Help keep Salon independent

Romney’s latest flip-flop-flip

He tells Meet the Press he would ban insurers excluding people with pre-existing conditions, then says he wouldn't

Published

Salon Default

Never mind. Mitt Romney’s support for a ban on insurers excluding folks with pre-existing medical conditions lasted about as long as a late-summer thunderstorm, and less than a Kardashian marriage.

Hours after saying on “Meet the Press” that he “liked” parts of Obamacare, including its ban on insurers’ excluding folks with pre-existing medical conditions and letting young adults stay on their parents’ insurance plans, Romney’s campaign issued a statement to the conservative National Review Online “clarifying” his remarks:

In reference to how Romney would deal with those with preexisting conditions and young adults who want to remain on their parents’ plans, a Romney aide responded that there had been no change in Romney’s position and that “in a competitive environment, the marketplace will make available plans that include coverage for what there is demand for. He was not proposing a federal mandate to require insurance plans to offer those particular features.”

Of course, “the marketplace” did not offer such features; that’s why Obamacare required them.

And a few hours after that, the campaign clarified its clarification to BuzzFeed:

“Gov. Romney will ensure that discrimination against individuals with pre-existing conditions who maintain continuous coverage is prohibited,” an aide said.

Let’s be clear: Romney absolutely was proposing a mandate to require such care in his statement on “Meet the Press” — or at least he was intending to leave that false impression. The plan Massachusetts adopted when he was governor, the one he said he’ll replace Obamacare with, has exactly such a mandate. “I say we’re going to replace Obamacare. And I’m replacing it with my own plan. And even in Massachusetts when I was governor, our plan there deals with pre-existing conditions.” With a mandate against discriminating against people who have one when they’re trying to buy insurance.

But now Romney is returning to the limited approach he’s mostly touted on the campaign trail: making sure that folks with “continuous coverage” don’t get dropped from their plans. But that’s very different from making sure that someone with a pre-existing condition who loses coverage due to changing jobs or a family event can get coverage again. That’s where the problem is, and that’s one of the most popular features of Obamacare, according to polls.

Advertisement:

So Romney tried to sound like he supports it, when in fact, he doesn’t. I’m hoping David Gregory gets a chance to follow up, but that’s not likely.


Advertisement:

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Related Articles