• News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Life Stories
  • Video
  • Reviews
    • Lifestyle
      • The New Sober Boom
      • Getting Hooked on Quitting
    • Education
      • Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
      • Is College Necessary?
    • Finance
      • Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
      • Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
    • Crypto
      • Investing
        • SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
        • 'Dark' Personalities Drawn to BTC
Profile Log In/Sign Up Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
subscribe
Help keep Salon independent
Newsletter
Profile Login/Sign Up
Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
  • News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
salon logo
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Video

"Rabid partisanship": Paul Krugman eviscerates legal assault on Obamacare and the "corrupt" judges who enable it

A frivolous lawsuit may prove healthcare reform's undoing

By Luke Brinker

Published November 10, 2014 1:45PM (EST)

Paul Krugman                                                                                                                                                                   (AP/Lai Seng Sin)
Paul Krugman (AP/Lai Seng Sin)
--

Shares

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email

Last week gave rise to an existential threat to the Affordable Care Act -- and it had nothing to do with the Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate.

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to hear King v. Burwell, a case in which opponents of health reform claim that health insurance subsidies for individuals who buy insurance on the federal Obamacare exchange are invalid. Seizing on language in the ACA that they assert restricts subsidies to “an Exchange established by the State,” the plaintiffs -- who lost their case before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals -- seek to restrict subsidies only to individuals who buy insurance on state-based exchanges. Because 36 states did not establish their own exchanges, the case puts subsidies for millions of Americans at risk -- and the Supreme Court's willingness to take King v. Burwell up is a worrying sign; the Obama administration had hoped the case would be resolved in the lower courts.

As economist Paul Krugman explains in his New York Times column today, the case threatens to unravel Obamacare. Health reform, he writes, is a "three-legged stool" involving a ban on discrimination against people with preexisting conditions; a requirement that everyone buy insurance, so that the risk pool is balanced out; and subsidies to ensure that people can actually afford the health insurance they're required to purchase. Sawing off the third leg would trigger "grotesque" consequences, Krugman warns.

"States like California that run their own exchanges would be unaffected," he notes. "But in places like New Jersey, where G.O.P. politicians refused to take a role, premiums would soar, healthy individuals would drop out, and health reform would go into a death spiral."

All of this, Krugman laments, over an "obvious typo" in the ACA. "[E]verything else in the act makes it clear" that denying subsidies to people on the federal Obamacare exchange "was not the drafters’ intention, and in any case you can ask them directly, and they’ll tell you that this was nothing but sloppy language," he writes.

Underlying the latest assault on Obamacare is "rabid partisanship," not "serious legal reasoning," Krugman argues. But lest you think the suit's obvious frivolousness dooms it to failure, he observes that "all too many Republican judges have made it clear that partisan loyalty trumps respect for the rule of law."

More from Krugman's column:

Once upon a time, this lawsuit would have been literally laughed out of court. Instead, however, it has actually been upheld in some lower courts, on straight party-line votes — and the willingness of the Supremes to hear it is a bad omen.

So let’s be clear about what’s happening here. Judges who support this cruel absurdity aren’t stupid; they know what they’re doing. What they are, instead, is corrupt, willing to pervert the law to serve political masters. And what we’ll find out in the months ahead is how deep the corruption goes.


By Luke Brinker

MORE FROM Luke Brinker


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Affordable Care Act Health Care Reform Health Insurance Insurance Exchanges Judiciary King V. Burwell Lawsuits Obamacare Paul Krugman Subsidies Supreme Court The New York Times

Related Articles


Advertisement:
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Archive
  • Go Ad Free

Copyright © 2025 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


DMCA Policy