Openings Scheduled In Virginia Tech Trial

By Salon Staff

Published March 6, 2012 11:18AM (EST)

CHRISTIANSBURG, Va. (AP) — Attorneys representing the parents of two Virginia Tech students slain in a campus rampage that left 33 dead will stake out their case for official accountability in an opening statement expected to sharply question the actions of top university officials.

Attorney Robert Hall will outline his case against the state Tuesday following the seating of a jury of seven, plus two alternates, in the wrongful death lawsuit being heard in Montgomery County Circuit Court.

The state will also offer its defense of Virginia Tech officials in the April 16, 2007, slaughter on the Blacksburg campus, a few miles from the Christiansburg courtroom. It was the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

The parents of Julia K. Pryde and Erin N. Peterson are seeking a judgment of $100,000 for each family, but they have said their primary interest is to get a full accounting of the events of that day, plus an apology. They say if the university responded immediately after the fatal shootings of two students in a dorm, their daughters and others on campus might have survived the killing spree of a lone gunman, Seung-Hui Cho. He turned the gun on himself after killing 32.

The killings began at a dormitory, where two students were fatally shot, but it took school officials more than two hours to alert the campus in a message that initially only said a "shooting incident" had occurred.

Only after Cho chained the doors to Norris Hall, a classroom building, did school officials issue a more ominous warning: "A gunman is loose on campus." He killed 30 at Norris Hall and then himself.

"Tragically, the warning message — a 'gunman is loose on campus' was old news — two and one half hours old and the advice to stay in their buildings too late for thirty students and faculty," Hall wrote in a summary of his case.

Moreover, Hall said, as the full impact of the shootings became clear, President Charles Steger and other university officials attempted to cover their tracks.

While attorneys representing the state have refused to discuss the case on the record, a spokesman for Virginia Tech and the attorney general's office have said the case is without merit and the charges of a cover-up false.

In filings prior to trial, attorneys for the state said the plaintiffs have produced no evidence to support their claims that Steger and others attempted to cloak their actions. They argue that if the families prevail, it will place an undue burden on state colleges and universities.

"This court cannot allow a disturbed individual's unprecedented criminal act to impose unprecedented duties on Virginia's public universities and their administrators," the attorneys wrote in a filing to dismiss the suit.

The lawsuits originally sought $10 million for the wrongful deaths of Pryde and Peterson, but the damages are now capped at $100,000 for each of their parents. The state is the lone defendant in the case, which has been scaled back from the lawsuit originally filed two years after the deadly shootings on Virginia Tech's campus.

Steger is not named as a defendant, but he is scheduled to testify publicly under oath for the first time on his actions on the day of the shootings.

A state panel that investigated the shootings concluded that officials erred in not sending an alert earlier. The lag in issuing a campus warning also brought Virginia Tech a $55,000 fine from the U.S. Education Department. The school is appealing.

The Prydes and the Petersons were the only eligible families who didn't accept their share of an $11 million state settlement.


Steve Szkotak can be reached on Twitter at .

Salon Staff

MORE FROM Salon Staff

Related Topics ------------------------------------------