<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Tracy Clark-Flory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tracy_clark_flory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing strip clubs for rape</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians are holding adult entertainment venues responsible for funding sexual assault services]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be that strip clubs were merely blamed for society's ills. Now they're actually being charged for it.</p><p>In recent years, measures have been introduced in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Texas, Illinois and, most recently, California to apply special taxes to strip clubs -- specifically to fund sexual assault services. Now, even if you <em>aren't</em> inclined to view erotic entertainment as the source of all evil, this might seem an appropriate aim -- who wants to argue against additional support for rape survivors? It would seem even more so when you consider politicians' and activists' repeated claims of solid scientific evidence showing a link between strip clubs -- specifically those that sell alcohol -- and sexual violence.</p><p>That is, until you look at the alleged proof.</p><p>The key study advocates point to is one commissioned by the Texas Legislature in 2009. But that very report states, "no study has authoritatively linked alcohol, sexually oriented business, and the perpetration of sexual violence." What's more, when I talked to Bruce Kellison, director of the Bureau of Business Research at the University of Texas at Austin, and one of the authors of the report, about the alleged link between strip clubs and sexual assault, he said, "That's not really what our study was trying to do."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex ads: It isn&#8217;t just Backpage.com</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/sex_ads_it_isnt_just_backpage_com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/sex_ads_it_isnt_just_backpage_com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Facebook to Twitter and once again on Craigslist, a new study shows adult advertising permeates the Web]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new report could defend the besieged Backpage.com -- and it comes from the same research organization that has been used in the campaign against the classified-ad site.</p><p>Activists calling for the site to shutter its adult classifieds section on the grounds that it promotes sex trafficking -- like New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof -- have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/opinion/sunday/kristof-where-pimps-peddle-their-goods.html">seized on</a> research from Advanced Interactive Media Group (AIM) showing that across a handful of sites carrying prostitution ads, 70 percent come from Backpage. Another significant finding from the organization is that the site's parent company, Village Voice Media, makes $22 million from such ads. Again and again, critics of the site trot out these, and similar, statistics drawn from AIM research -- but the organization’s latest study highlights just how far online prostitution spans beyond Backpage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/sex_ads_it_isnt_just_backpage_com/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/sex_ads_it_isnt_just_backpage_com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massage therapists rubbed wrong by sex talk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12924275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Jennifer Love Hewitt show and the Travolta allegations have masseuses tired of being confused for sex workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, a licensed massage therapist, knows what it’s like having a famous client who expects something extra. He had an Academy Award-winning actor begin gyrating on his massage table before raising his hips in the air to show off his erection. “He was hoping that I would play with him in some shape or form,” he says.</p><p>Needless to say, Joe isn't surprised by <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-rt-gloria-allred-john-travolta-lawsuitmt1thewrap4014-20120516,0,305056.story">allegations by two masseurs</a> that John Travolta got handsy during massages. (Travolta's attorney has <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/showbiz/travolta-lawyer-fight/index.html">denied</a> all the allegations, and called them "ridiculous.") “It happens all the time,” he says, and not just with celebrity clients. He frequently encounters men who try to fondle him, usually while he’s working on their glutes or lower back and their hand happens to be level with his crotch. “They think they’re so original, but they’re all so much the same,” Joe says, his voice rising. “They all use the same tactics, the same body movements, the same gyrations and grinding my table, the [heavy] breathing.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A night at the vibrator museum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early vibrators were hand-cranked, two-person jobs -- and prescribed by doctors. How far we've come since then]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can now say that I've used a turn-of-the-century vibrator -- on my hand, but still.</p><p>The silver, hand-cranked contraption is usually kept behind glass at Good Vibrations' <a href="http://www.antiquevibratormuseum.com/">Antique Vibrator Museum</a> in San Francisco -- but staff sexologist Carol Queen made a rare exception. "This is very special," she whispered, unlocking the case and carefully pulling out Dr. Johansen's Auto Vibrator, a relic from 1904. The "auto" part is not so much: It was a two-person job, with her having to crank the device's handle to get it thrumming. Pressing my finger tips to its inch-wide circular platform of pleasure, I was pleasantly surprised by its power.</p><p>As I was by the two other vintage vibrators that I got to try out -- the White Cross Electric Vibrator from 1917, which has a pronged aperture that makes it seem like the ancestor of <a href="http://www.jimmyjane.com/shop/form2-p-125.html">Jimmyjane's Form 2</a>, and the Beautysafe Vibrator from the 1940s, which is reminiscent in look, feel and sound to a car waxer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother-daughter sexperts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susie Bright and her daughter, Aretha, make parental talks about sex look easy -- and fun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most parents loathe talking to their kids about the birds and the bees, let alone pubic hair grooming, faked orgasms and "water sports" -- but most parents are not legendary "sexpert" Susie Bright.</p><p>Better than talking about these things, she penned an advice column in 2009 with her daughter, Aretha, then 19, for the ladyblog Jezebel. Their answers to questions about everything from porn to Paxil were unflinching but playful, and at times controversial. Now the pair have collected those columns into a new e-book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mother-Daughter-Sex-Advice-ebook/dp/B0080A92QK">"Mother/Daughter Sex Advice."</a> Together, they read as an irreverent version of "Our Bodies, Ourselves" for the Internet age. The mother-daughter team also reflect on what the experience of writing the column was like, and it turns out it wasn't as weird as many would think: For the most part, it was just a continuation of conversations they had been having throughout Aretha's life.</p><p>I spoke with them both by phone about sex-positive parenting, where they draw the "TMI" line with each other, and their tips for making "the sex talk" less awkward.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An uneasy Backpage alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/an_uneasy_backpage_alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/an_uneasy_backpage_alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-trafficking activists may turn to the site for tips, but some say we're ultimately better without it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fight against child sex trafficking, Backpage.com is seen as both friend and foe. The online classified site screens ads, reports thousands of potential cases of exploitation, assists in police investigations and acts as a resource for those searching for trafficked kids. But even some activists who use the site for good see greater benefit in the site shutting down its adult section -- a move called for recently in Senate and House resolutions. This uneasy alliance reveals the complexities of the problem at hand.</p><p>In the past 16 months -- the length of time Backpage has been screening and reporting potential trafficking ads -- the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) received nearly 5,000 tips from the site. The center’s president, Ernie Allen, tells me, “There’s no question they have undertaken the screening and reporting process very aggressively.” Ultimately, though, the question is whether it’s enough.</p><p>After working with Craigslist in a similar fashion for almost two years, he says, “What we basically concluded was that it wasn’t working. The price you pay to allow this kind of activity to proliferate was too great.” Eventually, Craigslist shuttered its adult section and, Allen says, “the total volume of these ads dropped dramatically, and most of that has not come back.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/an_uneasy_backpage_alliance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/13/an_uneasy_backpage_alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the rack: A cultural history of breasts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did breasts evolve for lactation or to enhance sex appeal? A new book explores why they matter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's hard to be boobs. Sure, breasts are cherished as givers of milk and the pinnacle of sex appeal, but the modern world hasn't been good to mammaries.</p><p>As Florence Williams writes in "Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History," they're the most tumor-prone organ in the human body. They "soak up pollution like a pair of soft sponges," and transmit environmental toxins to babies through breast milk. "Breasts are bellwethers for the changing health of people," she says. While we've "genetically modified our crops to be able to protect them from the ill effects of pesticides," Williams writes, "we haven't yet figured out how to modify our breasts." Aside from using saline and silicone, of course.</p><p>Speaking of, breast implants are more popular than ever: It's the most common form of plastic surgery, above even nose jobs and liposuction. Even cosmetic enhancement notwithstanding, breasts are bigger than ever, and girls are getting them at increasingly younger ages. These recent dramatic changes are the heft of Williams' book, although she also covers evolutionary basics, like why we have them, what they're made of and how they work. It's an interesting and engaging read peppered with factoids the kid from "Jerry Maguire" would no doubt appreciate (e.g., "the average breast weighs just over a pound"). Occasionally, it veers into technical territory that will put some readers to sleep, but overall it's a much-needed look at why breasts matter more than we realize, even in our boob-obsessed society.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing sexual pathos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attempts to ban talk of birth control and homosexuality from classrooms reveal conservatives' deepest sexual fears]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a high school teacher having to separate a smooching pair outside the classroom door to protect herself from being sued for condoning "gateway sexual activity." Envision a sex education class where the mention of homosexuality is forbidden by law and discussion of contraception, or even puberty, is deemed unnecessary.</p><p>That's the world that would be created by a recent raft of abstinence education bills in Tennessee, Utah and Wisconsin. These initiatives are frightening -- but, viewed the right way, they shine light on extreme conservatives' deepest, darkest fears about sex. They're veritable inkblot tests for right-wing sexual pathos.</p><p>This week saw the passage of a <a href="http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB3310">Tennessee bill</a> that has the usual aim of abstinence initiatives -- to "exclusively and emphatically" promote abstinence until marriage. But the bill ultimately goes above and beyond the usual. It allows parents to seek damages in court if a teacher “promotes gateway sexual activity" to their child. It's unclear what exactly "gateway sexual activity” is because the measure defines it vaguely as "sexual contact encouraging an individual to engage in a non-abstinent behavior." Critics of the bill have suggested that this could include everything from hand holding to french kissing. The bill also proscribes "implicitly" promoting or "condoning" gateway sexual activity (the latter could mean simply turning a blind eye to it, hence the example above).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ab-ed moves ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sexist, anti-gay abstinence-only program quietly gets the Obama administration's stamp of approval. Why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just yesterday I wrote of how <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/">the war on sex has gotten worse</a> in recent years and, what do you know, now comes news that an abstinence-only program has been added to the government's list of gold-starred, "evidence-based" programs for pregnancy prevention.</p><p>The Department of Health and Human Services didn't bother to issue a press release about the problematic addition, but a handful of tireless sexual health advocates -- Debra Hauser, Monica Rodriguez, Elizabeth Schroeder and Danene Sorace -- noticed the change on the department's website and today <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/04/30/he-men-virginity-pledges-and-bridal-dreams-an-hhs-endorsed-curriculum">took to RH Reality Check</a> to spread the word. Previously, the only approved abstinence programs on the list were after-school programs.</p><p>The program, Heritage Keepers Abstinence Education, "contains little or no information about puberty, anatomy, sexually transmitted diseases, or sexual behavior," they write, nor does it "include information about the health benefits of contraception or condoms." Worse still, it relies on inaccurate, fear-based classroom exercises, promotes heterosexual marriage as the only happy and healthy life path, harps on the potential harm of premarital relationships, promotes hoary gender roles and stereotypes and entirely ignores the existence of LGBT people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The prudes are winning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of "America's War on Sex" says things have gotten worse under Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explosion of government-funded abstinence-only education, extreme assaults on reproductive rights, crackdowns on "indecency" and "obscenity": This is but a small sampling of what spurred sex therapist Marty Klein to publish "America's War on Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust and Liberty" in 2006, midway through George W. Bush's second term. Six years later, under a Democratic presidency, many of the same problems exist -- in fact, in some regards, things have gotten worse.</p><p>That's why Klein has updated the book in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Americas-War-Sex-Continuing-Psychology/dp/1440801282">a new edition</a> published this week to detail the ways that sexual rights have actually become "increasingly tenuous" under President Obama. Sure, abstinence-only programs have been greatly defunded, but the battle over sex education still rages on -- as do assaults on reproductive rights and all manner of sex-related business, entertainment, expression and experience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve got &#8220;baby fever&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/the_science_of_baby_fever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/the_science_of_baby_fever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12881691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could there be real science behind the old cliche of a woman\'s biological clock? I didn\'t believe it -- until now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started with a TV commercial. I can't remember what was being advertised. All I know is that it showed a father holding a newborn baby, and I started to cry -- not out of sadness, but awe. A baby, a beautiful <em>baby</em>!</p><p>Look, I'm human, and as such, I've always found babies cute -- but, suddenly, right around my 28th birthday earlier this year, crossing paths with them caused me to grab the arm of my acquaintance as though I'd seen a celebrity. Reactions formerly reserved for baby animals began to apply to <em>human infants</em>. Noticing this shift, a friend who hadn't seen me for a while remarked, "Since when are you baby crazy?" The real question is: Since when did I become such a cliché?</p><p>It's not that I'm ready to reproduce -- good God, no -- but I do want to have a baby eventually, though the possibility seems many years off. Will I be ready -- emotionally, professionally, financially, romantically -- before my fertility nose-dives? This longing feels physically acute -- a twitching in my ovaries, an itching in my arms to cradle. In the past, I'd always written off the cliché of the woman in her late 20s or early 30s with a "ticking biological clock" as a sexist trope. Now I find myself reconsidering and wondering how real it is, and why it is.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/the_science_of_baby_fever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/the_science_of_baby_fever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fifty Shades of Grey&#8221;: Dominatrixes take on Roiphe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Roiphe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12884371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, Katie Roiphe misses the point. Women aren't the only ones who find escape in submission]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about men? That was the first thought that came to mind after reading Katie Roiphe's <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/04/15/working-women-s-fantasies.html">Newsweek cover story</a> on the BDSM-themed "Fifty Shades of Grey" phenomenon, in which she controversially speculated that women's current fascination with the book's story line of female submission was the result of the "pressure of economic participation" and the "hard work" of striving for equality. The desire for submission is hardly something unique to women.</p><p>Who understands this better than professional dominatrixes? With so many speculating this week on Roiphe's article, I decided to hand the microphone over to women with a unique perspective on the dynamics in power and play.</p><p>Several said that Roiphe is actually on to something when she talks about submission as an escape from life's stresses -- only, this reasonable point is overwritten by her wrongheaded focus on women and the impact of feminism. Roiphe wonders whether there is "something exhausting about the relentless responsibility of a contemporary woman's life ... all that strength and independence and desire and going out into the world," and suggests "that, for some, the more theatrical fantasies of sexual surrender offer a release, a vacation, an escape from the dreariness and hard work of equality." What about the exhausting, relentless responsibility of contemporary <em>people's</em> lives?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret Service scandal: GOP gets ahead of the facts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12871811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don't know what happened in Colombia, but GOP congressmen are already talking about unlikely sexual blackmail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secret Service agents, with their impenetrable black sunglasses and unwavering stoicism, seem anonymous, sexless beings. They are rigorously trained to sacrifice all, including their lives, in the name of their president. And yet even they, in their nun-like devotion, are vulnerable to the lure of easy sex.</p><p>At least, that's the narrative playing out in the news today surrounding allegations of misconduct involving Secret Service agents and a prostitute -- possibly prostitutes, plural -- in Cartagena, Colombia, ahead of the president's visit there. The media has been whipped into a frenzy -- finally, another sex scandal! -- while officials have been quick to offer condemnation, some claiming that the incident could put national security at risk.</p><p>Now, before getting all hot and bothered, let's look at the actual evidence that's available: This happened <em>before</em> the president arrived in the country. The agents in question are not members of the presidential protective division. Officials have said that some of the agents under investigation "may merely have been attending a party and violating curfew," according to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/secret-service-scandal-obama-calls-rigorous-investigation/story?id=16143158&amp;page=2#.T4xCRZhpDZs">ABC News</a>. Still, Republican congressmen Peter King (N.Y.) and Darrell Issa (Calif.) have claimed that the incident could leave the agents vulnerable to blackmail.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstinence isn&#8217;t working</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12864831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teen births are down, thanks to contraception use. Why does the right ignore the facts and insist it's abstinence?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, when the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db89.pdf">CDC announced</a> a record low in the teen birth rate, it listed two possible causes: "The impact of strong pregnancy prevention messages" and "increased use of contraception." The Guttmacher Institute came out with an even stronger message: "The most recent decline in teen births can be linked almost exclusively to improvements in teens' contraceptive use," the organization said in a press release, which pointed to another CDC study for evidence.</p><p>But that hasn't stopped conservatives from claiming that the drop is a result of, you guessed it, abstinence education and, paradoxically, an increase in abortions.</p><p>Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America <a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1575076">expressed her outrage</a> over the CDC analysis: "They don't even mention the fact there's been a tremendous increase in effectiveness and pervasiveness of abstinence education. They don't mention the fact that teen sexual activity, by their own admission, is down." As Think Progress <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/04/10/461402/teen-pregnancy-sex-education/">noted this week</a>, teen birth rates are actually <em>highest</em> in states with abstinence-only policies. Not only has it been widely documented that such programs are largely ineffective, it's also been shown that such programs <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Teen-Sex-Ed.html">may prevent</a> contraception use.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Troubling&#8221; fantasies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/troubling_fantasies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/troubling_fantasies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am I Normal?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12853101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Am I Normal?": A woman worries about only being able to orgasm alone while fantasizing about gay male sex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hello Tracy,</strong></p><p><strong>I've been with my boyfriend for a year and a half and having sex with him for a year. I'm getting concerned. I haven't had an orgasm with him at all. He does please me and I've been so close to climaxing a few times but something always stops me.</strong></p><p><strong>I've had orgasms before but only by myself or in my dreams. The most troubling part is that I don't dream/fantasize about having sex with him. Or any straight guy for that matter.</strong></p><p><strong>I've had a few dreams where I orgasm in my sleep while fantasizing about gay men having sex. Even more disconcerting is that in one of those dreams I was a "bottom" gay man who had female parts. I've also had deviant dreams and fantasies where I orgasm and they also do not involve straight men. I don't fantasize about females either because it doesn't do anything for me.</strong></p><p><strong>I am very confused. Am I normal?</strong></p><p><strong>-- Confused Woman</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/troubling_fantasies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/troubling_fantasies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dating while disabled</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/dating_while_disabled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/dating_while_disabled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12852031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial new U.K. show follows disabled singles in their quest for love. Is it exploitative or progressive?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shain, a 31-year-old with a learning disability, text messages a woman "I love you" before even going out with her. Luke, a 23-year-old with Tourette's, first meets his dating coach and uncontrollably yells out, "Horny bitch!" Richard, a 37-year-old with Asperger syndrome, flexes his biceps until his date has to hint for him to stop.</p><p>These are just a few of the stars, and awkward moments, of the new British documentary series that sets up disabled singles with a leading matchmaker service and then follows their search for love. The premise alone is ripe for debate -- and it doesn't help any that it's called "The Undateables."</p><p>The show, which premiered earlier this month (you can watch the trailer <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkqQwWX4x-Q">here</a>), caused an explosion of controversy across the pond, with the Guardian <a href=" http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2012/apr/02/undateables-channel-4-disability-rights-wrongs?newsfeed=true">declaring</a> that Channel 4 has "hit a near impressive level of crass" and the Mirror <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/opinion/lifestyle-opinion/kevin-o-sullivan/the-undateables-is-just-a--freak-show-784067">saying</a> that "the producers dress it up with a touchy-feely script safe in the knowledge the folks at home will laugh like drains." One writer <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/03/are-disabled-people-really-undateable">described</a> the popular public opinion that it is a "thinly veiled Victorian freak-show."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/dating_while_disabled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/dating_while_disabled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to friend a sex offender?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12809081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A push is under way to restrict registrants from social networking, virtual gaming and online dating]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a little boy playing Xbox Live with a registered sex offender, a girl striking up a Facebook friendship with a child molester, a Match.com member going on a date with a convicted rapist. These are just a few of the both real world and imagined scenarios that have inspired attempts in recent weeks to restrict registered sex offenders from social networking, virtual gaming and online dating.</p><p>The aim of these approaches is understandable, but their effectiveness is questionable, and some experts see potential for it to backfire. What's more, the breadth of these restrictions, and the inexactness of who is targeted, raise an issue unlikely to garner much sympathy: fairness to sex offenders.</p><p>On Thursday, New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman announced that through an initiative dubbed "Operation: Game Over," several major gaming companies had removed the profiles of more than 3,500 registered sex offenders in the state. The day before, a Louisiana bill forbidding registered sex offenders from using social networking sites <a href="http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/04/house_approves_more_narrowly_t.html">was approved</a> by a state House committee. (A similar bill was signed into law in Illinois in 2009 and put on hold in California in 2011.) Late last month, Match.com, eHarmony and the Spark Networks <a href="http://consumerist.com/2012/03/matchcom-eharmony-others-to-begin-screening-for-sex-offenders.html">signed a "joint statement of business principles"</a> to attempt to screen out registered sex offenders.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/banning_sex_offenders_online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I want to explore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am I Normal?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12794461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Am I Normal": A married reader is unsatisfied with his sex life and feels the itch to stray]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoy reading your columns and use them to some degree to allow myself some reassurance that my sexuality is not something to feel negative about. It is rare for me to see a woman who has complete comfort in her sexuality and makes it her purpose to explore. I spent a large portion of my younger years doing that and, now that I'm married and a father, I find it difficult to satisfy those desires in the way I used to.</strong></p><p><strong>There is part of me that wishes that I was not tied to the relationship I have so that I could continue exploring. It is not that my wife is not interested in joining me so much as it is that we are at different stages. I have a firm grasp on what I want coupled with a bit of fearlessness while she is still coming to know her wants and desires and is not entirely comfortable with where they sometimes lead. What I have been struggling with is: a) Will we ever be at the same place and b) What I am supposed to do in the meantime?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will ID checks stop Backpage and child sex trafficking?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/will_id_checks_stop_backpage_and_child_sex_trafficking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/will_id_checks_stop_backpage_and_child_sex_trafficking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12789871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new law in Washington state aims to save kids from sex trafficking -- but may contain too many loopholes to work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new law in Washington state is being heralded this week as the latest successful strike in the war against child sex traffickers. What isn't getting any coverage is what the law actually does and what it will mean in practice -- as well as the question of how effective it will be in screening out child traffickers.</p><p>The New York Times described it as "a bill that would require sites within the state to obtain documentation that escorts advertised there are at least 18" -- but it's a bit more complicated than that. (It's almost always more complicated than stated when it comes to sex trafficking.) The <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2011-12/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Passed%20Legislature/6251-S.PL.pdf">law</a> makes it a Class C felony for anyone to advertise "commercial sexual abuse of a minor if he or she knowingly publishes, disseminates, or displays, or causes directly or indirectly, to be published, disseminated, or displayed, any advertisement for a commercial sex act, which is to take place in the state of Washington and that includes the depiction of a minor." That applies equally to pimps as it does to an online classified site like the controversial Backpage.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/will_id_checks_stop_backpage_and_child_sex_trafficking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/will_id_checks_stop_backpage_and_child_sex_trafficking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook: The next tool in fighting STDs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12764791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herpes? Dislike. Cutting-edge sex researchers are using social networks to prevent STDs from going viral]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine being able to download a Facebook app that would alert you to your sexually transmitted infection risk based on your friend's status updates. This may sound far-fetched, and it still is, but as some researchers shift their focus to risk among friend groups, as opposed to just sexual partners, social networks are rapidly becoming a tool to prevent the spread of STIs.</p><p>Peter Leone, a professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina's Center for Infectious Diseases, is one of those experts. Earlier this month, he spoke at an international health conference and underscored the importance of exploring such possibilities. Real-world social networks -- in other words, a person’s circle of friends and sexual partners -- have already proved to be strong predictors of STI risk, he says. It follows that sites like Facebook, which convene all of those real-world connections in one virtual setting, have huge potential in this arena.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

