A kinder, gentler nuke

An eminently qualified former judge weighs in with a "fair" solution to the Senate's standoff

Mark Follman
May 9, 2005 11:16PM (UTC)

The political right's idea of compromise on the filibuster standoff is already plenty apparent, but in case you need a little refresher, there's an Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal today by a former federal judge proposing a solution he considers to be "fair and reasonable to both sides." It's called the "Judicial Confirmation Improvements Act."

"Such an act," the former judge writes, "should provide that within a certain period of time after a judicial nomination is received a hearing will be held, within a specified time a nominee will be voted out of committee, with or without a favorable recommendation, and within a certain period of time the full Senate will debate and confirm or reject a nominee by majority vote. This will be fair to presidents from either party. Nominees will know that within a reasonable period of time they will be confirmed or not confirmed, and they can get on with life."


A kinder, fairer nuking of the filibuster, then, which permits the minority party a little time to stamp its feet in protest before being obliterated by the expected vote? This more "humane" version of the F-bomb (the legislative one, not the Dick Cheney one) is the wisdom of right-wing Mississippian Charles Pickering, who served on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2004, following a recess appointment by President Bush -- and, of course, no confirmation vote in the Senate at all.

Mark Follman

Mark Follman is Salon's deputy news editor. Read his other articles here.

MORE FROM Mark Follman

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Dick Cheney War Room


Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address


Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •