Should Specter have run as an independent?
He couldn't win as a Republican and he may not be able to win as a Democrat. But there was another option
By Steve KornackiTopics: Arlen Specter vs. Joe Sestak, Arlen Specter, D-Pa., Joe Sestak, D-Pa., 2010 Elections, News
Senator Arlen Specter sits at a Senate Appropriations Committee emergency hearing on the Swine Influenza on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 28, 2009. Specter said on Tuesday he will switch parties, moving Democrats closer to a 60-vote Senate majority that would allow them to break Republican procedural roadblocks. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst (UNITED STATES POLITICS) (Credit: © Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)All of a sudden, Arlen Specter is on the brink of defeat. A week before Pennsylvania’s Democratic primary, Specter now consistently trails his challenger, Rep. Joe Sestak, in polls. More ominously for the incumbent, his own numbers seem stuck in the low 40s — lethal territory for a longtime officeholder.
We can argue all we want about Specter’s strategy — and specifically his decision to attack Sestak’s military record, a gambit that has emerged as a popular explanation for Specter’s apparent collapse. But the real explanation might just be that Specter’s bid to survive as a Democrat was doomed from the start.
Sure, Specter enjoyed robust leads over Sestak for much of the last year. But in all of that time, Specter has consistently failed to move his Democratic primary support past the 50 percent mark. In May ’09, he led Sestak by a 50-21 percent margin. In a Muhlenberg College/Morning Call poll out today, Sestak now leads 47 to 43 percent. So, basically, Specter’s support has fallen off slightly in the last year, while Sestak’s has more than doubled. At least half of Pennsylvania’s Democratic voters, it seems, were always going to be resistant to the idea of voting for Specter. And now that they are focused on the campaign and know who his opponent is, the horse race numbers finally reflect this.
Specter’s trump card, of course, was supposed to be his support from the White House and Pennsylvania’s Democratic establishment, led by Gov. Ed Rendell. They would vouch for him, raise money for him, muscle potential foes out of the way, and mobilize a field army. That was the theory, at least.
But the value of all this establishment support is diminished — significantly — if the electorate simply doesn’t want to vote for the establishment’s candidate, as seems to be the case in Pennsylvania. Then, all it takes is one credible candidate to defy the establishment’s pressure and jump in the race. By securing a one-on-one race against Specter, Sestak long ago put himself in position to corral the Anyone-but-Specter crowd, just as soon as the electorate actually began paying attention to the campaign. In this sense, the push to clear the field for Specter backfired: With multiple challengers, Specter would probably be in a better position to prevail next week.
Moreover, the White House has ended up undermining Specter in the race’s home stretch. President Obama’s Monday announcement that he’s nominating Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court turned Specter’s 2009 vote against Kagan’s confirmation as solicitor general into a major campaign issue.
The explanation for that ’09 vote is rather obvious: Specter was still a Republican at the time and, facing a likely primary challenge from former Rep. Pat Toomey, was trying to curry favor with the GOP base. But he can’t say that now. Nor is there any other explanation that will wash with the Democratic electorate. The whole episode merely serves to remind Democrats of Specter’s past GOP affiliation and the cynical nature of his party switch — all at a time when Specter can least afford it (and just as Sestak is blanketing the airwaves with reminders of all the nice things Specter and George W. Bush were saying about each other just a few years ago).
This doesn’t mean that Specter was wrong to leave the GOP last year. His conclusion that he wouldn’t be able to beat Toomey in a primary rematch was correct. Remember, Toomey was crushing Specter by 21 points when Specter switched parties. Never in their 2004 race (which Specter ended up winning by 2 points) did Toomey lead Specter in a poll. The GOP electorate had clearly given up on Specter, and there would be no winning them back in 2010.
But there was another option for Specter, one that might have spared him many of the problems now dogging him: run as an independent.
Doing so would have helped Specter in several important areas. First, it would have been treated — by the media and by the public — as a far less cynical move than switching parties. Specter’s reputation for political independence was and is well-established. By abandoning the increasingly hard-right GOP for independent status, he would have been portrayed as a sympathetic figure — a victim of the rabid GOP base’s irrational purge.
But siding with the Democrats was a step too far, because Specter had been just as independent of Democratic dogma as Republican dogma. By joining the Democrats, he was forced to sync up his positions and his rhetoric with the party base. Every time he changed a position, it became news. The whole transformation reeked of calculation, not principle. Had he simply declared himself an independent, Specter wouldn’t have needed to wiggle around nearly as much.
This would have boosted his standing with independent voters. A recent poll found Specter trailing Toomey in a potential general election contest by 3 points among independents. As the pollster noted, this isn’t bad for a Democrat, given the current climate. But how many of those independents were turned off by the cynical nature of Specter’s party switch? He’d be running much stronger among independents if he’d simply left the GOP. Plus, those independent voters aren’t eligible to vote in next week’s primaries, which are open only to registered Democrats and Republicans. By going the third-party route, then, Specter would have expanded the electorate to include a very fertile chunk of voters.
It’s true that the math is tough for a successful independent campaign, particularly in Pennsylvania, where the two parties are strong. Independents account for barely 10 percent of the electorate, so Specter would have needed to draw significant support from both parties’ voters. And it’s also true that, historically, independent Senate bids have failed when both parties field credible nominees, as will be the case in Pennsylvania. In the modern era, third-party Senate candidates have only succeeded when one party rolls over for them — think Joe Lieberman’s alliance with Connecticut’s Republicans and Bernie Sanders’ partnership with Vermont’s Democrats in 2006.
Then again, there really aren’t that many examples of serious third-party Senate candidacies in modern times. And there’s the case of Charlie Crist, who — at least for now — is winning over big numbers of Democrats, lots of independents and a few Republicans in Florida. Crist, like Specter, was a goner in a Republican primary. He’d also probably lose in a Democratic primary. But by pursuing an independent campaign, he’s given himself a chance — his only chance — at victory.
It’s worth wondering if a similar model could have worked for Specter. We know he was never going to win as a Republican this year. And it’s starting to look like he can’t win as a Democrat. It may be that his best option was the one he never seriously considered.
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.
Related Stories
More Related Stories
-
Alex Gibney: Julian Assange has become like "those he despises"
-
New Yorker launches tool by Aaron Swartz to protect leaks
-
Financial Times hacked by Syrian Electronic Army
-
Gitmo hunger strike reaches 100th day
-
New DSM, new debates over ADHD and autism
-
John Brennan makes surprise Israel trip over Syria concerns
-
Pentagon officials: Drone War on Terror is endless
-
Toronto mayor reportedly caught on video smoking crack
-
Google Glass chief: "You'll know" when someone is spying on you
-
California powers $550 lottery jackpot
-
North Dakota lawmaker: Blame Roe v. Wade for school shootings
-
Take the Pope Francis tour of Buenos Aires and be pontiff for a day
-
U.K. hacker sentencing highlights U.S. overreach
-
Obama leaves room for whistle-blower prosecution
-
Should Obama go Bulworth?
-
Government to share cyber-vulnerabilites info with private sector
-
Lockheed Martin yet another victim of the sequester
-
Report: 84 percent NY fast food workers report wage theft
-
Report: Millennials don't like Abercrombie & Fitch
-
Conservative group says AARP promotes radical "homosexual agenda"
-
Study: Muscle men more politically conservative
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 pics
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
Credit: AP/LM Otero -
Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
Credit: AP/Matt Rourke -
A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher -
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
Credit: AP/Molly Riley -
Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite -
Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster -
O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid -
Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield -
When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin -
A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin -
Recent Slide Shows
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Mobile Entertainment: 9 Amazing Drive-In Movie Theaters Still Standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Mobile Entertainment: 9 Amazing Drive-In Movie Theaters Still Standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Slideshow: Nerd Obama
Related Videos
Arlen Specter, a five-term incumbent who switched parties last year, is being challenged in the April 18 Democratic primary by Rep. Joe Sestak, a retired Navy admiral who has been in the House since 2007. Specter enjoys strong support from the White House and top Pennsylvania Democrats, while Sestak is
furiously trying to portray him as an opportunist, hoping to mobilize the party's grassroots base against Specter.
Latest Poll Numbers
Check out the most recent poll numbers on Real Clear Politics.
Fundraising Battle
For the most recent funding numbers, check out OpenSecrets.org.
Most Read
-
Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
Andrew Leonard
-
Jaron Lanier: The Internet destroyed the middle class
Scott Timberg
-
When the IRS targeted liberals
Alex Seitz-Wald
-
The man behind Abercrombie & Fitch
Benoit Denizet-Lewis
-
Pat Robertson: Husbands won't cheat if the wife makes the home "wonderful"
Jillian Rayfield
-
White House trolls Republicans over Obamacare hashtag
Jillian Rayfield
-
Is Reddit censoring openly racist users?
Fidel Martinez, The Daily Dot
-
Report: Millennials don't like Abercrombie & Fitch
Katie Mcdonough
-
Cannes: The 10 hottest movies
Andrew O'Hehir
-
My "truly remarkable" cancer breakthrough
Mary Elizabeth Williams
Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com
From Around the Web
Presented by Scribol
- Kerry urges Nigeria to respect human rights in Boko Haram offensive
- Pentagon approves iPhone, Apple products for military use
- Rome: Thousands protest austerity policy (PHOTOS)
- Could electroshock therapy work — for learning math?
- Raha Moharrak makes history as the first Saudi Arabian woman to summit Mt. Everest



Comments
21 Comments