Why do Yahoo e-mail users have sucky credit?

Credit Karma crunches the numbers. Gmail users have better credit. AOL, a little worse. But Yahoo is at the bottom

By Andrew Leonard
October 20, 2009 11:03PM (UTC)
main article image

Give the free-credit-score reporting Web site Credit Karma some credit for nifty public relations. The San Francisco-based site -- which really is free, if you have the courage to type your Social Security number into an online form -- crunched its own database of 20,000 credit reports, cross-referenced them with e-mail domains, and popped out a neat chart that tells us, among other things, that yahoo.com e-mail addresses are associated with the worst credit scores, especially in comparison with gmail.com addresses.

Mashable picks up the Credit Karma link and Gizmodo picks up the Mashable link and before you know it, Salon bloggers are checking out their own credit scores via Credit Karma while wondering why AOL users have better credit than Yahoo users.


Is it because AOL users are your grandmother and grandfather who signed up 10 years ago and never even looked at another e-mail provider? Or because Yahoo is the fly-by-night free e-mail provider of choice? Does this prove that Gmail users are the elite when it comes to free e-mail? And why does Bell South reign supreme?

All Credit Karma will divulge is that the answers have to do with differences in regional and age demographics associated with the various e-mail addresses. But my guess is that not too long from now, they'll have a much bigger database to crunch.

Andrew Leonard

Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21.

MORE FROM Andrew LeonardFOLLOW koxinga21LIKE Andrew Leonard

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Bolivia How The World Works Valentines Day