“4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days”
Don't call it the Romanian abortion movie! Cristian Mungiu's Palme d'Or-winner is a tense, brilliantly constructed thriller with a female hero.
Topics: Beyond the Multiplex, Movies, Entertainment News
IFC Films
Otilia (Anamaria Marinca) and Gabita (Laura Vasiliu)
I guess Cristian Mungiu’s film “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days,” which won the Palme d’Or at Cannes last year and finally opened in the United States last weekend, will forever be labeled “the Romanian abortion movie.” That is, after all, a literally correct description: It’s 1987, or thereabouts, and two college roommates, Otilia (Anamaria Marinca) and Gabita (Laura Vasiliu), must descend into the hellish underside of dictator Nicolae Ceausescu’s totalitarian state in order to secure Gabita an illegal abortion. Bribery, humiliation, sexual blackmail, the threat of prison, and the possibility of a painful and miserable death are all involved.
But that description of content might lead you to expect a certain kind of form — either Dickensian social drama or deliberately dreary, vérité-style realism. Even some people who’ve seen “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days” seem to have missed the fact that it’s a carefully plotted thriller, as ingeniously constructed as a Hitchcock movie. (Maybe the Academy’s foreign-language selection committee did grasp this. After all, if “4 Months, 3 Weeks” really were a soporific, vitamin-packed message movie about abortion, it would surely have gotten an Oscar nomination.)
Maybe I can hypnotize you into seeing this terrific picture by urging you to set aside the issue of abortion and how it resonates in America. Instead, consider “4 Months, 3 Weeks” in structural terms, as a film noir about two ordinary people drawn into a secret criminal world under the surface of everyday society, forced to communicate in an unfamiliar code and do business with untrustworthy low-lifes.
If this was a movie about young men instead of young women, and if the illegal activity in the story involved a suitcase of money or a harebrained plot to kill someone (if the plot was, say, that of “No Country for Old Men”), then its genre roots would be no mystery. There’s an unconscious sexist assumption at work here, which probably affects both male and female viewers: A supposedly serious film with female main characters has to be about explicitly marked-out “issues,” while a film about men can engage with cinema history, grapple with existential self-examination, explore the dark night of the soul, and so on. In fact, although “4 Months, 3 Weeks” is about a woman who wants to have an abortion, it isn’t about the question of abortion at all — whatever opinion you enter with on that subject is the same one you’ll leave with.




Comments
2 Comments