Tim Geithner’s plan to lose the 2012 election
There is a huge hole in the Treasury secretary's long-term economic strategy: Hanging on to the White House
Topics: 2012 Elections, Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Unemployment, U.S. Economy, How the World Works, Politics News
FILE - In this Feb. 19, 2011, file photo U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner answers questions at the closing press conference of the G20 Finance summit in Paris. Five years and one financial crisis since the United States and China commenced regular high-level economic talks, fast-growing Beijing might have the upper hand Monday, May 9, 2011, in the latest round of discussions between the world's two biggest economies. While analysts don't foresee major breakthroughs at the talks Monday and Tuesday, China's expanding economic might will give it greater leverage now. (AP Photo/Francois Mori, File)(Credit: AP)Zach Goldfarb’s much-buzzed-about Washington Post profile of Treasury secretary Tim Geithner boils down to this: Geithner was and is the primary architect of the Obama administration’s pivot from the economy to the deficit. Furthermore, since Geithner now reigns supreme on economic policy, there is zero chance of any change of direction in the next year. All the advocates for greater attention to boosting economic growth and job creation in the short term — Christy Romer, Jared Bernstein, Austan Goolsbee, and even the much-hated-by-progressives Larry Summers — are gone. Geithner is what we’ve got.
Geithner’s stated position is that without long-term action on the deficit, the government will not be able to continue to support social welfare programs.
Geithner says Obama must tackle the deficit now if he wants the government to be in a position to support the economy in the future and to continue to protect the elderly and the poor.
“It’s been my view for some time that unless he played a major role in shaping and negotiating the broad fiscal framework… we would be left without the capacity to do a whole range of things that are really important,” Geithner, 49, said in an interview. “I have been a consistent advocate of him doing that early and often.”
There is a level on which Geithner’s rationale makes sense. The Republican strategy is to seize upon (and create) big deficits as a tool to eviscerate government. Their successful execution of this strategy poses a serious challenge to the safety net. If no action is taken by Democrats to get spending and revenue aligned in the long term, then Medicare and Medicaid will be in big trouble.
I don’t think any left-of-center economists would seriously disagree with that. Their position has always been that the smart strategy is short-term stimulus paired with a long-term plan to stabilize government finances. With government borrowing costs at historically low levels, now is the time to put as much energy into job creation as possible.
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.




No Evidence FBI Is Targeting Chechen Separatists In Boston Bombing Case, Advocates Say
Bill De Blasio Won't Be Distracted By Anthony Weiner
State Roadblocks Could Complicate Marriage Momentum
Comments
30 Comments