Does truth really matter to Oscar?

"ZD30" has been under tremendous scrutiny this awards season. But few are quibbling with "Lincoln" and "Argo"

Topics: 2013 Awards Season, 2013 oscars, spielberg, Zero Dark Thirty, zd30, Lincoln, Steven Spielberg, Anti-Semitism, Movies, entertainment news, Film,

Does truth really matter to Oscar?

Oscar voting hasn’t even started yet, but “Zero Dark Thirty” has already been through about 15 cycles of backlash. Most recently, director Kathryn Bigelow — surprisingly not nominated for an Oscar this year — defended her work in the pages of the Los Angeles Times.

“On a practical and political level, it does seem illogical to me to make a case against torture by ignoring or denying the role it played in U.S. counter-terrorism policy and practices,” Bigelow writes, in response to critiques that the movie overemphasizes the role of torture, that the creators of this work of “reported filmhave been spun by the CIA. The disclaimer attached to the film, “Based on Firsthand Accounts of Actual Events,” hasn’t mollified critics.

Even Ben Affleck, director of best picture competitor “Argo,” got in the game, critiquing “Zero Dark Thirty” implicitly by saying that movies are not journalism “unless they say they’re journalism.”

Play nice, Ben! We’re in the midst of an awards season in which best picture nominees feature runaway slaves rampaging through plantations to effectively end slavery, in which a quasi-allegory of life in South Louisiana features mythical beasts rampaging the landscape.

You Might Also Like

And yet those films, “Django Unchained” and “Beasts of the Southern Wild,” deal with characters who are unambiguously good or unambiguously evil, and with situations that are riffs on the facts that make no pretense to accuracy. Where the trouble comes is with characters with the whiff of ambiguity or — that dread term — politics. Though “Argo” and “Lincoln” both take some liberties with the facts, they’re about freeing hostages from Iran and about ending slavery, in both cases through heroism. The factual quibbles are about the historiography, not the history — the outcome was the same, but the importance of the film’s heroes is different.

The debate over “Zero Dark Thirty,” and whether it valorizes individuals committing evil acts, has more in common with past Oscar debates; Universal Pictures accused other studios of spreading rumors about the accuracy of “A Beautiful Mind” in the 2002 Oscar race. That film’s subject, mathematician John Nash, was portrayed on-screen as a heroic genius struggling with mental illness, and left out Nash’s supposed bisexuality and anti-Semitic views. ”The timing of these latest missives and their orchestration has to be calculated,” said Stacey Snider at the time. The same thing happened to best picture front-runner “The King’s Speech,” the subject of anonymous tips to reporters about King George VI’s anti-Semitism.

So far this year, the attacks on “Zero Dark Thirty” seem to come from concerned critics acting independently; the front-runner, “Lincoln,” has been dinged for things like Bill Clinton’s appearance at the Golden Globes praising the film. (“People realized that [director Steven] Spielberg wants Oscar glory really badly this time, and will cash in any I.O.U.’s,” said one Oscar blog before Deadline reported the president’s appearance was brokered by Spielberg.) The genius of a film like “Lincoln,” in terms of the Oscars, is that it’s hard to make a compelling argument about its facts disqualifying it from gold. No one would argue that Lincoln didn’t free the slaves — it’s a boringly nuanced debate about degree.

But if you start reading more about the film’s failure to address Lincoln gay rumors and the like, you’ll know that publicists in Hollywood are scared.

Daniel D'Addario is a staff reporter for Salon's entertainment section. Follow him on Twitter @DPD_

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    Michael Ohl/Museum fur Naturkunde

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Soul-Sucking Dementor Wasp

    Latin name: Ampulex dementor

    Truong Ngyuen

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    10,000th reptile species

    Latin name: Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi

    Jodi Rowley/Australian Museum

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Colour-changing thorny frogs

    Latin name: Gracixalus lumarius

    Judith L. Eger

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Long-fanged bat

    Latin name: Hypsugo dolichodon

    Neang Thy Moe/FFI

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Stealthy wolf snake

    Latin name: Lycodon zoosvictoriae

    Michael Janes

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Feathered coral

    Latin name: Ovabunda andamanensis

    Jerome Constant

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    World's second-longest insect

    Phryganistria heusii yentuensis

    Nantasak Pinkaew

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Slide 8

    Latin name: Sirindhornia spp

    Tim Johnson

    Soul-sucking 'dementor' wasps and 8 other crazy new species

    Slide 9

    Tylototriton shanorum

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>