Surprise, surprise, there were no WMD

But Bush sticks to his guns on whether invading Iraq was worth the cost.

Published January 13, 2005 1:48PM (EST)

The U.S. investigators searching for Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction have given up the hunt and left Iraq with an appeal to the Pentagon for the release of several Iraqi scientists still being questioned, it was reported Wednesday. Charles Duelfer, who led the Iraq Survey Group, has returned to the United States and will deliver a final report in the spring that will be almost identical to the interim assessment he delivered to Congress last October. That assessment found that Saddam had destroyed his last weapons of mass destruction more than 10 years ago, and his capacity to build new ones had been dwindling for years by the time of the second Gulf war.

"Charlie has left Iraq," an intelligence official said yesterday. "In terms of the weapons hunt in a proactive sense, it has concluded, and the report is being tweaked a bit but it will be largely unchanged." But he added: "There is a considerable amount of document exploitation to be done that will continue to occur, and leads that come out of the exploitation will be followed up."

The Washington Post said the ISG had made "several pleas" to the Pentagon to release the Iraqi scientists, who have been held for nearly two years and who have been interviewed extensively. The scientists include Gen. Amir al-Saadi, who negotiated with U.N. inspectors on behalf of the Saddam regime; Rihab Taha, a biologist also known as Dr. Germ; her husband, Amir Rashid, a former oil minister; and Huda Amash, a biologist nicknamed Mrs. Anthrax by U.N. inspectors.

Gen. Saadi's German-born wife, Helma, told the Guardian Wednesday night that she had heard from U.S. sources that U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had approved her husband's release some weeks after the October report was submitted. He had checked with the Iraqi justice minister, who said he had no objection. "I understand the matter is with the prime minister, Ayad Allawi, now. I don't know why it is taking so long," she said.

By chance, the Red Cross arranged Wednesday for Gen. Saadi to make a rare phone call to his wife. "He didn't sound optimistic," she said. "He said he's kept in the dark. No one tells him anything. He asked for more books."

Wednesday night White House press secretary Scott McClellan said there no longer was an active search for weapons. "There may be a couple, a few people, that are focused on that," he said, "but it has largely concluded." He added: "If they have any reports of [weapons of mass destruction] obviously they'll continue to follow up on those reports. A lot of their mission is focused elsewhere now."

He said the final Duelfer report "is not going to fundamentally alter" the earlier findings, which said that Saddam not only had no weapons of mass destruction and had not made any since 1991 but had no capability of making any either.

Many thousands of pages of Saddam-era documents are still being translated and analyzed, but most weapons experts believe they are unlikely to change the fundamental ISG assessment that the former regime had rid itself of weapons of mass destruction many years before the invasion. After Duelfer's presentation to Congress in October, a senior ISG official said he was only returning to Baghdad "to tie up odds and ends," with no real expectation of further discoveries.

U.S. officials said the operation was being wrapped up because there was little expectation of finding any substantial new evidence and the hunt could no longer be justified in view of the rising danger to the investigators. Despite the end of the search, President Bush Wednesday night said he remained convinced that he was right to go to war on Saddam. In an interview with ABC television's Barbara Walters, Bush admitted: "I felt like we'd find weapons of mass destruction, or like many many here in the United States, many around the world, the United Nations, thought he had weapons of mass destruction." When asked directly whether the invasion of Iraq was worth the cost of an increasingly violent war, Bush said: "Oh, absolutely."

By Julian Borger

Julian Borger is a correspondent for the Guardian.

MORE FROM Julian Borger

By Jonathan Steele

MORE FROM Jonathan Steele

Related Topics ------------------------------------------