The $252 million man

Why does every single story about Alex Rodriguez have to mention the Rangers star's salary?

Topics: Baseball,

The $252 million man

Write down this date: May 9. That’s when it’ll happen.

That’s Tax Liberation Day — you’ll have to work from New Year’s Day to that date to earn the money you’ll pay in taxes next year, if you’re in the United States and you’re typical.

But that’s not what I’m talking about. What I’m doing is making a fearless prediction: May 9 will be the first time you will read a story about Alex Rodriguez that doesn’t mention his salary, which, in case you haven’t heard, is $252 million over 10 years.

On Friday in Oakland, Calif., Rodriguez (who signed a $252 million, 10-year contract this off-season with the Texas Rangers) hit his first home run of the year. “Rodriguez hit a solo shot to center off Mike Magnante in the fourth,” wrote the Associated Press. “‘It was nice to get it out of the way,’ said Rodriguez, who signed a 10-year deal with the Rangers in the off-season worth $252 million.”

Here’s the San Francisco Chronicle, on the same game: “The Rangers racked up eight runs against [Cory] Lidle, and later, the $252 Million Dollar Man, Alex Rodriguez, recorded his first homer with his new team, as Texas crushed Oakland 13-1, for the A’s fifth loss in a row.”

Also in the news over the weekend: Vice President Dick Cheney’s income tax returns show he made $36 million last year. For A-Rod to make that much money — his salary averages out to $25.2 million a year, or $155,555.56 a game — he would have to play an extra 69 games and into the middle innings of a 70th.

And yet, somehow, I doubt every newspaper story that mentions Cheney in the coming months will include the words “Cheney, who made $36 million last year …”

President Bush, by the way, made $894,880, nowhere near what either Cheney or Rodriguez pulled in, though both of them could argue, as Babe Ruth once did, that they “had a better year.”

On Saturday, Rodriguez — who will average $25.2 million a year for the next 10 years — had an even bigger game, driving in six runs in another Rangers win. “The Oakland Athletics overcame an eight-run deficit but could not overcome baseball’s highest-paid player,” wrote the Sportsticker news service. “Signed to a 10-year, $252 million contract in the off-season, Rodriguez enjoyed his biggest game of the young campaign.”

The Rangers swept the A’s with another high-scoring win Sunday, thanks in no small part to Rodriguez, baseball’s highest-paid player at $25.2 million a year. Here’s the AP lead: “To Jason Giambi, Alex Rodriguez might be underpaid, even with his record $252 million contract.

“‘He’s pretty phenomenal,’ the A’s first baseman and last season’s AL MVP said. ‘We made him look like he’s worth about $300 million.’”

(See, Giambi was referring to Rodriguez’s $252 million contract there.)

Last month, regulatory filings showed that Bank One Corp. paid its CEO, Jamie Dimon, $29.8 million last year. Dimon worked for the company for eight months. A Nexis search Monday revealed that Dimon’s name has appeared in stories in nine major newspapers on four different days since April 1. Not one of them mentioned his salary, which, prorated, is $44.7 million a year, or 77 percent higher than Rodriguez’s salary — $25.2 million a year, as you might know.

On Monday, Rodriguez brought his money and his Rangers teammates to Seattle to play the Mariners, for whom he played from 1994 through last year, before leaving to sign a $252 million contract with the Rangers this off-season. The AP: “The Mariners aren’t planning a warm welcome for Alex Rodriguez when he returns to Seattle for the first time since signing a $252 million contract with Texas. ” The Chronicle: “Alex Rodriguez left the Coliseum last night en route to Seattle for the first time since leaving the Mariners for a $252 million deal with Texas.” The Seattle Post-Intelligencer: “STORY LINE: Hello, Alex. This is Alex Rodriguez’s first series in Seattle since leaving the Mariners to sign with the Rangers for a major league record $252 million. All other story lines pale by comparison.”

According to Forbes, George Lucas makes $250 million a year. Oprah Winfrey makes $150 million. Bruce Willis? $70 million. They’re all in the entertainment business, just like Rodriguez ($25.2 million), but most stories about them don’t mention those figures. Did you know that Martin Lawrence — Martin Lawrence! — makes $33 million? Narrowing the focus to sports figures, we find race car driver Michael Schumacher ($59 million), golfer Tiger Woods ($53 million) and boxer Mike Tyson ($48 million) all making way more than A-Rod ($25.2 million).

Want to know who’s in Rodriguez’s low-rent neighborhood? Keanu Reeves ($25.5 million), the Dixie Chicks ($25 million, though they have to split it three ways, presumably) and Rosie O’Donnell ($25 million). I can’t remember the last time I read about any of these people’s salaries.

Alex Rodriguez is baseball’s highest paid player. For now. Can we all please get over it? He’s widely considered the top performer in an unbelievably lucrative profession. He makes what the market will bear, and the market will bear a whole big swingin’ heck of a lot right now.

Two hundred fifty-two million dollars over 10 years to be exact. Now shut up about it already.

King Kaufman is a senior writer for Salon. You can e-mail him at king at salon dot com. Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows



Comment Preview

Your name will appear as username ( settings | log out )

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href=""> <b> <em> <strong> <i> <blockquote>