Football
See a different game
Baseball's instant replay system might work fine, but its hasty implementation signals a disturbing change in attitude.
We’re four days into baseball’s instant replay era and it’s going great. The instant replay hasn’t been used. At its current pace, instant replay will not be used for another four days, or ever. Sample size warning.
So are we ready now to enter the official-scoring-by-committee era? That’s what Milwaukee Brewers general manager Doug Melvin says he wants after C.C. Sabathia lost a no-hitter on a questionable scorer’s call Sunday. Sabathia ended up with a one-hit shutout of the Pittsburgh Pirates, the only hit a dribbler by Andy LaRoche that Sabathia failed to pick up. Many observers thought it should have been ruled an error.
Since it was Sabathia’s own muff that cost him the no-no, he couldn’t blame a teammate for robbing him of his place in history. But he could have, if he’d wanted to, blamed the official scorer for breaking one of baseball’s pointless unwritten codes by ruling “hit” on a borderline play for a team’s first hit of the game.
He didn’t: “We still won the game,” he said. “If they change it or if they don’t, I’m fine.”
By “it,” Sabathia meant the ruling. The Brewers are preparing an appeal to the major league offices, hoping to get the ruling changed, which would give Sabathia a retroactive no-hitter. The Brewers could then retroactively mob him on the mound.
That presumably wouldn’t be good enough for manager Ned Yost, who whined after the game Sunday that he, among others, had been robbed of the moment. “That’s a stinkin’ no-hitter that we all got cheated from,” he said.
And that led to Melvin calling for a new system of official scoring. He wants a committee to decide these things, rather than the single scorer.
I think all of us who have ever worked anywhere recognize that a committee is always the best way to arrive at decisions. Without committees, we wouldn’t have camels.
Why this sudden impulse in baseball for radical and immediate change? After a century and a half or so of replay-free baseball, a perfectly good century and a half that gave us Willie Mays, the infield fly rule and sausage racing, all of a sudden the need for instant replay on so-called boundary calls — home runs or not, fair or foul — was so urgent that it had to be implemented midseason.
Now, after that same century and a half of rulings good, bad and crazy, of hits that should have been errors and errors that should have been outs and stolen bases that should have been fielder’s indifference and who knows what else, one fumbled grounder means the way games are scored has to be changed, at least according to Doug Melvin.
Melvin’s idea is probably a non-starter. For one thing, good luck getting Major League Baseball to triple its outlay on official scorers — to more than $400 per game! For another … what was I talking about? Oh, yeah: How games are officially scored is officially the most boring subject in the history of boring. That particular bandwagon need not stock up on the peanuts.
But it’s interesting and troubling that he says he’s seriously considering bringing it up at the next general managers meeting. This is a bad trend for baseball. This is how the NFL does things, constantly larding on new rules and methods to fix some momentary problem, often one caused by the last poorly thought-out new rule or method. It’s why the NFL rule book is an impossibly complicated, self-contradicting, unknowable welter.
The NFL is the god-king of everything, of course, but that doesn’t mean it does everything right. The product is so good the business is not endangered by this lurching management style.
Most of us who have ever worked anywhere recognize that too. Every minor problem is met with a new rule, a new policy, a new system. It’s a sign that the people running things don’t believe the history, don’t trust that minor problems — a hit or an error, a home run or a foul ball a few times a year each — really are minor, that, in this case, the game is strong enough to survive.
That’s always been a strength of baseball. It responded to a half dozen or so years of anemic offense by lowering the mound in 1969, then introducing the designated hitter in the American League in 1972. Those are the kinds of changes that happen on the odd Tuesday in the NFL. In baseball, they’re remembered as significant moments in history.
Change isn’t bad. Instant replay might not even be bad. But baseball should remember how to go about these things.
King Kaufman is a senior writer for Salon. You can e-mail him at king at salon dot com. Facebook / Twitter / Tumblr More King Kaufman.
Can Tebow find salvation?
Updated: After losing his job in Denver, evangelicals' favorite jock faces an uncertain future in New York.
Tim Tebow (Credit: Reuters/Rick WIlking) [UPDATED BELOW]
You don’t need to be an evangelical Christian to care about the future of Tim Tebow. I’m a lapsed atheist myself. But with the resurrection of quarterback Peyton Manning in Denver, I wonder most about the future of the spiritual scrambler, who led the Broncos to the playoffs last year.
The Broncos signing Manning to replace Tebow is a no-brainer. He may be diminished by age and injury, but he is also the best quarterback of our time, not because he is a brilliant coach’s puppet (Tom Brady) or an on-field, off-field brute (Ben Roethlisberger) but by virtue of a fierce work ethic and a concentrated intelligence that is contagious and inspirational. Whatever is left at age 35 of him will make the Broncos better.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
The Super Bowl is not a job creator
Despite what civic boosters say, hosting the big game provides few long-term benefits
(Credit: AP/Michael Conroy) Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League, argued on “60 Minutes” last Sunday that the NFL is one professional organization designed to appeal to the economic interests of the little guy: Its revenue-sharing model, he said, gives a fighting chance to squads from Green Bay and Buffalo as well as to those from large media markets like New York, Los Angeles and Boston.
On the eve of the Super Bowl, Goodell was touting the familiar idea that the sport’s biggest game is a boon to economic development. But with the cost of a ticket now averaging $3,982 and 30-second television spots selling for $3.5 million, the Super Bowl can appear to be more an occasion for ostentatious excess than an engine of development.
Continue Reading CloseAlexander Heffner is a freelance journalist whose writing has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe. More Alexander Heffner.
Political lessons from this year’s Super Bowl
From jobs to health care, football's big game illustrates the factors that will dominate the 2012 election
New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (Credit: AP Photo/Elise Amendola) Most Americans won’t need a justification to watch Sunday’s game, but if you’re a Salon reader you might think, even in passing, that celebrating the holiest day of violence, consumerism and class warfare on your couch is a betrayal of your values or a waste of your time. You might even imagine that it would be better to take a hike, read a book or meditate.
Not this Sunday, buster. It’s an election season. You need to watch this game to fully understand how jobs, religion, leadership and healthcare dominate every American contest.
Continue Reading CloseRobert Lipsyte is a former New York Times sports columnist. His new memoir, "An Accidental Sportswriter," has just been published. More Robert Lipsyte.
Enjoy the game? For the true fan, it’s all about agony
The New York Giants are in the Super Bowl. But for one obsessive, the question is what time to take the Ativan
Ohio State football fans (Credit: AP) “The truth is,” Nick Hornby wrote in “Fever Pitch,” his book about his obsession with Arsenal and British football, “for alarmingly large chunks of an average day, I am a moron.”
That’s a wonderful sentence by one of my favorite writers, but if Hornby is only a moron for only large chunks of the average day, he is doing a lot better than I am. I can honestly report that for the last few months I have been an absolute idiot for all but very small portions of the day.
Continue Reading CloseTed Heller's latest novel, "Pocket Kings," will be published in March. He is also the author of the novels "Slab Rat" and "Funnymen." More Ted Heller.
Small blunders kill Super Bowl dreams
For fans of the 49ers and Ravens, the road to the big game is paved with pain
Kyle Williams loses it Just when it looked like the NFC and AFC championship games were going to last until the Super Bowl, two fatal blunders brought them to an abrupt close. The stunning conclusions to two of the most tense, evenly matched conference championship games in recent memory were a painful reminder that although football is a team game, one miscue by a single player can wipe out thousands of hours of collective blood, sweat and tears.
It will be a sad and lonely night for Baltimore Ravens’ kicker Billy Cundiff, whose shanked chip-shot 32-yarder gave the AFC championship to the New England Patriots. Kickers must have strong mental constitutions: in a sport where bonds between teammates are cemented in blood and pain, they are not always regarded as full-fledged comrades to begin with, and so when they screw up, it’s even harder for them to deal with. The mantra “short memory,” which defensive backs are constantly shouting at each other, applies in spades to kickers. Cundiff could use a tall glass of Milk of Amnesia.
Continue Reading CloseGary Kamiya is a Salon contributing writer. More Gary Kamiya.
Page 1 of 52 in Football