<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Vincent Rossmeier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/vincent_rossmeier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who dat gonna replace Ray Nagin?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/05/new_orleans_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/05/new_orleans_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/02/04/new_orleans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ecstatic, resurgent New Orleans will pick a new mayor the same weekend as the Saints' first Super Bowl]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the night of Sunday, Jan. 24, after the Saints beat the Minnesota Vikings 31-28 to advance to the first Super Bowl in the team's 43-year history, New Orleans erupted into a wave of communal euphoria. It was as if someone had slipped Ecstasy into the water supply. Fireworks lit up the sky. Fans took to the streets, car horns honked in ecstatic rhythms, and elated chants of "Who dat?!" &#8212; the Saints rallying cry &#8212; could be heard across the city. Bourbon Street went from eerie silence to Mardi Gras-style revelry within moments of the game-winning field goal.</p><p>After suffering through years of futility, New Orleanians were certainly cheering for the success of their team. But their joy wasn't confined to football. They were also celebrating themselves. The Saints have become a symbol of civic unity, a sign of how the city's sense of self has undergone a profound transformation since Hurricane Katrina's devastation. And this hope is mirrored in the optimism many New Orleanians feel about the end of Ray Nagin&#8217;s notoriously incompetent reign as mayor &#8212; and the chance that City Hall may finally aid in the city&#8217;s recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/05/new_orleans_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/05/new_orleans_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right fears secret abortions for 13-year-olds in reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/bachmann_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/bachmann_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/01/bachmann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest myth going around: Healthcare reform legislation would lead to abortion clinics in schools]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wednesday night brought the latest installment of everyone's favorite political drama: "Michele Bachmann tries to warn <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/29/bachmann/index.html">Americans</a> about <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/03/05/bachmann/index.html">a threat</a> that <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/feature/2009/09/18/values_voter/index.html">isn't real</a>." Speaking on the floor of the House of Representatives, the Minnesota Republican warned parents everywhere that if Democrats' healthcare reform legislation passes, school clinics will become controlled by Planned Parenthood and turned into sex clinics that promote abortions free of parental consent for 13-year-old girls (video of Bachmann's comments is below).</p><p>Bachmann <a href="http://mediamattersaction.org/video/200909300012">said</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/bachmann_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/bachmann_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate finally taking up cap-and-trade bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/30/captrade</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long delay, legislation to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions is announced; passing it might not be easy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the summer of our healthcare discontent, the issue global warming was largely pushed to the backburner in Washington. The House <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454">passed</a> cap-and-trade legislation designed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and hopefully slow the process, but that was back in June. Only now, at the end of September, is the Senate finally taking up a similar bill.</p><p>At an event on Capitol&#160;Hill Wednesday, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/09/30/30greenwire-boxer-kerry-launch-campaign-to-pass-senate-cap-29235.html?pagewanted=all">announced</a> their version of the cap-and-trade legislation.</p><p>"We know clean energy is the ticket to strong, sustainable economic growth," Boxer said. Kerry echoed Boxer's optimism about the measure. "Ultimately, this bill is about keeping Americans safe," he said. President Obama lauded the tandem, saying in a prepared statement,&#160;"With the draft legislation they are announcing today, we are one step closer to putting America in control of our energy future and making America more energy independent."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even people who yell at town halls like Starbucks?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/starbucks_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/starbucks_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/30/starbucks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Starbucks ad attempts to appeal to everyone -- even town hall protesters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As further proof that Americans can find a way to <a href="http://www.highestfive.com/money/too-soon-people-whove-attempted-to-profit-from-911/">profit off of anything</a>, a new Starbucks ad attempts to sell coffee by lampooning the <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/07/town_halls/index.html">contentious healthcare reform town halls</a> that garnered national attention all summer.</p><p>The ad (a teaser is below, while the full version can be watched <a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1370868150/bctid42488764001">here</a>) is for Starbucks' new instant coffee Via. It shows a series of groups of people who can't tell the difference between Starbucks' regular coffee and the new version. The ad is attempting to say that all sorts of people, from nurses to Civil War reenactors to people with "yellow belts" will find Via as satisfying as regular Starbucks. The ad then concludes with a man standing up at a town hall meeting and yelling, "I&#160;can't taste the difference."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/starbucks_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/starbucks_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logic in short supply at healthcare hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/29/grassley_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/29/grassley_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus, D-Mont.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/29/grassley</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley calls government a "predator" -- so why does he support Medicare?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For today, at least, <a href="http://www.c-span.org/">C-SPAN</a> is must see TV. The Senate Finance Committee is <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/29/public_option/index.html">considering</a> two proposed amendments that would add a public, government-run insurance option to the healthcare reform legislation put forward by its chair, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. So far the debate, though lively, hasn't always involved totally logical arguments.</p><p>For instance, this morning, Sen.&#160;Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/61230/grassley-government-is-a-predator-not-a-competitor">ripped</a> the public option, saying it would be the first step towards a single-payer healthcare system in which Americans would lose the ability to choose their healthcare providers. This argument clearly got to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who introduced one of the public option amendments.</p><p>Schumer asked Grassley how he could support Medicare, yet oppose a public option. Grassley responded, &#8220;Medicare is part of the social fabric of America ... [but] to say that I support it is not to say that it&#8217;s the best program that it can be.&#8221; Grassley then went on to lament healthcare's fate if government becomes more involved.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/29/grassley_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/29/grassley_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Reid ready to give up on the public option?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/reid_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/reid_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/28/reid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate majority leader may push forward with healthcare reform that doesn't include a government-run plan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/health/policy/28health.html">article</a> in Sunday's New York Times on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will surely <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/03/27/reid/">incite angst</a> among progressives for a variety of reasons.</p><p>For one thing, the article -- entitled "Reid the Quarterback May Call on Obama to Referee" -- discusses how Reid, never a favorite of liberals due to his governing style of <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/07/09/baucus/index.html">gentle persuasion</a> and his seeming unwillingness to push back aggressively against Republicans, is now the Senate's point man on healthcare reform. The majority leader is now working to reconcile two competing healthcare proposals that have emerged from Senate committees so that the body as a whole can vote on a single measure.</p><p>This brings us to the second problem for progressives. The article cites unnamed senior Democratic Senate aides who told the Times that a combined bill will not contain a public option for insurance. Liberals see a government-run insurance option as a key to healthcare reform because it would provide competition for private insurers. Reid is apparently interested in dropping the option in order to appeal to centrist Democrats and Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, the lone Republican who appears even slightly willing to vote in favor of the Democrats' proposals for overhauling the system.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/reid_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/28/reid_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/traficant_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/traficant_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/24/traficant</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Rep. James Traficant has a bulls-eye on the crown jewels of the IRS]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don't remember former Rep. James Traficant, D-Ohio, you're forgetting one of the most colorful characters in recent American political history (for a great primer on Traficant, there's no better starting place than David Grann's 2000 article, "<a href="http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/crimetown-usa?page=0,0">Crimetown U.S.A</a>."). Traficant was released from prison on September 2 after serving seven years on corruption charges. He was <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2009/09/08/traficant_still_evokes_strong_emotion/">notoriously close with the mob</a>, yet since his release, Traficant has been greeted by adoring crowds in Ohio and has even mentioned that he is considering running for public office once again (perhaps he and <a href="http://search.salon.com/salonsearch.php?search=blagojevich&amp;breadth=salon">Rod Blagojevich</a> should arrange a sit-down).</p><p>Wednesday, Traficant appeared on MSNBC's "Hardball"&#160;with Chris Matthews and provided some amazing quotes (video below). Traficant said&#160;"I want to get the IRS. Kick them in the crotch real good" and later in the interview apologized to "all the hookers in America" because he once equated members of Congress with prostitutes. He also suggested that President Barack Obama "stimulate this."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/traficant_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/traficant_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Glenn Beck just boil a frog?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/beck_frog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/beck_frog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/24/beck_frog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News host's latest zany on-air stunt seems like bait for PETA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon's recent <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/09/22/glenn_beck_two/">three</a>-<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/09/23/glenn_beck_three/">part</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/09/21/glenn_beck/">series</a> on Fox News host and pseudo-right-wing-populist-rabble-rouser Glenn Beck traced his early career in morning drive-time radio. Beck was a morning "zoo" host and engaged in his fair share of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/23/glenn-beck-boiling-frog-v_n_297259.html">attention-grabbing stunts</a> on and off the air. So keep that in mind while watching the following video from his TV show on September 23.</p><p>In the clip, Beck does his usual bit denouncing both Republicans and Democrats and the ever-expanding government of President Obama. Then he decides to give his audience a visual example of how Obama's programs are so huge that they're forcing people to fight back -- though it's actually unclear what point Beck is trying to make.&#160; He says, "You know the old saying, if you put a frog into boiling water, he's going to jump right out, because he's scalding hot, but if you place the frog in lukewarm water and gradually raise the temperature, it won't realize what's happening and die?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/beck_frog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/beck_frog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama embraces the U.N.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/obama_un/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/obama_un/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/23/obama_un</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President pledges to increase international cooperation, while another leader steals the spotlight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is not his predecessor -- any remaining illusions to the contrary were pretty convincingly dispelled when he addressed the United Nations General Assembly Wednesday.</p><p>Many of those in the Bush administration, including former U.N. Ambassador <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Bolton">John Bolton</a>, did little to hide their <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames/2245">contempt</a> for the international body and tried to minimize its influence in world politics. But throughout his speech today, Obama reached out to the U.N., encouraging the organization to work proactively to make more of an impact.</p><p>"The United States stands ready to begin a new chapter of international cooperation -- one that recognizes the rights and responsibilities of all nations," Obama said to applause at the conclusion of his speech.</p><p>Obama sought to differentiate himself from Bush in a number of areas, highlighting policy changes he's made since assuming control of the Oval Office:&#160;Obama mentioned his plans to close Guantanamo Bay, as well as his commitment to ending torture and fighting terrorism within the "rule of law" as examples of how "America will live its values, and we will lead by example."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/obama_un/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/obama_un/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Reilly turns on himself</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/o_reilly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/o_reilly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/23/o_reilly</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News host is confused about the public option]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you've ever watched his show, you've probably come away with the impression that Bill O'Reilly is a truly eloquent rhetorician who likes to engage in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDV1jsPlKD8">reasoned</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAuOEdttjZQ">good-natured debates</a> with his guests.</p><p>Or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3U9ENaTPLY">maybe not</a>.</p><p>But regardless of your take on the Fox News host, it appears O'Reilly has finally found the perfect person to argue with:&#160;himself.</p><p>Lately, O'Reilly has made some decidedly confused comments about the public option being debated as part of the healthcare reform plans circulating in Washington. And it seems he's none too happy with himself -- or the liberal media -- about it.</p><p>The public option would in essence provide a government-backed insurance option for Americans in an effort to put pressure on private insurers to lower their costs and provide better coverage to consumers. Given O'Reilly's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908200016">ideological bent</a>, it'd be safe to assume he'd be against government involvement in healthcare. Yet, on his show on September 16, O'Reilly seemed to <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/18/oreilly/index.html?source=refresh">support</a> the idea of a public option. On that show, he had this exchange with Nina Owcharenko, the deputy director of health policy studies for the conservative Heritage Foundation (video is below):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/o_reilly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/o_reilly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden Watch: 2010 could be &#8220;end of road&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/biden_17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/biden_17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/22/biden</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest from our voluble vice president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Joe Biden may hail from one of the smallest states but the former U.S. Senator from Delaware has long been notorious for having one of the biggest mouths in the nation's capitol. Sometimes that works in Biden's favor, as when he famously <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/10/31/biden/index.html?source=refresh">declared</a> during the 2008 presidential campaign that there are "only three things" Rudy Giuliani "mentions in a sentence: a noun and a verb and 9/11."</p><p>Sometimes it doesn't. President Obama knew that Biden had no problem speaking his mind when he picked him to be his running mate: Biden once famously made headlines for all the wrong reasons when he called Obama an "<a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/01/31/biden_call/index.html?source=refresh">articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy</a>" in 2007. Former President George W. Bush <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/15/bush_excerpts/index.html?source=refresh">reportedly once said</a> of Biden that, "If bull was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/biden_17/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/biden_17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blagojevich for president in 2012?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/blagojevich_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/blagojevich_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/21/blagojevich</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Illinois governor is tanned, rested and ready]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, the New Yorker has long been known for its <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/timeline">profiles of fascinating and important</a> world leaders, political figures and authors. However, if you're like me, you've been thinking the magazine has been severely lacking in its coverage of the most compelling politician of our time:&#160;one Rod Blagojevich.</p><p>Based on the complete lack of self-reflection displayed by his subject, editor David Remnick's <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2009/09/28/090928ta_talk_remnick">new piece</a> on the disgraced former Illinois governor reads like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Thurber">Thurber-esque satire</a>. If Blagojevich's arrogance, alleged attempts to use his office as a personal revenue stream and <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/04/15/hey-its-the-rod-blagojevich-reality-tv-show-live-from-a-jungle/">flirtation with reality TV</a> hadn't convinced the world already that the man known as Blago lives in his own little world, Remnick's piece provides added confirmation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/blagojevich_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/blagojevich_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was said during the Obamathon?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/obama_117/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/obama_117/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/21/obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the president said during his Sunday media blitz -- and what they're saying about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engaging in an all-out media blitz that will culminate in an appearance on David Letterman tonight, President Obama sat down for interviews on five different networks that were taped Friday but aired Sunday. No other president has ever conducted so many interviews on the Sunday morning news talk shows in the same day.</p><p>Did you somehow miss him?&#160;<strong>Here's the gist of what he said:&#160;</strong></p><p>Obama dwelled on similar themes -- healthcare, the economy, race -- in all the interviews and made a somewhat surprising admission, saying that the healthcare debate had <strong>"humbled" him</strong>. He conceded that he has had problems "breaking through" and expressing to Americans why healthcare reform is so vital to the country. "I think there have been times where I have said I've got to step up my game in terms of talking to the American people about issues like health care," Obama <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/21/MN8M19Q1CH.DTL">said</a> on George Stephanopoulos on ABC's "This Week." The president added, however, that he will push forward with healthcare reform, &#8220;Because I &#8212; I really think it&#8217;s the right thing to do for the country.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/obama_117/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/obama_117/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Internet melting our brains?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/19/better_pencil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/19/better_pencil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2009/09/19/better_pencil</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No! The author of "A Better Pencil" explains why such hysterical hand-wringing is as old as communication itself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now the arguments are familiar: Facebook is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/magazine/30FOB-medium-t.html?scp=2&amp;sq=facebook&amp;st=cse">ruining our social relationships</a>; Google is <a href="http://www.gdumb.com/">making us dumber</a>; texting is <a href="http://www.times.co.nz/cms/news/education/2008/02/art100019283.php">destroying the English language</a> as we know it. We're facing a crisis, one that could very well corrode the way humans have communicated since we first evolved from apes. What we need, so say these proud Luddites, is to turn our backs on technology and embrace not the keyboard, but the pencil.</p><p>Such sentiments, in the opinion of Dennis Baron, are nostalgic, uninformed hogwash. A professor of English and linguistics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Baron seeks to provide the historical context that is often missing from debates about the way technology is transforming our lives in his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Better-Pencil-Readers-Writers-Revolution/dp/0195388445/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1252620443&amp;sr=8-1">"A Better Pencil."</a> His thesis is clear: Every communication advancement throughout human history, from the pencil to the typewriter to writing itself, has been met with fear, skepticism and a longing for the medium that's been displaced. Far from heralding in a "2001: Space Odyssey" dystopia, Baron believes that social networking sites, blogs and the Internet are actually making us better writers and improving our ability to reach out to our fellow man. "A Better Pencil" is both a defense of the digital revolution and a keen examination of how technology both improves and complicates our lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/19/better_pencil/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/19/better_pencil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The czar madness won&#8217;t end</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/16/czar_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/16/czar_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/16/czar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans, spurred on by Fox News, push a measure to cut off the pay of some presidential advisors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casting aside regard for <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/14/czars/index.html">historical accuracy and presidential precedent</a>, a few big name Republicans have been castigating President Obama for what they say is&#160; his "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091103504.html">unprecedented</a>"&#160;use of so-called "czars" in his administration. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/29/AR2009072902624.html">Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va.</a> -- not to mention Fox News' <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_09/019797.php">Glenn Beck</a> -- are just a few of the more notable conservatives who have warned about how Obama is allowing the government to be influenced by unelected policy advisors.</p><p>The subtext of the czar controversy is an attempt by Republicans to link Obama to socialism and Communism -- an illogical connection for many reasons, not least of which is that the czars of Russia weren't Communist -- they were a monarchy -- and they were in fact replaced by the Bolsheviks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/16/czar_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/16/czar_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum pre-buts Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/santorum_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/santorum_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/15/santorum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the former Pennsylvania senator can't say just yet whether he'll run for president in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since President Obama took control of the Oval Office in January, Republicans have chosen fairly conservative members from their ranks -- <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aKyeCP.LGe5s">Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal</a> and&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/09/09/gop/">Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La.</a> -- to respond to major speeches by Obama. Looks like that practice is becoming a habit for the GOP.</p><p>Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/59141/rnc-taps-rick-santorum-to-respond-to-obama">was tapped</a> by the Republican National Committee to give a "pre-buttal" teleconference to Obama's Tuesday address to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/14/AR2009091403426.html">AFL-CIO&#160;convention</a> in Pittsburgh. Santorum used the opportunity to slam Obama and Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., as well as to discuss his own political ambitions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/santorum_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/santorum_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A really good man&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/swayze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/swayze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2009/09/15/swayze</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demi Moore, Whoopi Goldberg and other stars remember Patrick Swayze as a true gentleman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Swayze, the actor, dancer and singer best known for his roles in "Ghost"&#160;and "Dirty Dancing" died of pancreatic cancer Monday at the age of 57. Since news of Swayze's death first became public, stars who knew and worked with Swayze, as well as critics, have responded with memories of Swayze as a kind, thoughtful man both on and off the screen. Here is a look at how Swayze is being remembered the day after his death.</p><p>
    <u><br />
      <strong>CELEBRITIES</strong><br />
    </u>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2009/09/14/2009-09-14_after_patrick_swayzes_death_stars_join_fans_on_twitter_to_share_memories_and_fee.html"><strong>Demi Moore:</strong></a> "Patrick you are loved by so many and <strong>your light will forever shine in all of our lives</strong>."</p><p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/15/patrick.swayze/index.html"><strong>Whoopi Goldberg:</strong></a> "<strong>Patrick was a really good man, a funny man and one to whom I owe much that I can't ever repay</strong> ... I believe in 'Ghost's' message, so he'll always be near."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/swayze/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/15/swayze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going czar crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/czars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/czars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/14/czars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kay Bailey Hutchison is worried about the number of czars employed in the Obama administration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, conservatives haven't shown much of a knack for the facts. The healthcare reform debate has been marred by bogus&#160;<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8298267&amp;page=1">accusations of death panels</a> and the myth that reform will include a government mandate that <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/05/politics/main5215880.shtml">taxpayers foot the bill for abortions</a>. Now, some Republicans are extending that same treatment to the personnel decisions in President Obama's administration.</p><p>On Sunday in the Washington Post, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091103504.html">wrote a column</a> warning of the number of informal policy "czars" employed by the White House. Hutchison asserted:</p><blockquote>
<p>A few of them have formal titles, but most are simply known as "czars." They hold unknown levels of power over broad swaths of policy. Under the Obama administration, we have an unprecedented 32 czar posts (a few of which it has yet to fill), including a "car czar," a "pay czar" and an "information czar." There are also czars assigned to some of the broadest and most consequential topics in policy, including health care, terrorism, economics and key geographic regions.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/czars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/czars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did motherhood help Clijsters win?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/pregnancy_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/pregnancy_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Clijsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//2009/09/14/pregnancy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research suggests women might actually become better athletes after giving birth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year on my birthday, after reminding me of the agonizing hours of labor pains she suffered through just to bring me into this world, my mother always tells me that being a mother prepares you for the most difficult jobs in the world.</p><p>I guess that includes tennis champion.</p><p>Sunday, Kim Clijsters capped off a <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/usopen09/news/story?id=4471433">remarkable comeback by winning the U.S. Open</a> women's title with a 7-5, 6-3 victory over the ninth-ranked Caroline Wozniacki of Denmark. Though this was the 26-year-old Belgian&#8217;s second U.S. Open victory, this title was even more impressive than her 2005 triumph. Clijsters became the first unseeded woman to win the U.S. Open and her stunning victory came just 18 months after she gave birth to a daughter. Sunday also marked the first time since 1980 that a mother has won a major tennis tournament.</p><p>But Clijsters&#8217; recent motherhood may have actually helped her athletic prowess. While it may seem counter-intuitive at first to think that the dramatic physical changes a woman undergoes while pregnant might have a positive effect on her ability to compete athletically, a growing body of research suggests that the child Clijsters cradled in her arms after the match may have made her a better tennis pro.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/pregnancy_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/pregnancy_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did the 9/12 protest crowd compare?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/march_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/march_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/14/march</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative pundits have some fun with D.C. rally estimates. But how did the size compare with other like protests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many right-wing pundits wildly overestimated the number of <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/feature/2009/09/12/protest/index.html">conservatives who marched</a> on Washington, D.C. this past Saturday.&#160; Saturday, right-wing commentator <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909120005">Michelle Malkin claimed</a> that two million people had attended the rally -- a number she attributed to ABC News. ABC News made no such claim. As Media Matters&#160; <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909120014">documented</a>, Malkin seemed to have no source for that high estimate, but many in the right-wing blogosophere repeated the number as if it were fact.</p><p>In actuality, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tea-party-protesters-march-washington/story?id=8557120">ABC&#160;News estimated</a> that between 60,000 and 70,000 people were at the rally. Certainly, that's a significant amount of people, but two million it is not. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/12/tea-party-express-arrives-march-washington-protest-government-spending/?test=latestnews">Fox News put the number</a> at "tens of thousands," a figure echoed by the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125276685577405975.html?mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular">Wall Street Journal</a> and <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/georgians-lead-protest-at-137117.html?imw=Y">The Associated Press</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/march_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/march_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

