Sex for pay? No, I'm gay!

Prosecutors anticipate a "lesbian defense" against prostitution charges

Tracy Clark-Flory
January 23, 2010 1:01AM (UTC)

Now here's a creative new way to fight prostitution charges: The lesbian defense. It's the argument prosecutors have anticipated in a case against Cassandra Malandri and Falynn Rodriguez, two strippers accused of offering to sleep with a police officer for $5,000. The idea being that a woman can't possibly have sex for pay with a man if she's into women -- because, as we all know, prostitutes only have sex with paying customers they find irresistibly attractive. 

The concept is hilariously absurd and isn't being entertained for even a moment by the women's defense attorney, Ikiesha Al-Shabazz. "It doesn't even make sense," she told the AFP. No, it sure doesn't. Nonetheless, the prosecution has subpoenaed a man believed to be engaged to Malandri. At the first sign of a lesbian defense, they will be ready to call the fiance to the stand. I can only imagine that argument: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this woman is heterosexual! Therefore, she was capable of having sex with a man for money."


The trial is shaping up to be quite a circus: Earlier this week, the defense tried to get the case tossed out over a ... conjunction. In the charges filed, the word "and" was incorrectly used instead of "or." In that light, I suppose the prosecution's anticipated lesbian defense seems somewhat less far-fetched.

Tracy Clark-Flory

MORE FROM Tracy Clark-FloryFOLLOW TracyClarkFloryLIKE Tracy Clark-Flory

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Broadsheet Sex Work


Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address


Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •