Help keep Salon independent

Comey indictment was never approved by grand jury

Prosecutor Lindsay Halligan may have sunk the case against Comey with one stunning admission

Nights and Weekends Editor

Published

Lindsey Halligan, attorney for U.S. President Donald Trump, looks on during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House, on March 31, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)
Lindsey Halligan, attorney for U.S. President Donald Trump, looks on during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House, on March 31, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)

The case against former FBI Director James Comey grows flimsier by the day.

On Wednesday, prosecutor Lindsey Halligan admitted that a full grand jury never voted to approve the indictment of Comey, raising questions about whether the case is even legal. The stunning revelation came during a hearing meant to determine whether the case against Comey was a malicious prosecution. While under questioning from U.S. District Court Judge Michael Nachmanoff, Trump’s hand-selected attorney revealed the unorthodox way she secured an indictment.

The grand jury convened at the behest of President Donald Trump initially declined to indict Comey. Halligan told Nachmanoff she brought an altered indictment to the grand jury’s foreman and had them sign off on it without another vote from the full jury. Per the New York Times, Comey’s attorneys requested that the case be dismissed following the admission from Halligan.


Start your day with essential news from Salon.
Sign up for our free morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Halligan’s confession comes mere days after a federal judge accused prosecutors of “profound investigative misteps” that could “potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.” Judge William Fitzpatrick said that Halligan made statements to the grand jury “that could reasonably form the basis for the defense to challenge whether the grand jury proceedings were infected with constitutional error.”

Nachmanoff did not make any ruling from the bench on Wednesday.


Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Related Articles