Help keep Salon independent

US Attorney Erik Siebert resigns, won’t prosecute Letitia James on flawed charges

Trump criticizes Siebert for declining to pursue charges against Letitia James in potential government overreach

Weekend Editor

Published

US Attorney Erik Siebert of Virginia resigns after Trump criticizes his refusal to prosecute Letitia James on flimsy charges. (Gwengoat / Getty Images)
US Attorney Erik Siebert of Virginia resigns after Trump criticizes his refusal to prosecute Letitia James on flimsy charges. (Gwengoat / Getty Images)

Erik Siebert, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, has resigned following pressure from President Donald Trump over his handling of an investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James. Siebert, nominated by Trump in May but not yet confirmed by the Senate, was overseeing a probe into allegations that James committed mortgage fraud by falsifying records to secure favorable loan terms. The investigation was prompted by claims from Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte, who alleged James misrepresented her financial records.

President Trump publicly expressed dissatisfaction with Siebert’s performance, declaring, “He didn’t quit, I fired him!” He criticized Siebert for receiving support from Democratic Senators Tim Kaine and Mark Warner during his nomination, suggesting this indicated a lack of impartiality. Trump also faulted Siebert for reportedly declining to pursue criminal charges against James, despite the investigation’s findings, noting that the U.S. Attorney had concluded there was insufficient evidence to bring a case.

In his resignation email, Siebert thanked colleagues for their dedication and professionalism, emphasizing his commitment to justice. The Eastern District of Virginia declined further comment on the resignation. James has denied the allegations against her, calling the probe politically motivated and an attempt at retaliation for her civil fraud case against Trump, which seeks damages for alleged financial misconduct.

Legal and political analysts say the resignation raises concerns about the independence of the Justice Department and the potential for political interference in federal investigations. Critics argue that pressuring Siebert to pursue a case without sufficient evidence reflects a broader pattern of using government authority to target political opponents, highlighting the tension between law enforcement and political agendas in high-profile investigations.

By CK Smith

CK Smith is Salon's weekend editor.

MORE FROM CK Smith

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Related Articles