Don’t take the Senate bait, Elizabeth Warren!
She's being urged to run for Scott Brown's Senate seat next year. Here's why it would be a bad move
Topics: 2012 Elections, War Room, Politics News
Apparently, Democrats are now urging Elizabeth Warren to give up her effort to win confirmation as the head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and instead to run for the U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, where Scott Brown will stand for reelection next year.
The 61-year-old Warren, according to the New York Times, is “intrigued but far from decided.” If she’s flattered by the suggestion, it’s certainly understandable, but her answer should be a quick and firm “no.”
Yes, in theory, Warren, thanks to her role as one of the financial industry’s chief critics, would make a fine candidate — someone who could make a case against Brown and his fellow Republicans with unusual moral clarity. That she is something of a rock star among national progressive activists would also help her raise significant money.
But it’s a trap: Like it or not, Brown is very, very likely to win a full term next year. His personal popularity is startlingly high — he is far better liked than Massachusetts’ two top Democrats, Gov. Deval Patrick and Sen. John Kerry. He runs well over 50 percent and crushes all of his potential challengers in head-to-head polls. (This is evident even in polls conducted by Democrats.)
Democrats enjoy giving Brown grief over his efforts to satisfy the GOP’s base (lest he receive a serious primary challenge next year) while also breaking with his party enough that Tea Party-phobic swing voters in the Bay State see him as an “independent” legislator. Viewed up-close, this can be a messy balancing act (as we’re seeing now with Brown’s flip-flopping on Rep. Paul Ryan’s Medicare plan). But most voters don’t watch this stuff too closely. What they know is that they really like Brown personally and that they’ve heard more than once in the last year about how he’s bucked his party (on a jobs bill, on Wall Street reform, on the START treaty, and now even on Medicare) and angered conservative activists. This is the same formula that Republican Bill Weld used when he scored a record-shattering landslide (42 points) in his 1994 gubernatorial reelection campaign.
Continue Reading Close
Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki More Steve Kornacki.



Comments
22 Comments