Your Facebook newsfeed rewards spammers

The site's Edge Rank algorithm determines what you do or don’t see appear in your newsfeed

Topics: Facebook, newsfeed, spammers, Edge Rank, Social Media, ,

Your Facebook newsfeed rewards spammers (Credit: pearleye via iStock/Salon)

For a long time now Facebook have meddled with the News Feed, and their Edge Rank algorithm is largely responsible for determining what you do or don’t see appear in your Facebook feed. Ever wondered how you managed to miss a post from one of your friends?  That’ll be Edge Rank at work.

Facebook: How Story Bump Rewards Spammers & Fake Likes image spambook2

Of course there are individual settings which will also have an impact; for example you have the option of manually turning off some or all of the updates from your friends, (not advertisers), but what you see on your wall is mainly down to Edge Rank doing it’s thing.

“Popularity is the new currency, giving spammers

even more incentive to buy fans and fake likes”

In a recent article I revealed how despite grossly misleading consumers and making outrageous, unsubstantiated claims in direct contradiction with their own published guidelines, scammers are allowed to advertise on Facebook with complete impunity.  In it’s wisdom, Facebook has now decided to reward spammers who purchase fake fans and likes.

Previously, posts were shown in a (largely) chronological order which makes perfect sense and meant that if you wanted to see older content, you simply scrolled down to it.  Now however, content is much more mixed and posts that are a day or more old will now be appearing at the top of peoples feeds if they have generated a lot of engagement.

“Buying likes is the logical step, leading to

more spam and low quality content”

Facebook claims this helps users to not miss ‘popular content’. I say rubbish, this simply gives Facebook the excuse to show ‘popular’ posts at the top of peoples feeds for longer.  This gives advertisers new incentive to buy artificial popularity in the form of fake ‘likes’ which can easily be purchased to get even more exposure, ensuring they benefit from the longevity that fake engagement will provide to them.

Story Bump Has Resulted In a Worse User Experience

Over the past month, i’ve found that my experience of using Facebook has been compromised and it is much harder for me to see what I want to see, which I find inconvenient and irritating.



You Might Also Like

Facebook: How Story Bump Rewards Spammers & Fake Likes image 7K0A0116 1024x6821

I am now seeing posts i’ve already read remaining at the top of my feed – why?  What purpose does this serve apart from irritating me and making me have to go and hunt out new content?  When i’ve already read something I don’t want to read it again! I want to move on and presenting posts in chronological order was effective at allowing me to do that with ease.

It’s Now More Tempting Than Ever To Buy Fake ‘Likes’

For SME’s who don’t have a vast budget or community following and for those who are ethical and choose not to buy fake fans or likes, these latest changes make it even harder to obtain visibility because the odds are now stacked against anyone seeing their posts.

It is estimated that just 15% of Facebook followers will see a post from a business page and of this 15%, content is now highly unlikely to appear at the top of peoples feeds unless it is popular, making posts even less visible.  This means that SMEs are fighting what appears to be a loosing battle right from the start.

These latest changes which started their roll out on August 6th 2013, make Facebook an even less viable marketing tool for SMEs with limited budgets and once again favours unethical spammers who simply need to sink a few hundred dollars into buying fake fans and likes to get maximum visibility for their low quality/value content.

How do you feel about the recent changes?  Do you prefer the old (largely) chronological order of posts or do you prefer things now, with prominence given to older, more popular content? Are you happy to see more spam in your newsfeed?

Original article

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    jkrebs04, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada

    akvarog, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.

    jhgraphicsusa, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R., DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    iMAGICations,DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

Loading Comments...