• News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Life Stories
  • Video
  • Reviews
    • Lifestyle
      • The New Sober Boom
      • Getting Hooked on Quitting
    • Education
      • Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
      • Is College Necessary?
    • Finance
      • Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
      • Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
    • Crypto
      • Investing
        • SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
        • 'Dark' Personalities Drawn to BTC
Profile Log In/Sign Up Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
subscribe
Help keep Salon independent
Newsletter
Profile Login/Sign Up
Saved Articles Go Ad-Free Logout
  • News & Politics
  • Culture
  • Food
salon logo
  • Science & Health
  • Money
  • Video

"Most perilous case": Fox News legal expert warns Trump can't "make the Georgia prosecution go away"

"Willis’ case may well be more straightforward — less legally problematic — than Smith’s," wrote Andy McCarthy

By Gabriella Ferrigine

Published August 15, 2023 1:25PM (EDT)

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis speaks during a news conference at the Fulton County Government building on August 14, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis speaks during a news conference at the Fulton County Government building on August 14, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
--

Shares

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email

Fox News legal analyst Andy McCarthy warned that former President Donald Trump's indictment by a Fulton County, Ga., grand jury is "his most perilous" case yet. McCarthy in a New York Post op-ed ahead of the indictment compared the Georgia case with Trump's prosecution by special counsel Jack Smith and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, arguing that the New York hush-money case "harmed no one" and although there is "significant overlap" between the D.C. indictment and the one in Georgia, "Smith's problem is that the federal penal statutes he has invoked — relating to fraud, obstruction, and civil rights — do not clearly and narrowly target the kind of conduct in which Trump engaged."

"Willis, by contrast, is probing serious misconduct — the duplicitous and heavy-handed schemes by which Trump tried to remain in power despite losing the election," McCarthy wrote, predicting that Willis would have "smoother sailing" than Smith because state laws are "specifically designed to deal with election-interference conduct of the kind Trump engaged in." Though the Fulton case isn't as "cut-and-dried" as the Mar-a-Lago documents case, he wrote, "Willis' case may well be more straightforward — less legally problematic — than Smith's election interference case, and it will surely be more compelling than Bragg's nakedly partisan business records indictment."

"What should most concern Trump is that the Georgia case could be the most enduring of all the criminal indictments," he added. "If Trump or another Republican were to win the 2024 election, the new president could issue a pardon or otherwise have their Justice Department drop Smith's federal indictments against Trump... It remains to be seen whether Wills can convince a jury of Atlantans to convict Trump. But even a newly elected President Trump could not make the Georgia prosecution go away."


MORE FROM Gabriella Ferrigine

Advertisement:
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Archive
  • Go Ad Free

Copyright © 2025 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


DMCA Policy