Why James Inhofe tried to sabotage open access
A look at his top campaign finance contributors explains all
October 26, 2007 3:00PM (UTC)
So why exactly did Oklahoma Republican, Senator James Inhofe,
attempt to gut the open access provisions of a bill passed by the Senate last Monday? Could it be because his 11th biggest financial contributor over the past five years was Reed-Elsevier, one of the largest for-profit publishers of scientific research in the world?
Open Access news passes on that tidbit from Charles Bailey's Digital Koans. How the World Works took particular interest in it, not only because it ties up Inhofe's motivations with a tidy little bought-and-paid-for bow, but because earlier this week readers were arguing over whether the science publishing industry had any money to lobby politicians with.
According to OpenSecrets.org, Reed-Elsevier spent a total of $3,380,000 on lobbying expenses in the United States in 2006.
COMPLETELY AD FREE, FOR THE NEXT HOUR Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address
Yes, it's time to impeach: But why?
Steven Raichlen's barbecue brisket
"OITNB" stars on visiting an ICE jail
How Trump serves Putin's interests
Trump's mental state is an "emergency"
Mitch takes big money from Wall Street
Why the data says Joe Biden would lose
Why corporations can legally poison us
Copyright © 2018 Salon Media Group, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written
permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a
trademark of Salon Media Group Inc. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All
rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.