Cute mass murderer alert!

A woman tells Salon she regrets tweeting that James Holmes is attractive, but says she doesn't deserve threats

Topics: Internet Culture, james holmes, Editor's Picks,

On Monday while watching CNN coverage of Aurora shooter James Holmes’ court appearance, “Sarah” tweeted something about James Holmes being somewhat attractive.

She got little response until the following day when Jezebel published a post titled, “Disturbing: Women on Twitter Think James Holmes Is ‘Hot,’ ‘Sexy,’ ‘Cute.” Her tweet, along with 10 others, was screen-capped alongside the piece, which detailed the many serial killers who have attracted female fans. Then came the threatening tweets, emails and phone calls, she says. “I’ve received hateful tweets ranging from ‘You should be ashamed of yourself’ to “You should get sterilized’ to ‘I hope someone kills your family to see if you’d still think he is cute.’” Someone called her house just to tell her “that they knew where I lived,” she says.

You Might Also Like

“Sarah,” who spoke to me on the condition that I leave her real name, Twitter handle and tweet out of this article, describes the past 24 hours as the worst of her life.

“Just so you know, I am not one of those crazies who actually gets off on psycho killers or anything like that,” she said. The tweet was taken out of context, she argues: Her other live tweets that day speculated on whether or not he looked drugged up during the hearing. “All I wanted to point out was that appearances can be deceiving,” she says.

And so too can tweets, apparently: Many, myself included, read her tweet as making light of the tragedy, but “Sarah” says, “I feel terrible about what happened in Aurora and I certainly do not think that what he did could ever be considered OK,” she says. “But what happened in Aurora and how I feel about that most unfortunate tragedy doesn’t change the fact that this is an attractive, educated young man with a nice family who at first glance would be hard to peg as a serial killer.”

Should people be able to make such a simple observation — that a mass murderer may be a monster but doesn’t look like one — without being heaped with opprobrium? Absolutely. Although it seems they rarely manage it with nuance or sensitivity in the land of 140-characters.

Tracy Clark-Flory

Tracy Clark-Flory is a staff writer at Salon. Follow @tracyclarkflory on Twitter and Facebook.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Michael Ohl/Museum fur Naturkunde

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Soul-Sucking Dementor Wasp

    Latin name: Ampulex dementor

    Truong Ngyuen

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    10,000th reptile species

    Latin name: Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi

    Jodi Rowley/Australian Museum

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Colour-changing thorny frogs

    Latin name: Gracixalus lumarius

    Judith L. Eger

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Long-fanged bat

    Latin name: Hypsugo dolichodon

    Neang Thy Moe/FFI

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Stealthy wolf snake

    Latin name: Lycodon zoosvictoriae

    Michael Janes

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Feathered coral

    Latin name: Ovabunda andamanensis

    Jerome Constant

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    World's second-longest insect

    Phryganistria heusii yentuensis

    Nantasak Pinkaew

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Slide 8

    Latin name: Sirindhornia spp

    Tim Johnson

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Slide 9

    Tylototriton shanorum

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

0 Comments

Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>