(AP/Ian Joughin)

Study: "Working together" won't fix climate change

Researchers say the best way to encourage activism is by emphasizing individual, rather than collective, action


Tom Jacobs
April 7, 2013 5:00PM (UTC)
This piece originally appeared on Pacific Standard.

When it comes to climate change, we’re all in this dilemma together, and forcefully addressing it will require collaboration and cooperation. A stirring sentiment, but if you’re looking to spur white Americans to action, it’s actually counterproductive.
Pacific Standard

That’s the conclusion of a Stanford University research team, which found invoking the idea of interdependence undermined the motivation of European-American students to take a course in environmental sustainability.

Advertisement:

The researchers, led by MarYam Hamedani of Stanford’s Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, argue that in mainstream European-American culture, independence functions as a “foundational schema” — that is, an underlying design or blueprint that guides behavior.

“Interdependent action is not as motivating for independent European-Americans because it is inconsistent with this schema,” they write in the journal Psychological Science.

Hamedani and her colleagues describe three studies that provide evidence supporting their thesis. In one of them, 91 Stanford students — 47 European-Americans and 44 Asian-Americans — examined a website that advertised a new course focusing on environmental sustainability.

Half looked at a version of the site that emphasized independent action, noting that the students would “learn to work autonomously” and “cultivate expertise in individual action.” The others read a version that emphasized interdependence, saying that students would “learn to collaborate with others” and “cultivate expertise in social action.”

All were then asked how much effort they would put into such a class and how motivated they would feel if they enrolled. They also allocated an amount of money to sponsor course-related activities and indicated whether they felt it should be a requirement.

White undergraduates who were told it would help them develop unique personal skills were more interested in the class, and more likely to believe it should be required for graduation. In contrast, Asian-Americans — who have been influenced by a culture with a more communal-oriented mindset — found the individuality- and interdependence-oriented appeals equally appealing.

Advertisement:

“These effects were robust and suggest that the frequent and pressing calls for Americans to recognize their shared fate and think collectively may result in the unintended consequences of undermining the very motivation they seek to inspire,” the researchers write.

“In the land of the free, motivating Americans to take action for today’s pressing societal challenges will be accomplished most effectively when people are encouraged to ‘take charge’ rather than to ‘work together.’”

Clearly, the Mad Man who came up with the appeal “Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires” had a good intuitive sense of his audience.


Tom Jacobs

MORE FROM Tom Jacobs

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Activism Climate Change Pacific Standard Research Studies Social Action Stanford University




BROWSE SALON.COM
COMPLETELY AD FREE,
FOR THE NEXT HOUR

Read Now, Pay Later - no upfront
registration for 1-Hour Access

Click Here
7-Day Access and Monthly
Subscriptions also available
No tracking or personal data collection
beyond name and email address

•••


Fearless journalism
in your inbox every day

Sign up for our free newsletter

• • •