait for it -- people lie about sex. But this isn't simply a case of researchers rehashing a truth already told by a million romantic comedies and stand-up comics. The study found that men and women fib about their sexual behaviors in order to conform to gendered expectations, and that sex is the one arena where this happens.</p><p>Per the usual, researchers had college students fill out a questionnaire -- this one concerning how often they engaged in over 100 different behaviors. All of the activities could be categorized, thanks to a previous study, as being generally perceived of as typically male or female. Here's an interesting twist: Half of the participants were hooked up to a polygraph machine, and told as much. The machine didn't actually work, but they didn't know that -- the point was to make them feel pressured to tell the truth. What researchers found was that regardless of whether they were hooked up to the lie detector, men and women readily admitted to behaviors that didn't conform to gender norms. For example, men openly reported engaging in supposedly non-masculine behaviors like writing poetry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/breaking_people_lie_about_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/breaking_people_lie_about_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war on lad mags</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/the_war_on_lad_mags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/the_war_on_lad_mags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.K. activists claim that selling magazines featuring partially nude women is sexual harassment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selling nudie magazines is tantamount to sexual harassment and sex discrimination. That is, according to two activist groups in the United Kingdom, which are threatening retailers with legal action unless they remove so-called lad mags featuring partially or fully naked women from their shelves.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/may/27/lose-lads-mags-risk-legal-action">a letter</a> to the Guardian, representatives from the organizations UK Feminista and Object argue that "retailers are exposing staff and, in some cases, customers to publications whose handling and display may breach equality legislation" and "amount to sex discrimination and sexual harassment." As a result, they are calling on retailers "to urgently heed the call to Lose the Lads' Mags" with the warning that if they don't comply they might be vulnerable to legal action by aggrieved employees and customers.</p><p>They make these claims based on the Equality Act of 2010, a piece of legislation aimed at protecting equal access to employment. Specifically, they argue that the act of selling such magazines falls under the law's definition of sexual harassment as "unwanted conduct ... of a sexual nature” that violates an employee's "dignity" or "of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment." They argue that this applies to customers as well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/the_war_on_lad_mags/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/the_war_on_lad_mags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best of Tumblr porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/the_best_of_tumblr_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/the_best_of_tumblr_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sex educators, writers and porn stars share their favorite adult Tumblrs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, in light of worries that Yahoo's purchase of Tumblr would mean an end to porn on the micro-blogging platform, I reviewed its most popular adult blogs. I slogged through hours of explicit material -- <em>all for you. </em>But then, the sophisticated porn-oisseurs among you were like: Who needs this plebe porn? Show us the best!</p><p>Alright, I hear you. But there is only so much of the Internet -- even the pornographic Tumblr Internet -- that one woman can cover, so I called in some expert help from porn stars, journalists and sexperts. The result is a wildly eclectic bunch of blogs featuring everything from porn superstar Stoya to the indifferent cats of amateur porn. There is something in here for everyone -- even if you don't consider yourself a pornophile.</p><p>------------</p><p><strong><a href="http://art-or-porn.com">Art or Porn: You Decide</a></strong></p><p>Because of its "unique twist," sexpert <a href="http://emilymorse.com">Emily Morse</a> (she of <a href="http://www.bravotv.com/miss-advised/season-1/bio/emily-morse">Bravo TV fame</a>) suggests this Tumblr. "You get to look at beautifully composed photographs that can also be considered pornographic," says Morse. "The photographs titillate and tell a story. It's up to you to decide whether you're enjoying porn or art."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/the_best_of_tumblr_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/the_best_of_tumblr_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do men pretend to be women online?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the anonymity of cyberspace allows men to express their "feminine" side, which they might otherwise hide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking: Sometimes men pretend to be women online!</p><p>This shocking revelation comes courtesy of Markus Frind, founder of the immensely popular dating site Plenty of Fish, who <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/online-dating/10072961/Most-hot-women-seeking-hook-ups-online-are-men-says-dating-site-founder.html">explained</a> his reason for shutting down the site's casual sex section by announcing that of the site's 3.3 million daily U.K. users, there are only 6,041 "women" looking for a no-strings hookup -- and, even still, many of them are actually men. He told users that the "Intimate Encounters" section "can be summed up as a bunch of horny men talking to a bunch of horny men pretending to be women." Of course, I'm kidding about this being surprising news. Isn't it, like, Rule No. 1 of the Internet?</p><p>Speaking of, why is that the case? Why do men pretend to be women online?</p><p>In the 2004 academic article titled <a href="http://users.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/genderswap.html">“Do Boys (and Girls) Just Wanna Have Fun?”</a> psychologist John Suler lays out a handful of theories. First is the hypothesis of feminine exploration: “Due to the pressure of cultural stereotypes, it may be difficult for some men to explore within themselves what society labels as ‘feminine’ characteristics” and the “anonymity of cyberspace” allows them to “express their ‘feminine’ side which they feel they must otherwise hide.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_do_men_pretend_to_be_women_online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most popular Tumblr porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site's users are afraid that Yahoo will make their smut disappear. We take a look at what there is to lose]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo's purchase of Tumblr has some devotees worried that what they love most about the micro-blogging platform -- the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/">GIF porn</a>, obvs -- will disappear. TechCrunch <a href="http://www.dailydot.com/business/how-much-tumblr-porn-stats/">calculated</a> that more than 10 percent of the service's most popular 200,000 sub-domains feature Yahoo-unfriendly adult material. The panic was barely lessened by CEO Marissa Mayer's <a href="http://jezebel.com/marissa-mayer-promises-to-leave-your-tumblr-porn-gifs-a-509046663">promise</a> to protect "the richness and breadth of content available on Tumblr." So I decided to take a look at what, exactly, Tumblr-ers have to lose -- by visiting the community's most popular adult blogs, of course. You know me, any excuse to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/">watch porn at work</a>!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_most_popular_tumblr_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will you marry me &#8212; once you&#8217;re done peeing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From popping the question while peeing to getting engaged for real estate, some proposals are charmingly unromantic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andi was sitting on the toilet peeing when her boyfriend bent down in front of her.</p><p>"It looks like you're proposing," she joked.</p><p>"Would you like me to?" he asked.</p><p>She laughed. "Yeah."</p><p>"Do you want a ring?"</p><p>"Yeah."</p><p>He went into the other room and came back with a diamond. He slid the family heirloom onto her finger before she even got up from the toilet. They're now happily married and it's a cherished story that they share "more frequently than is appropriate," she says.</p><p>After <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/">I wrote about </a>my own non-traditional proposal last week, people started sharing their own stories, like the toilet engagement above, with me. I couldn't get enough, so I started asking around for more. I was delighted to find that my feminism -- and basic critical thinking skills -- hadn't entirely inured me to romance. These stories of pragmatism, awkwardness and foiled plans were more enchanting than any viral YouTube proposal -- at least according to my warped sensibility. The traditional male proposal may still hold strong, as I wrote last week, but that doesn't mean that people aren't going against the ring-in-the-champagne grain -- or at least embracing the sweetness of imperfection.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/will_you_marry_me_once_youre_done_peeing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does porn cause violence?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality in Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Slade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Weitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morality in Media says evidence proves that it does -- but the faith-based organization is wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today a press release from Morality in Media celebrating a supposed "anti-porn initiative" landed in my inbox -- and you can imagine my shock at realizing that I actually agree with the conservative, faith-based organization on something. Which is to say that I too believe that it was appropriate for Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel to announce last week, following an outrageously high estimate of sexual assault within the armed forces, that all military workplaces would be searched for inappropriate sexual material that might contribute to a hostile work environment.</p><p>Enforcing basic sexual boundaries in the workplace is one thing. Blaming sexual assault on pornography, which is what the MIM press release goes on to do, is another. It reads, "Research overwhelmingly demonstrates a link between pornography consumption and increased sexual violence." What that sentence suggests is that there is a demonstrated link between porn-watching and an increase in perpetration of sexual violence -- and that is patently untrue. The availability of Internet porn has been <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-sunny-side-of-smut&amp;page=2 ">shown</a> to be associated with a <em>decrease</em> in sex crimes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are men still proposing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage and gender roles are changing dramatically -- but we still expect guys to get down on one knee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn't have much of an audience. There was a couple just out of earshot reverently staring at the horizon, and a lone crow hovering in place a couple of feet in front of us, its glossy black body effortlessly buoyed by the lift of the ocean wind. "Hey, you," I told the bird, nonchalantly. "We just got engaged."</p><p>Christopher and I had hiked four miles through the mossy Point Reyes forest to a dramatic cliff overlooking the ocean. We sat in the dirt, which was pockmarked with mouse holes and accented with ice plant in electric-pink bloom. Turquoise waves churned below and a seagull took stomach-turning dives as we read each other letters we had written moments before alongside a shady creek. These notes -- our individual expressions of why we wanted to make this commitment -- said the same things with different words. We cried, hugged and then took turns asking, "Will you marry me?" We both said yes and, hands shaking, slipped engagement rings on each other's fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really, with the gay jokes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Samberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zach Galifianakis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week bro-medians are delighting in comedy about guy-on-guy action. Fellas, it's time for some new material]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bros, you are on notice: No more jokes about gay sex -- at least for the rest of the week. Between "Late Night With Jimmy Fallon's" homoerotic lip-sync skit and Zach Galifianakis' latest episode of "Between Two Ferns" featuring gay marriage as a punch line -- both of which took off today -- we have officially reached maximum capacity for jokes made by straight dudes about guy-on-guy sex.</p><p>In case you missed these viral videos, a recap: On Tuesday's "Late Night With Jimmy Fallon," the host challenged "The Office's" Krasinski to a lip-sync off. They went back and forth, taking turns performing songs of their choice -- notably, songs by high-pitched women for maximum laugh factor -- and ended with the grand finale of Krasinski pretending to sing "I'll Make Love to You" by Boyz II Men and waving Fallon onto the stage for an intimate embrace. This morning, several publications ran coverage of the skit with the apparently hilarious screenshot of the two faux-crooning <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/watch-john-krasinski-jimmy-fallon-wage-lip-sync-battle-article-1.1338357">with their faces inches apart.</a> (For the record, Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/jimmy_fallon_challenges_john_krasinski_to_a_lip_sync_off/singleton/">posted</a> the video, but ran with a different still.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/really_with_the_gay_jokes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst porn ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farrah Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backdoor teen Mom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the "Teen Mom" porno so that you don't have to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can never say I didn't do anything nice for you, because I just sat through all 70 minutes of the newly released "Teen Mom" porno, so that you don't have to. (And seriously, I recommend <em>not</em>.)</p><p>The video, unoriginally titled "Backdoor Teen Mom," helps to confirm Farrah Abraham's costar <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">James Deen's claim</a> that the scheme was to film the video in the style of a personal homemade sex tape and then pretend that it had been leaked against their will. (Shortly after filming it, he foiled that original plan by giving an honest answer to a reporter's probing question about the tape, which was being shopped around.) Deen is behind a hand-held camera for much of it; sometimes he sets it down down to catch the entire scene from a distance. Former "Teen Mom" star Abraham repeatedly calls him "baby" (actually, it's a grating whine of "baaayyybeeeee"), as though they're in an intimate relationship and not strangers filming a porno. At one point, she attempts to lead him up the stairs to the bedroom with, "Come on, boyfriend." She engages in baby talk -- "give me kisses," "come cuddle" -- that is creepily reminiscent of scenes of her interacting with her daughter on "Teen Mom." She even calls him "butthead" at one point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>