Why the Republicans lost (according to the Republicans)

The NRCC says it was all sorts of things, but the war doesn't seem to have been one of them.


Tim Grieve
November 9, 2006 12:29AM (UTC)

In announcing the departure of Donald Rumsfeld today, George W. Bush acknowledged, at least implicitly, that the American people have made it clear that they want a change of direction in Iraq.

The National Republican Campaign Committee? Not so much.

Advertisement:

Earlier this morning, NRCC spokesman Carl Forti distributed an "Election Results Talking Points" memo in which he listed a lot of explanations for why Republicans took a thumpin' Tuesday: "Incumbents who were unprepared lost," "the scandal factor was costly, "retirements were also damaging," "sixth-year elections are toughest for the president's party," and "the erosion in the environment suppressed discussion of local issues."

As the Hotline notes, two words were missing from the list: "Bush" and "Iraq."


Tim Grieve

Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog.

MORE FROM Tim Grieve

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

2006 Elections War Room

BROWSE SALON.COM
COMPLETELY AD FREE,
FOR THE NEXT HOUR

Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address

•••





Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •