• News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Life Stories
  • Video
  • Reviews
    • Lifestyle
      • The New Sober Boom
      • Getting Hooked on Quitting
    • Education
      • Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
      • Is College Necessary?
    • Finance
      • Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
      • Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
    • Crypto
      • Investing
        • SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
        • 'Dark' Personalities Drawn to BTC
Profile Log In/Sign Up Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
subscribe
Help keep Salon independent
Newsletter
Profile Login/Sign Up
Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
  • News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
salon logo
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Video

“Dominion has a killer case”: Legal experts say settlement talks suggest Fox News got cold feet

Fox "should have pursued this strategy long ago," says ex-prosecutor, before damning messages became public

By Igor Derysh

Managing Editor

Published April 17, 2023 9:00AM (EDT)

Protesters Gather Outside Fox News Studios To Call Out Channel's Silence On The Dominion Lawsuit (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
Protesters Gather Outside Fox News Studios To Call Out Channel's Silence On The Dominion Lawsuit (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
--

Shares

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email

The judge overseeing Dominion Voting Systems' $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News delayed the start of the trial until Tuesday amid reported settlement talks.

Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis announced on Sunday that the start of the trial would be delayed by 24 hours after it was scheduled to kick off on Monday. No official reason was given for the delay but The Washington Post reported that the trial was postponed to allow both parties to discuss a potential settlement in the case.

The weeks-long trial was set to commence Monday morning, with Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch reportedly set to testify as early as the first day. Fox stars like Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Maria Bartiromo were also expected to take the witness stand during the trial.

Instead, the two sides will meet Monday to determine if a "last-minute deal to avoid trial could be brokered," the Post reported, citing two sources familiar with the case. One of the sources added that Davis asked the two sides to try to make one final push for a settlement before proceeding to trial.

Related

"It doesn't protect lies": Here's what legal experts think of Fox News' First Amendment defense

Fox and Dominion previously entered mediation around December 2022 but were unable to reach a settlement.

Fox has already pursued settlement talks on "multiple occasions," according to media reporter Brian Stelter. "Dominion, knowing it has tremendous leverage, held firm."

Since then, Fox has been hit by repeated adverse rulings from the judge. Davis ruled that Fox's statements about Dominion at the heart of the lawsuit were false, meaning that Dominion would only have to prove that the network acted with "actual malice." Davis last week also ordered an investigation into whether Fox withheld key evidence during discovery.

Fox has denied that they defamed the company, arguing that they were merely reporting on notable allegations as protected under the First Amendment. The network claimed it complied with all of its discovery obligations.

Pre-trial discovery revealed troves of internal messages showing that Fox executives and hosts trashed the same debunked conspiracy theories they aired while expressing concerns that fact-checking the false claims would draw former President Donald Trump's ire and potentially send viewers to even more pro-Trump outlets.

Dominion officials have said "they would not settle without a full-throated apology and acknowledgment from Fox that it aired false information — a position that could put the network at odds with many viewers and Trump, who is again running for president," according to the Post.


Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman tweeted that the case could be a candidate for a settlement because "Dominion has a killer case on liability but seeking damages that are hard to justify."

A big settlement offer from Fox "could make sense for both," he wrote.

Attorney Bradley Moss added that "trials are a wild card" and there is a "non-trivial chance the pre-trial rulings get reversed on appeal and the whole thing is tossed."

Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti wrote that Fox "should have pursued this strategy long ago, settling before damaging emails and texts became part of the public record."

Former federal prosecutor Elie Honig, a CNN legal analyst, said on Sunday that "there's something about being on the eve of trial that can really sober up both parties."

"Look at it from Fox's point of view: they're looking at the likelihood — if there's a trial — of having all of their, or many of their, most prominent anchors have to take the stand, testify and get cross-examined. You can understand why they would be hit by reality at the last moment, say, 'We need to avoid this,'" Honig said, adding that Dominion "has a very strong case here for defamation."

Read more

about the Fox News lawsuit

  • "Potential for criminal penalties": Experts warn judge could punish Fox for "engaging in misconduct"
  • Dominion v. Fox News goes to trial: Fall of the Murdoch empire, or attack on press freedom?
  • Fox News has lost control of its viewers

By Igor Derysh

Igor Derysh is Salon's managing editor. His work has also appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Herald and Baltimore Sun.

MORE FROM Igor Derysh


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Aggregate Dominion Voting Systems Fox News Politics Rupert Murdoch

Related Articles


Advertisement:
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Archive
  • Go Ad Free

Copyright © 2025 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


DMCA Policy