Music

White star, black galaxy

Eminem is the man of the hour, but rap is still an African-American business.

Astrologers took note last week as a rare alignment graced their star charts. The auspicious sign: one Eminem, two No. 1 slots. This year’s prince of hip-hop scored a pleasing symmetry, with the film “8 Mile” and its soundtrack album reigning atop the box-office charts and the Billboard charts in the same week.

In the marvel of a humanized Eminem, once just another angry thug, is yet another symmetry. The white rapper’s transformation is hip-hop’s, and in his race is the message that black music has gone mainstream. Eminems character in “8 Mile” climbs out of his Detroit ghetto on the merit of his stylish flow alone, an achievement all the sweeter for a young white kid in a black mans world. And so is born the record industrys white knight, he who will carry the budding hip-hop genre farther and deeper into the heart of a mostly white target market. Yet as his roman à clef meditates on hip-hop’s color barrier, Eminem’s observers miss the fact that this exception proves the rule and that his genre is anything but budding. Hip-hop is all grown up. And now, as much as ever, it is by and about black America.

Invented in the Bronx ghettos of the 1970s, the cultural form of hip-hop has found its target market in suburbs across America. From 1995 to 2001, the hip-hop market share boomed, increasing by 75 percent. (CD sales have sagged badly this year, but that’s true across all musical genres.) This achievement was possible only because more than three-quarters of hip-hop record buyers were already white. Booming beyond music, hip-hop’s biggest names are increasingly involved throughout the culture industries: fashion, TV, film and print. Twenty years after the Sugar Hill Gang’s “Rapper’s Delight” hit the pop charts, hip-hop has managed something rock ‘n’ roll never could: It’s popular, profitable and black.

Hip-hop has defied a central cliché of commercialization, unlike rock, jazz, and the blues before it. For all of the latter, Norman Mailer’s observation that postwar American “cool” has repeatedly returned to black America for inspiration is true. But as hip-hop transformed from outsider to establishment, it has remained a creation by and about black Americans — even if the product is for whites. Hip-hop’s leaders, stars and aristocrats are predominantly African-American, from Russell Simmons to the Wu-Tang Clan to Lauryn Hill to Ja Rule, DMX and Nelly (who topped the charts just prior to Eminem’s arrival). And on the world stage, hip-hop’s subject matter, from NWA’s 1987 “Fuck tha Police” to Jay-Z’s 1999 “Hard Knock Life (Ghetto Anthem),” continues to treat the experiences of American blacks.

Eminem’s prominence in 2002 merely confirms that the occasional white rapper is by now a familiar novelty. In the early 1990s, Boston’s Irish-American group House of Pain had rap’s biggest hit, and it was the Beastie Boys who were rap’s first superstars. But a check of the Billboard hip-hop chart last August found that 19 of the top 20 albums were from black performers (Eminem was at No. 4).

The surprise, in fact, is that there are so few Vanilla Ice-style knockoffs to mention. Rap records made up 11.4 percent of the $13.7 billion in U.S. record sales last year, and the confederate category of R&B accounted for another 10.6 percent. Rock, by comparison, has declined from over 40 percent in the late ’80s to just 25 percent today. While “teen pop” and the travails of Britney Spears have made headlines lately, the treacle merely footnotes the rise of hip-hop. Mass-market breakout has long since happened.

The face of hip-hop is and always has been black. But so too are hip-hop’s seats of power. Behind the stars is a universe of black producers and impresarios. This is where Eminem came from; he was discovered and packaged by black producer and entrepreneur Dr. Dre in 1999. Successful artists frequently start their own labels to sponsor whole coteries of affiliated acts or “families.” And while the L.A.-based major labels have surely made fortunes distributing most titles, Master P’s No Limit Records and Sean “Puffy-Puff Daddy-P. Diddy” Combs’ Bad Boy Entertainment are clearly powerful, as are other black-run labels.

The list of hip-hop businesses has kept on growing, notably with the explosion into fashion of fabulously successful brands like Phat Farm, Karl Kani, And 1, Rocawear, FUBU and Combs’ own Sean John line. Hip-hop is a world of black musicians, producers, film stars, moguls, critics and designers — and white fans.

The story has often gone very differently in the history of American music. Commercialization has usually separated black America from its artistic progeny, as with the appropriation of jazz by the bourgeois elites, the usurpation of blues first by a white record industry and then by the international explosion of rock ‘n’ roll.

Rock, above all other forms of pop music, has a history of singular racial uniformity, from Elvis Presley and Beatlemania to Morrissey and the Strokes. Rock as an institution is a narrative about the experiences of white, middle-class male adolescents. Just ask Jann Wenner or Nick Hornby. Try to think of a black rocker today. The odds are you can do no better than French-Jewish pop perennial Lenny Kravitz or the early-’90s band Living Colour. It’s true that Jimi Hendrix revolutionized rock guitar in the ’60s, and long before him Chuck Berry was among the music’s key progenitors. But while Mick Jagger will gladly admit that all the first great rock records were black, in subsequent decades rock has rarely told the stories from black America.

On this year’s 25th anniversary of Elvis’ death, music critics noted his catalytic role in the success of the musical form of which he would be King. As sweet country boy, he was perfectly positioned to foot the line of propriety and liberate teenage lust. And as sex symbol to millions of dizzy fans, he was an erotic object that a black man could never have been in pre-civil-rights America. It’s this overwrought parallel that Eminem has claimed, crowning himself “the worst thing since Elvis Presley/ to do black music  to get myself wealthy” on his most recent album.

A repeated theme from rap’s early days was that the fad would fade. Rap was nothing different or special. “King of Rock” was the triumphant title that Run-DMC put on the follow-up to their first hit album, as they claimed a place in the pantheon next to Led Zep and the Stones. The critic Samuel David, writing in the New Republic in 1991, detailed the role of white music insiders, like Def Jam’s Rick Rubin, behind the early hit groups, while pointing out the rappers often came from middle-class backgrounds. His point: Rap is “the black music that isn’t either.” The market would assimilate hip-hop, and thank goodness.

The 10 years since have not been kind to such predictions. Since the ’80s, groups like Public Enemy have crusaded on a Malcolm X-style platform of black identity. Rap was about life in the ghetto, about people from the ghetto, and it was tied up with the concerns of the ghetto; Chuck D famously called it “black America’s CNN.” While today’s materialistic stars have left overt politics behind in favor of flashing their hopelessly nouveau riche tastes on lifestyle showcases like MTV’s “Cribs,” they have not diminished their commitment to expressing the aspirations, realities and dramas of life in black communities. Hip-hop is still about the ghetto. If Rick Rubin was the slick producer behind Dr. Dre’s NWA in 1987, in 2002 Dr. Dre is the puppetmaster behind Eminem.

Of course, what rap’s opponents were really saying is that money changes everything. And commercialization has indeed reconfigured the genre. The early sound was all prosody, no melody; a rapper’s vocals meshed over a spare beat or record sample. These basic elements have evolved to incorporate a more R&B-influenced, consumable tenor, while the emergence of female stars like TLC, Jennifer Lopez and Missy Elliot has diversified its appeal. Combs, in his Puff Daddy phase, crystallized this mainstream sound in a series of hip-hop remakes of pop classics such as the Police hit “Every Breath You Take.” Following textbook marketing principles, duets intermingling “rough” male rappers with R&B starlets have become increasingly common. And kid-friendly acts like Lil’ Bow Wow deliver the low-in-sugar variety thats both kid-tested and mother-approved.

While capitalist impulses have driven the migration to a softer sound, it has also sharpened a hard edge: hip-hop’s obsession with themes of crude street contest and self-aggrandizement. The earliest stars were often gang members and graffiti artists, often in trouble with the law. Today’s stars still adopt this identity as a source of credibility. This posture’s significance peaked in the mid-’90s with violent, misogynistic “gangstas” like Snoop Doggy Dogg and Tupac Shakur. While the “West Coast” wave invented a new melodic, mass-market sound, its very success drew a political backlash against its disturbing messages. At the nadir in 1995, hip-hop sales collapsed.

The post-gangsta incarnation transcended this challenge, typified in the style of Notorious B.I.G. The ghetto credentials persist (like Tupac, he was murdered in an “unsolved” drive-by shooting), but the lyrical themes of violence and sexual power have been replaced by a sublimation of hip-hop’s street origins into a materialized “cash money” aesthetic. “Gucci down to the socks,” he sings on his first hit album, detailing his wealth and glitzy excess. Hip-hop went from “straight outta Compton” to “ghetto fabulous,” from “grunge” minimalism to plutocracy.

Gone are the inflammatory politics of Public Enemy’s black nationalism. Instead, a soothingly bourgeois materialism pervades the music. But there still remains an unexplained demographic mystery: At first glance, a white-dominated mass market would seem to require an increasingly white product. In an era when Britney was instantly covered in marketing-machine imitators, hip-hop has defended a remarkable cultural and racial uniformity.

Where are today’s answers to the Beatles and Rolling Stones, ready to bring us rap’s British Invasion? Or a downtown art-scene rapper, like a 21st century version of Andy Warhol’s flunky, Lou Reed? Is there a place for nihilistic suburban kids from good homes to go grunge, or for bespectacled English majors to make indie rap? A&R men have surely mused about the possibilities, and in fairness something of a multiracial, international hip-hop underground is beginning to take shape. But these white-guy flavors are nowhere on the charts. Ask elite DJs what they play at home, and you may glimpse an opening. For the rest of us? Hip-hop is as black as ever.

The explanation lies in the nature of hip-hop itself and in its deeply instilled obsession with origins and authenticity. The essence of hip-hop is a framework of values and identity that constantly demand artists to “keep it real.” Themes of violence and misogyny may offend genteel ears, but to hip-hop they have the virtue of being genuine. If rappers are charged with crimes and gang associations, they become more popular; they exhibit their authentic connections to the street. Connections to place and community are constantly avowed in shout-outs to Queens or Philly or associates in the crowd.

Materialistic values, far from being perceived as a vice of commercialization, express the basic aspirations of the ghetto and racialized poverty. Hip-hop never chastises its own for “selling out” for money, and artistic integrity is scarcely invoked. It is unimaginable that a rap star would invite commercial self-destruction for ideological reasons in the manner of Pearl Jam’s 1994 campaign against Ticketmaster or Smashing Pumpkins’ retirement due to artistic disaffection with “the Britneys.” Keeping it real never competes with “getting paid.” They are one and the same. Rappers explicitly praise each other for their business acumen.

While post-1960s youth culture has ascetically demanded a rejection of profit in favor of political or artistic ideals, hip-hop has built its values around a concrete cultural identity. To keep it real is to remember your origins in the ghetto, however removed your actual life now is from the street. And if there is a single indicator that most efficiently measures one’s connection to the conditions of the folkloric ghetto, it is race.

Hip-hop is dominated by black Americans, just as black America is dominated by hip-hop. As Q-Tip, member of 1990s alt-rap idols A Tribe Called Quest, put it when he was talking about his upcoming rock album experiment, “Black people in this country are told that they are just a few things. The minute you start to wander and go outside of that you’re not black.” Hip-hop is the identity of post-civil-rights black politics; and this time it is more Malcolm X than Martin Luther King Jr.

Though Michael Jordan once famously dodged political obligations by declaring, “Republicans buy sneakers too,” no such bland assimilationism would issue from hip-hop leaders expected to express solidarity with their communities. Black athletes may appear in suits, but hip-hop is raucous, vernacular and self-consciously intimate with ordinary black life. Its leaders pay attention to politics, sometimes appearing with figures like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, and they support social organizations. Russell Simmons has attracted many stars to his Hip-Hop Summit Action Network, promoting political awareness among hip-hop fans, responsibility among its stars, and issue advocacy through protests and campaign donations. Assiduously inclusive of Latinos and others in the “hip-hop community,” rap is nonetheless intimately connected with black identity in a way that Hollywood and even the National Basketball Association can never be.

Despite the undeniable star power of Eminem, this music’s racial identity remains so strong that some critics in the black community have openly worried that hip-hop is little more than a vehicle for marketing the most negative and violent black stereotypes to exhilarated white teenagers. This debate will surely continue, but it is usually black rappers who hold the microphone — and black executives who stand behind them. (In cases like Combs and Master P, MC and exec are one and the same.) Sex and violence sell rap records as surely as they sell movie tickets, but the news worth noting is that the success of hip-hop has opened a national forum on the life and identity of its largely African-American constituency.

One result is that hip-hop is starting to organize black political identity into a coherent picture for the first time since the civil rights era. Another is a purely unintentional marketing marvel: Race guarantees that black America will continue to ride this economic engine. But the cultural significance is even greater. Black culture is towing in its wake the aesthetic and social sensibilities of a generation of Americans. New York artist Tom Sanford’s reverential paintings of hip-hop stars as religious icons suggest a radicalization of Mailer’s old formula. Tupac’s violent 1996 death in Las Vegas was both an ordinary gangbang and a martyr’s self-sacrifice. Neither merely appropriated by white culture nor simply performed with minstrel-show detachment, hip-hop is black culture telling its own story.

Something has changed in America. It is white suburbia that looks on from a barren culture at murdered gangsters ascending to our culture’s firmament. Tupac and his fellows were once the inadmissible black men. Now they work raw and utterly unsanitized, busily making a culture as genuine, as messy and as painful as the one punctuated by the overdoses and rock-throwing protesters of our fondest Woodstock-era memories. The black music that was neither black nor music has turned out to be both — an early indication that this generation’s Bob Dylans and John Lennons will turn out to be a pantheon of African-Americans.

Amol Sarva is a graduate student inphilosophy at Stanford.

Trust me on this: David Bowie’s “Hunky Dory”

The Old 97's singer credits Bowie's brilliant "Hunky Dory" for rescuing his adolescence and inspiring his career

(Credit: Benjamin Wheelock)
This is the second story in the Trust Me On This series, which runs through Father's Day. You can read the other entries here.

Dear Kiddos,

Hey, you turkeys. Listen up. I need you to listen for five minutes. I’m going to impart a little wisdom. You can take it or leave it. For what it’s worth, I’d rather you took it.

The advice is this: David Bowie’s “Hunky Dory” is a perfect album, and, since perfect albums are a rare commodity, it is worthy of deep and repeated listenings.

I’m listening to “Hunky Dory” as I write this. How many times have I listened to this, my favorite record? Like a million? And it never gets old.

I discovered “Hunky Dory” by accident. I was a sad, lonely little kid. Eleven years old and obsessed with Joan Jett, another artist I imagine you kids would enjoy. Back then, the radio was still a real thing that people listened to, believed in and learned from. I stayed up past my bedtime one Saturday night during the Christmas holiday to listen to a weekly show called “The King Biscuit Flower Hour” featuring a concert by my secret girlfriend, Joan Jett. At the end of the set, she played a cover of a song that would forever change the course of my budding musical tastes, “Rebel Rebel.” As it turned out, “Rebel Rebel” would never be one of my favorite Bowie tunes, but I could detect, within its lyric, a narrative voice to which I could relate. Like really relate.

I was a latchkey kid, a thing that no longer exists. Both of my parents worked, so every weekday after school, I had a few hours wherein I could do whatever the heck I wanted. What I usually wanted to do was go to Half Price Books & Records. The next Monday, released from the grim confines of Armstrong Elementary, I walked to Half Price where I found exactly one David Bowie album. I brought home “Hunky Dory,” marveling at its weird, androgynous cover. In those pre-Internet days, one was always left with questions. Is that David Bowie on the album cover? Is that person a guy or a lady? Is it a painting or some sort of artsy photo? Is this even rock ‘n’ roll, or is it some other kind of music, the name of which has been kept a secret from me?

It was just that, some other, new kind of music. New to me, anyway. This album, recorded when I had been less than a year old, opened doors for me. And I thought I caught a glimpse of my own future. My family’s house on Gillon Avenue was empty when the needle dropped on Side A. “Changes,” turned up to top volume, was my anthem from the first line of the first verse. “Still don’t know what I was waiting for,” indeed. This was what I had been waiting for. Putting up with all the cruel dullards in my grade school, all the teachers and coaches, all the stupid kids and mean adults, had been almost unbearable. Suddenly, I wasn’t alone.

“Hunky Dory” is not a kids’ record, but there is certainly a preponderance of imagery relating to childhood. “Changes” speaks of “these children that you spit on.” “Oh You Pretty Things” has the song’s object driving his “mama and papa insane.” In “Kooks,” the singer begs his own kid to stay, reassuring the lucky little guy that “we believe in you.” At the time, I needed to hear that sentiment.  I went back to it over and over again throughout the difficult years of adolescence. David Bowie was not my dad, but he was there in a pinch.

As the album goes on, it gets weirder. And deeper. And darker. “Quicksand” offers up an epic take on the human experience, turning on a phrase that would echo dangerously throughout those most perilous years of my youth, “knowledge comes with death’s release.” I didn’t understand, but I did understand, if you catch my drift. These were meditations on the difficulty of everyday life, and the insane nature of our very existence. Heavy, beautiful stuff.

Antidotes appear in the record’s latter portion. “Happiness is happening/dragons have been bled … fear’s just in your head,” Bowie proclaims in the goofy-but-right-on “Fill Your Heart.” Then he proceeds to introduce the listener to Andy Warhol and Bob Dylan. And then comes “Queen Bitch,” wherein we meet Bowie’s longtime foil, the most underrated guitarist in rock history, Mick Ronson. The riff in “Queen Bitch” hints at what is to come on Bowie’s next LP, “The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars,” Bowie’s breakthrough album, but “Hunky Dory” is still pre-fame Bowie at his folkie best.

Finally, he leaves us with the epic poem that is “Bewlay Brothers.” As an 11-year-old, I played it repeatedly in an attempt to decipher this song’s meaning. I wrote out the lyrics in my journal, hoping to make sense of them. To no avail. I did know that something had gone horribly wrong, there was madness and sadness, and then the record was over. Just like that.

Again and again, I listened. Memorized. Marveled. Sang along. When I could take it no longer, I found a guitar teacher and learned how to do these things myself. Well, not exactly these things, but my own version thereof. My early songs were such a pale imitation of early-’70s Bowie, that I could have been sued — had anyone ever heard my early songs. It’s quite possible that I spent the whole of my teenage years singing with an English accent. As they say, mistakes were made.

I never got over Bowie. Especially “Hunky Dory.” Many of his other records have remained favorites: “Low,” “Ziggy Stardust,” “Station to Station.” But “Hunky Dory” was my first love. I caught a lot of grief for my borderline-obsessive Bowie fandom. Kids at school used it as ammunition in their attacks on my masculinity. Did I care? Sure. Did I care enough to throw Bowie under the bus and pretend to withdraw my admiration for this artist who set me on the path I knew I was destined to follow? Hell no. David Bowie was and is my hero.

Listen, kids: I want you to hear “Hunky Dory” because I think you will love it. Like I said, it’s a perfect record, and how often do those come along? But the real reason I want you to listen to “Hunky Dory” is because, in its 11 tracks, you will find the clues that will lead you to an understanding of me, your dad. You’ll see signposts pointing the way to the path I chose in life.

Making music for a living isn’t easy. Many things about it are tough as hell: The touring and its requisite absences; the self-absorption; the occasional financial insecurity; the mood swings one attributes to the “artistic personality.” This life, however, is what I was made for. This calling is the only one I’ve ever known. I’m not curing cancer or solving the global hunger crisis. I’m making music. But there is a certain hazy nobility in that vocation. Somewhere, an 11-year-old kid may be putting on an album of mine and discovering that the universe isn’t a meaningless jumble of coincidences, that there is purpose to be found in these three-minute constructions of music and lyrics. Some small but elegant meaning.

Heck, before you guys came along, that was all I had. The great thing is that now I have everything.

Continue Reading Close

Rhett Miller is the lead singer of the Old 97s. His latest solo album, "The Dreamer," will be released on June 5.

Illustrating the ’60s music revolution

How one book captured the spirit and art of the cultural transformation -- as it was happening

This article originally appeared on Imprint.

Imprint“When did music become so important?” That’s Don Draper from last week’s “Mad Men,” set in 1966. Later in the episode he turns off “Tomorrow Never Knows,” from the Beatles album “Revolver,” and walks out of the room.

art: Rick Griffin

There’s something happening here, but you don’t know what it is — do you, Mr. Draper? One year later, Rolling Stone magazine will make its debut, followed soon by “Rock and Other Four Letter Words.”

“Rock,” a 250-plus-page Bantam paperback, was published in January 1968 and subtitled “Music of the Electric Generation.” It was one of the first books of its kind, chronicling a cultural revolution that was still in the midst of its own creation. Crammed with black-and-white portraits of bands and musicians, it’s part oral history, part visual LSD trip. One of its fold-out spreads has an intricate, circuitlike diagram that connects over a hundred names, from the Butterfield Blues Band, the Beach Boys, and the Byrds to Busby Berkeley, Brubeck and Bach.

The editor-designer was a writer named J Marks. The photographer for most of the images was Linda Eastman, who went on to work for Rolling Stone and — oh, yes — marry Paul McCartney.

By the sheer force of its graphic presentation, ”Rock and Other Four Letter Words” conveys the mid-1960s music scene’s spirit, vitality and relevance.

 

Continue Reading Close

Protest music’s odd conservative turn

A 100-track, four-CD Occupy collection assembles generations of icons. So why does it sound shapeless and safe?

“In this hour of the ever-changing season, may our tears not douse the fire in our hearts.”

That’s a guy named Michael Pless singing “Something’s Got to Give.” Even without hearing the song, you can surely imagine the essential elements: Plaintive acoustic strumming, an earnest vocal, and an air of polite outrage to match the stilted syntax and hoary platitudes. Welcome to “Occupy This Album,” the collection of protest-minded songs released by Occupy Wall Street. Sprawling across four CDs and a slew of bonus digital tracks, this behemoth set includes 100 (why not 99?) new and previously released tracks from artists representing a range of generations, genres, backgrounds, settings, and styles. Folkies join hands with rappers; ominous post-rock marches alongside peppy radio pop. There’s spoken-word poetry, tribal percussion, earnest singer-songwriter fare. Even a bit of jazz.

Especially with Occupy reaching a crossroads in summer 2012 — a time when it needs to reassess its ideals, its accomplishments, its methods and its artifacts — “Occupy This Album” plays like a state-of-the-field survey of the protest song. From Jeff Mangum covering the Minutemen to the anonymous drum circles that soundtracked the demonstrations in real time, music has been a constant presence in the movement, although it’s not quite clear what role it has played. The new album portrays a movement with a broad scope and an admirably varied constituency, but the same criticisms that have been leveled against Occupy can also be applied to “Occupy This Album:” There is general unease but no clear direction forward. There is outrage but no plan. There is deep feeling but no clear message.

Ostensibly, there should be something on “Occupy This Album” for everyone to love, but that also means there is more than enough here for everyone to hate. It’s an unwieldy tracklist, almost daring you play it front to back. Of course, it’s pointless to review a 100-track release the same way you would approach a studio album, where functionality and some sense of logical progression are crucial. But there’s no consistent development of political or musical ideas weaving these songs together, nothing to link them or to justify this particular sequencing. As a result, “Occupy This Album” cannot make a statement as an album. In one sense, this release mirrors the leaderless ethos of the movement, which stridently preserves the democracy of the demonstrations. While that idea has certainly energized the Occupy protest, it makes for an amorphous blob of music and a messy, often frustrating listening experience.

But they mean well, right? It’s a charity album after all, with each disc sold separately and with all proceeds benefiting Occupy directly. You’d probably be better off contributing directly to the cause and just making your own mix of politically minded music. You might even have some of these songs in your iTunes already, although why you’d want to include Lucinda Williams’ drippy “Blessed” or Mogwai’s interchangeable “Earth Division” is beyond me.

The music that actually is new — that purports to find direct inspiration in either the righteousness of the demonstrators or the plight of the 99 percent — is generally unimaginative, hokey, disappointingly safe. Most of these artists address these economic issues either through narrative or through high-minded rhetoric. The latter produces the most lackluster results: Jackson Browne’s “Which Side Are You On?” which he has been touting for several months now, turns out to be political white noise, a gentle fist bump to the like-minded that barely puts across either side of the debate. At least it’s better than My Pet Dragon’s epiphany on “Love Anthem”: “Only love can save us now.” To their credit, they sing it like they might actually believe it.

The storytellers have more success, if only because they’re willing to entertain a bit more grit, a bit less blind hope. Featuring Joan Baez and Steve Earle, James McMurtry’s “We Can’t Make It Here” sounds downright curmudgeonly as it surveys the state of the working class in an economy that regularly sends its manufacturing jobs overseas. The song, however, goes a bit overboard when the trio decry litterbugs and graffiti artists.

One of the true standouts among these 100 tracks is Richard Barone’s ditty “Can I Sleep on Your Futon?” about a veteran-turned-singer who couch-surfs from one generous soul to the next. The verses are specific and soulful, as through he’s derived them explicitly from lived experience, and in that regard, the song could function as commentary on the music biz. But Barone stumbles over that massively awkward chorus, “Can I sleep on your futon?” It’s hard to imagine a crowd of protesters singing along.

If there is one overarching theme here, it is, vaguely, “history.” The past informs and even defines this music. Even the very idea of this type of compilations seems like a throwback to the CD’s heyday in the 1990s, when seemingly every charity, from NARAL to the Red Hot Organization, had its own release. It’s an impression reinforced by much of the music, especially hip-hop tracks by Born I Music and George Martinez & the Global Block Collective, whose lyrics and beats sound like they were scavenged from 1994. (For a better example of how hip-hop can address political themes, check out Killer Mike’s new track “Reagan.”)

Of course, there is a lot of folk music on “Occupy This Album.” That style has proved one of the most politicized musical forms of the 20th century, as lefties in the 1930s and 1940s adopted labor songs as battle cries. Clean-scrubbed, buttoned-up folkies like the Kingston Trio had some chart success in the 1950s, but they were quickly rendered obsolete by the Village bohemians reimagining the music as a vehicle for countercultural sentiments. That’s the model so many Occupyers are reverently appropriating, never suspecting that it might not be a natural fit for 21st-century dissent. The folk revivalists of the 1960s drew from the past as well, but took pains to update the music to the times: The mere fact that Dylan wrote new songs in this old style was revolutionary, alienating an older generation of folkie purists.

“Occupy This Album” obviously represents a counterculture, but too many of the artists are too caught up in role playing the past, which seems like an especially boomer enterprise. Michael Moore (yes, that Michael Moore) performs the most chipper version of “The Times They Are A-Changin’” imaginable, one that seems wholly unaware of the gritty realities of 2012, much less of 1964. (The less said about his skiffle version of the song, a hidden track on disc four, the better.) Perhaps the one artist who understands how to plumb history for present-day relevance is Loudon Wainwright III, whose wry “The Panic Is On” updates an 80-year-old tune originally penned by Hezekiah Jenkins (the cover originally appeared on Wainwright’s album “Ten Songs for the New Depression”). It’s an unusual artifact from the early 1930s, but there’s a sneaky observation about class disparity that sounds more disgusted and potent than anything else on the album.

Perhaps the worst thing that can be said about “Occupy This Album” is that the music is deeply conservative. There are so few moments that grab your attention or make you see the world differently. When Occupy already seems to be in danger of losing momentum, it’s hard to say whether the movement has failed to inspire these artists or the artists have failed to document the movement.

Continue Reading Close

Donna Summer: Disco diva and rocker

If you only knew the singing sensation by her 1970s smashes, you barely knew her at all

There is so much about Donna Summer that we didn’t know… and not just the cancer that took her life. Let’s start with her relationship to rock. Summer is quite understandably known as a disco singer, and quite rightly so. It was disco that made her, and she, as perhaps disco’s highest profile performer, who helped to shape the genre. But like a number of other disco artists — Nile Rodgers and Bernard Edwards of Chic, the vocal trio Labelle and Chaka Khan all come to mind — Donna Summer was also a rocker. Yes, she grew up singing gospel, but she began her professional career as a ’60s rocker. She would describe this as her Janis Joplin phase, and she did indeed sing in a group that performed at the Psychedelic Supermarket — Boston’s version of Bill Graham’s Fillmore. She then went on to play a hippie in the Munich production of the rock musical “Hair,” and sported an enormous Afro inspired in large part by her hero, the black radical activist, Angela Davis. Although the disco music that she made with producers Giorgio Moroder and Pete Bellotte, and engineer Harold Faltermeyer provoked a fierce backlash from some aficionados of rock, this was a foursome that, as critic Dave Mash pointed out, functioned as a rock band, one in which Summer played a pivotal role as singer and songwriter. And then there is her singing. Listen to her hit “Hot Stuff,” and tell me that Summer could not sing rock.

Summer, who was strikingly beautiful, made some very steamy — some would say X-rated — music, most memorably with her first hit, 1975’s “Love to Love You Baby.” With Summer’s groans, moans and gasps powering the track, it broke new ground in its sexual explicitness. Promoted by her record company in explicitly sexual terms, and giving performances that made Tina Turner’s look tame, Summer soon found herself tagged the “Linda Lovelace of pop music.” She had seen this coming. In fact, she had not wanted to be the singer on that track, and agreed only to record the demo, and only then in a blackened studio where she sang, imagining that she was Marilyn Monroe giving herself over to orgasmic ecstasy. After producer Moroder convinced her to let him use her vocal, her record label president, seeing its bedroom potential, demanded a long-playing version that left the media debating whether the singer came 22 or 23 times. Rock critic Robert Christgau poked fun at the record with a review that consisted of three questions, “Did you come yet? Huh? Did you come yet?” Other reviews were more disparaging. But “Love to Love You Baby,” like much of her music, put female desire front and center in a way that it wasn’t in most rock music. Indeed, Summer’s music is inseparable from second-wave feminism’s emphasis on women’s sexual empowerment.

There is so much to say about Summer, who could have been a full-fledged personality had she not been pigeon-holed and dismissed as a disco tart. I was once on a radio program with her and, believe me, she was nobody’s fool. She described the “star-making machinery” as well as anyone. After she had already became famous she told Rolling Stone that her career sometimes felt like “this monstrous, monstrous force, this whole production of people and props that you’re responsible for, by audiences and everything that rules you until you take it upon yourself to be a machine… And at some point a machine breaks down.” Fame, she observed, diminished her, making her feel like nothing so much as a “commodity.” After falling into a debilitating depression and attempting suicide, she took control of her life again through Christianity.

In a way, I think one hears Summer confront her own commodification on her marvelous record “Bad Girls.” Although the music in the final, released version suggests otherwise, Summer isn’t celebrating prostitution on “Bad Girls.” Rather, she is confronting what she shares with those streetwalkers. “Now, you and me are just the same,” she sings.  And if Summer sounds unusually exuberant as she yells out to a john, “Hey, mista, have you got a dime?” perhaps it’s because Summer understood what it meant to be made into a commodity and reduced to a seductive whisper. Tellingly, in a television interview some years later, Summer noted that “Bad Girls” marked the moment when she stopped being an object and became a subject. Let’s hope that in her death she inspires more writing that fully acknowledges the intelligent subjecthood of this disco diva and kick-ass rock and roller.

Continue Reading Close

Alice Echols, a professor of English, and the Barbra Streisand Chair of Contemporary Gender Studies at the University of Southern California, is the author of four books, including "“Hot Stuff: Disco and the Remaking of American Culture."

Donna Summer, Queen of Disco, dies at 63

The "Last Dance" singer passed away after a battle with cancer

NEW YORK (AP) — Disco queen Donna Summer, whose pulsing anthems such as “Last Dance,” ”Love to Love You Baby” and “Bad Girls” became the soundtrack for a glittery age of sex, drugs, dance and flashy clothes, has died. She was 63.

Her family released a statement Thursday saying Summer died and that they “are at peace celebrating her extraordinary life and her continue legacy.”

Summer gained prominence during the disco era of the 1970s, and released a number of albums that have reach gold or platinum status, including the multiplatinum “Bad Girls” and “On the Radio, Volume I & II.” Her No. 1 Billboard Hot 100 hits include “Hot Stuff” and “MacArthur Park.”

Her sound was a mix of genres, and helped her earn Grammy Awards in the dance, rock, R&B and inspirational categories.

She released her last album, “Crayons,” in 2008. She also performed on “American Idol” that year with its top female contestants.

Page 1 of 284 in Music