• News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
salon logo
  • Science & Health
  • Life Stories
  • Video
  • About
subscribe
Profile Login/Sign Up Sticky Header: Night Mode: Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
Contribute

Keep Salon Independent

salon logo
subscribe

Fox News' legal analyst Peter Johnson tries desperately to spin San Bernardino shootings into a "terror event"

"The site happens to be a workplace, but terror can occur in a workplace, it's the ultimate soft target," he said

By Scott Eric Kaufman

Published December 3, 2015 4:00PM (EST)

--

Shares

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email
view in app

Whether yesterday's mass-shooting in San Bernardino, California was a terror attack is still unclear -- but what's abundantly clear is how desperately producers and hosts at Fox News want it to be.

On "Fox & Friends" Thursday morning, legal analyst Peter Johnson questioned whether "this was a typical workplace violence attack or a Jihadi Jane and Joe." One of the shooters, Syed Rizwan Farook, worked for the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health, which had rented the Inland Regional Center for its year-end banquet. Farook allegedly attended the banquet that morning, but left early only to return later heavily armed and with his wife.

Co-host Steve Doocy hinted that it has to be "a terror event," because "with workplace violence, usually when somebody pops off, they don't go home and get their wife and she takes part in it."

Johnson mustered his best legalese, saying "the site happens to be a workplace, but terror can occur in a workplace, and this is the ultimate soft target. Automatic weapons, pipe bombs, booby-trapping, the potential for radicalization, a man who may have been love-lorn going to Saudi Arabia and bringing back a highly trained pharmacist wife."

"Is this beginning of green card jihad in America?" he asked. "If this was a terror attack, or a terror-inspired attack, Americans need to know."

Johnson noted that "politically, it's a fire-bomb for this White House to admit that this was a terror attack, or an ISIS terrorist with another foreign national who committed this. I don't think there's any question that this should be called 'terror.' What kind of terror it is we need to find out."

He concluded with a masterpiece of lawyerly dissembling, saying that he didn't "want to come to any hasty conclusions at this point, but if you look at the dots and start to connect them in a way that's rational and reasonable and not political, based on simple things we know about terrorism, it leads ineluctably and inescapably to that one horrible conclusion -- terror."

Watch the entire interview below via Fox News.

Watch our recap of what 2016 presidential candidates have said about the San Bernardino shooting:
[jwplayer file="http://media.salon.com/2015/12/SanBernardino.Asha_.1242015.mp4" image="http://media.salon.com/2015/12/2016-gop-candidates-debate1.jpg"][/jwplayer]

Calif. Hospital Talks About Shooting Patients


By Scott Eric Kaufman

MORE FROM Scott Eric Kaufman


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Aol_on Fox & Friends Fox News Islamophobia Peter Johnson Steve Doocy Video

Related Articles


Advertisement:
Advertisement:

Trending Articles from Salon

Advertisement:
Advertisement:
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Archive
  • Go Ad Free

Copyright © 2023 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


DMCA Policy