• News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Life Stories
  • Video
  • Reviews
    • Lifestyle
      • The New Sober Boom
      • Getting Hooked on Quitting
    • Education
      • Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
      • Is College Necessary?
    • Finance
      • Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
      • Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
    • Crypto
      • Investing
        • SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
        • 'Dark' Personalities Drawn to BTC
Profile Log In/Sign Up Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
subscribe
Help keep Salon independent
Newsletter
Profile Login/Sign Up
Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
  • News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
salon logo
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Video

New Jersey will face legal battle over same-sex marriage

With DOMA held unconstitutional and Christie promising to veto any legislation, the fight heads to the courts

By Jillian Rayfield

Published June 28, 2013 4:48PM (EDT)

--

Shares

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email

Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act, not much has changed for couples in states where same-sex marriage is not yet legal. In New Jersey, legislation to do so looks dead in the water under threat of a Chris Christie veto, so gay rights advocates are hoping that they can mount a legal challenge to accomplish the same thing.

Lambda Legal is planning to file a motion, in a case currently before the New Jersey Superior Court, that argues that current New Jersey law is at odds with the state Supreme Court's 2006 holding that gay couples are required to get the same benefits as straight couples.

From The Washington Post:

In response to the 2006 ruling, the legislature passed a bill establishing civil unions in the state. Since civil unions were adopted in the state, marriage advocates have argued that they are not equal to marriage. The DOMA ruling bolsters that claim. While couples in civil unions may get some federal benefits after the ruling — it’s a legal gray area — they will not get the automatic benefits enjoyed by spouses in states where gay marriage is legal.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman for the purposes of receiving federal benefits, is unconstitutional. Christie called it a "bad decision," and said he would still veto any legislation to legalize same-sex marriage in the state.

His Democratic opponent Barbara Buono quickly made it a campaign issue, and is pushing the state legislature to override the veto. “Those that need a way to rationalize their vote to override, they’ve got it," she told the Post, referring to the Supreme Court's decision. So far, though, supporters say they still don't have the votes to override it.


By Jillian Rayfield

Jillian Rayfield is an Assistant News Editor for Salon, focusing on politics. Follow her on Twitter at @jillrayfield or email her at jrayfield@salon.com.

MORE FROM Jillian Rayfield


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Chris Christie Civil Unions Doma New Jersey Republicans Same-sex Marriage

Related Articles


Advertisement:
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Archive
  • Go Ad Free

Copyright © 2025 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


DMCA Policy